Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender discrimination and critics
Gender discrimination introduction
Gender discrimination in today's society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender discrimination and critics
Over the years, America has done many things to insure that all Americans are treated equally and fairly. From gender to race, America has gone the extra mile to protect those who are viewed differently. Unfortunately, short adults are not given the same protections as others. Adults who are naturally below average height should have the same protections as any other minority because of how their height affects job options, their status, and how others treat them.
Unbeknownst to many people, certain jobs have a height requirement. Some of these jobs would be law enforcement, most sports oriented jobs, flight attendants, pilots, fashion models, and certain military jobs (“Height Discrimination”). A few of these jobs have requirements in place in order to make certain aspects of the job easier, such as flight attendants and pilots. Due to the fact
…show more content…
that flight attendants have to be able to reach bags in the overhead cabin and commercial pilots have to be able to reach overhead buttons and switches, flight attendants have to be somewhere between 6’ 3” and 4’ 11”, not including shoes (McGrath), while commercial pilots need to be 5’ 2” to 6’ 5” (“Height Discrimination”). However, other jobs like being a fashion model, or a sports star, do not have aspects that absolutely require a certain height. Yes, most coaches would not want a person who is 4’6” or 4’9” to be tackled by a very muscular person of 5’10” or 6’4” due to the possible injuries the smaller one could obtain. On the other hand, height does not always reflect skill and there are many athletes that have proved that (Hale). Regardless of what those athletes have done to prove that their height does not matter, many coaches prefer taller athletes (Liberman). Most people can see why there would be a height requirement or preference, so the bias in these jobs is not usually disputed and many people write it off as just how things are. A study in Australia found that those who are taller earn better wages than those who are barely average or below average height (James). Certain studies have gone even further and found that there is a 1.8% increase in wage with every additional inch (“Height Discrimination”). The wage difference is not just for the earlier mentioned jobs where height essentially matters, but instead it applies to almost all jobs. For those that are naturally short and hardworking, this wage difference makes no sense. If it was a matter of race instead, then there would be public outrage, but many people do not take the height problem seriously. One's height also affects their status as well. To go further, many people believe that how tall one is shows how powerful or important they are. Being called tall is considered a compliment while being called short is considered an insult. Several scientists and researchers have explored this by doing certain studies. One of these researchers is Malcolm Gladwell, who measured 500 CEOs of different companies to see if their height could be connected to their position. He found that almost all of them were white males who were over 5’9”, which is the average for American males (Roper). Another study was done where women were given several men ranging from different heights to choose from. During this study almost all of the women chose those that were taller, even when the researchers tried to up the short men’s status by listing their achievements and making them out to be quite successful. When the women were asked on why they did not choose the short men, all of their responses were, “he is just too short” (“Height Discrimination”). This bias for the tall does not just happen in America, this has been proven by studies done on the Mehinaku people in Brazil. The Mehinaku have different names for the males depending on their height, those who are average are called Wekepei and are averagely respected. Those who are tall are called Kaukapapai, they are highly respected and usually are treated as leaders. While those who are short are called Peritsi and are usually laughed at by the rest of the tribe. The Mehinaku are not the only tribes that have height hierarchies, Trobriand islanders of the Pacific, the Timbira of Brazil, and the Navajo of America have the same preferences (“Short”). For some reason, humans connect height with importance and tend to reward one for what they are born with, not what they worked for. One's height is determined partly by their genetics, from both parents. If a child comes from a family where everyone is 6’ and over, then there is a very likely chance that the child will grow to be 6’ or over. The exact same case for a child that comes from a family of 5’ and below. However, there are other factors in place as well, such as environment, what a mother ate during her pregnancy, what a child ate during their early stages of development, and so on. Regardless of these factors, there are many that are simply just short. Just like the fact that there are people that are big boned. It is not a genetic mutation or something that can be prevented (“Height Hopes”). Given that stature has all those factors, one would think that it would be treated like any other common genetic trait such as eye color. Surprisingly, if a healthy child who comes from a short family, and therefore is also short, goes into a doctor's office for a checkup the doctor will most likely suggest human growth hormones. Human growth hormones (HGH), are hormones that stimulates growth, cell reproduction, and cell regeneration in humans (Mandal). The side effects of HGH are nerve and muscle pain, swelling, carpal tunnel syndrome, numbness of skin, high cholesterol levels, risk of diabetes, and can contribute to the growth of cancerous tumors. It is commonly prescribed by doctors in situations where one has Turner’s syndrome, Prader-Willis syndrome, chronic kidney insufficiency, low hormones, or if they are naturally shorter than those their age (Dunkin). HGH is used for serious disorders, yet doctors, the FDA, and others think that one being short is serious enough to have HGH prescribed. Worse yet, usually those that are short and are given the HGH option do not believe that being short should be grounds for one to risk taking something that could cause cancerous tumors. If one is short enough to have the option of HGH, then they should have just as many protections as a minority or one with dwarfism would. However, Paul Steven Miller, who is a dwarf and stands at 4’5”, does not believe that. He says that dwarfs go through more discrimination than those who are short and well below average height. Contrary to mister Miller's belief, short adults are faced with discrimination just as much as dwarfs and other minorities. In fact, a study was done that showed that short adults (male or female) faced more bullying in their childhood and teens than those of average height (James). The worst part is that not all discrimination is malicious; a good majority is done as a joke. In certain sitcoms, short characters will often be picked on by the other characters. The TV show Two Broke Girls is the best example of this. The show has quite a few comments in it that would be considered wildly inappropriate if they were concerning gender, race, or disability, instead (Braxton). Unlike many racial and gender groups, those that are just short do not have an organization that fights for their rights and makes sure they are equal. At one point there was The National Organization of Short Statured Adults (NOSSA), who said that their goal was to support short adults and get rid of heightism in society (NOSSA “2013”). The NOSSA acted as a media watchdog, sponsored height-related research, provided public education, provided legal assistance, held online discussions and annual conventions concerning issues that short people faced (“National”). Unfortunately, they disbanded in May 17, 2013 (NOSSA “NOSSA”) due to lack of funds and support (NOSSA “Questions”). They had no support because many average size adults did not take them, or their cause, seriously. There is no doubt that there is a stigma associated with those who are short.
