worked in the court that the police would be searching the home. Daniel BenDavid also claimed to have had a similar conversation with Grasing, which he reported to Lieutenant Timothy Williams of Oak Bluffs Police Department. BenDavid provided a written statement in an affidavit dated November 21, 2011, . [Attachment #1]. Due to the serious implications of these accusations, Dolby created a timeline and reported the matter to Chief Anthony Bettencourt. [Attachment #2] As a result, on October 26, 2011, Captain Christopher Mason with the Massachusetts State Police CPAC unit in the Cape and Island District Attorney’s Office was assigned to investigate the allegations made against Laura Marshard. Over the course of several days Mason interviewed Dolby, Willoughby, Gabe Grasing, Mary Grasing, and Laura Marshard; Allyson Syslo was interviewed by Sergeant Jeff Stone also of the Massachusetts State Police CPAC unit. Several days later during an interview with the State Police Willoughby provided more details about his conversation with Gabe. According to Willoughby, he was present when Gabe received a phone call from his mother …show more content…
at approximately 4:00 P.M, on October 18, 2011. After the conversation, Gabe told Willoughby that a search was going to be executed on the home, and that his mother had learned of the warrant from Laura Marshard. The day before the search BenDavid asserts that he answered a call from Mary, she was looking to speak to Gabe, but he was sleeping. Later that morning BenDavid told Gabe that his mother needed to speak with him, it was that afternoon when Gabe told BenDavid about the impending search. Grasing specifically said the information was given to Mary Grasing from Laura Marshard. BenDavid, asserts that Grasing had also told him that he informed Willoughby of the search as well. Mason met with Gabe Grasing to discuss these allegations.
When asked about warning Willoughby about the search warrant, Gabe claimed that he lied to Willoughby about the warrant and had made a story up to get him to move out. He admitted to telling Willougby that his mother received the information from Laura Marshard, and alleges it was just a coincidence that a search warrant was executed. Mary Grasing denied having any knowledge of the search warrant, and claims to have learned of it by reading the paper. During Marshard’s interview she denied having any knowledge of the search warrant and its execution. She informed Mason that she believed she was not working the day the search warrant was obtained and executed. Also, Marshard claims that while she is close with Mary, she would not have revealed to her any sensitive
information. In addition to conducting in person interviews, Mason submitted an administrative subpoena records request for Gabriel Grasing’s home phone, (508) 939-9183, and Mary Grasing’s phone, (508) 693-9286, to Michael O'Keefe. [Attachment #3] The administrative subpoena request was approved, and
A summary of the case details (provide the circumstances surrounding the case, who, what, when, how)
Second, the search of Hicks home did not include a search warrant, and in Meyers case the police did have a search warrant. In Myers case, police had a lawful search warrant to search for drugs and drug paraphernalia. During that search police located a bloody rag, which was sent for testing. The results of this test revealed the blood belonged to a murder victim, implicating Myers for suspicion of murder. Although the police did have a search warrant, the warrant only listed drugs, and paraphernalia.
...om. The Court found Officer Flagg took and used against him, Gerald Gault’s confession without his parents or any counsel being present and never notifying the juvenile of his right to remain silent.
George’s journey in the criminal justice system began when officers arrested her at her house in the presence of her children, which occurred rather in a calm manner, considering the nature of her charges. The detectives arrived at her house with a social worker to secure her children, and they refrained from making a brutal arrest scene by not
On May 7th 2000, fifteen year old Brenton Butler was accused of the murder of Mary Ann Stephens, who had been fatally shot in the head while walking down a breezeway of a hotel with her husband. Two and a half hours later, Butler is seen walking a mile away from where the incident occurred, and is picked up by the police because he fit the description of the individual who shot Mary Ann Stephens. However, the only characteristic of the description that Butler featured was the color of his skin. Police then brought Butler to the scene of the crime in order for Mary Ann Stephens’s husband, James Stephens, to confirm whether or not Butler was the individual who had shot his wife. Almost immediately, Stephens identifies Butler as his wife’s killer.
