Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Myth of the american dream
Social inequality in us
Myth of the american dream
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Myth of the american dream
The debate on whether white privilege exists in the U.S. continues to split the majority of Americans into two conflicting realms of thought; one believing that the theory of white privilege only results in minorities exploiting this concept as an excuse for their lack of success, while the opposing side insists that the structure of American institutions is biased against minorities, mainly towards black Americans, thus resulting in an opportunity gap that impedes these individuals’ ability to realize their goals. These two opposing viewpoints are easily identified in Jon Stewart’s interview of Fox News host Bill O’Reilly, with Stewart arguing that white privilege is a reality for countless black Americans while O’Reilly refutes this argument vehemently. The central focus of O’Reilly’s case against the existence of white privilege is rooted in the classic concept of “The American Dream”, essentially that no matter where one begins in life, if you work hard enough and better yourself through higher education, then you will be able to …show more content…
achieve virtually anything that you set your mind to. O’Reilly recounts his upbringing during the interview, relating his childhood in Levittown and how his dedication to his goals resulted in his eventual success, all the while adamantly asserting that it was his passion and diligence, and not his skin color, that led to his various accomplishments. In addition to referencing his personal experiences, O’Reilly also rejects Stewart’s assertion that minorities continue to face a tougher and more daunting experience than white Americans, rather stating that numerous prominent American figures are black, therefore inequality cannot exist. He cites the statistic that, on average, Asian Americans have a higher household income than white Americans and later on in the interview also references Barack Obama and Oprah Winfrey, arguing that if they could have achieved such influence then white privilege is a myth, despite Stewart’s insistence otherwise. In stark contrast to O’Reilly’s argument is Stewart’s viewpoint, which is that not only does inequality between races persist in the U.S., but that it has become such a part of American institutions and culture that it severely handicaps many minority groups in the U.S. to the point that they are denied opportunities and rights awarded to white Americans. Stewart claims that the “residue” of the injustices that black Americans faced in the past has bled into today’s society, consequently resulting in a system that is skewed in favor to white male Americans. Although Jim Crow and slavery ended, their influence has not, which is evident in the lower quality of schools in predominantly black neighborhoods and the prison pipeline that countless young black men are confronted with in their lifetimes. However, Stewart is not claiming that white privilege is an excuse, rather a factor that makes it harder for certain groups of people to succeed in the U.S.
O’Reilly reminisced about his childhood in Levittown and how those years growing up in that town molded him as a person and gave him certain morals and values, all of which he asserts led to his success. Except, as Stewart points out, black GI’s were not afforded the opportunity to live in communities like Levittown with their white military counterparts, therefore denying their children that stable upbringing individuals like O’Reilly experienced. This, Stewart contends, is the first of countless hurdles that black Americans face in their lives that, although seemingly small, build up overtime and highly influence those exposed to these barriers. With this argument, O’Reilly slightly yields to Stewart, agreeing that this possible racial inequality could be a
factor. In spite of O’Reilly’s minor concession at the conclusion of the interview, I do not believe that he admitted that white privilege exists. Rather, he acknowledges that previous injustice existed in the form of slavery and Jim Crow de jure racism, but he still appeared to believe that racism is over and the nation has achieved equality across racial groups. O’Reilly appears to be the type of individual that needs to witness firsthand the events that Stewart described to be able to fully understand the black American experience, therefore then being ready to agree that white privilege does exist in the U.S.
In her article, “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack,” Peggy McIntosh writes about the privilege white individuals get without noticing it. McIntosh talks about how whites are taught to not recognize their privilege. McIntosh having a background in Women’s Studies, she also talks about how men have more privileges than women, yet they rarely recognize it. In the article McIntosh claims that “After I realized the extent to which men work from a base of unacknowledged privilege, I understood that much of their oppressiveness was unconscious.”
Temporary inequality exists as a means of “improving” a subordinate to the level of a dominant. After the period of inequality is over, the two view each other as equals. The other form of inequality, permanent inequality, exists solely because of an ascription of inferiority to a subordinate that is inherent and unchangeable. Unlike temporary inequality, there is no possibility of improvement for the subordinate; they are, in the eyes of the dominant, inferior and impossible to “fix.” The dominants, who view themselves naturally superior to the subordinates, begin to take advantage of the subordinates. “Out of the total range of human possibilities, the activities most highly valued in any particular culture will tend to be enclosed within the domain of the dominant group; less valued functions are relegated to the subordinates” (Rothenberg, 112). Moreover, the subordinates, who by this point are under the total control of the dominant group, may begin to internalize the value of the dominants. “[Subordinates’] incapacities are ascribed to innate defects or deficiencies of mind or body…More importantly, subordinates themselves can come to find it difficult to believe in their own ability” (112). This theory of domination and subordination are clearly mirrored in race relations in the United States. Whites, who are the dominant group, make all of the fallacious errors involved in race-based thinking; they are prone to, like Miller describes, hoarding superior roles in society and practicing systematic cruelty towards the subordinates due to their sincere belief that the subordinates are inherently incapable of rising to the level of the dominant. This internalized belief on the part of the dominants, that the subordinates
“I repeatedly forgot each of the realizations on this list until I wrote it down. For me, white privilege has turned out to be an elusive and fugitive subject. The pressure to avoid it is great, for in facing it I must give up the myth of meritocracy. If these things are true, this is not such a free country; one’s life is not what one makes it; many doors open for certain people through no virtues of their own.”
