Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of Polygraph
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of Polygraph
The idea of a technique that can help people seek the truth has been around since 1878 thanks to the work of Angelo Mosso. It was not until later on that the polygraph was modified and used in conjunction with law enforcements. The polygraph was first used in 1895 and later on modified to modern technology and computerize around 1992. Polygraph has been around for centuries but is still an inconsistent technique and grounds for errors at court. The polygraph can cause the case in court to be grounds for dismissal and well as a mistrial. The polygraph also crosses the line within the Constitution specifically the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments by violating the due process and the self-incrimination guarantees which are part on these …show more content…
The polygraph is a very controversial topic when comes to the introduction of the techniques into court. The polygraph technique has not changed since first developed in 1895. What the polygraph does is measures the blood pressure fluctuation, pulse rate and respiratory rate changes. The rate of the blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate not only changes due to the body being stressed because the person is lying, but it also changes due to anxiety, anger and medical conditions. This will affect the accuracy on the technique and give inconsistent readings within the results (Gailus, C., 2008, November …show more content…
Louis, Kemper had confessed of killing her son and setting the house on fire after police officer had told her that she had failed the polygraph test. The judge in this case had let the information and the results of the polygraph come in to court as part of the evidence of the State. Later in the trial, the judge decided to call the case a mistrial as the jurors had heard and gathered too much information of the case that could sway their judgment. The case was also questioned in the matters of a suspect confessing to a crime after falsely having been accused of failing the polygraph test when in fact she had passed the polygraph. The defendant’s lawyer had stipulated to the Supreme Court that the confession had been corrupted by the detective involved in this case. Later on in 2006 the case had been blocked by the Supreme Court (Matthew, F.,
In 1992, Houston police officers found two homicide victims in a house at an unspecified time. The investigation of this homicide led them to defendant, Genovevo Salinas, where the police asked and the defendant agreed to accompany the police officers to the station where the defendant was questioned for about one hour. Police collected shotgun shells from the murder scene, which is the home of the two brothers that have been shot and killed. The defendant, without being detained and read his Miranda rights, voluntarily answered most of the police officer’s questions about the murder stated earlier. This interview lasted about one hour and both the officer and the defendant agreed it was a consensual encounter. He became very quite once the officer’s asked if under ballistics testing the casing, found at the crime scene, would match the shotgun the defendant owned. After this question the officer asked other questions and the defendant did answer the rest of the questions asked. Police also found a witness who said Salinas admitted to killing the victims. In 1993, Salinas was charged with the murders, but could not be located. 15 years later, Salinas was finally captured. The first trial ended in a mistrial. During the second trial the prosecutors used the silence the defendant had at this time, even over the objection of the defendant, as evidence of guilt in Texas state court. He was convicted, in both State Court of Appeals and Court of Criminal Appeals.
George Maschke and Gino Scalabrini write, “But fear of being falsely accused may also entail physiological responses measurable by the polygraph and result in truthful persons being accused of deception” (p. 89). The America Psychology Association writes, “An honest person may be nervous when answering truthfully and a dishonest person may be non-anxious. (para. 7).Being nervous because of a test and being scared of being falsely accused could portray the idea of being guilty, when really that is not true. Someone just nervous because of the test could produce inaccurate results.
The polygraph became a valuable tools used by the different varieties of law enforcement agencies as either investigative information for evidence. By the same token, used as a hiring process in the different departments. It is used to determine the truthfulness of suspects, witness, victims, informants, and in employees. Yet there is question on the accuracy of the results when they are turned out to be not as expected, and whether or not it should be used in the process of employment. This paper will explore and discuss the art of utilizing ...
In today’s technology-reliant world, we are constantly aware of being videotaped as a means of documenting potential law-breaking as well as deterring future crime. Whether we’re shopping at a store or driving on a busy road, there are cameras watching at all times. Subsequently, many people might be surprised to learn that criminal interrogations are not typically recorded, and that the law does not require them to be. In a high pressure situation such as this, where there is certainly a chance of police officers using suggestible or coercive methods to obtain a suspect’s confession, it is of the utmost importance to require interrogations be videotaped. If confessions without a videotaped interrogation were inadmissible in court, there would be less likelihood of police-induced false confessions.
