Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Uses of rhetoric
How is the study of rhetoric helpful in making sense of politics?
The term politics is generally being understood as state politics such as legislators, bureaucrat and government departments. ‘Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them’ (Paul Valery, Fr. Poet). Paul Hirst suggests that politics exists where there’s a plurality of actors, with different ways of calculating their interests, and the possibility of conflict. This essay will explain how is the study of rhetoric helpful in making sense of politics by defining at the terms politics, power relations, rhetoric and I will use Kevin Rudd’s apology speech to illustrate it.
Politics is the set of activities and relations that are continually negotiated between social actors who are able to exercise varying degrees and forms of power. It is about power relations; it involves conflict and argument. In order to understand the approach of argument, we need to first understand what is rhetoric. However, Dean argues in the book of Governing Societies: Political Perspectives on Domestics and International Rule that political governing in contemporary societies is best understood as matters of confrontation, struggle and resistance. According to Dean, politics is about the overall set of relations between State and non-State player. (Dean 2007)
Foucault’s thinking of power is different from the general view. He suggests that power is not an ability that a person can have; rather, power is something exercised within interactions. Power runs through relationships, or networks of relationships. Foucault suggests that a power relationship is a relationship between any actors who seek to affect each other. He states t...
... middle of paper ...
...o make them your sincerity.
Kevin Rudd made the apology speech to all Aborigines and the Stolen Generations in 2008 immediately after he became the Prime Minister. It was a deliberative speech because it was well planned and with intentions. The speech is pathos because it was carried out with an awareness of counter-opinions. The word ‘sorry’ was being used three times in Rudd’s speech (News.com.au 2008). According to Rudd, he says the apology is being made to "remove a great stain on the soul of the nation (ABC News 2008). However, it is also because he wanted to prove to the public that their approach is different from the old government. His speech was to counter that what Howard government did in the past is wrong. By carrying out the speech, he presented himself as a person with integrity and had established a good image, reputation to the Australian public.
Shapiro, Ian, Rogers M. Smith, and Tarek E. Masoud, eds. Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. Cambridge ; Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Rudd, K. (2008, February 13). Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, MP – Apology to Australia’s Indigenous peoples [Parliament of Australia, House of Representatives]. [Transcript]. Canberra, ACT: Retrieved from http://australia.gov.au/about-australia/our-country/our-people/apology-to-australias-indigenous-peoples
The question of what is rhetoric and what does it do has been a question since stories were even being recorded. However, now there are multiply different scholars who believe that they understand what rhetoric is and how to use it. For someone to use rhetoric correctly they must first have a definition of rhetoric that either they have made to fit themselves or they find a previous definition that suits them. In order for me to become an improved rhetor and be able to rhetorical discuss and evaluate pieces of literature or speeches like General Douglas MacArthur’s Farewell address, I must first define rhetoric in how I understand it. Rhetoric is the art of persuasive speaking aimed to sway your audience in a direction that has been chosen by the rhetor. The way in which a citizen uses rhetoric can change over time. The need to argue the same problem is invalid so the need to use the same rhetorical situations is invalid. You can use rhetoric in a multitude of different areas within our life however; we must choose to use it for good or for evil. In order for rhetoric to still be used in speech today one of two things must be true. There must either be a Truth in life and rhetoric or the more likely choice, that rhetoric changes throughout time and situations. You are not trying to change someone’s mind about something however; you are trying to convince them that you are also correct. I will be using multiple pieces of works that are defining rhetoric to support my definition and finish by evaluating General Douglas MacArthur’s Farewell Address using my definition of rhetoric.
(Flynn 1996, 28) One important aspect of his analysis that distinguishes him from the predecessors is about power. According to Foucault, power is not one-centered, and one-sided which refers to a top to bottom imposition caused by political hierarchy. On the contrary, power is diffusive, which is assumed to be operate in micro-physics, should not be taken as a pejorative sense; contrarily it is a positive one as ‘every exercise of power is accompanied by or gives rise to resistance opens a space for possibility and freedom in any content’. (Flynn 1996, 35) Moreover, Foucault does not describe the power relation as one between the oppressor or the oppressed, rather he says that these power relations are interchangeable in different discourses. These power relations are infinite; therefore we cannot claim that there is an absolute oppressor or an absolute oppressed in these power relations.
