Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Operant conditioning theory
Operant conditioning theory
Effect of operant conditioning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Big Bang Theory, is a television show which utilizes many psychological tactics. In this specific scene, Sheldon demonstrated multiple conditioning methods on both Penny and Leonard. All of these techniques are what psychology refers to as operant conditioning. In operant conditioning, the experimenter could use positive and negative reinforcement, as well as positive and negative punishment. Out of these four methods, we see Sheldon apply positive and negative reinforcement, along with positive punishment. One method which Sheldon employed was positive reinforcement. Although Penny was frustrated with Sheldon, we can infer this because of the tone of Penny’s voice and her threat to punch Sheldon, Penny offered to take away Sheldon’s plate. Sheldon deemed this behaviour as correct, and extended a chocolate, otherwise known as the reinforcement. Penny enjoys the chocolate, as she later exclaims how the chocolates taste “so good.” Therefore, Penny likes the consequence, so as long as the reinforcement is on a continuous schedule, the likelihood of the target behaviour repeating increases. …show more content…
Sheldon is known to become upset when someone sits in his spot. With this in mind, Penny sits down, realizes this and switches spots. Penny did not need for Sheldon to reprimand her, nor did the sight of Sheldon act as a stimulus for her to move spots. Sheldon is impressed and reinforces the desired behaviour by presenting a chocolate. This is referred to as negative and positive reinforcement. In this case, Penny uses avoidance to negate the unwanted consequence. By doing so, Sheldon is eliminating the unwanted behaviour, which is sitting in his spot. The likelihood hood of this behaviour repeating
In second grade I was apart of a wild classroom. Their was a lot of chaos from all the young children. My teacher struggled to get everyone on task and to complete our work. After some time my teacher decided to make up a reward system (positive reinforcement). The children in the classroom were able to earn tickets for doing their homework, being respectful, and many other things. We were able to save these tickets and cash them in on fridays for treats, toys, or even sometimes extra recess. The teacher had a separate system for when we misbehaved. There were 3 colors you could earn everyday. If you weren’t on task, out of your seat, or just being disruptive she would change your color from green to yellow. If it happened again you got a red card and lost your tickets you earned for that day. This is a perfect example of positive punishment. It gave each child an opportunity to earn tickets for good behavior, and a warning system with the cards that possibly would lead to losing your earned tickets. Our teacher was using operant conditioning to produce a change in our
Joshua Klein’s experiment relates to the topic of operant conditioning that we learned in our class. According to Behavior Analysis and Learning, Operant conditioning is an increase or decrease in operant response as a function of the consequences that have followed the response. In Klein’s case, we want the behavior of picking up coins and putting it in the vending machine to increase. He uses the peanuts as reinforcement for the operant response.
“Operant conditioning is a method of learning that occurs through rewards and punishments for behavior. Through operant conditioning, an association is made between a behavior and a consequence for that behavior” (Cherry). Positive reinforcement which is praising a person for doing something good verses negative reinforcement which is an unpleasant remark a punishment. B.F. Skinner did an experiment on a rat, the rat was taught to push two buttons, one to receive food and the other was a light electric shock. The rat tried both buttons and realized which button was good and which one was bad. This experiment goes to show that upon the rewards and punishment system one can learn their rights from their wrongs through a series of lessons. Kincaid and Hemingway both use operant conditioning to show human behavior under stimulus control.
