different governance process. The fragmentation of state government is not caused by the rising of new governance; rather it becomes a process which adopted to tackle the diversified situation of the government. This situation of discursive power and resources shared by many actors from both public and private sectors, governmental and societal, has pushed a new process of governance. Therefore, this idea is quite different from Rhodes, which is minimizing the government role. Instead, it reemphasizes the importance of government in legitimising various actors to ensure their accountability. I think this can be seen as government empowers those actors to deal with lower level of problems and increase the efficiency, in order to take into account different interests of local people, communities, as much it can.
In Gerry Stocker’s paper, there are five propositions for governance as theory with the critics about each of them. First, he has argued that governance means a complex set of institutions and actors that are drawn from but also beyond government. This means that some of the organizations and institutions of government have been taken out and work independently. The power has flown to the inter-governmental and local actors. It is also including the involvement of private sectors of society in governance. Therefore, I think the debate in this perspective is still remained in the relationships between different actors and government, and the problem of this proposition is that how the actors can be legitimated in the governing process.
The second idea is from the perspective of responsibilities of different actors in handling social and economic issues. And the boundaries between different actors in exercising their power an...
... middle of paper ...
...deas, such as the change of governance traditions. Therefore, to understand the policy networks, one cannot ignore the social context and cultural influences to those actors. By introducing the concept of situated agent, decentred theory assumes that everyone in the networks is situated by the context and they are depend what they believe. Traditions are interpreted as understandings someone receives during socialization. It has strong impact on the actions conducted by individual. From the government perspective, traditions can be understood as the history of government. So institutions and organizations will make decisions according to those traditions. However, the traditions only effective at the beginning, but cannot determine the whole process. This is a theory that seems to treat networks more like human which has the strong relationship with social context.
The book aims at introducing political philosophy. To achieve this the author Stephen Nathanson has focused on a particular issue that is relevant to everyone. He discusses the problem of developing a personal outlook toward government and political life. Instead of attempting to survey the entire field of political philosophy, or discussing in brief a large number of classical or contemporary authors, the writer focuses on one question, what’s our thought or feeling about government institutions?
Throughout this assignment a variety of terminology will be used, first it is appropriate to define what the term ‘Social Policy’ means. Social policy can be defined in different ways and ‘there is no established or agreed definition of social policy’ (Baldock et, al., 1999:21). From reading different books on social policy, the author’s understanding of social policy is it provides guidelines to deal with social problems . Social problems are matters which direct...
There are three main theories of sociology; functionalism, conflict theory and symbolic interactionism. This paper will focus on two of those theories, functionalism and conflict theory. The objective is to delineate the assumptions of two out of the three theoretical perspectives and apply these assumptions to an analysis of social stratification. How this will be accomplished will be by comparing and contrasting their assumptions and by analyzing the two theories affect on social stratification. Then I will state my opinion on which of the two better fits my personal sociological views. Functionalism is many people's way to view the world sociologically. It states clearly that the objectivity of the researcher is necessary and can be accomplished. There are three main points, which make up a functionalist theory on sociological expression. The first point is that culture is made up of interacting, interdependent parts. Each of these parts has a function in maintaining the society as a system on the whole. The second point states that shared values and expectations(or beliefs) among the members of the society help hold the society together. The third point states that these systems have a need for stability and a need to try to keep all the parts working together congruously in a sort of system. Social change in this system is uncommon, and when it does happen, it is a very gradual change. Conflict theory is centered on the tension, or struggle that goes on in everyday life. There are many different parts, which make up the conflict theorist's view on the sociological perspective. The first main part is that society promotes general differences in wealth, power, and prestige. Wealth...
Politics is the set of activities and relations that are continually negotiated between social actors who are able to exercise varying degrees and forms of power. It is about power relations; it involves conflict and argument. In order to understand the approach of argument, we need to first understand what is rhetoric. However, Dean argues in the book of Governing Societies: Political Perspectives on Domestics and International Rule that political governing in contemporary societies is best understood as matters of confrontation, struggle and resistance. According to Dean, politics is about the overall set of relations between State and non-State player. (Dean 2007)
Some theorists believe that ‘power is everywhere: not because it embraces everything, but because it comes from everywhere… power is not an institution, nor a structure, nor possession. It is the name we give to a complex strategic situation in a particular society. (Foucault, 1990: 93) This is because power is present in each individual and in every relationship. It is defined as the ability of a group to get another group to take some form of desired action, usually by consensual power and sometimes by force. (Holmes, Hughes &Julian, 2007) There have been a number of differing views on ‘power over’ the many years in which it has been studied. Theorist such as Anthony Gidden in his works on structuration theory attempts to integrate basic structural analyses and agency-centred traditions. According to this, people are free to act, but they must also use and replicate fundamental structures of power by and through their own actions. Power is wielded and maintained by how one ‘makes a difference’ and based on their decisions and actions, if one fails to exercise power, that is to ‘make a difference’ then power is lost. (Giddens: 1984: 14) However, more recent theorists have revisited older conceptions including the power one has over another and within the decision-making processes, and power, as the ability to set specific, wanted agendas. To put it simply, power is the ability to get others to do something they wouldn’t otherwise do. In the political arena, therefore, power is the ability to make or influence decisions that other people are bound by.
