Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Free rhetorical analysis essays
Rhetorical analysis ideas
Free rhetorical analysis essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
43rd President of the United States, George Bush, in his speech, “9/11 Address to the Nation” addresses the nation about the day of September 11, 2001. Bush’s purpose is to convey the events of September 11, 2001 and what was and will be done about them. He adopts a serious yet somber tone in order to appeal to the strong and emotional side of the public and to his listeners around the world. Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This …show more content…
outpouring of confidence and emotion conveys a tone that their ability to stay strong is necessary in a time like this. The former President applies logos throughout his speech in order to prove to our nation that he is beyond qualified to take control of the situation at hand: maintaining a strong country. In one particular part of his speech, Bush reasons with Americans that “The functions of our government continue without interruption. Federal agencies in Washington which had to be evacuated today are reopening for essential personnel tonight and will be open for business tomorrow. Our financial institutions remain strong, and the American economy will be open for business as well.” He utilizes these points to prove to the audience that everything remains under control. Therefore he essentially demonstrates that the recently crushed America is returning to its routine. He mentions the repair of the economy and governmental institutions to convince Americans that there is nothing to worry about as long as such organizations are still functioning. He makes these logical claims to assure citizens that the upper levels of the societal hierarchy are not panicking; and therefore regular citizens should not either. However, Bush also demonstrates the help regular Americans contributed after the attacks. He claims that in response to the attacks, “we responded with the best of America.” Through these claims he logically proves that even “strangers and neighbors” were unharmed and were able to assist those who were in need of help. His logic in proving Americans that our country can withstand such a disaster is proved rather effectively through his strong use of logos. Although former President Bush exercises logos to prove that American citizens did their part to maintain a strong and dignified country, he also practiced ethos in demonstrating the responsibilities he has in the scheme of 9/11. He instantly portrays himself as a qualified leader as the camera begins to film him in the Oval office with the American and Presidential flag framing him at his desk. The symbolism of the patriotism and power projected in this image are tremendously affecting the audience in believing that anything the then President would say that evening would be official and hold truth. His overall appearance demonstrates his character as well. His obviously profession look gave him a more dignified persona and contributed to his powerful demeanor. As audiences viewed him across millions of television screens, they looked upon a man who was surrounded with great ethos that boosted his complete, leading character. Furthermore, George Bush uses verbal ethos to establish his character. In his address, he claims: Immediately following the first attack, I implemented our government’s emergency response plans. Our military is powerful, and it’s prepared. Our emergency teams are working in New York City and Washington D.C. to help with local rescue efforts. Our first priority is to get help to those who have been injured, and to take every precaution to protect our citizens at home and around the world from further attacks. Although he establishes a strong sense of power and action; he strategically makes use of the words “I” and “our” to reduce the amount of responsibility he holds as President. Taking notice of how he says “I implemented our government’s emergency response plan” it is evident that he credits himself for the immediate response of the emergency units. However one can also take notice how he claims “Our military, Our emergency, Our first priority” and recognize how Bush quickly reduces his responsibility and defers some of it to his fellow subunits in control of the situations. Through his diffusion of responsibility, George Bush lacks effective rhetoric because viewers can recognize that while he is claiming that America stands firmly, he himself becomes weak in not taking full responsibility for the effects of the help. That is to say if something were to have gone wrong during the attempts of the rescue teams, Bush does not take full responsibility as he claims that he and others are working toward the goal of helping those in need. The last emotion the former president suggests from the audience is hope.
