Importance Of Routine Outcome Measures

3181 Words7 Pages

Introduction
The aim of this essay is to discuss whether routine outcome measures (ROMS) can or cannot capture therapeutic work done in Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). The author intends to consider what ROMs are, and what they do or do not capture; reflecting on their use and purpose within the process of therapy; by considering established research and documented evidence found in literature to assist the discussion; in order to determine what the therapeutic work to be captured is, and the possibility of being able to measure this therapeutic work in its various forms. For the purposes of this essay, clients, service users and recipients of CAMHS therapeutic services will be termed as patients in line with NHS practices; and therapy refers generally to psychological therapies including counselling, psychotherapy, psychological and clinical interventions.
Use of Routine Outcome Measures in CAMHS
Outcome measures used within a health context have existed for many years. In 1910, Ernest Amory Codman was an orthopaedic surgeon who developed the "end result idea". At its heart was "the common sense notion that every hospital should follow every patient it treats, long enough to determine whether or not the treatment has been successful, and then to inquire 'if not, why not?' with a view of preventing similar failures in the future”. The term ‘outcome measure’ in itself suggests the measurement of health outcomes only. Mosby’s Medical Dictionary (2012) defines an outcome measure as ‘a measure of the quality of medical care, the standard against which the end result of the intervention is assessed’.

Walport, (2013) found that many Patient Reporting Outcome Measures (PROMs) were intended to help detect pattern...

... middle of paper ...

...ess of therapeutic interventions; the numbers and demographics of patients treated, and outcomes of treatment. ROMs do not capture the internal changes for a patient; they do not capture the invisible dialogue that forms a major part of talking and psychological therapies within CAMHS. Used in conjunction with clinical judgement and patient perspective ROMS have more than one purpose. These are:
• providing evidence based practice for psychological treatments, with service user voice contributing to ownership of their journey, helping to shape the therapeutic intervention;
• providing quantitative data to monitor some clinical effectiveness to satisfy the Governments ‘payment by results’ (PBR) agenda and health commissioners for funding; contributing to national data sets for research (CORC).
The authors view is they cannot capture therapeutic work in CAMHS.

Open Document