Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Genre analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Genius Files License to Thrill “The wackiest road trip in history has reached it’s final destination,” the twins Coke and Pepsi McDonald have not been having the road trip that their parents had planned. They are being chased by Dr. Herman Warsaw (who started the Genius Files Program, a program that takes the smartest kids from all around America to solve problems that adults only would have one solution to) and his group of hired henchman. The twins will be trapped with a venomous snake in Death Valley, pushed through a deadly turbine at the Hoover Dam and thrown into a volcano in Las Vegas. All this while someone is sending them ciphers to lead to their final destination, the Golden Gate Bridge. Will the twins be able to survive? …show more content…
You see the internal conflicts that Dr. Warsaw’s character suffers from after surviving a terrorist attack. We will see by using third person omniscient what drove Dr. Warsaw to want to kill the kids in his genius files program. One of the themes of this book is don't make assumptions about people you don't know.
Dr Herman Warsaw marries Mrs. McDonald’s sister Judy. The twins parents thought he was such a good guy because of all the lies that Aunt Judy had said about him. But as we learn, he’s actually a murdering psychopath. The twins parents finally found out at the end of the book all the bad things that he has done to the twins throughout the entire book series. Showing that he’s not the man they thought he was the parents finally see the true colors of Dr. Warsaw and realize that the twins had been telling them the truth about him the entire time. We also see that if you put your mind to it, you can do anything! Throughout the book series that the twins work together when placed in multiple dangerous situations to accomplish a single goal, SURVIVAL!. While fighting Dr. Warsaw on the the Golden Gate Bridge Coke uses his karate technique called the “inflictor” to kick Dr. Warsaw off the bridge while Pepsi uses a frisbee to knock the briefcase containing a nuclear bomb out of his hands. Together they save the thousands of people on the Golden Gate Bridge along with themselves from a nuclear …show more content…
explosion Dr.
Warsaw shows his internal conflict with the guilt that he feels after surviving a terrorist attack at the Pentagon on 9/11. He had tried to quit smoking on several occasions but on that day he just needed a cigarette, so he stepped outside to smoke when they plane hit his office. The shock of this event and the guilt he felt for surviving drove him to create the Genius Files Program but also drove him spiraling down a pit of madness. He believes that the Genius Files program was mistake and that he needs to kill them all and start over. He is willing to kill thousands of people just to kill the twins. He believes that they took the one thing that brought him joy in the world, his wife Aunt Judy. During the road trip we also see the internal conflict that Mr. McDonald faces when his car breaks down and he just totally loses it right there on the side of the road. Mr. McDonald is trying to fix the car but nothing he is doing is working. He starts yelling even screaming to the point his wife is trying to calm him down. He can’t figure out what is wrong with the car, he is frustrated at his wife, the trip is not going well. He finally decides that he just has to get over this, that his feelings of frustration is just going to make everyone
miserable. This book was written in 3rd person omniscient, because we hear the thoughts of multiple characters including Coke, Pepsi, Mr.McDonald and Dr. Herman Warsaw throughout not only the fifth book but throughout all the books. It would be hilarious in a first person point of view if we read it from the dad's perspective. He doesn't know all the dangerous situations that have be happening to his children until we get to the end of the book. If this had been told from the dad’s point of view it would have changed the entire meaning of the book because it would have shown that he knew all along what was happening to his children. The book wouldn't be as interesting as a series or a as a final book if it had been written that way but it would still be hilarious to find out the dads face at the very end of the book. In conclusion I find this book to be very entertaining, it grabs you and doesn’t let you go! It goes in depth with the characters, characters that i can relate to. I can see myself in Coke McDonald, we are the same age, we both have a similar background, we do great in school, we have been in karate I can even see myself when I read about him. This book takes me on a journey that I don’t want to end!