George Bush intentionally generates this emotion at the end to leave viewers feeling slightly better on the situation at hand. In his conclusion, the then president merges viewers in saying, “This is a day when all Americans from every walk of life unite in our resolve for justice and peace. America has stood down enemies before, and we will do so this time. None of us will ever forget this day, yet we go forward to defend freedom and all that is good and just in our world.” His conclusions strike different chords in raising hope amongst viewers. He ultimately depicts a unified country and reminds viewers that something similar to this tragedy has happened before, proving that our country has overcome similar challenges. In addition, his reminds viewers of “all that is good and just in our world” evoking more hopeful thinking from Americans. At the end of his address, Bush uses many positive images that cancel out the tragic ones from his introduction and thusly ends his address portray great amounts of hope, comforting
Americans. President Bush did an amazing job at staying calm in the face of disaster using ethos, pathos, and logos, to his advantage.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt delivered a powerful speech before Congress on December 8th 1941, the day after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. His purpose in addressing the country in this way is his attempt to calm the American People and avoid chaos across the country. Roosevelt is aware of the impact that the event has had on the Citizens. As their leader, he forcefully reassures the population that they will be safe. The President emphasizes that the United States would not allow the attacks to affect the country though his use of rhetorical devices, including pathos.
“President’s Address to Nation/” The Fifth Anniversary of September 11, 2001. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of 11 September 2006. http://whiteshouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060911-3.html. Reporters Without Borders. Press release: Worldwide Press Freedom Index, 2007.
President Bush’s speech was directed towards an audience of northern Arizonan republican supporters. Bush continuously uses the rhetorical appeal of pathos, the appeal to the audience’s emotions, to gain support from the crowd and connect them to the issues he addresses on an emotional level. The best example of such an issue is the promise of creating a new forest policy. By raises an issue that the audience was emotionally concerned with, Bush is able to persuade the audience to his purpose as well as relate them to it on an emotional level. It was likely that there were people in the audience who were directly affected by the recent forest fires in Arizona who felt very passionately about the topic of a new national forest policy. The appeal of emotion became a very effective tool in motioning the audience in the direction of his purpose, mainly the gain of support for the republican candidates in the next Arizona election.
British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, says in his speech, following September 11, 2001, points out the terrorists attacks on the twin towers. Blair’s purpose is to have unity between the citizens to ensure that the United States does not fall apart. Blair’s speech was effective in persuading American citizens to stick together because of the crisis in the world, effects of September 11, 2001, and the fight for stability by using pathos, colloquialism, and connotation.
President Obama’s memorial speech following the Tuscan shooting carefully utilized the Aristotelian appeal of pathos, or emotional appeals through his word choice, which aligned him with the American people while still conveying a sense of authority, and his use of biblical allusions, which drew his audience together on the basis of shared ideologies. In his opening lines Obama shows his compassion for the victims and mourners of the shooting stating: “I have come here tonight as an American who, like all Americans, kneels to pray with you today, and will stand by you tomorrow.” With just this short statement Obama aligns himself with the American people, showing his empathy and comforting the people by saying “I will be here for you.” This
George W. Bush’s “9/11 Address to the Nation” is a speech in which he talks about the catastrophic event on September eleventh, 2001. Two airplanes crash into the Twin Towers in New York City on this day, shocking the entire world. He addresses this speech to the people of America on the night of the disastrous event, to let the people of the United States know what is going on. This speech explains how the United States is a strong country, the motives behind the event, as well as to bring the United States together and stronger.
Obama speaks of America with courage and confidence in his first inaugural address by mentioning how previous Americans “faced down fascism and communism…with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions” (2009). By describing the troubles as well as the successes, Obama creates a sense of pride and patriotism. The president also uses haunting imagery to form fear in the audience such as “the fallen heroes who lie in Arlington whisper through the ages” (2009). Both quotes perfectly intertwine with each other through the speech so the audience feels a variety of emotions while understanding the values of America and importance of freedom. Obama conquers the method of pathos by putting himself into other peoples shoes while having them step into
It is perhaps easy to remember George Bush as a poor orator, someone who finished bottom of his class at Yale, basically a unremarkable man who should never have been president. In a time when the incumbent president is being forgotten in favour of the election race of the century it is simple to remember Bush as a thouroghly unpopular president who has stained America for the worse. However unintelligent, uneloquent George W Bush united a nation in the days following the 11th september 2001.His rousing sentiments spoken from the rubble of the world trade centre with the brave firefighters by his side showed a strong leader who loved his country. His reaction to 9/11 is essential in determining his legacy because it is an event that will be talked and learnt about in years to come. It is etched onto american’s hearts and minds and therefore for many so is George Bush. Once the war in Iraq is over the image of the falling towers will remain and the president will be remembered for handling this crisis. It is likely the atrocities in Iraq will seem distant to Americans as the ones still affecting the vietnamese every day do. Bush appeared strong capable and resolute after 9/11 and this I predict will have more staying power than the unpopularity regarding a middle- eastern war. When the president speaks about the terrorist attacks he appears to be deeply affected by them which speaks to Americans, it gives them solidarity and unity. As his press secretary recently said "The president thinks about 9/11 every single day when he wakes up and before he goes to bed.
