Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aims and objectives of business organisation
Primary objectives of business organization
Business goals and objectives examples
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aims and objectives of business organisation
Collaborations is the key to all things, one it comes down to it there is no way that business and labor can achieve their goals without this important element. Business goals are defined as goals that a business expects to accomplish during a period of time. Business tend to set goals that are within their reach. If business were to set their goals and expectations to high, this would cause their workers to feel discouraged thus resulting in low output performance. There are many aspects that business need to consider in order to reach there goals, for instance, hiring the right amount of workers, should they merge with other companies, and should they increase advertising are some things that are kept in mind. In the end, business and labor …show more content…
In order to achieve this, business must think about how many workers they should hire. By doing so, they are making sure that they are not spending all their money on their workers. Another aspect that business consider is whether or not they should take part in mergers. Mergers include, horizontal and vertical mergers. Horizontal mergers, deal with merging with another company that produces the same good and at the same process as you. This is a great for business, that are trying to save money by letting go of their worker. On the other hand, vertical mergers deal with merging with another company that produces the same product as you but at a different process. This is great for business that are trying to save money on manufacturing and paying for less labor. Not only do mergers, allow business to better achieve their goal by hiring less labor it also allows them to save money on advertising. There are many aspects business must take in consideration in order to produce the most money …show more content…
Both businesses and labor have the same goal, which is to make the most money possible. This goal is unachievable without collaboration, since their goals are similar they convey a problem for both parties. In order for one to benefit the other must lose money. The only way to prevent this is by setting the worker's wage to the equilibrium wage, which is where supply of workers and demand for the amount of workers businesses want to hire meet on the graph. If business were to set the workers pay higher than the equilibrium wage they would be the ones losing money, and vise versa if they gave their workers less than the equilibrium wage. To quote Ralph Ransom: “Before the reward there must be labor. You plant before you harvest. You sow in tears before you reap
Understanding the basic concept of minimum wage is important for every single individual. We all live in this world together and it is obvious that there is an order. In order to continue our lives and afford our basic needs, we all need to work and gain wealth. As the old adage says ‘‘There ain’t a such a thing as a free lunch.’’ We need to give up on something that we like to get something else that we like. That’s why, every single individual in the society face trade-offs. However, people have different status. Some people work as employees and some work as employers. In that case of minimum wage the trade off is between employees and employers. Employees work for employers in order to gain money and afford their minimal living expenses whereas employers give up on their money and pay for employees because employers take care of their need of labor. Employers pay for their workers who we call employees and employees gain hourly money. The calculated minimum money that they gain in an hour base called minimum wages. Besides, there is this cycle that everyone actually works
In addition to the pro-competitive economic effect some firms also experience what is known as a post-merger which is basically an incentive for a firm to raise downstream competitor costs by raising upstream market costs. Hence the increased price pressures the previously established downstream prices which cause conflict.
As the business, people put it, to maximize the wealth of shareholders (Peavler, 2016). This could be done by pursuing more of an immediate reason that will realize the shareholders wealth maximization goal. However, this main reason may fail to be realized as most mergers depict negative results.
Synergy is a commonly used word to explain why mergers and takeover occur; it means that combining the businesses will produce one enterprise that is more powerful and efficient. Synergies are expected when mergers occur due to the ability to take advantage of several economies of scale, such as distribution and production. However many firms under-estimate the effects of diseconomies of scale that two large business merging can bring. A furthe... ... middle of paper ... ...
In recent times, global competition and the drive to leverage advantage, has resulted in both small and larger companies combining resources. Consolidations of markets are one of the main reasons for Mergers and Acquisitions. Corporate organizations possessing similar products and services are looking to both consolidate and expand; thereby utilizing joint interests to further their goals.
Companies merge and acquire other companies for a lot of strategic reasons with different degrees of success. The success of a merger is measured by whether the value of the acquiring firm is enhanced by it. The impact of mergers and acquisitions on an organization can be small and big in other cases. Mergers and acquisitions immediately impact organizations with changes in rights, and ideas and eventually, in practice. There are multiple reasons, some are motives and financial forces just to name a few.
Merger is a process when at least two companies combine to form one single company.
Overall company will find it extremely hard to succeed without the support of teams. Work group members will not only help each other improve their performance but also help improve the performance of the business. Teamwork allows them to learn to trust and respect each other; this will come in handy when the business is forced to deal with a loss of a team member or loss in revenue. Creating strong hard working teams will benefit a business in the short-run as well as in the long-run. That’s what business of the 21st century should strive for.
Mergers mean two or more companies combining together to form one business or firm. There are six different types of mergers: Horizontal, Vertical, Conglomerate, Market extension, Product Extension and Diversified activity.
The author neglects the fact that large corporations do not pay the majority of minimum wage earners, small businesses do (Bartlett, 2004). The author of A Living Wage also suggested the creation of a Living Wage Board in each city (2014). The responsibility of this board would include examining the businesses’ income, and wealth. If this board decided that the business could increase wages, it would have the power to force that business to do so. This would increase the responsibility of managers to become the “middle-man” to ensure that the goals of the company are able to support the increase in wages as the Living Wage Board sees fit. However, there is a chance for a communication microbarrier. The Living Wage Board could see the increased revenue of a company and their only perception is to increase the labor rate. The
Horizontal merger: When competition becomes greater and there is a potential advantage when small companies come together to form one big company, managers go for a business consolidation between these small companies in a fragmented industry to improve their collective market share.
Organizations use teamwork because it increases productivity. This concept was used in corporations as early as the 1920s, but it has become increasingly important in recent years as employ...
Overestimation of synergy. The mutual support is always more beneficial just not always strong enough to shore two companies.
Access to resource - One of the reasons to collaborate is to take advantage of resources. For example, an inter-company collaborates to place a product in the market where one compa...
A number of reasons provide sanction for a corporate merger and acquisition, not all of which are necessarily financial in nature. Moreover, M&A is within the scope of the Board of Directors to pursue (1) and the company executives to initiate and execute. Since board members may also be subject to political, social, and personal interests, decisions seemingly in favor of the shareholders may also become quagmire with additional factors. According to Investopedia.com, an estimated 66% of mergers and acquisitions are not successful because of M&A intent. Of the 33% that are considered successful, the mergers and acquisitions achieved a net gain from the M&A with our without bad M&A intent. A number of reasons for the majority of failures exist in addition to the failures themselves indicating a potential disadvantage of M&A activity is a relatively high risk of failure.(www.investopedia.com). In some cases, mergers and acquisitions may not only disadvantage the shareholders but consumers as well. In both cases, this may happen when the newly formed company becomes a large oligopoly or monopoly. Moreover, when higher pricing power emerges from reduced competition, consumers may be financially disadvantaged. There are some potential disadvantages facing consumers though. One of which is increase in cost to consumers. Another is the decrease of corporate performance and services. Suppression of competing businesses is another disadvantage. Shareholders may also be disadvantaged by corporate leadership if it becomes too content or complacent with its market positioning. In other words, when M&A activity reduces industry competition and produces a powerful and influential corporate entity, that company may suffer from non-competitive stimulus and lowered share prices. Lower share prices and equity valuations may also arise from the merger itself being a short-term disadvantage to the