President George W. Bush is notorious for horrible public speaking, tripping over his words and making silly mistakes are not uncommon in President Bush’s speeches. When 9/11 struck the heart of America we turned to President Bush to guide us back to the path of calm and reason. The American population tends to lean on our President in time of tragedy to serve as a system of support. Instantly after the World Trade Center buildings were attacked President Bush addressed the nation on live television. Bush used neo-Aristotelian tactics: ethos, pathos, and logos to instate a sense of patriotism, argue that America will recover from this tragedy and bring justice to our nation.
After the twin towers fell emotions across the nation ran high with sadness and anguish. President fed off this emotion to evoke response in our nation through the use of pathos. Pathos is the appeal to persuade the
…show more content…
audience by feeling or emotion. Bush clearly appeals to the notion of unifying as one in his speech, using phrases like, “like “our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom” and “none of us will ever forget this day, yet we go forward…” Through the use of pathos Bush instills a sense of patriotism in his audience, their country has been attacked and everyone shares the same grief. Bush’s carful selection of words used to raise emotion and describe the attacks range from, “evil,” “despicable,” and “mass murder” all words, which create anger, sadness, despair and remorse. Additionally, pathos is utilized when Bush uses influential metaphors such as, “terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” The combination and repetition of the words “steel” and “foundation” produce a strong image of strength and resilience in every American. Through the use of strong vocabulary, metaphors and repetition Bruch give America hope that we will prevail again. Verbal language supports a great deal of pathos, but more times than not, real emotion is employed through unseen methods. For example the use of camera angles on television. Psychologist would contend that a person’s face is the simplest form of interpreting and processing emotion. A person’s facial expressions offer insight into the true meaning of their words, which is one reason why the television networks broadcasting Brush’s speech focused on the President’s face through the entire duration of his speech. Focusing on Bush’s face provided viewers a lens to view the President which they don’t get to see often, raw emotions. Bush’s argument that the nation would bounce back from the attacks on the world trade center reemphasizes pathos through connecting emotion to the Presidents thesis. Similar to the importance pathos, or the emotional appeal in a speech, the character of the speaker is equally important to take into account.
Ethos demonstrates the speaker’s credibility, separating the non-persuasive and not credited speaker from the trustworthy presenter. President Bush served in the military prior to his term which helped him established ethos – at the time- with America nation. George W. Bush served as a Lieutenant in the Texas and Alabama National Air Guard. Bush brings his military experience into his speech when stating, “Our military is powerful, and it’s prepared.” Moreover, the television crew begins President Bush’s speech with a zoomed out view of the Oval Office, where many presidential speeches have been presented to the American public. The view of the Oval Office habitually starts a connection in the views mind of power and authority. These ethical factors; in addition to, visually linking the Presidents authoritative status the average American viewer received a true sense that America could bounce back, if guided by such as strong
leader. In addition to the importance of ethos (emotion) and pathos (character), proving a sound logical argument and guiding be persuaded are fundamental traits. President Bush uses logos throughout his speech to inform the nation of the day’s events. The speech is setup sequentially, so anyone listening can follow. Additionally, Bush provides facts – for example, during his speech he explains what happened on 9/11 as a painting “The pictures of airplanes flying into buildings, fires burning, huge -- huge structures collapsing.” Bush paints a picture of the events that occurred just days before his speech invoking logos. Logos means the statement of true facts without faulty assumption. Bush then discusses his immediate actions after the traumatic event took place. He states, “immediately following the first attack, [he] implemented our government's emergency response plans.” Viewers were impressed by the Presidents knowledge and ability to control the situation, which the purpose of logos. Every word that was chosen by President Bush that day was spoken with the audience in mind. Bush addresses every woman, man, child, legal, illegal person living in the United States asking them for, “prayers for all those who grieve, for the children whose worlds have been shattered, for all whose sense of safety and security has been threatened.” First Bush reaches out to the victims and their families who were experiencing a pain no one else could feel. Next, Bush establishing more ethos and pathos, by to speaks to the children who may have been watching, while reminiscing on the fact that he was reading to a classroom in Florida when h received the new of the event. Largely, Bush focuses on the ordinary citizens of America who can help make a difference. He repeatedly using words such as, “America” and country. All public speakers have their pitfalls when addressing a large audience. President Bush’s shortcomings obstruct the effect of ethos, pathos, and logos. Bush stumbled through his speech, although not uncommon for President Bush, it was clear he did not practice. It has been argued that setting the speech in front of the Oval Office also played a role in hindering the speech’s effect on the nation. One could argue that a site near 9/11 would have aided in strong ethos and pathos. Logos is present throughout the speech, but more prevalent statistics and details would have better informed the audience. The United States was forever changed on 9/11, the goal of President Bush’s speech was to make American citizens feel united as one and comforted once more. His use of rhetorical strategies to persuade the viewers that America was stronger than ever, and would bring justice to our home soil was effective. Bush’s use of ethos, pathos and logos brought a voice of reason, dedication, and encouragement to a somber nation. Bush filled hearts across the nation providing strength and encouragement to forge onward creating a bond between President and each individual citizen.
