Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of sports on academic performance of the students
Effects of sports on academic performance of the students
Effect of sports on academic performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For sometime, schools have been debating if sport programs should go, or stay. Having athletics as an option can be a major distraction and could prevent students from learning to the best of their abilities.Therefore, school sports should be eliminated to save districts money, allow students more free time, and help them focus on academics. At the end of each year there is a significant amount of money spent on athletic programs, which would be reduced for school districts if sports were cancelled. In the article “Should Your School Get Rid of Sports?” Amanda Ripley states that “by suspending sports, the superintendent of Premont High School, realized the district could save $150,000 in one year,” this is because “no one realizes their actual cost” (11). Ripley goes on to state that “yes, even though there are concessions at games to help with the cost, there is rarely enough to cover the massive amount spent to begin with” (11). This shows that there is way more money spent on athletic programs than there should be. This is important because if the extracurricular activities are cut, more money can be saved for schools and can be used for academic purposes. Clearly schools are spending way too much money on athletic programs; however, by eliminating sports it will also allow …show more content…
students to have more free time. Ripley quoted a former Premont quarterback who said, “there was all this extra time” (11). Since, ‘there was no Friday night games to look forward to and no cheerleaders making posters in the hallways” it was said to be “eerily quiet” at Premont during the fall of 2012 (Ripley 11). This also shows that by cutting school sports students will be able to take a break, relax, and do things they enjoy. Therefore, it is clear that by cancelling athletic programs, more spare time will be available to students. Although, it is extremely important for students to have downtime it is also just as critical to have sports eliminated so the main focus can be on academics.
The author states that “ 80 percent passed their classes” after sports were cancelled ”compared with 50 percent the previous fall” (Ripley 11). Autumn of 2012 “about 160 people attended parent-teacher night, compared to 6 the year before” when athletic programs had been in play (Ripley 11). Yes, even though sports are important to many, academics should be our main priority because it is relied upon in the future. As a result, by changing the primary focus from athletics to learning more success can be
achieved. It is indicated that by executing athletics, learners will be able to have more money and time going towards intellectual academic purposes. Clearly, after physical activity is cancelled the problem with costs, time, and grades are now nonexistent. This shows that once sports are excluded many other opportunities will be available to students in schools across the country.
Amanda Ripley argues in The Atlantic in her article “The Case Against High School Sports”, that the United States place too much attention on sports rather than academics. Ripley argues that sports programs at schools should be reduced, maybe even cut out completely. She states that there are a lot of countries that outperform America on international tests, and it is because they put more of their emphasis on academics, where the United States puts more of an emphasis on athletics. Ripley says that high school sports negatively affects academics. (1). I disagree with Ripley on this topic; I think that sports are important for young kids because it teaches them very valuable life lessons and it keeps them out of trouble.
Athletics in American schools have always been controversial for many reasons. Some of these reasons include health concerns, safety precautions, and academic significance. Daniel H. Bowen and Colin Hitt wrote an article titled, “High-School Sports Aren’t Killing Academics” to present the factors of positive correlation between success in athletics and academics. I believe that athletics in high schools not only benefit students socially, but also academically.
After reading " The Case Against High School Sports" by Amanda Ripley started to make me think. There were many strong points about how the priorities of the sports are beginning to be more important to students than their education. Another great point was that the financing and budgeting is unfairly distributed throughout school districts and is spent more on athletics and clubs and not enough on classes. And I Believe that schools should put certain restrictions on the spending and promoting or in school sports and clubs because of the major drop in national and world comparisons.
Sports are a crucial part of an individual 's character. Counter arguments made against having sports at schools are getting more and more public. The arguments make people, think again about having students play sports. Sports are useful because they give players skills they can use on and off the field: strength, leadership, and confidence.
