Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial Disparities in the American Judicial System
Racial Disparities in the American Judicial System
Racial Segregation And African Americans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial Disparities in the American Judicial System
In his short story “Hymie’s Bull”, Ralph Ellison uses the story of the bums living on the train as an allegory for racial tension and classism in the Great Depression Era of America. A white bum named Hymie murders a “bull” on the train, jumps off, and escapes. When the train stops, and the Bull is found dead on the side of the tracks, they line the black bums up outside the train. They are planning to put one of them to death for the murder, although none of them committed the crime. Ellison uses numerous moments in his narrative to depict a small-scale example of the effects racism and classism have on the lives of African Americans during the Great Depression. Ellison never names the narrator in “Hymie’s Bull”. Because the narrator lacks …show more content…
a name, and therefore a person to identify with, he acts as a way in which to generalize the treatment experienced by the bums on the train. The narrator is almost de-personified - he stands to act as an ideology more so than an actual figure. This is an effective strategy to make the narrator’s struggles more relatable to a wider audience. In much the same way giving a prisoner a number instead of a name removes their identity, never naming a person at all removes identity as well. However, the removal of identity in “Hymie’s Bull” acts more to generalize experience than dehumanize. Making the narrator more relatable is a powerful tool that Ellison uses to strengthen his argument in the narrative; It allows for the story to reach a wider audience more effectively. Early in the story, the narrator climbs on top of the train car to watch the sunset. “I stood on top, feeling the wind pushing against my eyes and whipping my pants against my legs, and waved to Hymie. He had his legs locked around the open ventilator of a refrigerator car hooked next to ours” (85). In this moment, the narrator has just finished playing cards with the rest of the bums in the train car below. He climbs out on top and waves to Hymie who is sitting on the train car in front of the one of which he just climbed out. Hymie, a white man, sitting on the car in front of the rest of the black boys is incredibly symbolic. Even when placed outside of society, the bums are still separated, with the white man sitting in front of the black men. Not only does this example point out the racism embedded into society, but it also denotes the classism. Hierarchically and socioeconomically, white men are placed far ahead of black men; especially in the era this scene takes place. Another strong message drawn from the symbolism of the train is that of “separate but equal.” When this short story was published, Plessey V Ferguson had been over turned, but Ellison chooses to set the story in a time where the ideology of “separate but equal” was very prevalent.
Having set the narrative in a time in which Plessy V Ferguson had not been overturned implies that Ellison believes that the world has not changed, even though the laws have. The narrator and Hymie are both literally and metaphorically separated – in one way by the literal distance between them, in the other the difference between their skins. Although both men are bums, Hymie does have a socioeconomic foothold the black bums do not, as a white man is much more likely to be chosen for a job than a black man during the Great Depression …show more content…
Era. When a bull realizes there is a bum on the train, their job is to confront that person and make sure they no longer remain on the train. It is no coincidence that these figures always approach the bum from the front of the train, working backwards. In the setting of the train, the hierarchy remains where being closer to the front gives you more power. This metaphor is used repeatedly throughout the story. The bums are closest to the front: they have the most power, the most privilege. Then follows Hymie, who is a bum but it also white, and therefore holds more power in hierarchy. Next are the black bums, who hold the least amount of privilege possible. The climax of narration is the moment in which Hymie kills the Bull who is beating him for riding the train illegally. In this moment, the two characters are fighting and the narrator says, “Hymie fought the bull the best he could, but he fumbled in his pocket at the same time” (86). Hymie was fumbling in his pocket for a switchblade knife. Hymie succeeds in freeing his knife from his pocket and then uses the blade to attack and kill the Bull. “The bull had rolled from the cinders into the vines which lined the tracks, and lay there all bloody among the flowers that looked like lilies” (87). While the bums are on the train, they seemingly live outside of Jim Crow’s reach. However, once back in society, De Jure Racism returns. “The next day about dusk we were pulling into the yards at Montgomery, Alabama, miles down the line, and got the scare of our lives” (87). It is no coincidence that Ellison chose Montgomery, Alabama as the location to reintroduce the bums back into society. Montgomery is infamous for the anti-civil rights campaign, and Jim Crow was very much so alive and well in Alabama during the Great Depression. This location acts to remind readers of the parallelism between civil rights struggles and the struggle Ellison speaks on between the Black bums, Hymie, and the Bulls on the train. At the end of the short story, the train stops as it pulls into Montgomery.