In the “George Bush’ Columbia” speech, George W. Bush used a variety of ways in order to make his mark and effectively assemble his dialog. One of the most prominent strategies Mr. Bush used was his sentence structure. He did a great job shaping his speech by initially addressing the problem at hand. He first stated what happened, who it happened to, and gave his condolences to the ones who didn’t make it, along with their families. Mr. Bush also seemed sincere throughout his speech as he made sure to mention each hero apart of the crew. Another technique George W. Bush displayed was the diction and tone he used while delivering the speech. From listening to the audio last week, I remember the passion behind Bush’s words and the sincerity
Ethos, or credibility, Reagan touches the people of the United States because he expresses grief and sorrow in his speech. After the disaster, Reagan uses tone effectively to commemorate the deaths of the crew. “They had a special grace” or “your loved ones were loving and brave”(3) are examples of how Reagan sympathizes with the mourning families. This tone not only allows the families to grieve their losses, it also provides them with the opportunity to feel proud about their children’s accomplishments. Furthermore, Reagan uses tone to carry the people’s afflictions after the Challenger crash and change it into confidence.
- The best example is to keep the logo as clean and clean as possible, Google company logo
On the brink of two different wars, two United States’ Presidents rose up to the challenge of calming the American people and fighting for the belief of justice. A day after devastation on December 7, 1941, Franklin D. Roosevelt gives his “Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation”. At the beginning of a terrorist crisis in 2001, George W. Bush announces a “‘War on Terror’ Declaration”. Both Presidents have many similarities in common, yet their differences set them apart with uniqueness. These two speeches, separate by nearly sixty years, weave an outright and assertive tone into their diction and detail.
...n their backs, but while Roosevelt devotes his efforts into defending the nation through logos, Bush is alleviating the emotional distress of America's problems through the use of pathos.
Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This
President Bush and Prime Minister Blair delivered speeches shortly after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York and the Pentagon in Virginia, which occurred on September 11, 2001. Former President George W Bush utilized pathos, anaphora, and personification in his speech to convey an optimistic tone. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, addressing the same topic, utilized mild invective and parallel structure to express an affirmative tone. Throughout the speech, the former President George W. Bush strives to empower Americans by instructing them to remain resolute, but to “go back to [their] lives and routines”. He uses the personal pronoun we and the common pronoun us repeatedly to indicate that the people of the United States, who either saw the event on television or experienced this event firsthand, were and still are involved in this national tragedy.
A man gets up in the morning with nothing to do, why not play the Nintendo Switch to start your day? Want to have a good time and excitement with your family and friends? Nintendo Switch is what you want! It is easy to connect and disconnect. It is portable and can join other player with Nintendo Switch and can be played anywhere. Most of all, it is for all ages and they have a wide variety of games to choose from such as: Boxing, Dancing and Adventure games.