...less knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools, and blank checks” (page 79). McIntosh’s ranges of examples are no doubt impressive, ranging privileges from education, political affairs, hygiene, the job industry, and mainly public life. Her list of examples makes it easy for her readers to relate no matter how diverse the audience. While, many would disagree with this essay McIntosh anticipates this by making the contrast among earned and acquired power vs. conferred privilege. Contrary, to anyone’s beliefs everyone has an unbiased and equal shot at earned power. However, conferred privilege is available to certain groups: particularly the white race. America is founded on a system of earned power, where we fight for what we believe in, particularly freedom and equality. However, this is simply a mirage we want to believe in.
The two articles that had a profound impact to my understanding of race, class and gender in the United States was White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack by Peggy McIntosh and Imagine a Country by Holly Sklar. McIntosh explains the keys aspects of unearned advantage (a privilege that one group hold over another) as well as conferred dominance (the act of voluntarily giving another group power) and the relationship that these factors hold when determine power of a social group. Additionally, the purpose of McIntosh’s article was to demonstrate the privilege that certain individuals carry and how that translates to the social structures of our society. Furthermore, conferred dominance also contributes to the power of the dominant group
Tim Wise’s book White Like Me provides a picture of what it is like to be white in America. A main topic covered in White Like Me is white privilege. On pages 24 and 25 Wise illustrates what white privilege is and shares his opinion regarding how to address white privilege in society today. Wise’s plan for addressing white privilege is one not of guilt, but of responsibility, a difference Wise highlights. The concept of feeling guilty for white privilege lacks reason because white privilege is something built up through generations and its existence is not of any one person’s fault.
Everyone has privilege in one way or another. People feel that privilege is give to one race more, instead of every race. The race that it’s getting more privilege is the White race and with that comes White privilege. White means the people who have a light skin color also known as Caucasian or European and privilege means an advantage over others. An example of privilege is getting away with something that someone may not get away with. So White privilege is defined as “an invisible package of unearned assets that [someone that is White] can count on cashing in each day, but about which [they were] ‘meant’ to remain oblivious” (McIntosh 1990: 1). McIntosh is saying in that quote is that Whites do not recognize that they have this privilege
Peggy McIntosh wrote this article to identify how her white privilege effects her life. Each statement is written as a privilege that Ms. McIntosh does not need to consider or fear as a white woman. From financial credibility to national heritage, this article makes a valid point regarding the way white people can be arrogant and naïve when the same treatment is not being given to their neighbors, coworkers, and peers. There can be two responses when reading this. The first would be a person of color. They will appreciate the attempt at realization of what white people take for granted. The second would be the reality that smacks the white people in the face when they realize how true all 50 statements are. Once this begins to sink in, many will start to broaden their competence realizing the unfair treatment of the people in this world. Moving down the timeline, we can see how the acknowledgement can mend broken relationships. Owning the reality and doing something to change it can give the people of different races the treatment they deserve (McIntosh,
In Peggy McIntosh’s essay, “White Privilege Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” she recounts 50 ways in which white privilege has been present in her life, something she never considered before. White privilege today has, not by its own account, morphed into a word whom not many want to be associated with. Today, so many white people are made to feel guilty about their white privilege even though it is not their fault that they were born that way. In McIntosh’s essay, she does not say such things to make white people feel guilty, but rather to realize that being born white in America earns you certain unearned privileges in this particular society; that involuntarily white people benefit from a system that favors light skin.
With all of these facts, the author tries to prove that racial differences and privileges appear exaggerated and unrealistic. The privileged and less privileged exist at all levels of society. Duke wants white people to understand that they are in the same position as all other races. The awareness of “white privilege” is only a fallacy that causes feel of guilt without foundation.
Concluding remarks: Ultimately, Margaret Wente’s article “The Original Sin of White Privilege” is a missed opportunity. Had she decided to present this information with more statistical evidence and less anecdotal evidence her argument would have been stronger. This is a highly controversial topic that calls for the use of several examples in order to provide the reading with a clear and compelling
America has had plenty of racial unrest, and what 's shocking is how we continue to ignore its side effects. Many people believe white privilege does not exist or it’s not a real thing even though America was built by white people, with a foundation for whites. White privilege is prevalent in America. They believe there is no way the color of someone’s skin, gives them a privilege. In reality, it does. No matter how much we ignore the fact, that the color of your skin can change the way you live, it’s true. It’s not fair, but it’s true.
“White privilege is like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools and blank checks” (McIntosh, 172). White privilege is all around us, but society has been carefully taught
When looking back at our country during the civil rights movement, many people are appalled at how people of color were being mistreated and hated for so long. In our society, today, people like to pride themselves in not being racist and being accepting of all different races and cultures. Although people like to think that they are not racist and that our society is entering a “post-racial” phase, the truth is that we are all somewhat subconsciously racist and to think that we will ever become a post-racial society is unrealistic. People may not believe that white privilege is a real issue but the truth is that it is real and it is happening in our country more than ever. Sadly, race still plays a huge and important role on how you are treated and looked at in this country, there are still people in our society who treat others differently simply because of how they look and because of the color of their skin.
We do not live in a fair and just “color blind” society. If we did, white privilege and racial discrimination would not exist. When you first meet someone, you judge based off appearances. What they’re wearing, their hair, their skin, their voice. The first thing we notice is how someone is different from us, especially the color of skin. Some people can look past it all, just accepting people as they are, no matter their appearance or race. Others are unable to accept everyone and make it obvious that there is a color difference. I think society is slowly changing especially within the millennial generation. It’s normal to have friends of all races and even engage in intimate relationships and partnerships with each other. 50 years ago, that