Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of brand on consumer behavior
Impact of branding on consumer buying behaviour research proposal
Brand image on customers purchasing decision
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of brand on consumer behavior
Trademarks are the foundation of competition for businesses and it grants the freedom of choice to buyers. In the jungle of products, trademarks help buyers to get exactly what they want to buy. It is the function of a trademark to give an indication to the purchaser as to the manufacturing or quality of the goods. Therefore it is necessary to protect the trademark and its distinctiveness as perceived by public. Trademark law generally deals with the protection of trademark from being infringed when unauthorized person uses identical or similar mark and causes likelihood of confusion in the minds of consumer. In today’s world where consumers purchase products not based on quality or usefulness but instead are carried away by the brand name or the trade symbol which accompany the product, protection of the distinctiveness of the trademark is of utmost importance. Brand is the primary want of consumers and a trademark of a company is a graphical representation of the brand or reputation built by the company in a definite territory within the course of time.
Certain trademarks acquire unique reputation and psychological hold in the minds of its customers through its distinctiveness which it gains through extensive sale over a period of time. They are described in general terms as well known trademarks. Distinctiveness and its ability to sell the goods for its owner are the prime features of well known trademarks. It is highly necessary to protect these well known marks from all forms of activities which lessen its distinctiveness. Likelihood of confusion caused by use of similar or identical trademarks on similar goods is the traditional benchmark of trademark infringement. However, the scope of protection of trademark has been...
... middle of paper ...
... value or distinctiveness or tarnishes the reputation of the famous marks. Even though it is not consumer-centric, well known trademarks should be protected for its psychological hold in the minds of public with regards to the goods or services with which it is associated. In the Indian context, remedy under section 29(4) of the TM Act of 1999 is to be utilized only for those trademarks that deserve such a safeguard. Provisions relating to prohibition of trademark registration of the same Act can be looked into to enhance the protection sought from section 29(4). The concept of fame and reputation of trademarks is important and the requirement for a mark to be ‘well known’ is more than mere reputation. In this direction, ITC Case has well set the path for strict compliance of ingredients required under Sec. 29(4) for action against dilution of well known trademark.
It has been faced with the problem of brand recall getting restricted as there is low advertisements and exercise of marketing programs.
v. VIP Prods., LLC 666 F. Supp. 2d 974 (Mo., 2008) Anheuser-Busch makes a distinction between confusing and non-confusing parodies, the latter being protected as a parody. The important factors in the case were that the price point of the products was the same, they were directly competing goods and the survey showed that there was a level of confusion (30.3% were confused), in addition, consideration was placed on irreparable harm caused by the defendants use of the mark, the priority lay with the first to register the trademark, lastly the District Court considered public interest, i.e. whether the public was deceived. Similarly in Starbucks Corp v. Wolfe’s Borough Coffee Inc., 588 F3d 97 (2d Cir. 2007) the court distinguished Louis Vuitton S.A. v Haute Diggty Dog, LLC, 507 F.3d 252 (4th Cir. 2007) by holding that if (as in the Louis Vuitton case), the mark is used in non-competing goods, the defendant conveyed that it was not the source of the plaintiffs product and if the actual use of the mark does not impair the distinctiveness of the plaintiff’s mark there may be an argument in favor of the defendant, however, if the defendant’s humor is not conveyed to the public, and does not increase the public identification of the plaintiff’s mark with its mark it will fail to establish
Define and explain the following: copyrights, trademarks, and patents. Compare the three and provide an example of each. This paper will be non-graded, but it is still highly recommended that you complete this assignment for increased practice and self-improvement.
In every given business, the name itself portrays different meanings. This serves as the reference point and sometimes the basis of customers on what to expect within the company. Since personality affects product image (Langmeyer & Shank, 1994), the presence of brand helps in the realization of this concept. Traditionally, brand is a symbolic manifestation of all the information connected with a company, product, or service (Nilson, 2003; Olin, 2003). A brand is typically composed of a name, logo, and other visual elements such as images, colors, and icons (Gillooley & Varley, 2001; Laforet & Saunders, 1994)). It is believed that a brand puts an impression to the consumer on what to expect to the product or service being offered (Mere, 1995). In other application, brand may be referred as trademark, which is legally appropriate term. The brand is the most powerful weapon in the market (LePla & Parker, 1999). Brands possess personality in which people associate their experience. Oftentimes, they are related to the core values the company executes.