Throughout George W. Bush's political career he has implored the use of Aristotle's tripod, which we like to call it. This tripod is a rhetoric which implies that persuasion relies on three things, which are ethos, pathos, and logos. Logos is devoted solely to logic and reason. While on the other hand, pathos deals with attitudes and beliefs. Perhaps the most important one which pertains to George W. Bush is something called ethos, that is to say the branch of the tripod which deals with the personal strengths of the speaker and most importantly his character. Throughout his political journey he has showed the use of pathos, logos, and ethos time and time again, but the one of which he is commonly known for is ethos. The instances in which he has demonstrated them are countless, but I will recall but three. The first event took place on the day of September 14, 2001 at 'Ground Zero', three days after the attack of the World Trade Centers. The third instance was on September 20, 2001 during his Address to a Joint Session of Congress. Lastly, was the State of the Union Address in Washington D.C. Which was held on January 29, 2002.
The best way to examine this speech is through a speech-act methodology. Speaker-setting and speaker-audience relationships are key in the analysis of this situation. Before answering the proposed research question we can ask another important question. Why did former President Bill Clinton choose to give this address? According to the Hart text several things must be true. 1. The speaker feels something is wrong. After several rounds of questioning the American public was growing ti...
This was a very emotional event that occurred. Many people lost loved ones they cared about in the terrorist attack. For many Americans knowing that terrorist groups could attack U.S. soil scared a lot of people. Before, President Bush first addressed the nation on this terrible event many people had lost hope. When writing his speech, it was easy for him to relate to what happened. President Bush didn’t have to create an emotional response; he was already feeling the pain and was speaking from his heart during his speech.When President Bush gave his speech to the nation, it helped people realize that Americans are still strong and we will continue to fight for our country. He stated in his speech “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America.” (George Bush) By President Bush stating this in his speech it showed that they can try to scare us, but they can’t change the way we do things in
President Obama’s memorial speech following the Tuscan shooting carefully utilized the Aristotelian appeal of pathos, or emotional appeals through his word choice, which aligned him with the American people while still conveying a sense of authority, and his use of biblical allusions, which drew his audience together on the basis of shared ideologies. In his opening lines Obama shows his compassion for the victims and mourners of the shooting stating: “I have come here tonight as an American who, like all Americans, kneels to pray with you today, and will stand by you tomorrow.” With just this short statement Obama aligns himself with the American people, showing his empathy and comforting the people by saying “I will be here for you.” This
Bush demonstrates that with the use of metaphors, personification, and also repetition. Using metaphor, he compares America to steel, saying that America is like steel, but not pliable. Portraying that whatever dangerous act comes to America, America will stay strong and not move. Personification is to explain the reasoning behind the terrorists’ operations and the motives behind this move. Bush gives feeling and visualization traits to the nation, consequently putting it in the nation’s point of view, highlighting what the nation felt and saw. Repetition is to bring America together and strengthen everyone. It is to show that this heartbreaking event did not just affect the victims, but it affects the entire country. The way Bush uses repetition to get the people of America together makes America stronger because the more a country is together, the more power and strength it will possess. As a final point, President Bush’s usage of these three rhetorical devices grabs the attention of the people and helps Bush express the type of tone he wants to get
From his extremely vivid imagery at the beginning to his conclusion that America plans to seek a solution with Russia and other nations, the president’s flow from using pathos to logos to ethos made his speech very effective and compelling. His argument was backed up and supported all through out his speech, which helped his audience believe that what he was saying is true and important. However, his speech would have been nothing without the implication and opinion that America is the strongest nation in the world. Although this point is debatable, it is our duty to help other nations. We definitely do an excellent job at helping other nations and always having their best interests at heart. I believe this was the main goal for Obama’s speech; a plan to protect the United States. The use of logos, ethos and pathos just helped his speech to be more persuasive and
The speech given by Mr. President Deals with the consequences of violent actions and it raises questions of morality. It is an attempt to guide the American people through their hard times and motivating them.