Group Cohesion Essay

In the vast world of business many cooperation’s prefer to work in teams to get large quantities of tasks done. Working in teams is a great way for a company to meet their goals and derive efficient processes. When top level executives and managers are forming these teams, they tend to focus more on group cohesion and less on other aspects that are highly effective when forming teams. Group cohesion experiments are becoming more and more common throughout the workplace. When experimenting with group cohesion, while building a team, do teams with more group cohesion experience better goal achievements and productivity in terms of producing output? working with teams to create better group cohesion does group cohesion make a more productive team
When group performance starts to decline it is caused by problematic effects that happen when team leaders try to implement bonding through group cohesion. According to Manata, “There is good reason to believe that group cohesion mediates the association between relationship conflict and group performance outcomes” (Manata). If negative group performance starts to show it is typically due to relationship conflict within the group. When relationship conflict occurs, collaborative behavior cannot be performed because conflict will arise. Conflict that arises within the team can in turn affect social-task cohesion. Relationship conflict diminishes cognitive functioning and reduction of collaborative approaches to perform tasks. When cohesion is weakened positive effects are no longer in place, in turn, making performance non-existent. Relationship conflict strongly affects group cohesion in regards to group
Due to the fact that prior success and failure were positively correlated to group cohesion and self-efficacy, both forms related to collective satisfaction and commitment to the group. Lee notes, “Although there is a positive association between group efficacy and performance some studies failed to demonstrate the same positive relationship” (Lee). In other words, even though there is positive correlation between group cohesion and performance the study failed to show the same positive relationship every time. Debunking the theory that even though you have group cohesion you will not have a positive performance rate. When asked to grade themselves the students and employees ranked themselves higher than with the