Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender as a social construct of society and culture
Gender as a social construct of society and culture
Gender as a social construct of society and culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender as a social construct of society and culture
The word identity has become the most discussed idea in our society. It is described mostly, to be a word that stands for who we are. Therefore, because of who we are, identity has come to be a word that we use to claim and understand people’s actions in our society. So in this paper I will be analysing how social practices surrounding identity relates to gender in social, personal levels, through the work of three authors; by Ian Hacking on “kind making”, Margaret Somers on “Narrative construction of identity” and finally, Frederick Cooper and Rogers Brubaker on “beyond identity” . However, I will tilt more toward Frederick Cooper and Rogers Bruakers article on identity. This is because I feel that their article contributes better to my understanding of how identity relates to gender. Therefore, I hope to fully be able to outline how identity relates to gender.
First and foremost, I will look at how Identity relate to gender on a social and personal level. The reason for analysing the articles in these levels is because; the articles seem to talk of identity in either a macro, micro or in both level. First off, to show how far we can stretch and connect identity to explain many things, people and activities accoutring in our society. I will speak of the aspects of Identity and gender at a social level that are mentioned in all three articles. Identity on a social level is approached as an idea that was constructed by and used by a group of people.
First, Ian Hacking author of “Kind-Making; The case of Child abuse”, looks at the concept of child abuse as a socially constructed idea. In his article he speaks of kind making, which he identifies as the process of constructed ideas, ideas such as identity. These Constructed idea...
... middle of paper ...
...al level. I accomplished this analysis by using articles Ian Hacking on “kind making”, Margaret Somers on “Narrative construction of identity” and finally, Frederick Cooper and Rogers Brubaker on “beyond identity”. I spoke of how at the social level, identity is looked at through a macro level, where the authors speak of how identity and gender are ideas that are socially constructed. However at the personal level Identity and gender is seen as the cause of people’s actions.
REFERENCE LIST
Ian Hacking, “Kind Making: The case of Child abuse,” in The Social Construction of What? (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999), 125-162.
Frederick Cooper and Rogers Brubaker, “Beyond Identity’,” Theory and Society 29 (2000), 1-47.
Margaret R. Somers, “The Narrative Construction of identity: A Relational and Network Approach,” Theory and Society 23 (1994), 605-649.
In her book, Difference Matters, Brenda Allen discusses the importance of identity in an individual and in society. She addresses specific factors, from age to social class, that affect society. In her first chapter, more specifically, she talks about these factors as a whole in introducing the why differences matter. She then lays out the issues associated with differences in society. There are misinterpretations and misconceptions that become problematic between the relationship with individuals and society. This chapter is perfect for my topic because it shows that people differ from
Taylor, S. (2009) ‘Who We Think We Are? Identities in Everyday life’, in Taylor, S., Hinchliffe, S., Clarke, J. and Bromley, S. (eds), Making Social Lives, Milton Keynes, The Open University.
In general, identity means how one sees himself/herself and others around in order to distinguish himself/herself as different. David Snow differentiates between the ‘individual’ and ‘collective’ identity as “personal identities are the attributes and meaning attributed to oneself by the actor, they are self-designations and self-attributions regarded as personally distinctive.” (Snow 2) On the other hand, the “collective identities attributed or imputed to others in an attempt to situate them in social space. They are grounded in established social roles.”(Snow 2) This research paper aims at examining the role of ‘collective’ identity that is formed on the expenses of the ‘individual’ identity and how this leads to physical and psychological repression in Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” and Isaac Babel’s “My First Goose.”
Identity is a group of characteristics, data or information that belongs exactly to one person or a group of people and that make it possible to establish differences between them. The consciousness that people have about themselves is part of their identity as well as what makes them unique. According to psychologists, identity is a consistent definition of one’s self as a unique individual, in terms of role, attitudes, beliefs and aspirations. Identity tries to define who people are, what they are, where they go or what they want to be or to do. Identity could depend on self-knowledge, self-esteem, or the ability of individuals to achieve their goals. Through self-analysis people can define who they are and who the people around them are. The most interesting point about identity is that some people know what they want and who they are, while it takes forever for others to figure out the factors mentioned before. Many of the individuals analyzed in this essay are confused about the different possible roles or positions they can adopt, and that’s exactly the reason they look for some professional help.