The speech given by Mr. President Deals with the consequences of violent actions and it raises questions of morality. It is an attempt to guide the American people through their hard times and motivating them.
These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” George Bush was president at the time when the 9/11 attack happened. George Bush wrote this quote for the thousands of lives that were hugely affected. To the kids worried about their parents while they are in school, to the worried husbands and wives, and brothers and sisters. The 9/11 attack did not only change the lives of people who lost a loved one, and the people who were there where the planes hit, but also people who just saw what was happening and people who heard about it, cried. The increase and patriotism and the rise in security will make people feel more secure and protected but it will never change the the amount of people affected by 9/11. Millions of people around the world know about what happened on September 11th, 2001. Millions of people will be changed
No one imagined on the morning of September 11th, 2001 for there to be an attack on US soil. The morning started out just like any other morning. However, that all changed when 4 planes were hijacked by Al Qaeda terrorists groups. Two of the four planes crashed into the World trade Center in New York City. One shortly after collided into the Pentagon in Washington D.C. The fourth plane made a crash landing in a field in Pennsylvania. Thus killing all 40 passengers and crew aboard. One that day, we lost a total of 2,996 American lives due to the 9/11 events (statisticbrain). The American people, were frightened and angry. They needed answer not rumors. If rhetoric is situational, as Bitzer states, the opportunity existed for a rhetor to step
The fear he brings on by talking about Ebola spreading, the grief brought on by talking of the many murders and awful acts by ISIL terrorists, to the hope he projects be calling for the nations to come together to drive his argument. While some arguments use emotion to deceive readers and keep them from paying attention to the argument, but Obama’s speech does just the opposite. The emotions that are felt bring you closer to his argument and facilitate understanding of what he is saying. Since unfortunately not a great deal of people pay attention to politics, they are not knowledgeable on the issues that have taken place. With the use of emotion, Obama is able to help those understand without them having to know the situation entirely. For example, regarding the ISIL terrorists, Obama states the, “mother, sisters, and daughters have been subjected to rape as a weapon of war. Innocent children have been gunned down.” Now while one may not know the ins and out of all the acts of ISIL, this makes people understand that they are bad and need to be
President Bush used a copious amount of rhetorical strategies in his speech. He used many forms of personification, anaphora and metaphors. Personification is used to get people to comprehend what the country has at stake here when he says, “Freedom and fear are at war.” Anaphora is used when he wanted to make a point by disclosing, “The advance of human freedom, the great achievement of our time, the great hope of every time…” He used metaphors to describe to this glorious nation what they could do by proclaiming, “...our generation, will lift a dark threat of violence of violence from our and our future.” Overall the President's tone was sombre and proactive because what he was talking about was the worst situation anyone could imagine in America. While being sombre he was also proactive because he knew we couldn’t just sit there and let it happen again and he was letting the people know he wasn’t going to.
British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, in his speech Following September 11, 2001, describes terrorism. Blair’s purpose is to persuade the reader that our nation should work together. Blair’s speech was effective in persuading American citizens to unite as an American nation because connotation, pathos, and anaphora.
President Obama’s Address to the nation was presented on January 5, 2016. His speech was shown on all of the major network stations. The main goal of his speech was to get the point across to the nation about the increasing problem of gun use. His speech really focused on the issue of gun control and if it would benefit the country. Overall, the biggest idea of his Address was that gun control is a large issue in the United States. The way to prevent deaths caused by firearms can be prevented in other ways than taking peoples guns away. The examples brought up in this Address really stood out to me. The use of personal, national, and global examples really made his speech stronger on the topic of effectiveness.