Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay historical background of nigeria
Political culture in Nigeria
History of nigerian culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay historical background of nigeria
"The history of the world is a chronicle of oppression," declared General Ojukwu, an Igbo leader who fought for Biafran independence during the 1960s to the 1970s. He had to live in Nigeria during this period of oppression, which ultimately resulted in a civil war, known as the Nigeria-Biafran War. Prior to the war, Great Britain turned Nigeria into an artificial colony, consisted up of over 300 ethnic and religious groups who were shoved into one nation. The two largest and most conflicting of these groups were the Igbo and Hausa-Fulani. The Igbo, a Catholic and democratic group of people lived in the Southeastern region of Nigeria. The Hausa-Fulani, a Muslim and feudal group of people dominated the North. When Britain was in power, all of …show more content…
the ethnic groups were allowed to govern themselves, but when they left, everything changed. With Britain leaving, the North rose up and obtained national power, where they established a democracy known as the Northern Federal Government. Although there were some Igbo representatives in the government, the power was held by mainly the Hausa-Fulani. With this unequal power, many different military coups, massacres, revolts, and assassinations take place due to the Igbo desiring an independent government. Eventually, in 1967, the Igbo people declare their own independent state: Biafra. War broke out due to the Hausa-Fulani attempting to prevent the secession of Biafra, and lasted for the next three years. But what were the causes of this war between the Igbo and Hausa-Fulani? The Nigerian-Biafran War, a war fought by two entirely ethnic groups, was caused by religious differences, British colonialism, and political controversies. Although British colonization of Nigeria prior to the war and religious differences are key parts to why the war occurred, the most major reason for the independence campaign of Biafra was because of political controversies in the federal government of Nigeria. Religions differences caused the war due to the Hausa-Fulani attempt to install a Muslim state in Nigeria. The Hausa-Fulani continually oppressed the Igbo because they were Catholic, causing revolts and violence from both sides. To stop the oppression, Igbo leaders declared Biafra as their own state in order to peacefully live Catholic. For example, an article from Oxford journals states “The post-independence secular state, which seemed acceptable to the Christian/animist south, was abhorred by the Muslim north. Northern Islamists have consistently sought the establishment of an Islamic state to replace the extant secular regime.” The plan of the Hausa-Fulani is clear, which is to establish a Muslim state. Sequently, the Igbo needed to be exterminated to do so, thus leading to violent actions and terminally, war. Religious differences also caused the war due to violent actions committed by Muslim Hausa-Fulanis against Catholic Igbos. For example, there was the 1966 Anti-Igbo Pogrom. The Pogrom was a series of massacres against the Catholic Igbos with the intent to exterminate them, which brought up claims of genocide. A total of 30,000-50,000 Igbo Catholics were slaughtered in 1966 during this Pogrom. Surrounding African countries refused to prosecute the guilty Hausa-Fulani for the slaughtering. A student named Uzoigwe who lived during the time of the massacres stated “Nor would Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Emirate States with whom the northern Nigerian religious and political leadership had cordial relationships support any condemnation of Nigeria. For them what was happening became nuanced as a contest between Islam and Christianity.” The war was sought out by the Hausa-Fulani due to their religious differences, as they wanted to exterminate anyone who was Christian. These series of massacres caused the Igbo to declare their own state where they wouldn’t be murdered for their religion. The Hausa-Fulani instigated many terror attacks against the Igbo and also brought up the possibility of a genocide, but it is not the most important cause of the war because political controversies showed the strive for power from the Igbo people, resulting in them declaring their own state instead of continuing to be oppressed. British colonialism caused the Nigerian Civil War due to the creation of an artificial colony and the installation of unequal power when Britain abandoned Nigeria.