The first chapter in the book At The Dark End of the Street is titled “They’d Kill Me If I Told.” Rosa Park’s dad James McCauley was a expert stonemason and barrel-chested builder. Louisa McCauley was Rosa Park’s grandmother, she was homestead and her husband and oldest son built homes throughout Alabama’s Black Belt. In 1912 James McCauley went to go hear his brother-in-law preach. While there, he noticed a beautiful light named Leona Edwards. She was the daughter of Rose Percival and Sylvester Edwards. Sylvester was a mistreated slave who learned to hate white people. Leona and James McCauley got married a couple months after meeting and Rosa was conceived about nine months after the wedding. In 1915, James decided to move North with all
Chapter six of Blown to Bits by Hal Abelson, Ken Ledeen, and Harry Lewis focuses on the availability of bits via the internet and how easily they can be stolen. They discuss how companies attempt to combat this issue and potential issues that this can present. Throughout the chapter, the authors contemplate the effects that the internet has had on copyright infringement and legislation surrounding that. They discuss authorized use and rulings surrounding it. The overarching theme of the chapter seems to be that the internet was made to share information, however; in that process, information can be stolen easily, and that issue is not easy to combat.
Ooka Shohei named the last chapter of Fires on the Plain “In Praise of Transfiguration.” Through the whole novel, readers witness the protagonist Tamura transform from an innocent soldier to a killer. Readers watch him go from condemning the practice of eating human flesh to eating human flesh for his own survival. At the end, Readers see Tamura’s redemption as he shot Nagamatsu who killed and ate his own comrade Yasuda. What was the difference between two men who both killed and ate human beings? To Tamura, the guilt of eating human flesh distinguished himself from Nagamatsu who cold-bloodily killed Yasuda. As Tamura recalled, “I do not remember whether I shot him at that moment. But I do know that I did not eat his flesh; this I should certainly have remembered.” (224) The fact of him shooting at Nagamatsu had no importance to Tamura. However, his emphasis on not eating
as population grew, less land was available for children (this led to some people wanting t expand out west)
In the Earley book, the author started to talk about the history of mental illness in prison. The mentally ill people were commonly kept in local jails, where they were treated worse than animals. State mental hospitals were typically overcrowded and underfunded. Doctors had very little oversight and often abused their authority. Dangerous experimental treatments were often tested on inmates.
In chapter three Isbister explains that social scientists wrestled to justify conditions in the third world, as a result, a mixture of indefinite theories developed. A point often overlooked, by social scientists is that the struggle and growth of Asia, Africa, and Latin America cannot be measured “in statistics, nor in treatises of social scientists and historians.” After reading the chapter, an obvious conclusion stood out poverty is tangible for most of the world’s people and nations. Why is this and who is to blame? Are the poor people to be blamed for their own poverty? The answers are arranged into three different groups: mod¬ernization, dependency, and Marxism.
Vonnegut's writing style throughout the novel is very flip, light, and sarcastic. The narrator's observations and the events occurring during the novel reflect a dark view of humanity which can only be mocked by humor. At the beginning of the novel the narrator is researching for a book he is writing. The book was to be about the day the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and the lives of the people who created the bomb. The narrator travels through the plot of the story, with characters flying in and out, in almost a daze. He is involved in events which are helplessly beyond his control, but which are inevitably leading to a destination at the end.
