A good analysis is the foundation of every essay. Analyzing is a skill to be honed, it does not come easily. Over the years of many English classes, I have learned the difference between analysis and paraphrasing. An analysis is how the I perceives a certain scene, event, or subject. The main point of analysis is meant to state a deeper thinking or concept to the reader. It is meant to relay a certain message or thought in the reader’s mind throughout the whole text. The most important thing about analysis is that it should always agree with the main picture that the I am trying to send.
After taking English 2 last year, I was finally able to differentiate between paraphrasing and analyzing. Many people including myself frequently mix up the
…show more content…
I don’t know how other people analyze or if they even have a process, but I have a set of questions I ask myself to make sure that what I’m writing is actually an analysis. When I learned how to analyze things, I noticed that analysis is supposed to relay your own assessment of the text. When writing an essay the key to a thought provoking analysis is to show the reader what I took away from the source. How I separate a good analysis from a summary is to see if it answers the question: Does the analysis contain my own point of view on the text and support the main theme/message I’m sending?” If my analysis doesn’t fit the criteria, then I know that I have to rewrite it or reword the sentence. This process has helped me eliminate any paraphrasing that I could have mistaken for analysis throughout my essays. However, there will be certain times where I can’t even come up with an analysis. When I can’t put my thoughts into words, I think of other questions like “What about the evidence backs up my thoughts or claims?” Or “Why was this evidence important towards my essay/ why did I choose this statement as my example?” These are my strategies on how to think of analysis or weed out any paraphrasing in my …show more content…
Sometimes when authors write books, they don’t like to say things directly. This is why analyzing is useful because it hints at the readers to think about a certain topic and search for a deeper meaning. An analysis also is supposed to make the reader explain what they were able to gather from the source. It also has to be able to have the reader be able to show what they know about a situation from the given text. Another purpose for analysis is to have the reader really think about the source as a whole. Analyzing makes the reader come to their own conclusion about what the main message or theme of the source is. In addition, an analysis is meant to produce burning questions and thoughts for the reader. Other than having the readers think about the message or real meaning behind a situation, analyzing gives the reader a chance to really get to know characters mentioned in the literature. When a certain character behaves a certain way, it can reveal the character’s personality or true intentions to the reader. Analysis also gives insight on how a certain author likes to write by taking into account of the way sentences are worded, or how thoughts in the book are laid out
Analyzing is very important in literature. Without analysis, literature would be bland and hidden meaning or messages wouldn’t be discovered. Without having the readers come to their own
Good. I don’t know if you looked at Dartmouth’s site, but I highly recommend examining it and bookmarking it for college. In general an analysis goes into a bit more length and detail and contains an introduction and conclusion, as well as a thesis that is tested, if even briefly. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~writing/materials/student/ac_paper/what.shtml
In order to analyze the essay and answer the question, a systematic analytic approach mustbeset forth. In the case of a narrative analytic approach, there are twomainsteps. First, the piece ...
The first writing project I was assigned in this class was an analysis of the film, Gran Torino. During class, I learned there was so much more to the movie than what we see; there was a meaning behind every little thing from the clothes to the hair to even the cars on the side of the street. It all meant something. The key features of an literary analysis include “an arguable thesis, careful attention to the language, attention to patterns or themes, and a clear interpretation (Norton Field Guide 85-86).” Critical thinking is an important skill, not just behind a desk, but also in the real world. The second writing project was a workplace writi...
The essay is written in a very critical style where the reader will feel like they have been wast...
Essay 2 Psychoanalysis is the method of psychological therapy originated by Sigmund Freud in which free association, dream interpretation, and analysis of resistance and transference are used to explore repressed or unconscious impulses, anxieties, and internal conflicts (“Psychoanalysis”). This transfers to analyzing writing in order to obtain a meaning behind the text. There are two types of people who read stories and articles. The first type attempts to understand the plot or topic while the second type reads to understand the meaning behind the text. Baldick is the second type who analyzes everything.