Men who are 5’2” to 5’5” are considered immature, negative, insecure, unmasculine, and unsuccessful (“Short”). While short women are often treated as children in their workplace and are often not taken seriously (James). These stigmas exist, yet there is only one state (Michigan), out of the fifty in the U.S., that has specific laws that prohibit height discrimination. While only areas like, Santa Cruz, San Francisco and Washington, DC have laws against height discrimination (“Height Discrimination”). Nevertheless, all states have laws against gender, race, and disability discrimination (“State”).
Those who are well below average height face problems in the work force, with their peers, co-workers, and in the media. They face stigmas, discrimination, and in some cases will result to human growth hormones because their height is viewed as a problem or an abnormality. Despite of these, short people are given little to no protections. If the U.S prides itself on equality and equal protections, then short people should be entitled to those
protections.
At the first glance, an image of the society portrayed in the “Harrison Bergeron” short will put the reader at a halt. This short story depicts a nation that has made the world a place of pure equality. “They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else.” (Vonnegut). The government had completely taken over the nation and its people. There were handicaps for those who had advantages over anyone else. Power was non-existent in this land. Mainly because all of it belonged to the government. If there was ever a time to see the imbalance of power it would be now. This story is not only a fictitious short to entertain the reader. This Short is a warning to the world providing a view of the consequences of power. “Ironically, no one really benefits from these misguided attempts to enforce equality” (Themes and Construction: "Harrison Bergeron"). Even on the television programs, beautiful women with handicaps placed on their faces. “They were burdened with sashweights and bags of birdshot, and their faces were masked, so that no one, seeing a free and graceful gesture or a pretty face, would feel like something the cat drug in.” (Vonnegut). An elaborate handicap had been placed over the whole country and the public was fine with it! Power causes more than a hardship if not detected. It ruins lives. The people of this short will never know what it means to be
Kurt Vonnegurt’s short story, “Harrison Bergeron” is set in 2081, where everyone is equal. No one is smarter than anyone else, better looking than anyone else, or better in any way than anyone else. If you were smarter than someone, you would have a handicap to make you average to everyone else. If you were strong, you would have a handicap to make you weak. In this world, equality is everything. The government does this because they don’t want others to become envious of their peers. One lesson that can be taught through this story is, people will always be jealous of what makes you different from them because, everyone wants to be better than the person sitting next to them.
Health Disparities and Racism is an ongoing problem that is reflected among society. Health is when an individual is physically, mentally and social well being is complete. However health disparities seems to be a social injustice within various ethnicities. Health disparities range from age, race, income, education and many other things. Even though we realize health disparities are more noticeable depending on the region of country where they live in. Racism is one of the most popular factors, for why it’s known that people struggle with health.
I am the type of person that likes to feel as important as the Caucasian male sitting next to me on the train. I am a small person compared to my coworkers and many would agree that a loss prevention officer job is no job for a female who is less than 5ft tall. I once was denied a job opportunity because of my height and gender; yet when I was given the chance, I proved that my gender and height could do the job even better than my male coworkers. Now I am one of the top ten in the company when it comes to shoplifting case productivity. I did recognize that inequality and prejudices existed as I was trying to get the job, but I also did not let those barriers affect me, just because some doors may had close along my path, it does not mean that I was less nor good than the person who got their first.
