Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ways the media influences public perception
The role of mass media
The role of mass media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ways the media influences public perception
How Do Documentaries Produce ‘Truth Effects’? The role of media has often been a subject of much debate, particularly in terms of its role in portraying and conveying truth to the target audience. Some argue upon its utility as a means to disseminate information and to rectify perceptions and facts in the minds of the viewers; while others squabble on the amount of misrepresentation which is often adopted by media as a means to project baseless arguments which lead to severe impact on the minds, especially those who are unlearned and uneducated. In today’s burgeoning era, the role of media still remains a largely disputed topic but fragmentation of media has become a broadly accepted and also, widely noticed phenomenon. Not only have new media vehicles emerged but also newer forms of media are often depicted in order to creatively convey ideas and thoughts or to depict reality. One of these media forms is the Documentaries. Although, documentaries are not new as they have been around since the era of 80’s; their commercial appeal has gained momentum lately. Initially, only a particular clique used to be interested in such art forms, but due to growing sense of awareness among the masses many documentaries have been widely acclaimed and watched across the globe. Due to this very popularity, makers of such documentaries are now laden with the increased responsibility to adopt various means for displaying truth and also to avoid such techniques which might either confuse the viewers or might signal or project an opposing idea that is in contradiction to actual facts. A documentary is known to be more heterogeneous than a fictional movie. Currently, documentaries have taken so many forms that defining it has become problematic (Murra... ... middle of paper ... ...ilm. Available: http://www.documentary.org/magazine/do-you-swear-re-enact-truth-dramatized-testimony-documentary-film. Marfo, A. (2007). The Evolution and Impact of Documentary Films. Senior Honors Projects, 42. Murray, S., Ouellette, L., & American Council of Learned Societies. (2009). Reality TV: Remaking television culture. New York: New York University Press. Shapiro, A. L. (1997). How Real Is the Reality in Documentary Film?. History and Theory, 36(4), 80-101. Spence, L., & Navarro, V. (2011). Crafting truth: Documentary form and meaning. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press. Stott, W. (1986). Documentary expression and thirties America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press www.filmsite.org.(n.d.). Documentary Films Available: http://www.filmsite.org/docfilms.html. Youtube.com (2014), Available: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0AlaPdf2Fh4HpwTiNuvrlA
...lly has a critic. To strengthen the arguments and persuade viewers to their side of the debate, film makers tend to present only one side of the story. Specific placement of an object, the choice of words and the selection of scenes are possible elements that could be woven into documentaries to shape viewers’ perspectives on certain issues. Fat Head is a great case in point, which is likely to convert some public opinion about the ideology of healthy eating. Documentaries may contain biases that mislead the viewers; presenting ‘facts’ but perhaps not revealing the entire picture. Therefore, in a sense, documentaries can be truthful, but also fallacious. It is imperative to evaluate the techniques used in documentaries, in order to distinguish readily from what is fantasy. It could be concluded that Fat Head and Super Size Me are two version of the same reality.
The film immediately sets the tone from the very beginning by presenting various interdisciplinary ‘experts’ who equally have part in narrating the film throughout. As the argument develops, however, the narrators seem to hav...
Lussier, G 2013, /Film Interview: Sarah Polley Explains Secrets of her Brilliant Documentary ‘Stories We Tell’, Slash Film, accessed 2 May 2014,
The documentary is structured in a way that presents the factual information first, and uses
[2] Regardless of how careful the director, producer, and actors are at being loyal to the subject matter, then, the question still remains whether or not Hollywood is a legitimate resource for historical matter. Is it possible for a dramatic, high priced and glitzy medium to be honest and true to its subject matter in such a way that viewers are not confused but more educated walking out than they were walking in? Is the Movie Theater any place for history to be learned? Directors fight and argue that indeed Hollywood is equally as reliable and legitimate a source as other "texts." The movies provide a more immediate resource, allowing history to change from the dreaded school subject to an appea...
Documentary has been heavily associated as a representation of the truth and reality due to its absence of fictional elements and control by the filmmaker (Chapman, 2009). It aims to entice the audience perception of the information presented as fundamental and legitimate (Beattie, 2004). With today's technology, the question of manipulated facts and proclaimed evidences presented in documentaries has heightened concerns in providing the audience with the truth and the real. Hence, with reference to the documentary on "Biggie and Tupac" (2002) directed by Nick Broomfield, we will explore how the documentary has managed to capture the real in terms of structure, style and modes of documentary.
