Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effective management and leadership in healthcare
Abstract on effective leadership
Abstract on effective leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effective management and leadership in healthcare
Introduction
Effective leadership is essential to a profitable, efficient and productive work environment. The literature surrounding leadership is enormous, but there is a consensus that the Locus of Control construct is an important predictor of leadership capacity. In order to understand the ramifications of the Locus of Control concept and measurement in the workplace one must first understand the construct, its importance, and the leadership characteristics that it predicts, and the implications for the career choices of individuals.
The nature and the importance of the ‘Locus of Control’ construct
The Locus of Control construct is essentially concerned with the perceived ability of the individual to control his/her personal environment (Lefcourt 1966) or the perception that ‘positive and/or negative events are a consequence of one’s own actions and thereby under personal control’ (Lefcourt 1966), and vice versa. The construct was initially developed by Rotter in 1954, and aimed to understand the extent to which individuals feel internally in control of their lives and circumstances.
The construct of Locus of Control continues to receive attention for its importance in assessing aspects of an individual’s personality and ability to accurately predict scores for other core psychological constructs such as self-esteem, self-efficacy and neuroticism (Judge et al. 2002b). Schjoedt and Shaver’s (2012, p.713) review concludes that ‘locus of control is an important construct, [as] three meta-analyses show that locus of control is an important aspect in work motivation, satisfaction and performance’. Although there has been debate over how the construct should be measured (Levenson 1981), the construct has remained remarkably re...
... middle of paper ...
... Control are predisposed to having these other leadership traits. To the extent that that is true, I am likely to make an effective leader in the workplace and will be suited to both executive and entrepreneurial roles.
Conclusion
While Judge’s comment that ‘no single trait or group of characteristics has been isolated which sets off the leader from members of his group’ (Judge et al. 2002b) holds true, the Locus of Control construct is important as it has been shown to have strong capacity to predict effective leadership. The strong correlation between Locus of Control scores and effective leadership allows individuals to understand whether they are suited to a leadership position; however is not necessarily a definitive test of leadership. Other domains, behaviours and skills are arguably important in predicting effective leadership (Kaiser, Hogan and Craig 2008).
So when at work or at a party you have to ultimately make a choice. At work, you can choose to do poorly because you think your work will be overlooked resulting in an external locus of control or work hard because you think you determine the results of your work, which is an internal locus of control. Same situation different scenario, with your personal life. For example, you can choose to be quiet and talk to no one at a party because they choose to be alone. They make a difference by sparking up a conversation with someone they know or someone
Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (2001). Leadership: Do traits Matter? Academy of Management Executive,5,, 48-60.
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132-153.
According to the text, “Control is defined as any process that directs the activities of individuals toward achievement of organizational goals. It is how effective managers make sure things are going as planned (Bateman, pp 520, 2007).” The combination of these two concepts, leadership and control help formulate an ideology that becomes an integral part of the success or failure of any business entity. This paper will give Team D an opportunity to delve into Sears Holdings’ leadership and control mechanisms. The focal point of this paper will be to identify the current CEO of Sears Holdings, and gain insight on his background, i.e., training, education, and previous employment. To identify his style of leadership, evaluate the effectiveness of this leadership style based on Sears Holdings’ performance, and to explain the various control mechanisms used in the organization to determine the effectiveness.
It is important for us humans to know that we must take full responsibility for our actions and maturely deal with any consequences that those actions may lead to. According to Ryon and Gleason (2013), “the first conceptualization of control was developed in 1966 by Rotter,” which is currently referred to as locus of control. Rotter defined locus of control as “the degree to which an individual expects that a contingent relationship exists between one’s behaviors and outcomes” (Ryon & Gleason, 2013). Fournier and Jeanrie reference Rotter’s study by explaining the two types of locus of control: “external control” and “internal control” (as cited in Rotter, 1966, p. 1). The purpose of Rotter’s theory was to examine “what causes reinforcement” whether it be an intrinsic or extrinsic factor (Kormanik & Rocco, 2009). Rotter measured “people’s general control expectancies” by using what is known as the “Internal-External Locus of Control Scale” (Fournier & Jeanrie, 2003).
