Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender identity masculinity and femininity
Gender roles in society
Gender roles and femininity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender identity masculinity and femininity
In Guyland, Kimmel discusses the cultures of entitlement, silence, and protection. Today, many young men have a “shockingly strong sense of male superiority and a diminished capacity for empathy.” (59) When guys subscribe to what Kimmel calls “Guy Code,” they are rewarded with this newfound sense of entitlement. Kimmel gives the example of white men in their late twenties and early thirties who participated in a show called “A Black Women Stole My Job.” Even though all of the candidates for the job were evaluated on the same platform and the black women was picked for the position, the men thought it was “their” job for the taking, even though they had never worked in that job to begin with. This sense of entitlement is one of the reasons that …show more content…
violence is so prevalent among this age group of men. Although most men believe that acts of hazing, bullying, rape, and fighting are wrong, they conform to this culture of silence because they are afraid of being shunned by their peers. “Silence is one of the ways that boys become men.” (61) They are forced to be silent witnesses because if they were to express any vulnerability, they would likely become the next target. As Kimmel says, “what happens in Guyland stays in Guyland”. (62) By silencing oneself and turning a blind eye, these young men are not only supporting themselves, but also protecting themselves. When the community dismisses these violent acts, the criminals who commit these atrocious acts are protected, which in turn “enables them to transgress again, or even escalate the severity of their actions.” (63) One of the main ways that guys bond and prove their manhood is through the institution of sports. “Guys like sports because it is the easiest way to choose ‘guy’ over ‘gay’—and make sure everyone gets the right idea about them.” (128) Sports play a very important role in solidifying male camaraderie because it allows men to talk to each other without having to disclose anything personal or show any emotion. Additionally, Kimmel points out that “sports enables men to deft the cardinal rule of masculinity—‘Don’t Cry”. (129) It is one of the few occasions where it is acceptable for men to express emotion. The liberation that is awarded by watching sports is a nice respite from the “relentless assertion of heterosexuality” that is expected of men (169). One of the main ways that men assert their heterosexuality is scoring with women. However, the process of getting a woman to comply with any sexual advancement is just “as much a threat to their self-esteem as it is a booster.” (170) This is one of the reasons why men frequently turn to pornography to get their sexual fix. “The pornographized woman’s middle name is compliance” and she “always comes around eventually—and passionately.” (170) Kimmel addresses how the sexualization of women in the media is all part of an “anti-feminist backlash aimed at helping men regain their self esteem having been diminished by the women’s movement” (171). Pornography allows men to overcome the “street dilemma,” which is when men see girls walking down the street and knowing that they cannot see them naked or have sex with them. Kimmel discusses a website called slutbus.com, where you can watch videos of guys picking up random girls and offering them money for sex. After the girl agrees and has sex with the guys in the bus, they wave the money in her face and drive off without paying her. Websites like this along with many others solve the “street dilemma” and restore “men’s unchallenged authority” (177). Guyland is characterized by the new phenomena of “hooking up” with girls.
Traditional forms of dating are very rare on college campuses, but now, “hooking up has become the alpha and omega of young adult romance.” (191) This culture has become so prevalent on college campuses that many young adults have difficulty making the change to serious, committed relationships in their post-college lives. Not only are men “delaying adulthood,” they are “entering it misinformed and ill prepared.” (192) In this culture, young men and women are constantly rating each other. Men need to belong to the cool fraternity, dress well, and be smooth, while women have to have “effortless perfection.” Although hooking up may seem equally desirable for both sexes, it “enhances his reputation whereas it damages hers” (197). Kimmel references an interview he had with one young man who said that as he was having sex with a girl, all his could think about was how excited he was to brag about it to his friends. He didn’t care at all about her preference to keep it between them. This is a classic example of how “girls live in Guyland, not the other way around. Whereas guys are permanent citizens, girls are legal aliens at best. As second class inhabitants, they are relegated to being party buddies, sex objects, or a means of access to other girls.” (245) In Guyland, a girl can either be a bitch, a babe, or a bro. Women are never equals, they are merely “prizes to be collected and conquered”
(151). In conclusion, the continuous cycle of fear and control is the driving force behind Guyland. The fear of not being accepted by others coupled with the continuous effort to exert masculinity is what Guyland is all about. Whether it is though sports, video games, hazing, or fighting, men are constantly looking for ways to prove to others that they are in control. Kimmel explains that the “struggles to prove masculinity in Guyland come from fears of inadequacy, incompetence, and weakness.” (278) In order to address this problem, Kimmel believes that we need to develop a “new model of masculinity” and in order to do this, young men need to realize that standing up for what is right is what constitutes a real man, not being “a passive bystander, going along with what seems to be the crowds consensus” (287).