Britain came into Nigeria and combined over 300 ethnic and religious groups. They were allowed to govern themselves, but the issue was that when they left, the groups fought for political power because it was unequally given to the Hausa-Fulani. In a letter to President Nixon written by American diplomat Henry Kissinger, who was stationed in Nigeria during the war stated, “The civil war is rooted in the failure of the first generation of British- tutored politicians to make something of independence and unity.” The goal of the British was to leave Nigeria with a fair and just government, but by leaving it in the hands of the Hausa-Fulani when there are over 300 other ethnic groups doesn’t show equitable rule! With the disregardance of religion, ethnic differences, race, etc., war was bound to happen if one group was prioritized over the …show more content…
rest. British colonialism also caused the Nigerian Civil War due to the ensconcing of a corrupt democratic government. The rule of the Hausa-Fulani in the Northern Federal Government was not a real democracy. For example, a Washington State University article voiced the possibility of the effectiveness of the government. Admittedly there was a veneer of parliamentary democracy, but rigged and corrupt voting seriously compromised democratic elections. This mean that although there were sincere attempts by well-meaning nationalist to ensure that democracy was possible, the reality was that the parliamentary system left by the British was hopelessly undemocratic and factionalised. The Northern Federal Government created by the British after they left comprised of rigged elections in order to maintain the political power of the Hausa-Fulani. The factionalism between the Igbo and Hausa-Fulani were never solved, or put into play when Britain was in charge, so when they left it only increased the factionalism between the two groups, eventually leading to the war. British colonialism is important to the start of the war, but isn’t as important as political controversies because British colonialism didn’t directly cause the military coups for power, as political controversies did. Lastly, political controversies was the most important cause of the Biafran War due to the two military coups that led the Igbo to declare independence. The first military coup was an Igbo plan to exterminate Hausa-Fulani political leaders, including the Prime Minister of the Federal Northern Government. An Igbo leader for independence at the time, known as General Ojukwu, believed the only way to fight back the oppression of the Hausa-Fulani in the government was to take them out. "Since oppression is maintained by force, it is only possible to remove that oppression by a counterforce." Ojukwu is saying that the only way to achieve independence and power is with war, which is what he means when he says “counterforce.” The counterforce plan, being the first military coup, was a success. The Hausa-Fulani Prime Minister and other leaders were assassinated. One of the first coup leaders, Igbo Major Ifeajuna, believed that all Hausa-Fulani politicians failed and needed to be exterminated. Major Ifeajuna addressed the meeting on the subject of the deteriorating situation in Western Nigeria to which, he contended, the politicians had failed to find a solution. He added that as a result the entire country was heading toward chaos and disaster. The military Major Ifeajuna and the coup believed that they needed to exterminate the political leaders in order to avoid chaos and destruction, highly motivating retaliation from the Hausa-Fulani. But, on top of that, an Igbo leader named Gown came into power as head of state. As head of state, Gowon never punished the persecutors of the first coup, infuriating the Northern community. The rise of Ironsi struck fear into the Hausa-Fulani community as he showed favoritism to Igbo people, thus instigating the counter coup. The second of the two coups, the counter coup was another main reason of why political controversies was the most important reason for war.
The Nigerian Counter Coup was a Northern military plan masterminded by a military leader named Murtala in order to take revenge on the Igbo for their actions of the first coup against the Northern Federal Government. This military plan resulted in Ironsi being assassinated. “Aguiyi-Ironsi was killed and widespread reprisals were unleashed against the Igbo. Fearing marginalization within the state, on May 30, 1967 the Igbo-majority province declared its independence as the Republic of Biafra.” The widespread reprisals erupted everywhere in Nigeria and lasted for months... No Igbo was safe from the Hausa-Fulani, causing the Igbo leaders to declare Biafra as their own independent state on May 30, 1967. Refusing to accept a state-split, the Hausa-Fulani and Igbo went into direct war to gain or demolish independence.
To conclude, the three causes of the Nigeria-Biafran War was religious differences, British colonization, and most importantly, political controversies. The entirety of conflicts between the Igbo and Hausa-Fulani relate to the dissension in Rwanda. Two large ethnic groups, once colonized by a European country who creates tension between the groups, and eventually leading to violence/war. In both cases, the groups fought for political power, and ended with massacres of millions. The occurrences in Rwanda are a proven genocide, but
in Nigeria, it’s still a debated dispute to this day.
