Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hostage negotiation process
Hostage negotiation process
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hostage negotiation process
According to special agent Gary W. Noesner, who is a chief negotiator with the FBI, when dealing with a hostage situation and responding to the hostage taker or barricaded subject the negotiator has been trained to use one or two types of behavior, Instrumental or Expressive. Negotiators usually look at the behavioral, criminal, and psychological distinctiveness of the hostage takers involved in the situations to decide whether they should be handled as instrumental or expressive. When involved in this type of situation the negotiator is facing crisis situations that are unplanned and involve a barricade which occurs in the home by angry males in a domestic dispute, (Goodwill, Stephens, Oziel, Yapp, & Bowes, 2012). Instrumental behavior …show more content…
When dealing with this type of person they could be individual that are psychotic/emotionally disturbed, Schizophrenic Personality, - Bipolar Personality- Inadequate/Dependent personality, - Antisocial Personality, Borderline Personality. On the other hand, an expressive behavior is designed to enhance communication of the subject's frustration, passion, anger or feelings. The actions of the subject expressive mode appear illogical and highly emotional. Additionally, the critical incident itself can be of a self-destructive nature (Shulman, Steinberg, & Piquero, 2013). Primarily, even though the two different types of behaviors represent an opposite end of a continuum, subjects primarily acquire elements of both types when an incident occurs. For instance, while predominantly slides between the continuum of instrumental and expressive, this makes it difficult to respond law enforcement personnel to develop a negotiation strategy (Goodwill, Stephens, Oziel, Yapp, & Bowes, …show more content…
This especially includes behavior such as debating the ideology of the terrorist group involved, arguing with the hostage-takers or becoming physically challenging toward the hostage-takers (Poland 1999: 27). The relationship that develops is one of annoyance, hate, and resentment on the part of the captors. The usual outcome of this relationship between hostage and hostage-taker is quite different from that of the Stockholm Syndrome—a captor may come to dislike a hostage so intensely that at first opportunity he eliminates him (e.g. kills him) (Antokol 1990:
Marianne Szegedy-Maszak, a senior writer at U.S. News and World, published her article, "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism," in 2004. She uses the article to briefly overview the scandal as a whole before diving into what can trigger sadistic behavior. The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal took place in 2004, wherein American troops humiliated and tortured Iraqi detainees (Szegedy-Maszak 75). The main objective of Szegedy-Maszak’s article is to investigate the causation behind sadistic behavior, exclusively in the Abu Ghraib Prison scandal. She effectively does so by gathering information and research from professional psychologists and professors of psychology, specifically Herbert Kelman and Robert Okin (Szegedy-Maszak 76). She finds
A mentally insane person, according to psychologytoday.com, is defined as “a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality… or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive
Rather than soothing each other in times of trouble, the detainees react to their circumstances by betraying each
On August 23rd, 1973, in Stockholm, Sweden, four hostages were held captive after a botched bank robbery and kept there for six days. Throughout these six days the four hostages grew a strange bond with their captor. The captor allowed his captives to call their family, kept them warm when they were cold and even let them out of the vault they were kept in when they said they were claustrophobic. This strange relationship that grew in this short amount later became studied and was widely known as Stockholm syndrome. It has been looked at as one of the smartest survival methods for kidnappings. Stockholm syndrome can be seen in many cases around the world when it comes to kidnapping and happens to one in every four kidnappings that occur, states
Every person that has different characteristics that influence how they think, act, and build relationships. While some people are introverted, others are extroverted. Some people are strict and do not take risks, while others are carefree and free spirited. However, there are times where a person’s behavior becomes destructive, problematic, and maladaptive (Widger, 2003). The key to examining a person for a possible personality disorder is not if they have quirks, but if they display severe behavioral, emotional, and social issues. A diagnosis of having a personality disorders involves identifying if their extreme behaviors, emotions, and thoughts that are different than cultural expectations interfere with the ...