Donna Freitas “Time to Stop Hooking Up. (You Know You Want to.)” First appeared as an editorial in the Washington Post in 2013. In this essay Freitas aims to convince her readers that hooking up may seem easy and less stress than a real relationship, but in reality they become unhappy, confused, and unfulfilled in their sex life. “Hookups are all about throwing off the bonds of relationships and dating for carefree sex” personal experience, compare and contrast are a few techniques Freitas skillfully uses to strong convincing essay.
Belongingness is an emotion that everyone longs to feel throughout the course of their lives. Starting in adolescence, we as humans are naturally attracted to others in a romantic way. Girls in junior high start wearing make-up and dressing nice in order to impress the boys and get their attention. During this time, both girls and boys want a boyfriend or girlfriend, and are interested in this idea of “dating.” As boys and girls progress into high school, dating becomes even more of the thing to do. As a young teenager, I wanted to date, but my parents were against it. Many parents have a negative outlook about dating because of the consequences it may lead to, mainly sexual activity. Some believe that dating has changed drastically for the worse, but Beth Bailey believes differently. In Bailey’s article entitled “From Front Porch to Backseat: A History of the Date,” she analyzes the history of dating and how numerous people have not conceptualized this idea correctly. By showing authority, evidence, and values, Bailey presents an effective argument about the history of dating.
In her book, Hooking Up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus, Kathleen Bogle studied the different relationship trends over the past 100 years. She explained how young adults shifted from calling on each to dating each other to now hooking up with each other (Bogle 2008). In today’s society, college-aged adults have adopted the practice of hooking up, which involves different levels of intimacy (kissing to sex) without a long-term commitment to one’s partner. Throughout her research, Bogle explored the social script for hooking up and the different relationship dynamics for young adults due to this practice (2008).
...ve begins generating rumors for male peers who do not qualify as a stereotypical male. For instance, Olive pretends to have sex with a male peer during a popular house party (Gluck, 2010). This imaginary hook-up benefits the male peer’s bullying dilemma. Again, gender policing occurs between men when masculinity is questioned (Kimmel, 2008). “One survey found that most Americans boys would be rather be punched in the face than called gay” (Kimmel, 2000, p.77). The gender police govern Olive’s and the male peer’s status in social standings. America’s obsession with sex disregards if a girl truly sleeps around.
As a female student, it is not uncommon to hear people refer to marriage as a financially safe, plan B after graduation. By continuously labeling men as greater beings we encourage women to fall short. The same applies to academics through gendered education (Wood). If women are bread to believe they are incapable of performing or thriving without men, they will stray, or be forcefully strayed from, anything that appears challenging. This could also translate into excessive exposure on social media sites and womanhood. When searching for a mate, women may be more willing to show skin in order to attract a higher quantity of men. These examples prove that minor expectations within gender identities have a large scale, damaging effect on the dynamic of the
The article begins with the author’s reflections on male privilege; she then transitions into her personal reflections on its implications in race relations. After outlining several characteristics of white privilege, she communicates numerous examples of white privilege. For example, McIntosh states that she can turn on the
Kimmel details the transition from adolescence to adulthood and the issues that young males encounter while trying to put forth their manliness and prove themselves to their peers. One of the things Kimmel pointed out which was an eye opener for me in terms of how much times has changed is that in the past, between the ages of sixteen and twenty-six, young men used this stage in life to prep for a life of work, committed relationships, and other responsibilities. Today, young men in Guyland spend their drinking, playing video games, having immature relationships with woman and participating in risky behavior. Kimmel goes on to explain that young men are “frighteningly dependent on peer culture” and “desperate to prove their masculinity in the eyes of other boys.” (Kimmel 2008, pg.30). They live in constant fear of not measuring up to the ideals of masculinity which Kimmel says are power, wealth, status, physicality and
In the years before World War l, when men “courted” women, they pursued only women they intended to marry. In the 1920’s, however, casual dating became extremely excepted. Even so, a double standard-a set of principles granting greater sexual freedom to men than women-required women to observe stricter standards of behavior than men did. As a result, many young women were pulled back and forth between the old and new standards.
