Germline Gene Therapy Argumentative Analysis

510 Words2 Pages

therapy is when the new genes are transferred into the somatic cells of a patient. Any effects of the therapy will be restricted to the patient and will not be inherited. Somatic gene therapy is commonly used to treat a disease in an individual, is either integrated in the genome or as an external episome or plasmid.
Germline gene therapy is when germ cells (sperm or eggs) are modified by introducing new functioning genes, which are then integrated into to their genomes. The germ cells will then combine to form a zygote which will divide to produce all the other cells in an organism and therefore if a germ cell is genetically modified then all the cells in the organism will contain the modified gene. This would allow the organism to have no …show more content…

Ultimately it could improve peoples lifestyles and wellbeing improving personal and families lives.
Social and Political Impacts 2
Thursday, 4 September 2014
Because Gene Doping could give athletes and unfair advantage there is a lot of controversy surrounding the subject. Some of the arguments given are that genetic technology could make doping safer therefore making it more ethical. Some scholars believe “That if anything, gene doping will level the playing field if all athletes receive equal access: this will ensure that all athletes compete solely on how well they are performing relative to their maximum potential. (Kayser, Mauron and Miah, 2007)On the other side of the argument, scientists and medics agree “ that any application of a therapeutic intervention for non-therapeutic or enhancing purposes compromises the ethical foundation of medicine and the spirit of sport.” (Kayser, Mauron and Miah,
2007)Currently there are some regulatory bodies which govern the use of gene therapy but there is currently no legislation on gene doping.
Is Management Necessary?
Currently there is no legislation or regulatory bodies for gene doping but as gene

Open Document