The twenty Gladers that survived came face-to-face with the Creators who appeared thin, pale, and joyless adults who look over the Glade behind a piece of glass. One of them congratulated the successful Gladers who found a way out of the Maze. Alongside one of the Creators was a young boy named Gally who was once a Glader. Gally pulled out a knife and decided to throw a knife at Thomas. Chuck jumped right in front of Thomas causing the knife to plunge right through his body. This enraged Thomas so much that he beat Gally to the ground almost killing him. Police officers came, swarming the Creators and then handcuffing them along with Gally. The officers placed the Gladers on a bus to drive them home. During the trip, Thomas was told that the Creators put people into the Maze for something called the Maze trials. The people who were able to escape the Maze were the most intelligent ones. These people were used to save everyone from The Flare. Thomas learned on the bus ride that the world has been ravaged by unknown solar flares and a disease called The Flare. He also found out that the Creators used the Gladers to find people that were intelligent enough to find a way to defeat The Flare and save humanity. And Thomas was one of
Everything has died, and all that remains is brutality and savagery. People, once neighbors and friends, now turning on each other in the name of survival. It is disturbing and horrific most of the time. Despite this, there is a light in the dark. Two survivors wandering the road, a father and a son. They are some of the last “good guys” on the planet. They are able to survive, despite the horrendous conditions presented to them. They are constantly running from terror, with little safety to hide. They, however, make their own safety. Cormac McCarthy is able to masterfully use things that most writers try their best to avoid. McCarthy writes without using names. This creates a sense of safety between father and son, as they do not need each other 's names. It is just them. McCarthy writes using incorrect grammar. This shows the father and son are alike real people. They are not perfect, cookie cutter characters. They could be anyone the reader knows. They both love each other and feel safe enough with one another. McCarthy writes using short, to the point sentences. This conveys that the son is smart enough to understand what is happening without long descriptions. Despite this knowledge, the father is constantly calming down the kid, furthering their love for one another. McCarthy is a master of writing, and The Road is sure to go down in history as a magnificent piece of
The Road, a thrilling novel about a post-apocalyptic world, demonstrates a great understanding of the reasoning behind the choices humans make. While living a normal life with his wife and child, some unknown disaster occurs leaving the world in ruins and a father caring for his son by himself. He continues to raise his son, facing difficult decisions everyday, but inclusively decides to continue living. Also after discovering a bunker full of nonperishable foods, the father makes the tough decision to leave. Finally, the father choices to take a robber’s clothes; which presumably leads to the thief’s death. However, the son states his disagreement with his father’s choice leading to a change of heart. The incredibly difficult choices the father makes throughout the novel demonstrates his commitment to a strong relationship between him and his son.
Eric Burdon once said, “Inside each of us, there is the seed of both good and evil. It's a constant struggle as to which one will win. And one cannot exist without the other”. Cormac McCarthy’s novel, The Road, illustrates a recurring motif of Good vs. Evil in a charred post-apocalyptic universe. This new world that is scorched of life contains the father and son duo who go one each day with Good and Evil lurking behind. The father and son, for most of the novel, are the good side of the spectrum but even the good in people parts away when the stress of living one more day is constantly knocking on the front door. McCarthy’s larger purpose in writing The Road is to show how Good and Evil coincide with each other while facing identical circumstances.
Waiting impatiently for the arrival of the Allegro Middleseton the Upper Chadwell Green Monitoring Unit counted every wheel-turn between start and finish of its journey, a journey that took the massive double engined, battery-powered shining blue train through the rain directly towards, and beyond the huge railway configuration situated between smokestacks 2 and 3. Upper Chadwell Green Monitoring Unit also checked on the whereabouts of Coal Train 6476.
In the novel “The Road” By Cormac McCarthy, the two main characters; the man and the boy faced several issues throughout their journey. With each encounter, a different side of them is displayed which assists with developing their personal characteristics. Certain encounters revealed the characters moralistic side and other encounters revealed their deprave sides. Based on the man and the boys actions, one can personally choose whether they are antagonists or protagonists.
Yaghjian deals in this chapter with how to write a theological reflection paper (TRP) well along with “rhetorics of process, problem solving and proclamation” (18). The beginning of this chapter memo is not simply an “academic exercise” but rather a good instruction to write TRP well. The author admits that there is no such model of writing Theological Reflection Paper, because different writers write a reflection paper depending on their specialization. To write a Theological Reflection Paper is to have a clear understanding of what does it mean to be “theological reflection” and the reason of writing their reflection in their particular context. Determining writing what type of paper also essential in writing reflection paper.
In O’Connor’s short story, “The Misfit”, a grandmother, her son, and his wife and children go on a family field trip. There is a criminal on the loose but the family decides to proceed with their plans anyway. The criminal is called the Misfit, and as with the rest of the story, this is full of irony. The thwarted family road trip might symbolize the choices a person makes and the consequences they bring.