Substantial speeches do not intend to manipulate the audience but rather utilise powerful rhetoric, in order to aid the audience in developing their own judgment and thus establish a relationship. It is clear that despite contextual differences of texts, the amalgamation of textual integrity, purpose and form establishes a resonating message to audiences. Therefore, composers employ ‘powerful’ rhetoric and cohesiveness in their speeches, not to manipulate but allow audience to enhance their knowledge and understanding. This is undoubtedly clear in Anwar Sadat’s “Speech to the Israeli Knesset’ and Noel Pearson ‘An Australian history for all of us’, which both exhibit the power of words in refining our perspectives and ideas. Therefore, it is
The three Aristotelian appeals include logos, ethos, and pathos. These three appeals were created by Aristotle, and he came up with them in his On Rhetoric. Each commercial made sure to incorporate at least one these appeals with the goal of attracting their targeted audience. In the commercial advertising Shamwow, the demonstrator called “Vince” made sure to incorporate logos into this technique by talking fast and excited. This appeal is successful at times by catching the attention of the viewer by waking up the viewer. In the TD Ameritrade commercial, a well-known actor and activist named Sam Waterston applied ethos by talking confidently and earnestly to the audience. By apply ethos, the audience will feel like they can trust and believe
Rhetoric is the art of effective speaking or writing, and persuasion. Most people use rhetoric numerous of times in their everyday life without their concern or knowing.
Taught the larger section twice a week, held smaller discussion sessions weekly, marked and graded papers.
When do you use rhetoric in real world scenarios? Oh, hey there, did I grab your attention? Well when talking to someone and trying to persuade them I define rhetoric as defending my thoughts and actions to others and allowing them to see my point of view. I support this definition of rhetoric because to persuade another party, he or she must be against your stance on the subject matter.
Kevin Rudd’s sorry speech is a whole other speech. It uses repetition and metaphors in a completely different way to Martin Luther King. The best use of repetition by Kevin Rudd is, “We say sorry”. He said this, to infer that the whole government was apologising for the disgusting behaviour that they displayed. By repeating this, the saying or sentence gets stuck in the audience’s mind like super glue and makes it a mind-blowing speech. His metaphor “turning a new page” makes us think that these bad things are behind them and the ending of the story will be a happy one.
Political texts are representative of individual, shared and competing ideologies within a society and can be constructed in various forms to enhance their diverse contexts and inherent perspectives. Ultimately, political perspectives and society shape one another; they’re inextricably linked and cyclical in nature.
7th edition. London: Pearson Longman, ed. Garner, R., Ferdinand, P. and Lawson, S. (2009) Introduction to Politics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
The important area of debate in the definition of politics is where the political world ends and the other areas of the world start; if it is made clear where each perspective views this barrier to occur then by evaluating a perspective against its competitors a conclusio...
This paper is aimed at discussing the definition of politics which seem to be a huge confusion as to what really it is worldwide. It begins with the definition of Politics and continue with political as science, its establishment and its introduction as an academic learning discipline in institutions. What follows are the key manifestations from the state to the citizens leading to the end product being politics. Politics is a very disturbing word from a distance as people think of it as involving conflicts, corruption or all sorts of social ills. Therefore this essay will define politics by looking at it as science, as an art of Government, as public affairs, as compromise and consensus and finally as power.
What Is Politics On hearing the word politics, what usually springs to mind are images of government, politicians and their policies or more negatively the idea of corruption and dirty tricks. The actual definition seems to have been obscured and almost lost by such representations and clichés that tend not to pinpoint the true essence, which defines this thing, called politics. In order to make an attempt at a definition of politics a systematic approach is required. To begin with, a brief historical overview will be considered, to understand the origins of politics. Following this, different core concepts, which are imperative to a definition of politics, will be discussed, in the hope to discover a true and fair interpretation of the word politics.