The general personality traits, which are related to success both in and outside the workplace, are all inherent in my answers given in the Leadership Assessment Quiz. With statements such as, “it is easy for me to compliment others” and “team members listen to me when I speak,” it is apparent I possess these characteristics. Whereas my task- related personality traits associated with successful leadership, such as courage, still need to be developed. Not only do I know this in myself, but it is clearly pointed out throughout the test, with statements such as, “resolving conflict is an activity I enjoy” and “I would enjoy coaching other members of the team”.
In comparison, people with a high external locus of control have a tendency to see themselves as powerless in controlling their own lives. Therefore, their development of decision-making skills is poor. because they genuinely believe that the choices they make will not have much or any influence on the way their life turns out. These individuals believe that life events are associated with factors such
“The extent to which people believe they have power over events in their lives. A person with an internal locus of control believes that he or she can influence events and their outcomes, while someone with an external locus of control blames outside forces for everything,” (Fournier, n.d.). There are two types of people in this world whose results can be effectively measured using Locus of control. Locus of control can be used as measuring tool in people who feel; that they are accountable for their own behaviours. Individuals who score a high internal result on a locus of control test tend to believe that they are in control of their own destiny and everything that happens to them is their own doing. But, individuals with
This fifth negotiation that we did was unlike any other we had done for many reasons. The whole time leading up to the negotiation seemed to be a bunch of unfortunate events at my expense. Although the results that I received at the end of the negotiation weren’t as bad as they could’ve been, I still believe it to be somewhat of a failure because I know I had the potential to do better. If I had an external locus of control I would have just attributed this failure to the influences that affected me leading up to the negotiation. However, being a person with a high internal locus of control I know that my success is based on my own work. I could have been more successful in this negotiation had I been better at planning, been more careful and more
Locus of control is how much control a student has over their success in school. There are two different types of locus of control classified along a spectrum; internal and external. Students who have an internal locus of control suppose that the outcomes in their life are due to their own efforts. For instance, if someone didn’t complete an assignment and got a 0 they would know that next time they should complete it so they get a better grade. Students who have an external locus of control suppose that the outcomes in their life are due to luck or chance. If you didn’t do too well on a test or quiz and you say that you failed because it wasn’t worded correctly would be an example of external locus of control.
There are two types of locus of control the one is the external locus of control wherein the person exhibit less responsibility over his life. And they are being likened to be selfish individuals. In the internal locus of control the person believe that no one is responsible for their lives. They are being labelled as “control freaks” (Mckoy 2009). Learned helplessness refers to a person mental state where they feel completely powerless over their own life situation.
Control is something that everyone not only wants, but needs to a certain degree. To have no control would make life a real challenge and could make one question their will to live. This doesn't mean that the control in question here is the control of others. The type of control this relates to is self control and having the ability to decide what one will or won't do. To have control over others is one thing, and it is something very different to have it over oneself.
Many people associate leadership with a specific job title or form of power within an organization. However, through personal experience, I have concluded that leadership can come in many forms and position as well as from multiple sources of roles and job titles both with and without power. Based on the definition of leadership, anyone can be considered a leader as long as they have the ability to influence people to achieve a particular result or goal which benefits the organization or group as a whole. Individuals with a secure sense of self and understanding, acceptance of diversity within an organization tend to be the strongest leaders that not only make others want to follow, but they also encourage other leaders to gravitate to their
McCombs’ (1991) research tells us that the concept of “locus of control” can be referred to as “self as agent”. In other words, it is up to the individual to decide on his/her own personal endeavors; this is internal locus of control. McCombs (1991) states that “The self as agent can consciously or unconsciously direct, select, and regulate the use of all knowledge structures and intellectual processes in support of personal goals, intentions, and choices" (p. 6). He continues to say, “the degree to which one chooses to be self-determining is a function of one's realization of the source of agency and personal control" (McCombs, 1991, p. 7). A mother, while running a household, probably does not have the benefit of feeling this locus of control that McCombs’ research explores.