The only problem was Bart had realized that and started misbehaving again. In phase three of Lisa's plan, Lisa planned to use reinforcement and a little punishment. As a form of positive reinforcement, Lisa promised Bart her lunch for a few weeks, a primary reinforcer. If Bart helped Lisa clean up the burger wrappers, she offered Bart all the money saved up in her piggy bank ($5) and her allowance per week ($2), a secondary reinforcer. For the first half of the day, Bart kept his deal up with Lisa. Soon after Bart began to get lazy which resulted in Lisa putting all her chores on Bart, the addition of something unpleasant: positive punishment. Every time Bart picked up a wrapper to help Lisa or cleaned up a dish, Lisa rewarded Bart with another week of her allowance. Lisa is using a continuous reinforcement schedule. Since Bart woke up at 8 a.m. and his parents would be home at 8 p.m., for every hour Bart cleaned he would be rewarded. Lisa put Bart on a fixed interval schedule giving him by giving him a high five each hour he continued to clean for. Whenever Lisa caught Bart doing what he was supposed to do, she put in place the reinforcement. Lisa put Bart on a variable ratio schedule. By 8 p.m. when their parents got home, Bart was nearly unrecognizable. He helped by cleaning, was nice, and respectful to his sister. He even stopped his violent ways! Lisa's use of psychology worked! She had never been
Hence, in his experiment, Skinner placed rats in the Skinner box and observed its’ behaviors. Initially, these rats would be randomly moving around exploring, and would usually press the bar accidently. At this point, a food pellet would drop into the tray. He observed that if a hungry rat receives a pellet of food when it presses a lever after, maybe 2 minutes have elapsed since the last pellet, then its response rate increases with the passage of time. In other words, after the first incident of the food pellet dropping into the tray, the rate of the rats pressing the bar rises dramatically and remains high until the rats hunger were satisfied. Thus, this study showed a clear association made between the behavior and the consequence of that behavior. In this case, the consequence of a behavior encouraged the repetition of that behavior also known as positive reinforcement.
Operant conditioning is a kind of conditioning, which examines how often a behavior will or occur depending on the effects of the behavior (King, 2016, pg. ). The words positive and negative are used to apply more significance to the words reinforcement or punishment. Positive is adding to the stimulus, while negative is removing from the stimulus (King, 2016). For instance, with positive reinforcement, there is the addition of a factor to increase the number of times that the behavior occurs (King, 2016). An example of positive reinforcement is when a child is given an allowance for completing their household chores. The positive reinforcement is the allowance which helps to increase the behavior of doing chores at home. In contrast with negative
CBT adopts a perspective on learned behavior, whereas unhealthy behaviors can be learned and un-learned and then substituted for more healthy behaviors. This form of therapy does not assume that people are innately flawed, rather their environment and behaviors modeled by others teach them how to behave. Another important aspect of CBT is that thoughts and beliefs influence behavior. Social scientist and their theories such as Pavlov’s classical conditioning and Skinner’s operant conditioning contributed to the make-up of the CBT. Classical conditioning explains human behavior as a response to repeated stimuli. In relevance to Mrs. Kay’s case, the crying behaviors and feelings of helplessness are classically condition. In regards to operant conditioning, human behavior is contingent on reinforcements. A reward or positive reinforcement for a particular behavior encourages the behavior to continue and/or improve. In contrast, discipline or negative reinforcement of a behavior discourages the behavior from continuing, as well as allows the person to avoid unwanted or uncomfortable experiences. Both positive and negative reinforcements can lead a person to continuing the behavior that will give them the reinforcement that they desire. In regards to Mrs. Kay, her silence and lack of request may have lead caretakers to praise her being so easy to manage and strong, which made her feel good and
- As a child, you received positive verbal reinforcement for eating a carrot, and still expect such positive factors to happen if you continue such behaviour.
If a behavior is desirable, consequences called reinforcers are used to encourage the behavior in the future, via the process of reinforcement. Reinforcement can be positive (presenting reinforcing stimulus) or negative (removing a negative stimulus). However, if a behavior is undesired, a negative consequence can be used to discourage the behavior, through the process of either positive or negative punishment. In positive punishment, a negative consequence is presented after the undesired behavior occurs. When negative punishment it used the idea is the same “to discourage future display of undesired behavior,” but instead of presenting a negative stimulus, a desired stimulus is removed following the behavior.
Behavior modification is based on the principles of operant conditioning, which were developed by American behaviorist B.F. Skinner. In his research, he put a rat in a cage later known as the Skinner Box, in which the rat could receive a food pellet by pressing on a bar. The food reward acted as a reinforcement by strengthening the rat's bar-pressing behavior. Skinner studied how the rat's behavior changed in response to differing patterns of reinforcement. By studying the way the rats operated on their environment, Skinner formulated the concept of operant conditioning, through which behavior could be shaped by reinforcement or lack of it. Skinner considered his discovery applicable to a wide range of both human and animal behaviors(“Behavior,” 2001).