Snitch Testimony’s are one of the most common ways that someone is wrongfully convicted. “Jailhouse snitch testimony is arguably the single most unreliable type of evidence currently used in criminal trials.” (Covey 1375) They are extremely unreliable and the most persuasive to jurors. The issue is that many them are con artists, and will do anything or say anything to shorten their sentence or make someone else suffer like them. In a perfect world snitch testimony would be a wonderful thing. If someone did something someone would tell the authorities, and boom problem solved he would get punished. But, a lot of times they don’t always tell the truth. Why wouldn’t you tell the truth you may ask? Well, let’s just say that a detective gives a
In order to have a fully comparative analysis on the Reid investigating method and another alternative method, I am targeting three following psychological concepts to analyze the important components of forensic interrogation, respectively are non-leading open-ended questions, false confessions and components of communication. An interrogation conducted when it is believed that the person is guilty, so if a person is guilty, which may make them feel hard to confess the terrible things they have done. Therefore, whether an investigation would proceed smoothly or not is determined by the questions the police asked. it is fairly important for police to ask questions. Since the suspects are guilty and are rarely willing to tell the fact
A polygraph test can record a person's breathing rate, pulse, blood pressure, perspiration and other significant physiological changes that suggest a person is lying, but it should not be used as evidence in a court of law because it does not provide reliable proof of a person's physical reaction to the stress of lying.
Grubin, Don, and Lars Madsen. 2005. "Lie detection and the polygraph: A historical review." Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 357 - 369.
Before knowing that polygraphs/ lie-detectors actually give truthful results, you have to know what they actually are. Polygraphs are lie-detecting tests that measures and records indices such as blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity while the person is answering questions that are asked. Polygraphs are machines that has many sensors and a heart rate cuff connected to the machine that are placed on your body. The sensors placed on your body and the heart rate cuff placed on your stomach will sense the way your body changes physically while you are answering questions that are asked. Sensors are also placed on the suspect’s fingertips. While being questioned a piece of paper will be determining your lies by a pen drawing on the paper your different rates from your body.
Its accuarcy is being questioned and not many states actually allow to introduce evidence to the court based on polygraph test discovery. Some states allow a certain amount of such evidence being introduced, but mainly judges are skeptical when it comes to polygraph testing.
It measures blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity. Today they mostly use computerized recording systems (“The Truth About Lie Detectors”, 2004). A typical test is a pretest, where the technique is exlained and the questions are reviewed, then it goes on to questioning the subject where there are different techniques. One technique is the control question test (CQT). This technique is designed to compare responses to relevant questions to control questions. Another technique is the guilty knowledge test (GKT). The GKT that has multiple choice questions with concerns only a guilty person would know. The only way this technique can work is if the investigators have information that only the criminal knows. This test has been seen used in court cases, investigations and on the tv screen. It is widely thought to be a machine that accurately tells when a person is being deceitful. The polygraph test is highly inaccurate. The only way the polygraph test works is if the suspect believes the test works and confesses or becomes extremely anxious. The accuracy of the test is questioned because the evidence for large scale research on polygraph testing compared to individual testing does not match up. The CQT has significant error rates, failing to detect criminals and to misreading innocent suspects. The polygraph is also wrong in that it does not take account for education, intelligence and level of autonomic arousal (“The Truth About Lie Detectors, 2004). There are also ways criminals have learned to “cheat” the polygraph test. Many psychologist believe that there is little basis for using the polygraph in investigations though it is still used in non-judicial
I agree with the statement "honesty is the best policy". People will be able to trust people who are honest, liars will have rumors spread around about them, and it's just plain easier to tell the truth. Nobody likes people who lie all the time and won't know whether to trust them or not. People get annoyed by people who lie a lot.
Admit it: You 've lied. We all have at some stage or point in our life. Whether you 're asserting your feelings, getting it off your chest or just being plain and distinctly honest, the truth about honesty is that honesty isn 't always the best artery of choice. What 's more, striving on the avenue of complete disclosure can drive an unwanted wedge and result in permanent closure on a relationship. Today, the consequences of lying are often veiled from reality, the unvarnished truth is, we don 't need weapons to fatally hurt those closest to us as the act can be equally carried out with the sharp verbal cuts of a truthful tongue.
Can you remember the last time someone lied to you? Or how about the last time you lied to someone else? Did you ever stop and ask yourself why? There are so many different reasons that a person might lie. Maybe a lie about something to keep oneself out of trouble, or even a lie to impress other people. But either way there are always going to be serious consequences or effects of lying.
Honesty is a characteristic that everyone should possess. However, being honest is a difficult task for many people. Living honestly means allowing a person’s true self to be exposed to others. Honesty is considered owning up to one’s wrongdoings and not lying, cheating, or stealing. Being honest is a trait that many people believe is obsolete. Even though every person interprets honesty differently, it all stems back to telling the truth. Being honest allows a person to earn respect from their peers. Honesty is allowing oneself to be completely exposed by being truthful.