Stockholm syndrome, as defined by the FBI, is “a psychological response of a hostage or an individual” (De Fabrique, et al. 11) where the victim will “[wind] up emotionally
This is mainly because Stockholm Syndrome is rarely studied and it isn’t even in the bible of Psychology, the DSM V. Some say that victims don’t identify or bond with their captors but that they’re mostly too terrified to leave. Many of the victims of Stockholm Syndrome are usually women. The first time Stockholm Syndrome was first discovered was back in 1974 in a city called Norrmalmstorg, Stockholm, Sweden. One man took four hostages during a bank heist in Norrmalmstorg and during the six day ordeal, he ended up forming a sort of emotional relationship with the hostages. Because of this, the hostages refused to leave the captors side. How did he manage to do this? While they were together, he would give them moments of kindness such as, giving them blankets when they were cold, allowing them to talk to loved ones or even letting them out for a while when they needed fresh air. Due to some of his kindness, his hostages started to bond with him, they bonded so much that when a cop came to talk to them, they acted with hostility towards the cop instead of their
There are different examples that correlate to the diagnosis. Almost every day Pat goes out for a long run because he wants to show Nikki that he lost weight and looks fit for her. He also loses sleep by being fixated on a character named character Hemmingway in a book. He losses interests in everything else, but trying to get Nikki back. He gets into a fight at a football game when you can see him talking to himself trying not to intervene. You can also say Tiffany has borderline personality for these reasons. She is reluctant to spend time with her sister at dinner time. When things are not going her way she seem to feel self-guilt and starts drinking
mental disorder with aggressive antisocial behavior which is a nice way of saying a really bad
These personalities don't listen to others limits. They are at times very verbally and physically injurious yet the majority of the times they are not
According to the FBI’s Hostage Barricade Database System, 73% of hostages display no sign of Stockholm syndrome (G. Dwayne Fuselier. 1999) My aim was to find out the root causes of the condition, to help myself and others to better understand this unique phenomenon established on the evidence discovered from my research.
There are many characteristics of people diagnosed with Schizoid Personality Disorder. The characteristics are based around the fact that these people do not associate with others, and when they do, it is very rare. An example of this would be when family comes over for a holiday; a person with Schizoid Personality Disorder does not associate with anyone and tries to be away from the crowd. Other characteristics about people with this disorder include that they are usually oblivious to social ques and self-absorbed. This makes it hard for them to understand how to interact with others because they have no interest in it. Other major characteristics of Schizoid are that they usually do not have strong emotions like anger, joy and sadness. This is because criticism and approval do not affect them since they do not care about how society views them. Which makes it hard for them to have strong emotions. Since there are levels of severity for this disorder, some diagnosed might not have as much isolation from society as others. There is not one type of Schizoid Personality Disorder since it varies with each case. These characteristics can be found in people who are diagnosed. Before being diagnosed wi...
Expressive is one type of illocutionary acts and it represents the intentions behind the words. Austin divided utterances into three types and Searle developed illocutionary acts to five kinds. This classification focuses more on functions rather than forms. In Searle’s (1976) words, expressives have the purpose of expressing the speaker’s feelings (i.e. apologizing, praising, congratulating, thanking). In our group’s examples of Two Broke Girls, Caroline has said You know, having only cute outfit takes hours off getting dressed. This is a kind of indirect expressives. Caroline expresses her depression in an indirect way and mocks her current situation. Imagine that she used to be a millionaire and did not need to worry about the problem of lacking good outfits. However, now she is just a waitress and even has no place to live and Max takes in her at that moment. Therefore, she want to give a positive impression to Max and please Max. Another example is that after falling into shit, Caroline is screaming and requesting Max that Tell me it’s mud. T-tell me it’s mud. In Two Broke Girls, Caroline is a love of clean and she is very care about her appearance. She requests Max in a direct way and shows her feelings indirectly. She cannot accept the fact that it is mud rather than shit and want to make Max to persuade herself it is not true. Actually, she feels very terrible and disgusting. The two examples indicate that sometimes people express their attitudes or feelings in an indirect way in order to make good impressions to others or to escape from facts.
“DSM IV defines personality disorder as an "Enduring pattern of inner experience and behavior that deviates markedly from expectations of the individual's culture". (Rotter 2002). The literature compared impatient and outpatient rates between different disorders documented in prisons, and the rates of personality disorders in the state mental health system. The inmates were grouped into four different Personality Disorder categories based on the DSM-IV criteria. Thirty-six percent of the inpatient population studied had a primary or secondary personality disorder diagnosis. 5% of the other category in the outpatient group, the most frequent personality disorders were paranoid and schizotypal. 17% of the inpatients also had a mood disorder,
Hostage and barricade incidents are amongst the most difficult, emotional, and sometimes potentially lethal situations that a negotiator can be involved in. Often, the hostage taker shows signs of mental illness, drug or alcohol intoxication, or personal disputes accompanied by a high level of emotion. (Feldmann) These contributing factors lead to impulsive and often unpredictable behavior on the part of the hostage taker. It is sometimes impossible for negotiators to anticipate possible outcomes and complications that could arise from these incidents. Negotiators use a wide variety of tools, information, and strategies to try and resolve whatever grievances and demands the perpetrator is exhibiting. The main focus on the part of the negotiator is to keep the hostage alive, then try to negotiate a surrender. There is a considerable risk to both the victims and law enforcement when dealing with a hostage situation. (Feldmann) This paper will identify and distinguish several high risk factors that negotiators and law enforcement use to extinguish potentially lethal situations. The presence or absence of these factors can influence the outcome of a situation for the better or for the worst. Second, this paper will identify several motivations for hostage taking. Why and what would prompt an individual to take hostages? Several influential and background reasons will be examined. Finally, some successful and also failed negotiations will be explored, with possible reasons and explanations to what factors made them either a success or a failure.