The narrator says, “we knew Hymie’s bull had been found and some black boy had to go” (88). The black bums on the train understood that even though none of them had committed the crime, one of them would become a scapegoat. The bulls on the train don’t care who murdered the other bull; they just need to prove a point that they hold the power over the bums. One has to wonder, if Hymie had stayed on the train, would he be standing in line next to all the other bums? Or, would the institution of racism prevail and it still be presumed a black man committed the murder? I believe the later would hold to be true. In finality, the other bums on the train end up getting a pass – “But luck must’ve been with us this time because just then the storm broke and the freight started to pull out of the yard”
(88). In “Hymie’s Bull”, Ellison provides a look into the lives of bums living on trains in the Great Depression Era. Ralph Ellison is known for his narration on racial identity, and this short story serves that purpose, as well as acting as an insight into the hierarchy that exists within society of socioeconomic classes. The story shows that the black bums on the train realize that even though they may live “outside” of Jim Crow and De Facto racism, their racial identity is still working against. In a society where race determines many aspects of everyday life, the bums face many challenges despite living on the fringes of said society. This allegory is also used in a modern context in the 2013 movie Snowpiercer, directed by Joon-ho Bong. In the movie, the world has been swept into an ice age, and the only living people on earth live on a train that circles the global annually. The wealthiest people on the train live closest to the front, with socioeconomic standing diminishing the farther back one is on the train. The story is also a commentary on the hierarchy that exists in society between the classes, although to a much more extreme extent. “Hymie’s Bull” was set in the 1930’s and yet stories today still have similar content. The fact that the two stories share a common theme proves that the narrative holds a place not only contemporarily, but also modernly.
To depict the unfair daily lives of African Americans, Martin Luther King begins with an allegory, a boy and a girl representing faultless African Americans in the nation. The readers are able to visualize and smell the vermin-infested apartment houses and the “stench” of garbage in a place where African American kids live. The stench and vermin infested houses metaphorically portray our nation being infested with social injustice. Even the roofs of the houses are “patched-up” of bandages that were placed repeatedly in order to cover a damage. However, these roofs are not fixed completely since America has been pushing racial equality aside as seen in the Plessy v. Ferguson court case in which it ruled that African Americans were “separate but equal”. Ever since the introduction of African Americans into the nation for slavery purposes, the society
Originally published in 1999, Mary Pattillo’s Black Picket Fences explores the circumstances and conventions of the Black middle class, a group that has experienced both scholarly and popular neglect. In the Acknowledgments section of this work, Pattillo details the mentorship she received as a graduate student from William Julius Wilson at the University of Chicago. She recounts that Wilson often encouraged his students to extend, and even challenge his scholarly works, and that this urging provided the impetus for her research on the Black middle class (xiv). The challenge Pattillo (2013) refers to, becomes quite apparent when comparing her work to Wilson’s 1980 piece, The Declining Significance of Race. In this work, Wilson (1980) contends that in the industrial/modern era of the United States, class has surpassed race to be a salient factor of social stratification. He supplements his argument by referencing the progress and achievements of the Black middle class, relative to the “economic stagnation” of the Black underclass (p. 2). Pattillo (2013) offers a
Although Langston Hughes’ “Why, You Reckon?” is a short story, it encapsulates differences between races and classes in American society. The story highlights the desperate and hopeless lives of poor African-Americans in Harlem, New York, who would do anything just so they can fill their stomachs. Hughes adds a contrast by putting in a white man who uses his money and privileges to try to experience the exuberance of Harlem but fails to do so. Written in 1934, during the peak of racial divide in America, Langston Hughes’ “Why, you reckon?” shows that real experiences, not money, contribute to happiness.
