Harriet Jacobs Incidents In The Life Of A Slave Girl

1101 Words3 Pages

“O virtuous reader! You never knew what it is to be a slave…” (Jacobs 49)
It is rare for an author to directly address their audience, even more uncommon for them to establish characteristics for an unknown person. General conventions of writing suggest that first and third person is for the narrative form while the secondary “you”, the address to the audience, is typically left out. However, Harriet Jacobs, in her autobiography Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, issues repeated statements to the “reader”, often referring to them as “you”. Given the nature of slave narratives, which were often used as propaganda for abolitionist agendas, the leap to second-person was not necessarily so great for Jacobs. Introductions or letters written …show more content…

In the preface, the first sentence of the autobiography— “Reader, be assured this narrative is no fiction.”—immediately associates these appeals to attempts to define the work as “strictly true” (2). Although the violence she depicts in her autobiography might feel excessive to the reader, she assures them that she draws “no imaginary pictures of southern homes” (33). Her appeals bring attention to the difference between the realities of slavery and the vision Northern white women have come to believe. In fact, Jacobs tells the reader that the cruelties of slavery are “greater than you would willingly believe” (26). The key word here is “willingly”. Jacobs knows, that despite the reader being a Northern white woman, and (probably) a progressive abolitionist, even they cannot handle the truth without constant direct assurances that those cruelties are lived experiences. Like the introductory letters from white abolitionists, Jacobs uses these appeals to assert the validity of her story and gain the reader’s trust. She knows that it is something that must be carefully won over because people often questioned the authenticity of slave narratives, particularly those of …show more content…

Her conversation with the reader represent attempts to arouse sympathy for black women by drawing on the shared experience of womanhood and motherhood while emphasizing the contrast between a free and enslaved life. She juxtaposes “O, you happy free women” with “poor bond-woman” and reminds the reader that her child is hers, that “no hand but that of death can take them from [her]” (16). Offering the grim image of a child’s death forces the reader to confront the horror of having a child unwillingly stolen from her, a reality, like a premature death, few would contemplate as frequently as a slave mother. The imagery of a child torn from a mother, with “irons upon his wrists”, repeats throughout the narrative to prompt the reader to conclude that “slavery is damnable” (23). However, as much as she wishes the reader to identify with a slave mother, she acknowledges that she cannot. When Jacobs reunites with her son, she suggests that the Northern woman cannot understand the depth of her joy (142) and she reminds the reader that “if you have never been a slave, you cannot imagine the acute sensation of suffering at my heart” (160). Jacobs, therefore, utilizes these conversations to assert the magnitude of the slave mother’s suffering, first by engaging the reader’s empathy through shared motherhood, second by engaging her sympathy of imagined

Open Document