“I agree with Ms. Krejci that the entire file should have been disclosed with the publics record request, but that does not make it discoverable.” Feeney said. “I understand her frustration that she wasn 't given the same information that another defense attorney was. When I discovered what had happened, which was in august, I immediately requested the entire file from the Phoenix Police Department so that I could disclose it to the defense council. I didn’t do that because I believed that the information was discoverable or relevant. I did it as a professional courtesy. So that we were on the same field, and so that she felt that she had everything tha...
In this documentary, we never go into the minds of any of the people, but only get to interpret what we see and hear. This documentary was filmed in Jacksonville, Florida where Brenton Butler, a 15 year old African American boy was accused of the murder of Mary Ann Stephens. The main people in this documentary are Ann Fennell, Patrick McGuiness, Brenton Butler, and detectives Williams, Glover, and Darnell. Ann Fennell and Patrick McGuisness are the two defense attorney’s on Brenton’s behalf. Brenton Butler is the boy being accused of murder. Detectives Williams, Glover, and Darnell are the detectives in department 3 the violated many laws and policies while holing Brenton in
On Wednesday, August 29, 2015, at approximately 2:31 p.m., I, second shift Assault Detective Matthew Grasham, Badge #1661, along with second shift Assault Detective Russ Henslee, Badge #2131, conducted an interview with CARLISA CARTER. Ms. Carter was identified as a witness in this incident by Defense Attorney William Ireland. The following is a summarization of the interview:
Based on document B, it has been proven that the main gender group of accusers were women. Also, these documents say the main age group was from 16-20 years of age. Most people in this town got very little attention. I am confident that these young women were
Significant market growth for quality branded products seemed possible in Diageo’s core markets, given the size of the informal market and the fact that formal beer and spirits consumption was substantially lower than in developed markets. For example, formal beer consumption per capita was 4 liters per year in Ethiopia, compared to 78 liters in the U.S. and 72 liters in the U.K. Ethiopian spirits consumption per capita was 0.4 liters per annum, compared to 7.4 liters in the U.S. and 5.4 liters in the U.K.
According to, “Murder on a Sunday Morning”, Brenton Butler was accused of a murder of Mary Ann Stephens. During the trial, there has been some moral and corrupt evidence to prove whether this “suspect” was guilty or not. Many logical pieces of evidence were provided during the trial such as, photographs of the clothing that was worn by Mr. Butler to observe whether Mr. Stephens could identify it – and proving that Mr. Butler was accused because of his race. There has been biased argumentation during this trial such as identifying racial profiling (African-American), another eye-witness name Mr. Stevens discovered a bag of Mary Ann Stephens near the garbage, been accused by the police for “taking the gun” out of bag – but failed to fingerprint
Louis, Kemper had confessed of killing her son and setting the house on fire after police officer had told her that she had failed the polygraph test. The judge in this case had let the information and the results of the polygraph come in to court as part of the evidence of the State. Later in the trial, the judge decided to call the case a mistrial as the jurors had heard and gathered too much information of the case that could sway their judgment. The case was also questioned in the matters of a suspect confessing to a crime after falsely having been accused of failing the polygraph test when in fact she had passed the polygraph. The defendant’s lawyer had stipulated to the Supreme Court that the confession had been corrupted by the detective involved in this case. Later on in 2006 the case had been blocked by the Supreme Court (Matthew, F.,
“This is an arraignment for Marlene Barnes accused in the murder of her mother, Katherine Lincoln. Is the State ready to present their evidence?” Asked Judge Dean,
In 1965 that is when the griswold case happened in March 29th through the 30th. The thing about this case is that when this case happened it clashed personal life of an individual and the state interfering with that said personal life. Why This case is unique is because it had to do with connecticut the contraceptives that against the law in that said state and the Defendant was a the head of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut. The Defendant's name was Estelle Griswold. Estelle was from Hartford Connecticut With her spouse Richard Griswold and opened a health clinic in new haven with her accomplice Baxter
March 31st at 6:10pm I as a detective receive a call from Captain Muldoon that Ernie Millers wife had fallen off the back porch and severely hurt herself. This happened at 554 Theresa Drive. I arrived There was no eye witness but the neighbor Mrs. Clever knows the wife Mrs. Miller very well. Mr. Miller’s alibi don’t really make since or adds up right, so imp going to take him into custody for second degree murder, which is a killing that is not planned or committed in a reasonable passion.