The court case of Plessy vs. Ferguson created nationwide controversy in the United States due to the fact that its outcome would ultimately affect every citizen of our country. On Tuesday, June 7th, 1892, Mr. Homer Plessy purchased a first class ticket on the East Louisiana Railroad for a trip from New Orleans to Covington. He then entered a passenger car and took a vacant seat in a coach where white passengers were also sitting. There was another coach assigned to people who weren’t of the white race, but this railroad was a common carrier and was not authorized to discriminate passengers based off of their race. (“Plessy vs. Ferguson, syllabus”).Mr. Plessy was a “Creole of Color”, a person who traces their heritage back to some of the Caribbean, French, and Spanish who settled into Louisiana before it was part of the US (“The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow”). Even though Plessy was only one eighth African American, and could pass for a full white man, still he was threatened to be penalized and ejected from the train if he did not vacate to the non-white coach (“Plessy vs. Ferguson, syllabus). In ...
In his poems, Langston Hughes treats racism not just a historical fact but a “fact” that is both personal and real. Hughes often wrote poems that reflect the aspirations of black poets, their desire to free themselves from the shackles of street life, poverty, and hopelessness. He also deliberately pushes for artistic independence and race pride that embody the values and aspirations of the common man. Racism is real, and the fact that many African-Americans are suffering from a feeling of extreme rejection and loneliness demonstrate this claim. The tone is optimistic but irritated. The same case can be said about Wright’s short stories. Wright’s tone is overtly irritated and miserable. But this is on the literary level. In his short stories, he portrays the African-American as a suffering individual, devoid of hope and optimism. He equates racism to oppression, arguing that the African-American experience was and is characterized by oppression, prejudice, and injustice. To a certain degree, both authors are keen to presenting the African-American experience as a painful and excruciating experience – an experience that is historically, culturally, and politically rooted. The desire to be free again, the call for redemption, and the path toward true racial justice are some of the themes in their
From beginning to end the reader is bombarded with all kinds of racism and discrimination described in horrific detail by the author. His move from Virginia to Indiana opened a door to endless threats of violence and ridicule directed towards him because of his racial background. For example, Williams encountered a form of racism known as modern racism as a student at Garfield Elementary School. He was up to win an academic achievement prize, yet had no way of actually winning the award because ?The prize did not go to Negroes. Just like in Louisville, there were things and places for whites only? (Williams, 126). This form of prejudice is known as modern racism because the prejudice surfaces in a subtle, safe and socially acceptable way that is easy to rationalize.
On the hot day of August 2, 1943, a racial storm brewed within Harlem, New York. With the Detroit riots in just weeks past, the white and black people of Harlem felt a mutual, chaotic animosity towards each other. As a result, the Harlem race riots of 1943 occurred just before James Baldwin’s 19th birthday, which was also the day of his father’s death. Leaving a devastating gash in the hearts of Harlem natives and the American people, this event not only touched the lives of Harlem’s residents, but also exhibited a picture to the world regarding American race relations.
Fueled by fear and ignorance, racism has corrupted the hearts of mankind throughout history. In the mid-1970’s, Brent Staples discovered such prejudice toward black men for merely being present in public. Staples wrote an essay describing how he could not even walk down the street normally, people, especially women, would stray away from him out of terror. Staples demonstrates his understanding of this fearful discrimination through his narrative structure, selection of detail, and manipulation of language.