Trademark is a word, symbol or phrase used for identifying a particular manufactures or seller’s products and distinguish them from other products. The overall purpose of Trademark law is to prevent unfair trade competitions by protecting the use of words, symbols logo design, name ect..Why because these are the key distinguishing things of goods and services of a firm. These laws protecting consumers by preventing firms and companies from using trademarks substantially similar to those of others. The main purpose of these laws is to avoid confusions regarding the identity and quality of companies and preventing the companies from diluting the marks of other’s. In present day world particularly in commercial market,
The aim of this essay is to critically discuss how the law of passing off and trade mark law have common roots and therefore are, in many respects, similar. I will begin with a short brief history of trade mark law and the law of passing off. I move on to discuss the similarity between trade mark law and the law of passing off with reference to relevant case law and statutes. Although, passing off and trade mark law deal with overlapping factual situations, s 2(2) of the Trade Mark Act 1994 maintains passing off as a separate cause of action. When a trade mark is threatened by the actions of third parties the proprietor will bring an action for both passing off and trade mark infringement which both share many similarities. However, they are
Mainly based on case-by-case basis, prior to 1995, the court held that the importer was not using the trademark as a trademark and therefore could not be infringing the trademark. For instance, Atari Inc v Fairstar Electronics Pty Ltd (1982) 1 IPR 291; R A & A Bailey & Co Ltd v Boccaccio Pty Ltd (1986) 6 IPR 279; Delphic Wholesalers Pty Ltd v Elco Food Co Pty Ltd (1987) 8 IPR 545. There was a separation between the owner of the registered Australian trade mark and the company that actually produced the goods, the outcome for the parallel importer was one of only two cases where the parallel importer was found to be infringing or likely to be infringing the registered trade mark. The difference between the legal identity of a trademark and its physical identity in the approach taken in the Fender Australia Pty Ltd v Bevk case was rejected after the passing off of the 1995 legislation.
India is a nation that is on the move towards becoming one of the leaders in the global economy. While the country still has a long way to go, it is making significant strides towards competition with nations such as the United States and England. Indian leaders have been moving towards "a five-point agenda that includes improving the investment climate; developing a comprehensive WTO strategy; reforming agriculture, food processing, and small-scale industry; eliminating red tape; and instituting better corporate governance" (Cateora & Graham p. 56, 2007). These steps are geared to begin India's transformation from a third world nation into a global economic leader. The current marketing environment in India is in transition, with both similarities and differences in comparison to the marketing environment in the US.
Companies use a collection of brand equities to represent their products in the market (Voolnes, 2012). Brand equity refers to the commercial value that is derived from the perception of consumers on any given brand name of particular products in the market as opposed to the product itself. Ataman (2003) notes that the effect to the consumer is in the brand name and not the product itself. Companies use logos, trademarks and a collection of other symbols to present this information to the customers. The use of these symbols is meant to try and capture the customer mindset so that they can be thinking about the company products at all times through the items they possess at home (Estes, Gibbert, Guest, & Mazursk, 2012). This can well be explained by use of the customer-based brand equity model that brings together the requirements for a publicly renowned brand in the market.
What’s in a name? Certainly, it can be tied to product identification, brand loyalty and a tremendous amount of revenue. Companies protect their trademarks knowing that public perception must be positive, controlled and maintained. Without control over your name, it seems self-evident that doom awaits. According to Jamie Lundi, “copyright genericide can occur when the benefits to society of copyright protection (i.e. the incentive to create) cease to outweigh the costs” (131). Truly, copyright protections won’t apply if the material becomes so used as to become commonplace. In his article, Pike comments upon rules and regulations that protect a company from losing creative control over
Secondly, Loss of reputation. First example, if company “A” that not do well for its protection of the intellectual property. Company “B” may use the Name of Company “A” ...
Every company seeks to create its own brand - a unique and effective image. Purpose of brand is attracting and retaining customers in its market share. Branding in marketing is a complex technology, aimed at making advantageous position a brand from the competition. Facilitating the search for the necessary goods to the buyer, branding in marketing becomes more effective if the consumer product features meet market requirements. It is especially necessary to identify the goods, for a case of unprepared buyer which can not assess the competitive characteristics (for example, high-tech products). The development of technology has had a huge impact on human society. It is reflected in the fact that we are surrounded by complex technical devices that we use every day and sometimes we have no idea of how this thing is located within. Here the brand comes to help the consumer that stands out from all those product characteristics that are important to the consumer and facilitates the understanding of the product.
Product is the core of marketing, which including tangible goods like food or drinks or intangible services, as it is the major way to embody customers requirements; and, branding is directly associated with it. In fact, branding is all about decisio ns of products, like brand names or trademarks. Stork (2007) asserted that a brand is a unique business identity which represents the personality, quality or origin of products. And, such a product which added value by branding would appear in every activity of marketing, namely, branding is actually react on the whole marketing system directly and indirectly.
This article studies the relationship between advertising and sales promotions and their impact on brand equity. A main priority for most companies is to establish and achieve a strong and powerful brand name. A company can build a strong brand name by creating the market for their customers want. By creating a strong brand name, a company will become more established. Brand equity is important to the producer, retailer and consumer. The consumer knowledge of the brand says how the producer will produce and market the product. The consumer knowledge of the brand name also determines the quantity the retailer will sale. Brand equity can have a positive or negative effect. A positive effect would be for everyone to recognize the name and purchase the product. The negative effect would be to have the product recalled. Brand equity is important because it can offer many advantages for a company. Brand equity can create a high demand for your product, reduce marketing cost and the company’s brand name will have high credibility.
Over the years, many companies such as scrabble, Tylenol, Channel, Louis Vuitton and even Polo Ralph Lauren (PRL) Corporation have had to fight to protect their intellectual property. By looking more specifically into Polo Ralph Lauren, a fashion company that offers a range of products from clothing to home furnishings, this paper will explore trademark laws and how these laws could be advantageous one hand and limit one group and limit business abilities on another.