Identity is very important in a person’s life. It can induce pride or shame, provide a community or provide a way to distinguish one’s self from others. But, where does this identity come from? It is easy to assume we are who we are because of who raised us, but this is not the entire case. Andrew Solomon, author of “Far from the Tree” introduced two different forms of identity, vertical and horizontal. He defines vertical identity as the attributes acquired and shared by the people we are raised by and horizontal identity as the attributes different from those who raised us, but are shared and acquired through a peer community. These two types of identities generally do not intersect and, depending on the circumstance, one can greatly impact
The identities have tended to be divided into some different categories, such as gender, race, and class, and these sources have been judged in the different ways. In other words, the different determinant factors of the individuality have been considered separately, and these components have been regarded as a unrelated simple category. Under these points of view, however, it is hard to recognize the problems of interrelated individual component of the identity. Thus, to solve the disregarding crossover point, the new theory of the “intersectionality” are essential. This essay explores the key definition of the “intersectionality” from the viewpoint of gender studies, and how the concept is connected with the social system and individual identity
“The nature of events in a 21st century society: A critical discussion of events, gender and identity”. Identity: The fact of being who or what a person or thing is. The principal objective of this paper is to establish how the role of identity and our belonging impacts on what types of events we attend, where we attend and who with whom?
Throughout society there are a lot of identities one might categorize themselves within; based on knowledge and opinions and fundamentally a way of life. The Social Identity theory, proposed by Henry Tajfel in the 1970’s is designed to explain and help aid in the understanding of how it is one might develop a connection and belonging to particular groups within society; but more importantly providing an understanding as to how the mechanics of discrimination regarding other groups work.
Deaux (2001) established numerous parts of social identity that reflect the many courses in which individuals unite with different assemblies and social categories. A label on the acquired social identity might be viewed as a painted creation with emotional association and behavioural outcomes. People often participate in their own particular and eccentric definitions of what it intend to be a specific kind of individual. As such, by acquiring an athletic identity as a woman, they ...
What is identity? Identity is an unbound formation which is created by racial construction and gender construction within an individual’s society even though it is often seen as a controlled piece of oneself. In Dr. Beverly Daniel Tatum’s piece, “The Complexity of Identity: ‘Who Am I?’, Tatum asserts that identity is formed by “individual characteristics, family dynamics, historical factors, and social and political contexts” (Tatum 105). Tatum’s piece, “The Complexity of Identity: ‘Who Am I?’” creates a better understanding of how major obstacles such as racism and sexism shape our self identity.
This assignment explores Cohen's theory of moral panic in relation to the construction of child abuse. I discuss two main ways in which the notion of "folk devils" help us to better understand the construction of child abuse, through the understanding of high profile cases to the non-static nature of child abuse within society and child protection in social services. I draw on two pivotal cases in the face of moral panic and the evolution of child protection, Peter Connelly (Baby P) and Victoria Climbié. The essay also looks at the history and changes of society's view of child abuse, as well as policy and legislation changes to child protection in Britain.
Rodgers, W,S. (2003). Selves and Identities. In: Social Psychology: Experimental and critical approaches. Maidenhead,GB: Open University Press/McGraw Hill. 229-240.
In this paper I will be focusing on Erikson’s Theory mainly about identity versus role confusion. Finding one’s identity is not always an easy task. Everyone at some point in his or her life has had, as Erikson puts it, an identity crisis. Everyone experiences different struggles that can have either a positive or negative impact on their identity. On my path to identity, I have reached identity achievement, which means I have explored and made commitments. I will also be focusing on two articles highlighting a fifth possible outcome regarding identity and looking at identity statuses as developmental trajectories.
James Marcia’s theory of identity formation was based on Erik Erikson 's “psychosocial stage theory” (Diessner, 2008) identity versus identity confusion. The foundation of which he used to identify, and divide one’s
The question ‘who am I?’ raises speculations about who we are as human beings and why we behave the way we do. This is of great interest to social psychologists. One particular theory about this social identity is that it is not fixed or innate but that it is something that changes over time and is constructed through our social interactions with other people. This essay will explicate the idea of socially constructed identities and consider the evidence for and against this view with examples of research studies from both social constructionism (Phoenix, 2007) and Social Identity Theory (SIT) (Turner and Brown, 1978).