More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of college athletics on academics
Effect of college athletics on academics
Positive impact of sports and students
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I believe that students should not have to pay to play. Some schools are making students pay to play for their sport. By making students pay to play, it can cause many issues and problems between families and schools. Schools nationwide are starting to enforce this new concept for students by making them pay to play. When schools make this change, students will have to pay for more expenses, earn their spot on the team, and it can make them second guess about playing a sport.
When students have to pay to play on their high school team, they not only have to do that, but also pay for any other expenses for that sport. A high school sport can cost a great deal of money without paying to play. Paying for warm-ups, gear, and other related equipment, can add up very fast along with paying to play for a sport. “Paying for equipment, facilities, uniforms, transportation, and coaches’ salaries results in a cumbersome financial burden.”(Cerling & Herman,
…show more content…
2007, p. 1). This is an example that students should not be required to pay for all of this when they pay to play. When prices get to be too much, some students will start to drop out and not play sports. This is not fair to the students who cannot afford to play. For the wealthier students, it is a privilege to play, because it's not a huge issue of paying to play. Many parents will complain because they can't afford it, because their student can't play their favorite sport. This is a largely known issue when schools make students pay to play. Playing for team that must be paid for, shows whether students can afford it or not. In some schools, the fees are not a great amount of money to pay for. In bigger schools, the amount of money can add up to great amounts, because the schools have more students. Many students are asking themselves where are they going to get all of this extra money to pay for their sport. Most students can’t have a job because there is no time to have one. Between school, homework, and practices, students are unable to have a job to help pay for their sport. When one school in an area enforce pay to play, other schools in that area will switch also. More and more high schools across the country are switching to make students pay to play. “Increasingly, pay to pay fees are becoming a reality of high school athletics.” (Popke, 2007, p. xx). This makes a much greater conflict between students and paying to play for sports. When playing a sport a student should showed dedication and put the hard work to have a spot on the team, not by paying from their wallet. On a team, a position should not be purchased. When a student is on a team, that students’ family is going to come and watch them play. Having to pay to play parents and families are going to already pay to get into the games, so why make them pay for their child to be on a team. When a student wants to play sport the only thing that they think about is buying some equipment.
They don't think about paying for the sport they are going to play. This can make students second-guess themselves about playing and make them not want to play their sport. Schools should want more and more students to play sports. These reasons are terrible for students to stay in active and not play any sports. “Taxpayers are saying, ‘Let’s get rid of sports. We don’t have to pay for them,’ School boards are saying ‘Hey, it’s not mandatory to offer these programs.’ What we’re saying is, ‘Well, we still have something to offer that is very important in this country.’” (Popke, 2007, p. xx). Sports teach to students a lot in their life, it's a great deal of responsibility. So when students aren't playing sports they can be missing out on important lessons in their life. “While these programs are important to the students’ educational growth, the bills inevitably add up.”(Cerling & Herman, 2007, p.
xx) While schools want to enforce this pay to play, they need to think about if it is really worth it for students to go through the extra struggle? Students shouldn’t need to spend that extra money to play a sport. They should not be paying for a spot on the team, they need to earn it themselves. This rule that schools are starting to enforce, should not make students second guess themselves about playing a sport they want to do. Schools need to think about how these possible problems that might arise in the future if this is enforced. This is why schools should not make their students pay to play.
I believe that kids should not pay to play sports because if their families do not have a lot of money, they can’t afford to participate.So what if they are really good at that sport and can’t afford it? Perhaps you ask, What will the coach do now?, you just lost a star player just because he had very little money. So if was a coach I would take that 65.00 to100.00 dollars off hoping it will bring back the kids that were playing in the first places. But you can’t bring the price up again it will just drive them back off.
Money Hurts College athletes attend post-secondary schools in order to receive an education and to participate in sports. “Student athletes participate in an organized competitive sport sponsored by the educational institution in which he or she is enrolled. Student athletes must typically balance the roles of being a full-time student and a full-time athlete” (“Student athlete” 1). Additionally, some people believe athletes should receive a salary. However, paying college athletes hurts the school, the sports, and the athletes.
In conclusion, I think student-athletes should get paid for racking up revenue for their universities, the amount of time they spend in their sports, and by paying student-athletes, it may increase their motivation to reach academic success and steer them clear from unsolicited activities. The efforts of student-athletes must be acknowledged because they have given their best effort and countless hours of their time to represent their universities in the best way possible.
The argument whether a student-athlete should be paid to play or not be paid is one that spans the ages. College sports are considered to be of amateur status by the NCAA. Therefore they believe student-athletes should not receive a pay check to participate in a sport. However on the other end of the spectrum, many critics believe that student-athletes should receive pay for play because not only are they participating in a sport, they are entertaining the spectators. They believe that if performers in the entertainment industry are paid, why not pay the college-athletes.