Over the course of time, schools have invested all their finances on sports like football. Primarily, the sport had initiated as a form of recreational fun, but therefore lead into a trend. This popular trend later spread into competitiveness and in some schools, even idolized. At Premont High School, a small school in Texas, it was threatening to be shut down for the neglection of academics and a misuse of finance. All money funded was focused on being used to support all sports and the money raised, was a large amount of money. The solution was to suspend all sports and with that, changes were made. Teachers were retrained, the curriculum was raised to the appropriate standard, and too much avail, academics improved significantly. According to the article, when sports have been dominating, only 50 percent of the students were passing their classes. After changes were made, 80 percent were now passing. The author argues that with the suspension of sports, academics would be at a higher level than they are. With this argument, I agree with Ripley’s motion to cancel all sports. To many students, such as myself, it may seem irrational and absurd at first, but realistically it is a reasonable solution. Tons of money is being spent primarily to a sport and most times, aren't even at a winning season. Sports should not the prime focus. Schools are not instituted to emphasis on sports
Some people don’t know why schools are trying to drop interscholastic sports. Some schools are trying to get rid of the sports that are going on for the district because of the cost to cover the injuries for the players or the cost of the equipment. Although people say that the equipment for school events like football pads, football cleats and basketball things. If the price goes down on the equipment schools would probably buy a lot of the equipment so they don’t have to buy it so they have extra material for events if something breaks or gets ruined. Among the cost of the equipment school districts would possibly use the same equipment.
Financial aspects and profitability of college athletic programs is one of the most important arguments involved in this controversy. A group of people expresses that college athletic programs are over emphasized. The point they show on the first hand, is that athletic programs are too expensive for community colleges and small universities. Besides, statistics prove that financial aspects of college athletic programs are extremely questionable. It is true that maintenance, and facility costs for athletic programs are significantly high in comparison to academic programs. Therefore, Denhart, Villwock, and Vedder argue that athletic programs drag money away from important academics programs and degrade their quality. According to them, median expenditures per athlete in Football Bowl Subdivision were $65,800 in 2006. And it has shown a 15.6 percent median expenditure increase fro...
When schools make budget cuts, they usually take money from athletic programs and clubs. The author is essentially saying that schools have taken away funding from too many programs that it feels as if they will will even stop funding necessary programs in order to say money. This critique on budget cuts helps us see the problem within the public school system. Certain activities that are common in other schools will be seen as a luxury to students in other schools and therefor are not given the same opportunities. The underfunded schools have taken away money from many programs that they will now have to stop funding certain areas that are key to a student’s education.
When students have to pay to play on their high school team, they not only have to do that, but also pay for any other expenses for that sport. A high school sport can cost a great deal of money without paying to play. Paying for warm-ups, gear, and other related equipment, can add up very fast along with paying to play for a sport. “Paying for equipment, facilities, uniforms, transportation, and coaches’ salaries results in a cumbersome financial burden.”(Cerling & Herman,
The average family spends $100-$500 a month on sports. People have been doing sports for ever. Some people would be very angry if schools decided to get rid of them. Sports are dangerous though. They are causing parents to pressure their kids, students are becoming sleep deprived, and they are dangerous even though they can be healthy in some ways. Youth sports are harmful to students because they can be parents are pressuring their kids, they are dangerous, and many students are becoming sleep deprived.
Ultimately, both male and female sports will have to be cut because schools simply can’t afford to pay players. Budgets across the collegiate landscape are already struggling to fund sports.
I believe schools should not force students to participate in organized sports. Medical conditions, such as asthma, prevent students from being able to participate. Family situations may leave the student with no ride to or from practice. Students may not have time to be able to
The topic of whether the art or sports budget in schools be cut to fund the other is very debatable. Arguments from omit supporting sides are valid, as sports and arts shape a student’s mind. The Evergreen School District’s budget for the programs deflated and is in need of a solution. Either the art or sports funding be cut, to fund the other. This has caused an uproar from students attending the school district. Arts and sports are both fundamental to students, but under these circumstances, the deplete of the art program’s funding is the only answer. Sports ought to stay in school, as it teaches how to work in teams, keeps you healthy, and prevents students from committing crimes.
Because these schools don’t have enough money to provide the resources to educate their students, it is likely they are unable to expend funds on sports activities. This results in sports programs being cut first, right behind music and art. Since many of these programs offer a way for adolescents to escape reality, it is a necessity that we fund these programs. Sports programs are a way for adolescents to experience physical skill development and critical
Sports programs have been an integral part of all schools. They support the academics of the school and therefore foster success in life. These programs are educational and help produce productive citizenship. They help students experience and build skills that may help them in their future, like interpersonal and time management skills. Education may kindle the light of knowledge, but sports help to maintain the proper physique. Sports are also an important means of entertainment and a use for energy after long hours of study. Sports increase a student’s performance not only in the classroom but also in their life.