Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Global warming myth or reality
How global warming is a lie
Global warming is a myth research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Global warming myth or reality
For many years we have been hearing about how the world was going to end if we do not clean up our acts and stop causing global warming. In reality, we actually are not harming the planet at all and it is all a hoax in order to help the government raise more money. They say with in an increase in CO2 and the earth’s temperature escalating we are doomed for the world to eventually go down in flames. On the contrary, the multiple unscholarly reports have been used as scare tactics when we actually have little to nothing to worry about. One of the biggest scams they try to pull off is the fact that CO2 is increasing. The government blames in on the human species. There is actually no proof that humans have increased CO2 production. Scientist …show more content…
(Redsliverj) They say that this represents all scientist, not just environmentalist. That percentage comes from a U.N. panel. It is in part with a government ran panel called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). There were 4,000 scientist that were on the panel but not all of them reviewed the report. Some of the names on the consensus were also duplicated so if one took away the names duplicated than it is less than 2,900 scientist. (Redsliverj) Some of those scientist do not even have their PhD yet. One cannot accurately represent the whole scientific community with only around 4,000 people. It is not correct to say that almost every scientist believes in climate change. The scientist are supposed to be unbiased but many of the scientist that were in connection with the consensus are also closely connected with the World Wildlife Fund. A program specifically designed to help stop the “carbon footprint” that humans are leaving on this earth. It is virtually impossible for those people to be unbiased towards climate …show more content…
(Redsliverj) The report is found on every day news channels but is not reviewed by scientist. It was an online survey with two questions. The first question being “When comparted with pre-1800 levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?” The second question was “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing global temperatures?” They sent the survey out to 10,257 people and only 3,146 received the actual survey. (Redsliverj) Only 77 of those 3,146 scientist actually specialized in climate science. (Redsliverj) Of the 77 climate scientist, 75 agreed with number two, which is where they get their 97% consensus. (Redsliverj) They did not take the opinion of the other scientist that took the survey which makes the survey completely and totally biased. The consensus was rigid in order to favor the government in order to raise money for the politicians. They hid the actual final results of the research in order to cover up how unscholarly it was. Although some of the people on the panels are scientist, most of them are government officials who are known for wanting to raise money at any cost. Global warming was a scare tactic created by the government in order to enforce grants and programs that would give them money. There is no signs of it actually happening and if it is how can we actually believe what they are saying? There are so
Unfortunately, scientist are still searching for the missing puzzle pieces when it comes to solving the global warming hiatus. Here is what I did find in the article that seemed to be aligned with other articles;
Global Warming is blown way out of proportion and heavily exaggerated in order to purse the underling and real agenda, which is the hate of Capitalism.
They say there is no evidence and no real scientific organizations accept it. People think environmental organizations are falsifying and exaggerating information about the climate. The majority of those contradicting climate change have never been apart of any actual research and only get their information from those who profit off the things destroying the environment. Some corporations who publicly deny global warming include the American Enterprise Institute, Americans for Prosperity, American Legislative Exchange Council, Beacon Hills Institute, Cato Institute, and many others. Each of the organizations listed are being privately funded by either Koch foundations or Exxonmobil, if not both (Source 12).
It is ‘regarded as a mark of knowledge shared by researchers’ (Miller, 2012). Simply put, consilience illustrates climate science as multiple bricks that make up the wall of a solid house or pieces of a complex jigsaw fitting into place. However, in society and politics, consensus often imply ‘majority opinion or concurrence’ (Howard, 2014). This basis for understanding consensus gives public the impression that CC science is valid only because of the ‘sheer number of scientists’ (ibid), as though science is conducted by poll. This impression is the very notion that Shermer (2015) is arguing against.
It is difficult to turn on the news or surf the internet without hearing about global warming. It is currently a very controversial topic in America. Many politicians use the idea of global warming to alarm their target audience and earn their votes. Billions of dollars are spent each year to reduce America’s carbon footprint, whether it be on cleaner technologies or alternative fuel sources. This is all done without concrete evidence that proves global warming is actually taking place. If it is actually taking place, there is no convincing evidence that verifies it is directly being caused by the human population. The topic of global warming has become more than the protection of our planet. It is becoming a game of politics. Our lawmakers are supporting the spending of these large amounts of money towards a cause that hasn’t been verified; when the funds could be used on other problems our country is faced with, such as healthcare or the rapidly-increasing national debt. This is a problem that continues to grow. Our country is becoming more comfortable with the idea of big spending, and the issue is starting to be swept under the rug. This is an important issue. Our taxpayers’ dollars are being wasted and this issue is contributing to the election of officials for a fictitious cause. If it is not stopped, America will continue to spend billions of dollars per year on something that will not change and political leaders will continue to be elected for the wrong reasons.
Despite all the documented evidence of global warming, there are still those that believe that global warming does not exist. These skeptics are convinced that global warming was just a political platform used by Al Gore during his presidential campaign in 2000. One of the reasons Gore was criticized for his theory was because he made predictions associated with global warming that did not happen. For example he predicted that the Artic would be ice-free by 2013. He claimed the Pacific Islands were drowning and polar bears were dying.
