British Colonial Policy And The Nigerian Civil War

2828 Words6 Pages

Timothy Vilgiate
King-Ndaya
HIST 3000
April 28, 2014
British Colonial Policy and the Ensuing Nigerian Civil War.
The Nigerian Civil War lasted from July 6, 1967 until January 15, 1970. The belligerents were the Federal Republic of Nigeria, led by the military governor Yakubu Gowon, and the Republic of Biafra, led by the military governor C. Odumegwu Ojukwu. After an abortive counter-coup d'etat in favor of Northern independence, General Ojukwu declared the independence of southeastern Nigeria. Each of these regions were dominated by one particular tribe, and the Hausa of the north long felt oppressed by the southerners underneath colonial rule, while during the short-lived military government from 1966 to 1967 the Igbo had been the victims of several pogroms within the army itself.1 2 To further complicate the tribal tensions already fueling the conflict, British Petroleum, and several other oil companies, had vested interests in vast fossil fuel reserves in the secessionist state, which they feared would be unfriendly to their business.3 The ultimate result was a 3 year civil war, during which 150, 000 troops and as many as 3 million civilians died.

While the outside world considered Nigeria to be a united and monolithic entity, even the British colonial administration was wary of the reality of Nigerian politics; the nation was not so much a “country” as it was more than three hundred different groups coalesced into one.4 5 These tribes were divided between three main spheres of influence: the Yoruba, the Igbo, and the Hausa. Historically, their interests were often opposed, and their cultures did not come into regular contact with one another until the British occupation. In spite of the differences British administration a...

... middle of paper ...

...war.

Overall, the Biafran secession and ensuing conflict essentially served as a referendum of British Colonial policy and the concept of Nigeria as a nation. Since the country had been an amalgam of diametrically opposed and diverse interests, structured for the role of a British economic subordinate, unity was never established. Instead, politics were viewed in ethnic dimensions. Other tribes were viewed with suspicion, making peace negotiations and mediation between belligerents difficult. Moreover, British policy and its establishment of unilateral economic dependence complicated efforts at democracy, and conversely limited strides towards Nigerian independence. However, the Biafran civil war, and the price paid by the Biafrans in their struggle for independence both helped to create a new sense of national identity, changing the political and cultural norms.

Open Document