Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The namesake jhumpa lahiri literary analysis
The namesake jhumpa lahiri literary analysis
Jhumpa lahiri the namesake essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The namesake jhumpa lahiri literary analysis
Jhumpa Lahiri obviously uses indirect literary techniques to characterize Mrs. Das. Some of these characterization techniques Lahiri uses to describe Mrs. Das include: physical description, details, dialogue, and background information. “The family looked Indian but dressed as foreigners did, the children in stiff, brightly colored clothing and caps with translucent visors.” (Lahiri 147) In the beginning of the story we can see in this quote that Lahiri shows a theme, the difficulty of communication, where it shows a contrast between Indians and Indian Americans. Mr. Kapasi, after checking out Mrs. Das hopes that they will find something in common and will pursue his romance; yet, later on he does find that American gap that leads to disappointment. …show more content…
Soon after Mrs.
Das gets back in the car, Mrs. Das apparently does not show any parental figure and doesn’t seem any more mature than any of her children. Lahiri describes Mrs. Das’s emotional traits, “She did not hold the little girl’s hand as they walked to the rest room. This quote depicts Mrs. Das personality because she obviously doesn’t show any warmth toward her children. Mrs. Das’s is overwhelmingly self-centered. She only thinks about herself and we can clearly see this in page 150 “As soon as the car began to move the little girl began to play… Mrs. Das said nothing to stop her. “ Mrs. Das not only did she not share her food but disengages from her family. Additionally Lahiri, uses her physical traits, Lahiri uses details that describe in page 149 “She was wearing a large dark brown sunglasses with a pinkish tint to them…” Lahiri uses these exact details to convey to the reader that Mrs. Das is hiding behind her
sunglasses. Mrs. Das and her family symbolize orthodox American flaws, including rudely talking about other countries, rapacity children, for example, “Monkeys! Ronny shrieked. WOW!” Mrs. Das shows big comparison that the author is reflecting American parents where she blames others for her feelings of fault about her infidelity. “It means that I’m tired of feeling so terrible all the time…” (Lahiri 165) Mrs. Das characterizes what is often called the unpleasant American; after she confesses to Mr. Kapasi about her secret, readers realize that Mrs. Das is in a oblivion state of mind where she is unaware and insensible about her family, she only cares for herself and Lahiri clearly illustrates her character trait in this paragraph. In Conclusion, Lahiri with the use of her characterization technique such as physical/emotional description, details, dialogue, and background information have sufficiently done the job to support her indirect literary techniques.
She says, “My perception as a young girl was that I fell short at both ends, shuttling between two dimensions ... I followed the customs of my parents, speaking Bengali and eating rice and dal with my fingers. These ordinary facts seemed part of a secret, utterly alien way of life, and I took the pains to hide them from my American friends” (Lahiri 182). Lahiri could not change the fact her skin was brown. This was beyond her control, but has shaped her identity in adulthood. Regardless, the decision to assimilate in childhood made all the difference. The annoying and most real part about assimilation, is that no matter how hard you try, your name and skin color give off so many things that people love to stereotype you before you even open your mouth. I laugh at how many people have told me "your voice doesn't match your face". I really feel with Lahiri when she says, " The immigrant's journey …secures for the subsequent generation a sense of arrival and advantage" (Lahiri
In her short stories, Lahiri presents the condition as a ramification of the degree to which characters adapt to society (Bhardwaj 12-13). This is to say that immigrants experience this crisis differently, depending on how much they have integrated into their new surroundings. Mrs. Sen cannot seem adapt to American culture as she continues to embrace her Indian upbringing. Her traditions cannot be fulfilled at her house or in her community as she yearns to return to India. However, she realizes that she should try to adjust and becomes a babysitter for a short while until she gets into a car accident. Because Sen barely accepts her environment, her challenge is embracing Western
...d and left with little cultural influence of their ancestors (Hirschman 613). When the children inadvertently but naturally adapting to the world around them, such as Lahiri in Rhode Island, the two-part identity begins to raise an issue when she increasingly fits in more both the Indian and American culture. She explains she “felt an intense pressure to be two things, loyal to the old world and fluent in the new”, in which she evidently doing well at both tasks (Lahiri 612). The expectations for her to maintain her Indian customs while also succeeding in learning in the American culture put her in a position in which she is “sandwiched between the country of [her] parents and the country of [her] birth”, stuck in limbo, unable to pick one identity over the other.
Traditions control how one talks and interacts with others in one’s environment. In Bengali society, a strict code of conduct is upheld, with dishonor and isolation as a penalty for straying. Family honor is a central part to Bengali culture, and can determine both the financial and social standing of a family. Usha’s family poses no different, each member wearing the traditional dress of their home country, and Usha’s parents diligently imposing those values on their daughter. Those traditions, the very thing her [Usha] life revolved around, were holding her back from her new life as an American. Her mother in particular held those traditions above her. For example, when Aparna makes Usha wear the traditional attire called “shalwar kameez” to Pranab Kaku and Deborah’s Thanksgiving event. Usha feels isolated from Deborah’s family [Americans] due to this saying, “I was furious with my mother for making a scene before we left the house and forcing me to wear a shalwar kameez. I knew they [Deborah’s siblings] assumed, from my clothing, that I had more in common with the other Bengalis than with them” (Lahiri ...
