Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The causes and effects of telling lies
Psychology of lying
Methods of lie detection
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The causes and effects of telling lies
The 20th century brought about the invention of the polygraph test, a machine that monitors for specific physiological signs of deception. Once people realized that with deception comes certain bodily signs, the stage was set for the invention of the polygraph. Once invented, it was and still is somewhat controversial. Yet in its very early form, it influenced American history by helping to bring about a momentous Supreme Court decision regarding the admissibility of scientific evidence in the courtroom.
The history of lie-detection
Throughout history, there have been attempts to distinguish truthfulness from falsehood. These attempts have ranged from completely ineffective to borderline torture. Many theories were based in religious texts. However, even in its most primitive form, each new invention or technique was based on the idea that there exists some normal physiological reaction within a person when interrogated, and additional reactions when the person is lying.
Even as early as 980 BCE, the Hindus knew how to detect liars. Written in one of the “Vedas”, the oldest most sacred books of the Hindus, there are instructions on how to detect poisoners. “A person who gives poison may be recognized. He does not answer questions, or they are evasive answers; he speaks nonsense, rubs the great toe along the ground, and shivers; his face is decolored; he rubs the roots of his hair with his fingers; and he tries by every means to leave the house” (Trovillo 1939)
Additionally, a Greek story is told, demonstrating the physiological responses of the body to various inner thoughts and desires. This story is of Antiochus, son of Seleucus I of Syria (also referred to as Nicator). Nicator had married a beautiful woman, Stratonice. Some...
... middle of paper ...
...Merrell Dow: The Supreme Court Tackles Scientific Evidence in the Courtroom." Journal of American Medical Association 2964-2967.
Grubin, Don, and Lars Madsen. 2005. "Lie detection and the polygraph: A historical review." Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 357 - 369.
Marston, William H. 1938. The Lie Detector Test. New York: Richard R. Smith.
Matte, J. A. 1996. Forensic Psychophysiology Using the Polygraph: Scientific Truth Verification, Lie Detection. Williamsville, New York: J.A.M. Publications.
Mokyr, Joel. 1999. The Second Industrial Revolution, 1870-1914. Rome: Laterza publishing.
R. v. J.-L.J. 2000. SCC 51 , 2 SCR 600 (Supreme Court of Canada, November 9).
Sophocles. 2005. Antigone. Translated by J. E. Thomas. Clayton, Delaware: Prestwick House Inc.
Trovillo, Paul V. 1939. "History of Lie Detection." Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 29 (6).
This essay will analyze the entire case R. v. Morin and evaluate the facts, issues, positions of the Crown and accused. The decisions made during this case and reasons that ultimately lead to the final verdict by the Ontario Court of appeal. This essay will evaluate the decision of whether the delay of the R. v. Morin and the cases that it set precedent for were valid decisions made by the court. This evaluation will describe the arguments made on both sides during these trials. It will discuss how the decision made by the court to decide the trial delay being reasonable were the correct decisions and that section 11(b) of the Charter was not violated. The essay will also discuss the court cases R. v. Godin...
Kassin, Saul, and Lawrence Wrightsman (Eds.). The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure. Chapter 3. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1985. Print.
Psychological research shows that eyewitness testimony is not always accurate, therefore it should not be used in the criminal justice system. Discuss.
Martin, Sheilah L. "R. V. Morgentaler Et Al." Canadian Journal Of Women & The Law 1.1 (1985): 194-205. Academic Search Complete. Web. 16 Nov. 2013.
Many of today’s interrogation models being utilized in police investigations have an impact on false confessions. The model that has been in the public eye recently is the social psychological process model of interrogation known as the “The Reid Technique.” There are two alternatives used by the police today to replace the Reid Technique, one is the PEACE Model and the other is Cognitive Interviewing. These methods are not interrogation techniques like Reid but interview processes.
education-portal.com>. The "Behavioral Analysis Unit. " History of Forensic Psychology. N.p., n.d. Web. The Web.
Costanzo, M., & Krauss, D. (2012). Forensic and Legal Psychology: Psychological Science Applied to Law. New York: Worth Publishers.
Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 277-295.
Criminal profiling is not just something that one as a law enforcement officer, jumps up to. It is usually done by forensic experts who have anatomical knowledge and are conversant with the criminal mind and culture. According to Fintzy (2000), it requires diligence, brainpower and the ability to query assumptions and presumptions. Thus a normal police officer would be confused when left to decipher the cause of a particular crime and would appear completely subdued if told to deduce the profile of the possible criminal. Criminal profiling itself as a process of deciphering criminals and their actions, began in 1969 and was advanced by the FBI (Turvey, 1997). According to many psychological experts on crime scenes, the scene of crime should and will always tell of the offender’s psychological disp...
McGrath, Michael G. "Criminal Profiling: Is There a Role for the Forensic Psychiatrist?." Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 28. (2000): 315-324. Web. 13 Apr 2011.
Greenfield, D. (2007). Introduction to forensic psychology. issues and controversies in crime and justice. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 35(2), 201-201-204,105-106.
In the early 20th century. Dr. Edmond Locard, who is a forensic science. Formulate a theory based upon on “Every contact leaves a trace”. Locard method continuously known today society for all forensic science. Edmond not only paved the way to state his theory but successfully his results from an exchange of physical material .Showing his belief was no matter what criminals activity he or she may have committed by coming close to an object a criminal will always leave all sorts of evidence including DNA, fingerprint, foots prints fibers, hair, skin cells or even blood the list goes on and on.
Since the father of lies deceived Eve in the Garden of Eden man has been telling lies and other men have been trying different ways to detect the truth. Some of these ways of detecting the truth were crude but they were the pioneers to today’s polygraph test.
There are cases in the history of scientific inquiry that are marred by instances of fraud. Robert Bell's The Impure Science offers several case studies in questionable scientific activity; Bernard Rollin touches on a few more cases in the final chapter of Science and Ethics, and the chapter "Deceit in History" offers an account of possible fraud by some of science's largest historical figures. What is strange about these accounts is that the integrity of the scientific discipline remains unaffected despite these instances of fraud. The central question of this brief analysis is to ask if science can sufficiently control its internal fraud. Science's self-policing techniques are peer review for research proposals, referee system for the review of manuscripts, and the ability to replicate scientific results (Rollin ).
The history of narco-analytic interrogation dates back to the early centuries when doctors used induced to induce a sleep- like feeling for different operations. These drugs were then strictly used for medical reasons but with time and evolution came different usages of this drugs. Later on in the year 1922 for the first time in history these drugs were used for police investigation. Robert House, a Texas based obstetrician did an experiment with two prisoners where interviewed two scopolamine-induced prisoners, whose guilt seemed clearly confirmed. With this came the historic case of aurora massacre where for the first time the judge ruled that to prove the wrong-doer’s insanity a medically appropriate drug would be used. This may be the first time that a court has mandated use of so-called "truth serum" in a sanity evaluation after this there were many cases where the truth serum has b...