Equality starts his quest from birth, facing challenges in school because he was much more intellectually advanced than the other students. He always asked too many questions which caused the teachers to start ignoring him and treating him unequally. When he reached adulthood, he became too tall and this statement
America was founded on the promise that all men are created equal in Harrison Bergeron; Kurt Vonnegut uses satire to explore the theme of equality in a fatalistic dystopia. Society in which we live today in this dystopia Harrison a genius and an athlete is forced to wear handicaps to bring him down to a level of equality with others around him, affect and interrupts equality. Although equality may seem like a necessary component in modern progressive society forced equality could have a negative impact on the society itself by eliminating competition, individuality, and motivation.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is one of the most significant laws in American History. Before the ADA was passed, employers were able to deny employment to a disabled worker, simply because he or she was disabled. With no other reason other than the person's physical disability, they were turned away or released from a job. The ADA gives civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities similar to those provided to individuals on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, age, and religion. The act guarantees equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities in public accommodations, employment, transportation, State and local government services, and telecommunications. The ADA not only opened the door for millions of Americans to get back into the workplace, it paved the road for new facilities in the workplace, new training programs, and created jobs designed for a disabled society (Frierson, 1990). This paper will discuss disabilities covered by the ADA, reasonable accommodations employers must take to accommodate individuals with disabilities, and the actions employers can take when considering applicants who have disabilities.
The goal within the United States government is to treat each individual as an equal citizen. Unfortunately, through the inadequate practice of public policies people have been treated unequal because of natural conditions and the countries social environment. In health policy, the two concepts that cause unequal treatment are health disparities and health differences. Health disparities are resulted from social factors that are avoidable and unjust. For example, saying ovarian cancer death rates are higher because men have better research on prostate cancer (Smith, 2016). “The extent and nature of health disparities changes over the life course” (Adler, 2008, p. 241). Health differences are inherently biological being completely natural and
Inequality and prejudice has been around for as long as the country has been founded. Beginning as a social construct, arbitrary differences, be it sexual orientation, age, and or handicapped status, have been pointed out and discriminated against. Many advocate for stricter guidelines to be placed on new laws that might seem offense and or discriminatory. This is referred to as Strict Scrutiny and it is deemed as a necessity by some in order to remain a progressive society. This means that before a law can be made it must undergo carefully inspection by the Supreme Court. (180-181) I believe that this argument does have merit and should be the standard for these types of laws, as well as in general.
Everyone will have a least one job in their lifetime, and knowing how to recognize discrimination, so they are able to seek the proper help when needed to is very important. Discrimination in the work place can happen to anyone, and that is why people need to know the laws that protect employees against discrimination, ways employers can prevent discrimination, and the effects of discrimination in the workplace.
As stated by the founding fathers of America “All men are created equal.” Black, white, brown, short, tall, smart, and dumb, all are created equally. Therefore every person deserves fair judgement. Unfortunately, it is a profound fact that not everyone is born normal and capable of task typical for a common person, who is free from disability. In my opinion, the quote “All men are created equal” serves to promote a friendly environment that helps encourage equality among people and aids to recognize the similarities rather than the differences that separates men. Even so, with this hope, the disabled community still struggles for equality. According to Legal Rights by the National Association of the Deaf (NAD), “Almost 10 percent of all American have some kind of hearing loss. These ten percent suffer from unfair treatment from professional, social and government service providers, including court and police” (NAD 1). Obviously, because deaf and hard of hearing have limited hearing, their communication and social skills are below the expectation of a common hearing person. Thus, most of these people are ignored, neglected, and discriminated against. However, as a citizen protected by the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), deaf and hard of hearing individuals deserve equal rights and must be accommodated for as a disabled person.
There are many forms of discrimination such as age, disability, transgender, and sex discrimination. This paper will focus on discrimination based on gender, race and age in the workplaces. All over the world, we hear about people treating each other prejudicially depending on their background, ethnicity, or sex orientation. Workplaces should be free from all personal biases but unfortunately, we hear about employees being discriminated against, almost, on a daily basis. Workplace discrimination can be described as treating an individual or a group of people differently than others.
One obstacle that women have always faced, and still due at times is discrimination in the hiring practice. Many of the original height and weight prerequisites were discriminatory and had been in place to discriminate against women (Potts, 1983). Potts (1983) wrote that in Alabama and Maryland, standards had been purposely set to exclude 81% of females between 18 and 34 years because administrative personnel did not believe that women should be police officers.
Every day in America, a woman loses a job to a man, a homosexual high school student suffers from harassment, and someone with a physical or mental disability is looked down upon. People with disabilities make up the world’s largest and most disadvantaged minority, with about 56.7 million people living with disabilities in the United States today (Barlow). In every region of the country, people with disabilities often live on the margins of society, deprived of some of life’s fundamental experiences. They have little hope of inclusion within education, getting a job, or having their own home (Cox). Everyone deserves a fair chance to succeed in life, but discrimination is limiting opportunities and treating people badly because of their disability.
Equal treatment in society and under the law is the first step to equality in the United States, and then the rest of the world. Our country always seems to rise to the occasion when freedom and liberty are challenged, and this nation’s people pride themselves on that fact. So why shouldn’t the United States lead by shining example in the fight for equality? The equal treatment of all people is one of the largest steps society can make in the fight for equality, but that, of course, is not