Prior to the 19th century, the Europeans traded mainly for African slaves. It turns out they were not immune towards certain diseases and therefore had an increasing risk of becoming sick. For years to come this continued, but not much land was conquered. Eventually, conference between only the Europeans was held to divide up the land appropriately, and the scramble for Africa began. The driving forces behind European imperialism in Africa were expanding empires, helping natives, and natural resources.
As the 20th century approached, more and more countries grew desperate for land, resulting in an imperialistic activity known as the Scramble for Africa. The European imperialists were motivated by three main factors; economic, political, and social. These factors made countries compete for power and eventually led to the scramble for African territory. Although economic expansion at times was a positive outcome of European imperialism in Africa, these positive effects are outweighed by negative outcomes such as loss of culture and independence.
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting for a land grab in the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economical, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation.
Throughout the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, almost every country in Africa was imperialized by other countries in Europe. To imperialize is to conquer another country, whether it be in the means of politics, economics and/or culture, and control that land. The aftermath for the imperialized country was either beneficial or harmful. The amount of African countries that a European country imperialized varied. Great Britain imperialized fifteen countries in Africa, including Egypt in 1882, Sierra Leone in 1808, and the Union of South Africa in 1910. Although Great Britain’s reasons to imperialize were selfish, Britain helped each country progress afterwards.
When the Age of Imperialism began in 1875, it effected Africa in many ways. Nowhere was the competition for colonies more intense than in Africa. Europeans went after North and South Africa splitting up the continent. Egypt and Sudan were taken over by Britain to obtain the Suez Canal. Imperialism helped to develop Africa’s economy and turned it into a continent of colonies.
In the early 1880’s, the powers of Europe started to take control of regions in Africa and set up colonies there. In the beginning, colonization caused the Africans little harm, but before long, the Europeans started to take complete control of wherever they went. The Europeans used their advanced knowledge and technology to easily maneuver through the vast African landscape and used advanced weapons to take control of the African people and their land. The countries that claimed the most land and had the most significant effect on Africa were France, England, Belgium, and Germany. There were many reasons for the European countries to be competing against each other to gain colonies in Africa. One of the main reasons was that the Europeans believed that the more territory a country was able to control, the more powerful it could become and the more powerful it would be seen as by other countries. Other reasons for the desire to control African land included the many natural resources that could only be found in Africa, such as diamonds, gold, and as time progressed, rubber. It also provided new markets in surrounding places so that manufactured goods could be sold for a larger profit. The Europeans had many motives for imperialism in Africa. Yet the true motives were often shielded as they tried tom present themselves as humanitarians when in reality they were making Africa a terrible place to live with brutality and harsh treatment of the African natives. The ways of the Europeans had many physical and emotional costs for the people of Africa. The imperialism process also took a toll on the people of Europe. The European imperialistic colonization in Africa was motivated by the desire to control the abundant natural resources an...
The novel Things fall apart depicts the cultural battle between the Igbo and the British: one was trying to keep its tradition, and one wanted to change those traditions by replacing them with a new religion. Finally, the British won because of they could figure out the falsehood in the indigenous people’s degenerate customs and attack it. Nothing in this world is perfect, and it is hard for a culture to be perfect. However, if a culture wants to develop and thrive, it should respect the value of its entire people. That was the reason why the Igbo culture was destroyed, because of its conservativeness, gender differentiation and superstitiously killing of the innocent.
In the fateful year of 1884, the Berlin Conference convened (Berlin Conference). The Nigerian natives did not know this, but, because of that meeting and many other factors, they would soon be conquered by Britain, pressured to convert to an alien religion, and would hurt culturally and economically not just during their time as a colony, but even after they achieve independence, with the their future political system inefficient and hard to reform as an added bonus. To begin, this paper’s goal is to reveal the symptoms of Britain's reign over Nigeria and how they continue to be a huge nuisance even today in the form of huge economic, ethnic, and political difficulties.