First, be sure to recognize the difference between reinforcement and punishment. To increase the desired behavior, reinforcement should be used. Punishment is used to decrease unwanted behaviors. Second, when an adult begins to use positive reinforcement and ignoring the inappropriate behavior, some students may begin to exhibit behavior that get worst. This abnormal behavior is referred to as “extinction burst”. The student is acting out in an effort to generate the reinforcement they use to get from the adult. Thirdly, teachers and adults should use positive reinforces that are attainable quickly and easily. Sometimes, food is not accessible and is not appropriate so positive phrases work well. Lastly, inappropriate behaviors should always be ignored, unless they are
“Behavior theory consists of ideas about how human actions and emotions develop, are sustained, and are extinguished through principles of learning” (Walsh, 2010). Positive and negative reinforcement is used to help manipulate the behaviors of the individual. The theory has been used to help eliminate unwanted behaviors. In addition, behavior theory has been use primarily with children, and persons with developmental disabilities. According to Walsh (2010) behavior theory evolved in the 1960s from a field of philosophy to the field of science. Ivan Pavlov discovered classical conditioning, which plays a major role in behavioral theory. Classical conditioning is the process of learning through ones surroundings, conditioned, and unconditioned stimuli and response. B. F. Skinner discovered operant conditioning the process of learning to influence the future responses to the environment (Clark, 2004). The two concepts has been used throughout the behavior theory to help assist clients with unacceptable behaviors that is occurring. The combination of the two concepts has been a very helpful aspect to the behavior theory. Both concepts offer a different approach or solution to the behavior of the client.
B.F. Skinner is a major contributor to the Behavioral Theory of personality, a theory that states that our learning is shaped by positive and negative reinforcement, punishment, modeling, and observation. An individual acts in a certain way, a.k.a. gives a response, and then something happens after the response. In order for an action to be repeated in the future, what happens after the response either encourages the response by offering a reward that brings pleasure or allows an escape from a negative situation. The former is known as positive reinforcement, the latter known as negative reinforcement (Sincero, 2012). A teenager who received money for getting an “A” is being positively reinforced, while an individual who skips a class presentation is being negatively reinforced by escaping from the intense fear and anxiety that would have occurred during the presentation.
My measurable, specific and realistic goal for this quarter is to exercise at least 10 hours a week by weightlifting, running, and swimming for the next 10 weeks. To be able to do that, I would need to have positive reinforcement to keep me going, help give me that little push that I need every day. One positive reinforcement that I absolutely love to use is food. After a hard day of working out, I buy myself something nice to eat, like good pizza or burritos. This way I become more likely to work out knowing that I will get something doo to eat after. I like to believe that food is my number 1 enforcer. It will always be there when I need it, it satisfies me tremendously, and overall it is just ridiculously reinforcing. As a result I try to
Reinforcements can strengthen behaviour and can be positive, desired by students, or negative, which involve something undesired being taken away (Eggen & Kauchak, 2010). Sophie can begin the reinforcement extrinsically by introducing an immediate reward to students who complete their homework nightly, such as extended computer time (Brady & Scully, 2005). She can also reinforce their intrinsic motivations by providing stimulating and engaging homework tasks. Skinner’s (as cited in Brady & Scully, 2005) theory of operant conditioning promotes use of reinforcement, and states importance of the knowing student’s needs, likes, dislikes, and interests in deciding reinforcements. However, Bennett (2010) states BM models based entirely around rewards are doomed to fail as students may not respond, however nearly all respond to punishment. Punishments can shape student’s behaviour as they begin to understand consequences. Sophie needs to enforce punishments that are fair, proportional, consistent, meaningful, and immediate (Bennett, 2010). Storey and Post (2012) state that the longer the delay between the two punishments, the more ineffective the punishment. An example of a punishment could be sending students to time-out or removing class priviledges. If Sophie’s students do not connect to the reinforcements and punishments, they will cease to be