While whites lived comfortable lives in their extravagant mansions and driving their fancy cars blacks had to live in a disease infested neighborhood with no electricity or in door plumbing. Approximately one thousand people lived in shacks that were squeezed together in a one-mile zone. The alleys were filled with dirt, rats, human wasted and diseases. Blacks lived in houses made of “old whitewash, a leaking ceiling of rusted Inx propped up by a thin wall of crumbling adobe bricks, two tiny windows made of cardboard and pieces of glass, a creaky, termite-eaten door low for a person of average height to pass through...and a floor made of patches of cement earth”(31). Living in such a degrading environment kills self-esteem, lowers work ethic and leaves no hope for the future.
The story I chose for this analysis is “Why, you reckon?” by Langston Hughes. IN this analysis I will be focusing on how the great depression in Harlem had effect on the story, how racism played a part, and how or if the characters were justifyied in their actions. During this time period the intense racial divide combined with the economic harships that plagued the U.S. during the 1923’s makes for an interesting story that makes you think if the charaters were really justified.
Racism is not only a crime against humanity, but a daily burden that weighs down many shoulders. Racism has haunted America ever since the founding of the United States, and has eerily followed us to this very day. As an intimidating looking black man living in a country composed of mostly white people, Brent Staples is a classic victim of prejudice. The typical effect of racism on an African American man such as Staples, is a growing feeling of alienation and inferiority; the typical effect of racism on a white person is fear and a feeling of superiority. While Brent Staples could be seen as a victim of prejudice because of the discrimination he suffers, he claims that the victim and the perpetrator are both harmed in the vicious cycle that is racism. Staples employs his reader to recognize the value of his thesis through his stylistic use of anecdotes, repetition and the contrast of his characterization.
Well, I tell you, you all stink to me.” (Steinbeck, 68). In this conversation between Lennie and African American stable buck Crooks, Crooks explains why he could not accept playing cards together with other ranch hands. The fact that other ranch hands discriminate against Crooks because of their skin colour is one of the important examples that prove social belief that race was one factor in determining a person’s value in the Depression era. Crooks were isolated from the sand.
this story that causes controversy because of his skin color. Is the story’s relevance based on Mr. Robinson and his skin color? In my opinion yes, the book revolves all around his skin color and racism of the time. Tom Robinson is treated unfairly because he was black not because of what he supposedly did. The controversial subject matter in this book is immense in numbers, but out of all them, racism stands out the most. A question that has come to mind after reading this book is, today is racism still a hostile problem and as big as it was in the 1930s? Throughout this research paper I will gather information about racism from the 30s, and also today. Then I’ll compare and contrast the differences between the past and present and come to a conclusion.
The impact that race had on individuals throughout American history is clear. The role race had on social and political relations were nothing but negative and struggled to make positive progression. Starting from the last 1800s, the recognition that, for example, blacks were unfairly treated and seen as unequal was newly acted upon. From the early years of being seen as just economically useful, the feelings of blacks were overlooked and almost irrelevant to the leaders of society. One of the first displays of action against this discrimination is shown in the Plessy v. Ferguson case. While being the victim of segregation in the south as a black man, Homer Plessy challenged the courts when he directly acted against the laws separating whites and blacks by being a passenger on a white-only train. The outcome, however, directly meant nothing, leading to the legalization of segregation laws stating that the separate but equal laws didn’t imply inferiority. The decision made in Plessy v. Ferguson was an immediate disaster for racial relations in the US, but you can only push people so far until they finally snap.
Brent Staples focuses on his own experiences, which center around his perspective of racism and inequality. This perspective uniquely encapsulates the life of a black man with an outer image that directly affects how others perceive him as a person. Many readers, including myself, have never experienced the fear that Staples encounters so frequently. The severity of his experiences was highlighted for me when he wrote, “It also made it clear that I was indistinguishable from the muggers who occasionally seeped into the area from the surrounding ghetto.” (135) Having to accept that fact as a reality is something that many people will never understand. It is monumentally important that Staples was able to share this perspective of the world so others could begin to comprehend society from a viewpoint different from their