How Tracy Austin Broke My Heart

464 Words1 Page

In David Foster Wallace’s essay, “How Tracy Austin Broke My Heart,” he argues that the true talent of star athletes is to completely engross themselves in playing the game. While worshipping the “power and grace and control” of her, he notes that such talent does not stretch to the field of writing (143) He continues by saying, her memoir did not meet reader’s expectation, which is to take a peek at the secrets of her God-given talent. As a matter of fact, Wallace suspects that the exceptional talent of athletes can only be brought out by their apathetic and ignorant nature when it concerns something other than their passion. He supports this claim by first describing talents Tracy Austin displayed at a very young age. After playing in games against older …show more content…

He, then, lists the varying degrees of naïveté she displays. For instance, illegally accepting money to play in a match and receiving a costly jewelry from a stranger. In the same fashion, he emphasizes her miserable failure to recognize and communicate with the reader as she “forgets who it’s supposed to be for” (144). Instead, “the author’s [primary allegiance seems to be to her family and friends” (145). Towards the end of the text, he develops the argument even more by indicating the tone of the writing and the insipid vocabularies used through out. The “same air of robotic banality” of every “sports-memoir genre… [and] media” is also present in her writing. The vapidity of the text was the most noticeable at the part where she described the tragedy and the acceptance that follows with the same bland voice, even though she had to “think about the end of the only life she’d ever known” (151).

Open Document