Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Basic comparative essay book versus film
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Basic comparative essay book versus film
The Similarities And Differences Between the Book and The Movie
Many adaptations of books are made throughout time in order to let different groups of people experience the same enjoyment. Overtime, people's’ interests and style of writing change too. The Hound of The Baskervilles is one example of that. When this thrilling and mysterious book by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was made into a movie, there were no major changes to the story. The plot, tone, and setting. However, there were some subtle and not so subtle changes to the characters, their personalities and relationships in order to make the movie more appealing to the audience.
One similarity between both the movie and the book is that Watson goes with Sir Henry to Baskerville Hall in
…show more content…
This shows that in the book and the movie, Mrs.Stapleton, the author of the letter, does not want Sir Henry to become a victim of Stapleton’s evil plot and disagrees with what he is doing. In the book, she sends a letter that says, “As you value your life or your reason keep away from the moor.”, hoping that Sir Henry will not come to Baskerville Hall (Doyle, 43). In the movie, Sir Henry appears to Holmes and Watson with a similar letter in made out of newspaper clippings that says, “As you value your life or your reason keep away from the moor.”(Attwood, The Hound of the Baskervilles). Furthermore, in both the movie and the book, The Hound of the Baskervilles, Sir Henry starts to fancy Mrs.Stapleton. In the movie it is kept as a secret, but in the book, Sir Henry expresses his feelings outright when he says, “I told him[Stapleton] that my feelings toward his sister were such as I was not ashamed of, and that I hoped that she might honor me by becoming my wife.”(Doyle, 127-128). Additionally, in both the movie and the book, Holmes tells Watson that he is solving a case on Baker St. ,but actually goes to the moor to try and solve the case himself. Watson finds him and is surprised at what he is doing there when he says, “but how in the name of wonder did you come here?”
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
Many novels are transcribed from their original texts to films. Some of the movies are similar to the original plots, others do not follow the authors work. Alice Hoffman’s novel Practical Magic is altered when it is made into a movie; and Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible which was also made into a movie, was extremely similar to his original writing. There are multiple variables that account for how a movie is made some of them include; the amount of income, how much can be changed, and the author’s approval. The two recreations previously mentioned, have two completely different outcomes, the results all depend on the amount of creative licensing the movie company has.
Many time in our lives, we have seen the transformation of novels into movies. Some of them are equal to the novel, few are superior, and most are inferior. Why is this? Why is it that a story that was surely to be one of the best written stories ever, could turn out to be Hollywood flops? One reason is that in many transformations, the main characters are changed, some the way they look, others the way they act. On top of this, scenes are cut out and plot is even changed. In this essay, I will discuss some of the changes made to the characters of the Maltese Falcon as they make their transformation to the ?big screen.?
There are many similarities presented to the audience between the movie and the novel. One
One major difference in the movie that was not in the book was the starting scene of the movie was set in the moor with Sir Charles being attacked by the Hound. In the book the starting scene was when Watson and Holmes had just found a walking stick that had the initials C.C.H. on it. I think that the movie starting scene was more informative because it let you know about what was happening and it also gave some more suspense to the film.
When novels are adapted for the cinema, directors and writers frequently make changes in the plot, setting, characterization and themes of the novel. Sometimes the changes are made in adaptations due to the distinctive interpretations of the novel, which involve personal views of the book and choices of elements to retain, reproduce, change or leave out. On the contrary, a film is not just an illustrated version of the novel; it is a totally different medium. When adapting the novel, the director has to leave out a number of things for the simple reason of time difference. Furthermore, other structures and techniques must be added to the film to enhance the beauty and impressions of it. Like a translator, the director wants to do some sort of fidelity to the original work and also create a new work of art in a different medium. Regardless of the differences in the two media, they also share a number of elements: they each tell stories about characters.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
The film adaptations of literary works can sometimes be a nightmare. However, they can also turn out better than the original work in some rare instances. In the case of The Speckled Band by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the movie was a better format for telling the murder mystery because of the movie’s ability to show rather than tell the audience what is happening, the clearer explanation of the plot, and the more in-depth development of the characters.
“The Hound of the Baskervilles” demonstrated the differences between the upper class and the lower class and even between those people who were in the same class as each others at the end of the 19th century in England. Beside those differences, there were also some similarities between the two classes. In this essay, I will analyse how they are alike and different in some main aspects such as the belief in the curse, the relationship to the law, their mysterious actions, and especially the subjugation between people in the same class.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Hound of the Baskervilles is the third of four novels written about his world famous detective, Sherlock Holmes. However, unlike the other books written about Sherlock Holmes, much of The Hound of the Baskervilles is absent of the detective. Instead, the audience is left to work through the mystery of who murdered Mr. Baskerville with Sherlock Holmes’ assistant and friend, as well as the narrator of the novel, Dr. John Watson. There are multiple reasons Doyle may have decided to make Watson the narrator, and to remove Holmes from a large portion of the novel. First, as Holmes is such a dry and clinical person, by making Watson the narrator, Doyle is able to employ more descriptive and entertaining writing. Second,
It is common in today's media-driven society to reach into the past for inspiration and ideas. A trend has developed where original works are transformed into other mediums. For example: books are turned into movies and/or plays, movies are turned into weekly sitcoms, and cartoons will spawn empires (Disney). These things happen so often that an audience rarely stops to question the level of authenticity that remains after these conversions. Perhaps it is only when a project is not well received that people begin to think of the difficulties involved with changing a work's genre. Using Gulliver's Travels as an example, discrepancies and additions in the movie can be contrasted with Jonathan Swift's original text.
Imagine if your work was to be published, but the publishers required you to change even the most minute detail to fit their need. This work would be unrecognizable, not at all what you wanted to convey with your story. This is essentially what happens with every movie adaptation of a popular novel, and readers are always enraged. One such case is The Book Thief, by Markus Zusak, which was unnecessarily changed. The lack of many important details in the movie adaptation of The Book Thief shows how obvious it is that movies must stay true to the book for full effect.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's writing style in “The Hound of the Baskervilles” utilizes trends from opposite ends of the Victorian Era. Doyle is well known as a late Victorian author and yet he has characteristics in his writing style of the early Victorian era. The literature in the Victorian era had a variety of commonalities focusing on behavior of a man and how views changed over the era. The drive for social advancement, what it is to be an “Englishman”, and rebellion against idealized notions and codes of conduct are the most prominent factors in “The Hound of the Baskervilles” and representation of the Victorian era through the writings of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
Adaptation of any kind has been a debate for many years. The debate on cinematic adaptations of literary works was for many years dominated by the questions of fidelity to the source and by the tendencies to prioritize the literary originals over their film versions (Whelehan, 2006). In the transference of a story from one form to another, there is the basic question of adherence to the source, of what can be lost (Stibetiu, 2001). There is also the question of what the filmmakers are being faithful to or is it the novel’s plot in every detail or the spirit of the original (Smith, 2016). These are only few query on the issue of fidelity in the film adaptation.
Some things were different between Beauty and the Beast, Beauty and the Beast the Graphic Novel and Beauty and the Beast, the movie like, in the movie the main character was named Belle, in both the books the main character was named Beauty. In the movie there were talking household items like a clock and a candelabra, in both of the books there were no talking inanimate objects. In both the books Beauty was honored in the town for her beauty and youth, in the movie Belle was called a “funny girl” and people always thought of her as strange because she reads. In the books Beauty has two sisters but in the movie Belle has none. In the movie Belle’s father is kept in the beast’s castle until Belle comes to rescue him, but in the books Beauty’s