Both passages concern the same topic, the Okefenokee Swamp. Yet, through the use of various techniques, the depictions of the swamp are entirely different. While Passage 1 relies on simplicity and admiration to publicize the swamp, Passage 2 uses explicitness and disgust to emphasize the discomfort the swamp brings to visitors.
The piece that I will be analyzing is called How It Feels to Be Colored Me. This piece appealed to me because she described her point of view through the use of anecdote. Her perspective of being different caught my attention because most articles about being colored are so clique. This one is out of the ordinary because she thinks of being colored as a good thing. The only thing that could be difficult to analyze about this piece would understand how she feels because back then, black people were treated horribly.
Analysis of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Analyzing a book can be a killer. Especially when it contains tons of subtle little messages and hints that are not picked up unless one really dissects the material. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is a prime example.
“I Stand Here Ironing” by Tillie Olsen, is a story about a mother's struggle to balance the demands of raising children and having to work to make ends meet during the Great Depression. The story’s primary focus is on the relationship between the narrator, a mother, and her first child, Emily. Throughout the story, the narrator reflects on the decisions and mistakes she made while raising Emily. The narrator was detached from Emily almost completely during her younger years, but she desires an emotional connection to her, like she has with her other children. She also wants Emily to have a better life than she had.
Today, we are writing an essay. Its content is about reflection and rhetorical analysis. What to reflect it? Reflections on what we learn. We have studied English for a long time. For our international students, from primary school, we learn the content and form of learning is similar to our own native language. When we learn to basic knowledge of English after. We began to learn new things. This knowledge is to make us more skilled use of the English language. So we started to learn writing. In the writing of a lot of knowledge, they like us to write our own language to write an essay. We need to improve our writing skills with a lot of writing skills. These writing skills can be a plus for our writing. It allows people to join them more interested.
Reader-Response theories propose that works of literature exist in a mutual relationship between the reader and author. The meaning that a reader extracts from a text is a simultaneous result of both the author’s intent, and the reader’s interpretation of it (Roberts, 149). With this theory, there is an inherent subjectivity associated with the analysis of any work of literatur. An author may have a specific meaning to the story but another person can read the story and create his or her own interpretation that is just as meaningful as the author’s original ideas. Put another way, meani...
To explain, I have come to see paraphrasing to be useful with the students, I work with. I myself find it greatly useful when others use the micro-skill when speaking
Literature is rarely, if ever, merely a story that the author is trying to tell. It is imperative that the reader digs deep within the story to accurately analyze and understand the message the author is trying to portray. Authors tend to hide themselves in their stories. The reader can learn about the author through literary elements such as symbolism, diction, and structure. A good example of this is Robert Frost’s poems The Road Not Taken and Nothing Gold can Stay in which he uses ordinary language unlike many other poets that became more experimental (Frost, Robert. “1.”).
Literary criticism is used as a guideline to help analyze, deconstruct, interpret, or even evaluate literary works. Each type of criticism offers its own methods that help the reader to delve deeper into the text, revealing all of its innermost features. New Criticism portrays how a work is unified, Reader-Response Criticism establishes how the reader reacts to a work, Deconstructive Criticism demonstrates how a work falls apart, Historical Criticism illustrates how the history of the author and the author’s time period influence a text, and last of all, Psychological Criticism expresses how unconscious motivations drive the author in the creation of their work as well as how the reader’s motivations influence their own interpretation of the text (Lynn 139, 191). This creates a deep level of understanding of literature that simply cannot be gained through surface level reading. If not one criticism is beneficial to the reader, then taking all criticisms or a mixture of specific criticisms into consideration might be the best way to approach literary
Devlin believes that mathematics has four faces 1) Mathematics is a way to improve thinking as problem solving. 2) Mathematics is a way of knowing. 3) Mathematics is a way to improve creative medium. 4) Mathematics is applications. (Mann, 2005). Because mathematics has very important role in our life, teaching math in basic education is as important as any other subjects. Students should study math to help them how to solve problems and meet the practical needs such as collect, count, and process the data. Mathematics, moreover, is required students to be capable of following and understanding the future. It also helps students to be able to think creativity, logically, and critically (Happy & Listyani, 2011,