Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
British effect on india
Positive impacts of british rule in india
British effect on india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: British effect on india
The Raj of the Influencers India is an exquisite nation shaped by the lush farmlands of Punjab, soaring mountain peaks of the Himalayas, arid terrains of the Thar Desert, and many more exceptional elements. The country is known for its beauty, but the people of India have seen the frightful and unattractive side of India not many years ago. India was greatly influenced by the ruling of the British Raj as they completely reconstructed the government as we know today. The British Raj has affected the lives of India in a negative aspect, causing this country to be permanently altered for better and worse. One of the largest impacts Britain has created upon India, was the shift in the forms of government the Raj conducted; this resulted in the Indian government …show more content…
India is a land where everyone jointly used to live with each other, where each community had their own rules and regulations according to their needs; it all ended when the British Crown intruded their rule and forever ravaged life as it was known in India. The British Raj by-product was, a mass migration occurring all across the new boundaries as well as on the estimated loss of a million lives in the communal bloodbaths involving Hindus, Muslims, and also Sikhs in the Punjab (Kaul). The better greatly altered India till this date seems to have no harmony in what was known as India before British rule. Today, neighboring countries India and Pakistan are just waiting for a signal to demolish each other. British rule has irreparably damaged the peace in what is now known as India, Pakistan and Bangladesh today. The current government of India is an offspring of the British Raj in India. The several chapters that the Indian government has gone through is astonishing. As the British rule in India, they cause a great influence in the Indian people; forever changing the lives of the Indian people
The relationship between cricket and politics is clearly delineated in South Asia from 1880 to 2005 through the easing of the stress between totally different caste members, although the stress mitigated wasn't forever from a religious aspect between the Pakistanis, Indians, and also the British. The various issues that arose in South Asia was largely class or caste systems (Docs 2, 3, 4), rivalry (Docs 1, 6, 10), and religious tensions (Docs 5, 7, 8, 9) against the various countries and cricket groups. Throughout its interaction with Indian politics from 1880 to 2005, cricket has served as both a unifying force between totally different political groups and also has divided political groups in periods of power struggle and political variations, as well as making sturdy bonds between countries.
British Imperialism in India and China Imperialism is the domination of a weaker country by a stronger country. For instance, Britain dominated India and China in the mid 1880s to the beginning of the 20th century. Imperialism has had both a positive and negative effect on the countries involved. Britain was imperialistic for many reasons, it could dominate because it had the technology and power to do so.
What is pictured when someone thinks of India? Perhaps the manufactured goods, or diverse people. The truth is, however, that until India gained its independence in 1947, it was ruled entirely by British government. The British then proceeded to “improve” India, driving it into a deeper hole. Although British Imperialism in India had some positive effects, the overall political, economic, and social impacts were negative.
Thousands of years ago, Indian society developed into a complex system based on different classes. This system was known as the Caste System. It separated Indians into different castes based on what class were born into. As thousands of years went by, this system grew larger and became further complex (Wadley 189). This system caused frustration for the Indian citizens because they were receiving inequality. Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement
One could approach this topic from two points of view; the British and the Indian. One could choose either party and find very different opinions. When British colonizers first arrived in India, they slowly gained more and more control in India through many ways, the most prominent being trade and commerce. At first, they managed India’s government by pulling the string behind the curtain. However, soon they had acquired complete rule over India, converting it into a true British colony. The British considered Indian civilization to be inferior and implemented their western ways overriding ancient Indian customs. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that British imperialism in India resulted in both positive as well as negative reforms in political, economic and social aspects of its new colony.
Colonial government back in colonial times influences how the government works today. Even though the similarities and differences might not be clear on the surface, colonial government is very similar and different at the same time.
James, Lawrence. Raj: The Making and Unmaking of British India. New York: St. Martin's, 1998. Print.
The laws created from British rule had a structured government that was not equal to all people such as the Indians with unjustified laws that affected villages and all over India.The British in an attempt to control 500 million people with only 100,000 englishmen the government passed repressive laws like the rowlatt act that prohibited Indians from attending public meetings (gandhi).But the British
The Indian government is corrupted and makes promises it is unable to keep. In The White Tiger, Balram describes that the government is “...the world’s greatest democracy. What a fucking joke.” (Adiga 145). When Balram lived in Laxmangarh his right to vote for the prime minister was taken from him, due to the fact that running candidates pay the current government to make sure they are elected. The government system also enables the rich to get richer. They do this by immensely taxing the poor and enforcing the caste system on the poor. The caste system is a labeling system you were born into and of what you are expected of in life. For example Balram had the caste of Halwai, which is derived from “sweet-maker”. This meant Balram was expected to work...
"All the leadership had spent their early years in England. They were influenced by British thought, British ideas, that is why our leaders were always telling the British "How can you do these things? They're against your own basic values.". We had no hatred, in fact it was the other way round - it was their values that made us revolt." -Aruna Asaf Ali, a leader of the Indian National Congress. (Masani, quoted in Wood, 32, 1989)
The caste system in India is elaborately structured to have an Indian touch to it, clearly distinguishing it from social structures worldwide. Caste is a word often used to describe a cluster of people who have a specific rank in the society. Each caste system is elaborately crafted to suit the needs of the society and they vary from group to group; each has its own rules and customs. Different chaste systems are planned in a hierarchical manner to become part of any of the four basic colors; varnas (a Sanskrit word for color). These include; the varna of Brahmans, identified with the learned class and priests; varna of Kshatriyas, which is encompasses warriors, rulers and property owners, the varna of Vaishyas, which attracts traders ; and lastly the varna of Shudras, who are servile laborers (Bayly, 1999).
The decision to grant independence to India was not the logical culmination of errors in policy, neither was it as a consequence of a mass revolution forcing the British out of India, but rather, the decision was undertaken voluntarily. Patrick French argues that: “The British left India because they lost control over crucial areas of the administration, and lacked the will and the financial or military ability to recover that control”.
By the year 1857 the British had established complete political control of India. As Western education was introduced and missionaries eroded Hindu society resentment among Indian people grew and it was joined by unease among the old governing class when the British decided to formally abolish the Mughal Empire.
With major control over India, the British used a combination of firepower & guile to consolidate their power over the country by expanding from their base areas along the coast into the interior (Duiker 31). Some territories were also taken over the privately run East India Company, which at the time was given authority to administer Asian territories under British occupation, while others were ruled by local maharajas (Duiker 31). British governance brought order and stability to a society that had recently been wrecked by the wars from the different empires (Duiker 31).
There are formally 100 different sub-units of India and 200 informally. There are 14 major languages, 8 alphabets and 22k dialects. There is also a high level of religious diversity with Hindu (80%), Muslim (11%), 9% Christian/Sikh/Buddhist and 63 national holidays. They are unified as Indians against colonialism ("the enemy of my enemy is my friend"), they also found unity in the anti-colonial struggle. They are formally a liberal democracy yet informally a one-party system (remnants of their past colonial rule), though their political institutions are considered largely legitimate as they somewhat mimic the British political system (Parliament which they refer to as "Lok Sabha", independent judiciary, culture of noblesse oblige). India 's first clear definition of being a single state with boundaries was in 1947 when they gained independence from Britain. However, they experience partition with Pakistan in the west and Bangladesh in the east. Conflicts exist with Kashmir where the territory is split, 2/3 belonging to India and 1/3 belonging to Pakistan. India is a young democracy, their sense of nationalism is best described as "Unity within