They think that earth is on a natural cycle where there are ups and downs and humans have little to no effect on it. 2016 was the hottest year on date and we have doubled what the predicted cycle would be without our emissions. The climate is on a severe spike and there is nothing that will bring that down unless the human race makes a change of living style. “Because emission rates of these gases exceed their rate of sequestration and uptake by the oceans and biosphere, their concentration in the atmosphere has grown rapidly since the beginning of the industrial age, and it is threatening to double by the first half of the next millennium. The projected consequence is a warmer earth and revised agendas in other climate-sensitive areas.”
The video states, that 98% of scientist agree that climate control is real and is impacting the world daily. Many scientists believe that climate control is mainly due to human interactions. Interest groups such as Heartland Institute and American of Prosperity have called climate control false. These organizations also allow politicians and scientists who do believe in climate control to have their views but want to prove them false. On the Heartland Institute website, the main headline is The Heartland Institute is, “the world’s most prominent
The truth is that the Earth is not experiencing rapid enough changes for all of that to be necessary (Salmon 25). Salmon also compared the global warming threat to a weekly weather prediction. He says that just like a weatherman is often wrong about the weather of the week, the predictions about Earth’s future weather are a little sketchy. If weather cannot always be predicted a few days in advance, then there is no way the claims of Earth’s weather over several years can be determined true (Salmon 24).
The opposing party would like you to believe that the scientists are 90% certain that extreme heat periods will increase worldwide. They say that this is causing increased danger of wildfires, human deaths, and algal blooms. This of course is utterly false on many different levels. These scientists that the opposing party was actually paying a select group of scientists to testify for them meaning the “90% of Scientists” were actually lying because they were being paid off. The real majority agreed against these paid scientists, but they were not included in the vote for agreement in this statistic. These statistics are not nearly as dire as described because they won’t happen. This is because the CO2 emissions are no where near to where they are portrayed in the Al Gore video.
Many people dedicate their lives to spread the message about climate change being real. Even though some change in the climate is natural, many events that have happened cannot be explained away by nature. Climate change is causing damage to the world that is completely irreversible. Nasa says, “Most scientists say it 's very likely that most of the warming since the mid-1900s is due to the burning of coal, oil and gas. Burning these fuels is how we produce most of the energy that we use every day” (nasa). The energy that we use daily makes our life easier, but it hurts the earth. Why does the government still allow us to use these things? Science has shown us that sea levels are rising in many parts of the world. Warm weather is causing glaciers to melt which results in the sea level rising. Earth 's average temperature has been rising for the last century in a half; and there has also been a steady rise in ocean temperature since 1969. It is said that climate control is man made and it is dangerous. On the other side of the argument, many people do not believe that climate change is real. They argue that their has not been a big temperature change in almost two decades. They also bring up the point of there not being enough data in the climate history to draw the conclusion of what is happening in the climate now is abnormal. Scientist started to record climate change around the 1800’s which many people believe is not enough data to do a comparison. Another reason some believe that climate change is not real is because of some instances where a scientist predicts a date of a significant climate change never happens. Rinkesh writes, “ For example:- Al Gore predicted that all Arctic ice would be gone by 2013. But, on contrary Arctic ice is up by 50% since 2012” (conserve-energy-future). Many people find that these reasons are why climate change is not
The Great Global Warming Swindle has been the most widely watched documentary critical of the scientific consensus that climate change is due to anthropogenic activities. Aired in 2007 in the United Kingdom, the documentary claimed to debunk the “myth” of manmade global climate change, exposing it as a vast conspiracy designed to gain funding for research and push an environmental agenda that is especially harmful to the developing world. Directed by British producer Martin Durkin, the documentary includes discussion with a number of scientists who are skeptical of anthropogenic global warming and claim that there viewpoints are being deliberately censored in favor of the politically correct consensus.
There are still some believers that support that climate change is not real and that they are just made up facts so people can grab the opportunity to make money with new products that will help the world to become “cleaner.” Their arguments are that the earth always had these types of climate changes just like a natural cycle. When asked about if there is any link on how in the past decades, when humans started using fossil fuels and the changes became worst and worst, they come with a response that it is just a
In a survey of nearly 7,000 in the agriculture field, found that most scientists agree that climate change is happening, but just 50.5 percent blame mankind” (Washington Examiner). The statistics presented by NASA are often altered for reasons that benefit a country. Like Obama has said, climate change is caused by humans and we need to change our lifestyle (Balukjian). Humans are being thought of as being the main cause, because we trust the statistics presented by scientists, we never question it without bias. The government of a country tends to be funding research activities and therefore could lead to them
Scientists are of the opinion that matters of global warming cannot be based on mere consensus. In addition to this, they also claim that up to date, there has been no single experiment that can solidly claim that the effect of global warming is actually taking place. To that extend, their allegations remains very true because even the existing computerized models and patterns have greatly differed from what is actually happening. For example, in establishing the temperature changes, you find that the experiments carried out have no sufficiency demanded by basic rules of science. Naturally the world temperature is greatly influenced by ocean currents. Despite of this fact, nearly 90% of all the temperature measuring equipment is placed on dry lands. This result to the question of how helpful is such information because according to science the actual thing has not been measured. The difficulty existing in measuring temperatures in ocean currents has not been well accomplished and thus according to the scientists’ argument ...