The ultimate result was troops and as many as 3 million civilians died. While the outside world considered Nigeria to be a united and monolithic entity, even the British colonial administration was wary of the reality of Nigerian politics; the nation was not so much a “country” as it was more than three hundred different groups coalesced into one. 45 These tribes were divided between three main spheres of influence: the Yoruba, the Igbo, and the Hausa. Historically, their interests were often opposed, and their cultures did not come into regular contact with one another until the British occupation.
Political instability and regime change in Nigeria will be observed in this paper. The resource curse has greatly weakened Nigeria as it has led to the numerous regime changes, the hindering of the nation’s democratization, corruption in the government, as well as, civil conflict. According to Samuels in Case Studies in Comparative Politics, Nigeria began as a group of states and empires, which were conquered by the British Empire who ruled Nigeria through indirect rule with varying degrees of rule in North and South Nigeria (Samuels, 323-326). Since they were granted independence in 1960, three republics have been created and each has ended by military rule, which led to the creation of the fourth, and current republic in Nigeria. In the current regime, Nigeria’s GDP is ranked 108 out of 156 and has been decreasing, lower than some of the non-oil-producing nations in Africa (“Nigeria”).
To adapt one of Isichei's claims, Nigeria's “confrontation with an alien culture, its conquest, and the experience of an alien rule, created … [crises]” (180). There were many riots and conflicts between the Nigerians and the British, although most of the uprisings were eventually subdued by the military power of the British. Riots were common—from the culturally rooted Yoruba riots in the West and the religious skirmishes with the Muslims and Hausa in the North, to the confrontations with the naturally ‘rich,' yet stubborn Igbo and Delta states. Apart from encompassing all the major ethnic groupings and regions in Nigeria, amazingly these conflicts also covered the three most explicit British inculcations: cultural, religious, and economic.
Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and then colonized those countries to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling countries to use the weaker countries for their resources. Colonizing other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries “scrambled” for Africa, it seemed as though Africa had no say in anything. During the 19th century, Europe found a way to use Africa for their own growth and power. Using Africa for their resources, the Europeans colonized Africa without a second thought. European imperialism in Africa had a negative impact because of social disarray, cultural loss, and death it caused.
Nigeria is a developing country in West Africa that was colonized by the British in 1884 at the Berlin conference where Africa was divided by European powers (Graham 2009). The British wanted to expand their empire, which meant taking over other countries that had resources that they wanted, and would allow them to expand their trade market and economy. One of the colonies that British colonized was Colonial Nigeria, which was forced to participate in the slave trade in the past and was controlled by the British through the set up of trading posts and selling manufactured goods. The British split Nigeria into the north and the south regions (Temple 1912). The Southern and Northern Nigeria Protectorates controlled these two regions. The Protectorates
Post-colonial politics in Nigeria are born out of civil strife, and military dictatorships. A major impetus for political schism in Nigeria was the Biafran war. Following a military coup led by an Igbo man named Chukwuma Nzeogwu in 1966, there was an anti-Igbo riot in which 30,000 Igbos were killed and up to a million Igbos fled as refugees. As a reaction to the prejudice and violence that the Hausas and the Yoruba inflicted upon the Igbos, the Igbos seceded under the leadership of General Ujokwu. They then formed a new country called Biafra in 1967. The Nigerian government immediately moved to quash the rebellion because the Biafra region was abundant in Nigeria’s most prized resource: oil.
Ever since the British takeover left Nigeria to try and create its own stable form of government with many failed constitutions they have failed to reach a maintainable form of democracy. The country has had countless military rules and leaders that have promised a push towards democracy, but instead have used their place in power to set up policies to support themselves. On top of this, a reach in power is also usually followed by subsequent extending of power to other members of the family. In this way they are able to keep themselves in charge by controlling as many different branches and positions as possible. Along with this is the complete takeover of revenues by those higher up to corrupt the country’s largest source of revenue for their own personal gain. All of these problems work against one of the most necessary steps in creating a strong democracy: the trust of the people.