In college sports athletes perform on the big stage in front of thousands of people every week and receive no money for their performances. These athletes receive no money for their performance because it is made illegal by the NCAA for any student athlete to receive any type of reward for their performance. In the last five years there has been a heated debate on whether the NCCA should start paying college athletes. People responded to this situation with mixed views and opinions. The first reason that people have shown views against pay for play is because scholarships pay for college athlete’s school either fully or partially. Secondly people believe pay for play would create jealousy and hypocrisy on college campuses between administration, college students, and other civic workers. The first reason that people have been convinced about pay for play is overpaid college coaches who make millions for the little work they do. Next the NCCA, Colleges, and merchandisers profit millions off the athletes every week without any of that revenue given back to the athletes. Next people believe scholarships are ineffective or incomplete. Lastly people believe the corrupt system of the NCAA is a reason college athletes should be paid. The NCCA has proposed plans to enact a pay for play plan including adding a two thousand dollar stipend for student athletes but this has been on hold for now. In society for student athletes to succeed in college and college careers the NCCA must pay them.
The average family spends $100-$500 a month on sports. People have been doing sports for ever. Some people would be very angry if schools decided to get rid of them. Sports are dangerous though. They are causing parents to pressure their kids, students are becoming sleep deprived, and they are dangerous even though they can be healthy in some ways. Youth sports are harmful to students because they can be parents are pressuring their kids, they are dangerous, and many students are becoming sleep deprived.
Some of these students are star athletes and recreation becomes the primary factor in their lives. It has been set into their minds when they were young by their parents and piers. Early in their lives the child is taught the importance of being the best and nothing else matters. The school system now comes to realize how important this athlete has become to the school team and grades are given to keep the student on the team, and problems are just pushed aside.
Many high schools today face the dilemma whether to have their student athlete’s pay-to-play or cut all funding for sports. Tremendous amounts of high schools across the country have put the pay-to-play act into effect. All schools should put this act into action for many reasons. First, it creates more capital for the school’s athletic budget. Second, students can set up fundraisers to reduce the fees charged to play each sport. Lastly, high school sports are a privilege not a right.
I believe schools should not force students to participate in organized sports. Medical conditions, such as asthma, prevent students from being able to participate. Family situations may leave the student with no ride to or from practice. Students may not have time to be able to
A common argument against this position is that the athletes should be paid. Many of the colleges make hundreds of millions a year from people coming to see the athletes play. This being said many people think the players should each get a portion of that money, because they’re the ones bringing the major crowds in. People are failing to consider that college athletes are already
One major topic of controversy in today’s society is whether or not the NCAA should allow college athletes to get paid. As of right now, the closest thing to payment athletes can receive for playing sports is an athletic scholarship. Although some people believe that an athletic scholarship is enough compensation for college athletes, the NCAA should start allowing colleges to pay athletes for playing sports at their school because it would help control the salaries of college coaches, athletics are a major source of revenue for schools, and it could help keep athletes on the right track.
If players are given the opportunity to make money and be paid, they should be able to accept these offers. Yes, extra expenses such as plane tickets home and other personal costs are a luxury, but if other full-time students can afford these luxuries and the ability to work towards them, shouldn’t the full-time student athletes be able to as well? Student athletes work just as hard in their field as the other non-athlete students do. One of the main arguments against paying student athletes is that they are being paid with a free education, but when education is no longer a priority and students are worked day in and day out at practices there is a problem with this argument.
According to statistics gathered by youth sports organizations, “Up to 50 million kids play youth sports in America, and 73 percent of those who begin playing a sport quit before they turn 13” (Binns). The children could have quit because they did not like the disappointment of losing, or because they are exhausted from their parents pushing them too hard. But parents have their reasons for pushing their children into sports. “Studies show that kids who play sports are less likely to become obese, abuse drugs or alcohol or to perform poorly in school” (McCormick). If children are not active, then they will most likely become overweight, and if they have nothing to do in their pastime, they may turn to drugs and alcohol, which usually leads to a decrease in grades in school.
Because these schools don’t have enough money to provide the resources to educate their students, it is likely they are unable to expend funds on sports activities. This results in sports programs being cut first, right behind music and art. Since many of these programs offer a way for adolescents to escape reality, it is a necessity that we fund these programs. Sports programs are a way for adolescents to experience physical skill development and critical
Bissinger states in his essay that local high schools these days are spending millions of dollars on things such as elaborate stadiums, gymnasiums and even chartered planes to transport their team to big play-off championship games. In the past, schools would sponsor fundraisers to RAISE the money for these t...