In the story “Mrs. Sen’s”, Lahini presents the struggles of assimilating into a new country and portrays how lonely and restricted immigrants can feel. She is able to do this through her use of the character, Mrs. Sen, a woman who is originally from India. Throughout the story we see how difficult it is for Mrs. Sen to assimilate to the lifestyle in America. Her days, usually consist of staying in an apartment while her husband teaches at a nearby university. Mrs. Sen’s Indian lifestyle still seems very prominent, all her furniture is still wrapped in plastic, the shoes are all lined in a bookcase by the front door, she refuses to purchase fish from the supermarket and she uses and abnormal blade to do her cooking. All of this illustrating
Sociology professor Morrie Schwartz once said, "Rules I know to be true about love and marriage: If you don't respect the other person, you're gonna have a lot of trouble. If you don't know how to compromise, you're gonna have a lot of trouble. If you can't talk openly about what goes on between you, you're gonna have a lot of trouble…” (Albom 149). Although not stated as clearly or concisely, the vast majority of Jhumpa Lahiri’s stories retell the truths told above. Three stories in particular; "A Temporary Matter," "When Mr. Pirzada Comes to Dine," and "The Third and Final Continent," especially exemplify the quote above. Throughout these stories Jhumpa Lahiri writes of the struggles Indians have building new relationships while trying to assimilate to American culture; Lahiri illustrates that in order to strengthen any relationship, one must display compassion, respect, and honesty.
Das shows a stereotypical American flaw where she did not care about her children and went and openly started discussing her personal life and also in the process she found guilty for disrespecting the country and the cultural believes, where she believes it or not she still got the Indian heritage in her. Lahiri’s proves us that Mrs. Das is a messy; lazy and over all a bad parent. She simply has no concern for the environment, as she was completely fine after dropping rice snacks all over the floor riling the local wildlife. Mrs. Das simply represents what’s called “Ugly American” who always stands out in the crowd for her own needs and is very narrow minded and only cares about her self. This showed a complete lack of understanding among them shows a complete difference between the family and culture.
Singh uses Nimmi narrative because she came to the United States with her family and faced challenges between her traditional culture and western culture. Nimmi mentions her mother as someone she does not want to be like. Nimmi’s mother is portrayed as being someone who does not want to be westernized, she does not want to learn English or learn how to drive. Nimmi on the other hand wants to belong in the host culture. Nimmi grew up just interacting with her extended family or her ethnic
The narration is first person, as told by the narrator. We never hear directly from the wife so we must use our imagination in order to acknowledge or sympathize with her character. Not much is revealed about the wife’s history or appearance, but we d...
Kapasi felt insulted that Mrs. Das should ask him to interpret her common, trivial little secret.” revealed in the story “Interpreters of Maladies”. Mrs. Das only spoken to Mr. Kapasi because she assumed he can cure her but Mr. Kapasi turned down her request, informing her that she is feeling guilt, not pain. Mr. Kapasi then saw how unimportant he became right after that situation, Mrs. Das didn’t even insult him after realizing he’s not worth the time. Mr. Kapasi assumed she wasn’t capable of adultery because of her descendants.
Upon moving to America Jhumpa Lahiri thought it would be much better than before, but it still caused many challenges. The home he lived in did not have much; however, he accepted this and lived there knowing it could be worse. The setting the characters live in can have an influence on how they accept their challenges. The setting can change how the characters live, which can change how they look at different experiences. Acceptance by characters is shown differently through different literary
In “My Two Lives” Jhumpa Lahiri talks about her hardship growing up in America coming from two different cultures. At home she spoke Bengali with her parents, ate with her hands. According to Jhumpa’s parents she was not American and would never be. This led her to become ashamed of her background. She felt like she did not have to hide her culture anymore. When Jhumpa got married in Calcutta she invited her American friends that never visited India. Jhumpa thought her friends would judge from being part of the Indian culture and isolate her.However her friends were intrigued by her culture and fascinated. She felt like her culture should not be hidden from her friends anymore, and that coming from an Indian-American culture is unique. Jhumpa believes that her upbringing is the reason why she is still involved with her Bengali culture. Jhumpa says“While I am American by virtue of the fact that I was raised in this country, I am Indian thanks to the efforts of two individuals.” Jhumpa means that she is Indian, because she lived most of her life and was raised here. In the story Lahiri explains that her parents shaped her into the person she is. Growing up coming from two different cultures can be difficult, but it can also be beneficial.
Even though he was abandoned, Ram’s imaginings are positive for the woman evident in the way “she smothers the baby’s face with kisses” (49) and “[arranges] the old clothes to make him comfortable.” (49) Ram’s interpretation of events plays on our sympathies and suggests that while Ram has been abandoned, he does not resent his
This Blessed House by Jhumpa Lahiri is a short story that follows a small period of time in the two characters’ lives. Having known one another for only four months, newlyweds Sanjeev and Tanima, called Twinkle, are finding it difficult to adjust to married life. Both have very different personalities, a theme that Lahiri continuously points to throughout the story,. Their conflict comes to a head when Twinkle begins finding Christian relics all over the house. Sanjeev wants to throw the relics away, but Twinkle collects them on the mantle and shows them off at every opportunity. As a character, Sanjeev is unadventurous and exacting, while Twinkle is free-spirited and does not care for the fine details. The root of the conflict between Jhumpa Lahiri’s characters Sanjeev and Twinkle in “This Blessed House” is the clashing of their two very different personalities in a situation that forces them together.
Desai is a woman interested in feelings, in what people experience within the family sphere. Her novels usually do not present many actions and adventures, but she portrays Indian lives and social structures. She criticizes the flaws of Indian society by painting small scenes of everyday life; she shows the reader how society works and how it can put pressure on people, sometimes to the point of destroying individuals. She is more interested in the inner self of an individual rather than the vast world of politics. Relating a story of deteriorating middle-class Indian family in postcolonial Old Delhi, Clear Light of Day is described by a haunting, frigid and gloomy atmosphere, particularly in the Das family (Batts, 2011).