With the advent of television, films start progressing "by leaps and bounds." One kind of cinema is a documentary film. Thanks to the documentary film, which is simple, concise and understandable form, tell us about nature, culture, history and science, and replenished our "body of knowledge." This is the positive role of cinema in which the means of the common man gets a huge amount of information without losing its finding and processing of your precious time. It increases the overall level of culture. The story of “Australia” makes us closer to the problems of Australian native people, and still, it tells us a beautiful story of Australian people which would be erased if it had any other form except film.
Filmmakers engage the past as a historian but not specifically in a way actual historians are doing. Historians use archived facts ranging from documents, photos, or objects from a specific time era to understand history. Contrastingly filmmakers as a historian can only bring to life a certain part of history without altering the past by focusing specifically on an aspect of the subject at hand. Scholars Marita Sturken and Barbie Zelizer argue how well-known filmmakers use film techniques or credibility in order to portray what happened in the past. Filmmakers as a historian is limited to only details they can use based on documents and archived history to re-tell a history through mise-en-scene to become a faux “historian”. Sturken and Zelizer would argue that filmmakers are not real historians; specifically how film can be made to manipulate the past towards the vision to get a narrative through that appeals to the film viewer and director. Filmmakers are not real historians since they can be biased to specific details of what occurred in the past.
“We must understand that truth is not relative.” (TED Talk) Deborah Lipstadt underwent a journey that was not only important for her own research, but also helped influence the course of the future. The moment Lipstadt decided to fight the lawsuit, she became the champion of the truth. The film Denial explores the importance of evidence and truth in a way that is easy to follow. Throughout Denial, Lipstadt and her legal team are shown collecting evidence and talking about why even though there was no photographic proof of the Holocaust, it happened.
During this course, I had the opportunity to watch several documentaries that enlightened men on different perspectives of cultural diversity. These documentaries contained a variety of different methods used to examine several cultural diversity issues within America. Racism, sexism, ageism, and social class were the main topics that were examined in these videos and documentaries. As part of the process, researchers creatively designed experiments that uncovered how people instinctively respond when it is not apparent that they are being watched. Reports such as these must be carefully crafted and presented in an objective manner. If critical steps are overlooked, this kind of research tactic can easily been interpreted as intrusive, dishonest, bias, or unethical. That might ultimately defeat the purpose and distract the viewer from understanding, and that may become counter-productive to the message the researcher is attempting to convey. All documentaries presented were necessary for us to gain a true consideration of the cultural diversity issues this country faces. Some documentaries contained the element of surprise by using hidden camera tactics. It is no secret that cameras have a tendency to change individuals’ attitudes, if they are conscious of the fact that they are being filmed. Though all of the video and documentaries were impactful, the two documentaries that had the most impact on my learning were:
2 nd. Carol Stream: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 2004. Print. The. Lyons, William L. “Teaching the Documentary Hypothesis to Skeptical Students.”
1. Nichols, Bill. ‘Why are Ethical Issues Central to Documentary Filmmaking?’ Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2001, p1-20
Reality Television has changed television in a way that no one could have imagined. Being the one of the most talked about genre in history, it is seen by millions of viewers. It has more ratings than any other kind of show (Breyer 16). From its start, there have been many Reality Television shows. Shows like The Real World, Survivor, Big Brother, and Jersey Shore. All of these give off a negative portrayal of reality. While Americans watch these shows, it seems that the show is real life, but in reality, no pun intended, before the show is even filmed, it’s written, edited, and produced (Breyer 21). Writers humiliate and degrade people just for the plot of the show, making their private lives public (Breyer 16).
In today’s society, reality television has become one of the most watched programs on a regular basis. When some people here the phrase, “reality television”, they automatically associated that with the idea of whatever they are seeing is 100% real and they are getting a firsthand view. This is a misconception that so many people have that causes a problem in what is perceived as real in today’s society. Reality television mainly consists of various programs which significance is to showcase people appearing as themselves in a variety of different situations on a day to day basis.
The film exposes how modern media develops so greatly and expeditiously, and also in a way, horrible. People get diverse information from all kinds of media. The entertainment through the media also provides us immense enjoyment. In a word, media has become one of the most important things in our life. We even cannot live without it now. It re...