Connor Kelly highlights and brings insight to the development and cultural effect the hookup culture has evoked on college campuses in “Feminist Ethics Evaluating the Hookup Culture”. Connor starts out with the statement: “Hooking up-the practice of pursuing sexual activity without any expectation of a relationship” (Kelly 27). It is also explained that hooking up can constitute as kissing, sexual intercourse, or anywhere in between. The mystery of the “in-between” allows individuals to participate in the hookup culture as a means to fit in, without being specific on what level of sexual activity they are partaking in. A main theme of this article can be described by the idea that hooking up allows for a greater realm of independence than
Although forty percent of college-aged students report having sexual intercourse once or never, the perception that hookups are prevalent amongst college students leaves individuals feeling pressured to conform to “the norm” (Zimmerman). The term “hookup” is an ambiguous term that can mean any physical behaviour from kissing to more sexual acts that occurs outside of the confines of a clear relationship. Hookups can occur once or repeatedly, but the primary difference between dating and hooking up is that there are fewer emotional expectations and the encounters are based around physical intimacy. It is difficult to ascertain as to what exactly hookups add to the college experience, but when approaching this issue from a sociological perspective, Robert Merton’s theory on manifest and latent functions sheds light on the potential role hooking up plays. Considered to be the intended purposes of college, manifest functions include job networking and technical skills. However, hookup culture is one of the latent- or unintended- functions. College can be viewed as a type of marriage market where students meet potential partners and determine what they do or do not want from a relationship. With more individuals delaying marriage, hooking up furthers this trend in society and also increases the average age for
The debate on whether white privilege exists in the U.S. continues to split the majority of Americans into two conflicting realms of thought; one believing that the theory of white privilege only results in minorities exploiting this concept as an excuse for their lack of success, while the opposing side insists that the structure of American institutions is biased against minorities, mainly towards black Americans, thus resulting in an opportunity gap that impedes these individuals’ ability to realize their goals. These two opposing viewpoints are easily identified in Jon Stewart’s interview of Fox News host Bill O’Reilly, with Stewart arguing that white privilege is a reality for countless black Americans while O’Reilly refutes this argument vehemently.
Despite the political rights and power that African American’s have gained, the racist and supremacist ideologies are ingrained into the minds of Americans and can be seen clearly by what the media chooses to show the public. For as long as I have been alive, the media has been criticized by African Americans for the representations of African American men on television and within other forms of the media. African America men are the second-class citizens such as the butlers or they’re classified as the “Help” in movies; they are the criminals or the thugs in television shows, and the cause of destruction and disorderly conduct on the news. I admit, the quantity of African American’s image has increased since the early 1900’s but the quality
When females engage in hooking up the expectation is things will lead to a relationship, whereas males do not expect this (Stinson, 2012). Females are also concerned with the reputation following a hook up and males not so much (Allison &, Risman, 2013). The reasoning is males and females are held to different standards (Stinson, 2013). It was reported however, students are starting to lose respect for both genders who partake in hooking up, so males are now concerned with their reputation as well (Helm et. al, 2015). It is also thought when campuses or social activities are male dominate different attitudes can be seen from both genders (Allison &, Risman, 2013). One example mentioned was the engagement of college male’s in Fraternities. The popularity gained from participating increase one’s power to influence other students on campus. When this happens the disrespect of females who hook up increases and if the female does not conform to the social norm she is considered an outcast. Finding a balance between the two can be difficult for females (Allison &, Risman, 2013). There are some differences and similarities seen in college male and female attitudes as it relates to hooking up, but there is more researcher needed to explore
Perlman, D., & Sprecher, S. (in press). Sex, Initimacy, and dating in college. In R. D. McAnulty (Ed.), Sex in college. New York, NY: Praeger.
Are relationships in high school truly worth the potential heartache? Answers to this question vary, ranging from the enthusiastic “yes!” to the skeptical view of which cutting off one’s own third toe makes more sense to indifference. Yet, how can the value of a relationship be determined when the tumult of everyday teenage life may result in the potential loss or gain of a new relationship every week? One view may be relationships teenagers enter into are valuable practice for later in life, teaching those which engage in them how to interact with members of the opposite sex in a way which leads to marriage or family. Others, however, state the truism being a significantly low percentage of high school romances result in marriage. Although some may say the benefits outweigh the risks, relationships in high school are not feasible for many and may not be worth the effort put into them.