The Economic System of a society is the set of relations and institutionalized procedures to which tries to solve the economic problem. Today’s world is that of “economic imperialism”, where economical factors, most importantly, money dictates all the elements of the society… (Importance Of Economics).” The Economic system is a response to the problem of scarcity, a fundamental economic challenge that all societies faced. This economic problem is caused by limited resources and unlimited wants. Scarcity resources and the possibility of alternative use forces society to make decisions about the fate of these resources. Decisions taken to address these issues have political component, and set the economic system of a society. “The role of government in the economy is nothing new; they go back to the Founding Fathers and beyond. There has been a broad trend, though, for the role of the government in the economy to expand over time (Shmoop Editorial Team).” The economy is composed of three systems: Market Economy, Planned Economy, and Mixed economy. Each of these economic systems responds to three key issues: what goods and services are to be produced and in what quantity. Companies must decide whether to produce food or appliances, vehicles or drugs, factories or farms, etc.. Second , what resources are to be employed in producing goods and services? Lastly, who will enjoy the goods and services produced?
Society is highly stratified when considering social classes i.e. - upper class, middle class, lower class, and working class citizens. That being said, not everyone has the same access to the superstructure; thus creating tension. The largest problem when considering structure and agency is the constant struggle and negotiation of power inequality. Among the asymmetry of power are two major disparities; class and gender. Thinking as a critical theorist, one must consider the individual’s participation in the public sphere; “The word means a false view of the world that is in the interests of the powerful citizens in order to keep the subordinate classes oppressed” (Habermas, 10). Though the public sphere is virtually a democratic sphere where ideas can circulate and opinions are formed there are certain restrictions when referring to lower classes and women and thus how their agencies as individuals are limited.
Global Governance emerged due to interdependence and globalisation, proliferation of non-state actors (Weiss 2013, pp. 10 - 13),
By this method, we concentrate on the performer and recognize the multiple realities and diverse social practices of a variety of actors. The interaction between diverse social interests encourages social change and is essential when it comes to understanding development processes. The intersection where we have different social organization mixing with one another negotiating is called the interface. The interface is where the social systems interacts in their own worlds and where the different actors see their own realities and work on how to achieve certain goals they may have set for themselves or goals that the society they are in have been set for them.
A state is believed to be working efficiently with good governance. According to goodgovernance.org, “good governance is about the processes foe making and implementing decisions.” Moreover the speaker, Teresita Baltazar herself stated that there are more or less three things that should be implemented in order to ensure the practice of good governance.
Distribution and exercise of power shape attitudes towards authority. How people sustain themselves economically, and how they manage to obtain the necessities of life, determines assigned roles of individuals and the relationships among them.
Good governance has got great significance in our state as the problems of corruption, red tapism and inefficiency crept in the internal structure of our country. Today good governance not only occupies central place in our state but also regarded as crucial element in building nation. Nation cannot flourish in the absence of good governance. It is the need of an hour. Without the presence of good governance, no country can play pivotal role in the orb. It is regarded as the soul of country. Governance is very pertinent in every sphere of life, whether it is house or office, good governance is needed to perform effectively. It also provides strong foundation for the developmental process.
Annan, "Great governance is maybe the absolute most critical element in eradicating poverty and advancing development." Governance is an exercise of force for guiding social systems, and also a procedure by which associations are coordinated, controlled, and considered answerable to their general public. It is an arrangement of the systems and processes worried with guaranteeing the general direction, effectiveness, supervision and accountability of an association. E-Governance includes new styles of leadership, better approaches for debating and choosing arrangement and investment, better approaches for getting to training, better approaches for listening to citizens and better approaches for sorting out and conveying information and administrations.
People use governance in their daily lives to manage human relationships likewise Government body of a country or state do to manage their interactions and activities with people. The constitution of India provides information about the governance of our country. We have adopted a democratic system of government. Parliament is a body of representatives
Political decentralization supports transparency for one of its aims is to better inform it people on the decision process that is taking place in the government. By this, the citizens of that state or that region are given the chance to participate more and can further influence the decision making of their own government. The citizens’ local interests are better represented because its representatives cannot hide from them and by this many will be more enthusiastic about participating and be more interested in the government and this in return will make the citizens complain less and accept rules or policies that will be passed or implemented by their government. This will create less chaos and opposition from the citizens and will result to faster implementation of rules and many will acknowledge the passed rule or policy at a much quicker pace since they were a part in all of the process.