Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of World War 2 on people
The effect of World War 2 on people
Explain the social effects of World Wars 2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Gender roles have existed since the beginning of civilization. Historically, women were treated as physically and mentally frail creatures while men were viewed as the stronger and more capable sex. Gender roles created predisposed notions of what a woman should be, as seen through a male-dominated lens; quite similarly the same lens dictated the notion of the role a man should conform to. Largely influenced by social, economic, and technological factors of the era, gender roles in the 1940s and the 1950s saw a great amount of change. While the trauma of the 1940s resulted in an unseen level of gender equality, the 1950s drastically redefined the roles of men and women in American culture, and in doing so created norms that are still present …show more content…
in our current society. In the Roaring Twenties in American society, there was a national feeling of limitless possibilities. Unfortunately, this economic and societal high did not last long as the stock market crash of 1929 triggered the economic downturn that would take the nation a decade from which to recover. The Great Depression was a devastating economic crisis: unemployment numbers increased to an all time high, as an estimated 15 million Americans were left without a job . Banks were failing, and with no financial security or means to make money, there was nationwide panic. Under President Herbert Hoover, the government unsuccessfully attempted to create programs to help civilians who were suffering from starvation, poverty and illness. With thousands of men and women newly unemployed, the government was forced to spend heavily on relief programs. These, however, were often inadequate and left many people without enough food, clothing, and other necessities to properly support their families. Malnutrition became rampant and facilitated the spread of beriberi, tuberculosis and other diseases. As America was reaching its social and economic low point, Europeans were beginning to feel the rumblings of war. Adolf Hitler’s ascension to total political power in Germany and his consequent decision to lead the German army into neighboring countries would give way to what would come to be known as the most cataclysmic war in world history. On September 1, 1939, German troops invaded Polish territory. This direct attack on Poland not only breached the Munich Agreement of 1938 but the Polish-British Common Defense Pact of 1939 which stated that “should one of the Contracting Parties become engaged in hostilities with a European Power… the other Contracting Party will at once give the Contracting Party engaged in hostilities all the support and assistance in its power.” The German invasion of Poland thus triggered the entrance of Britain and France into the Second World War. During this time in America, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected to his second term as president. Roosevelt openly addressed the issue overseas and stood firm in his support of the Allied powers of China, the United Kingdom, and Russia. He conceded that although he gave his support, America could not join the war given its still unstable financial and societal state. This stance however, would quickly change as it became more apparent as to the type of war the Axis powers (Germany, Italy, and Japan) were waging. The Second World War differed drastically from the previous wars in world history as new technologies gave way to advanced mechanized warfare. German U-boats, tanks, and machine guns were only a few of the new deadly machines that were utilized. Aircrafts, which had been so effective during the First World War, were upgraded with the invention of radio detecting and ranging apparatus, which equipped pilots with bombsight technology . The customization and improvement of ships, communication devices, and artillery such as cluster bombs and bunker busters were critical to the war effort. Of all the innovations to arise from World War II, the potential for an atomic weapon further highlighted the pertinence of science in warfare tactical weaponry. This was a new type of war, where the race for arms was not sufficient; the race for new ideas in warfare was more of a commodity as each side tried to outdo the other. The bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 by the Japanese army finally forced Americans to join the fight with the Allies against the Axis powers. Once this occurred, men were drafted into the war effort, leaving behind their jobs as they took on the role of the nation’s protectors. As fighting nations must supply their troops with artillery, women were needed to fill the positions left by men. The American economy began to grow as the surge in war production opened new occupations for women, from which they had previously been excluded. For the first time, women flooded the workforce. The role of men was also transformed from being unemployed and helpless as providers (as they had been during the decade of the Great Depression) to becoming needed and important in the eyes of the nation. During the Great Depression men felt emasculated because they could no longer support their families. The perception of men in history had not been altered much, as they were constantly thought to be the protectors, providers and breadwinners. Men were to keep the family financially secure with food on the table and a roof over their families’ head. During the Depression, America’s middle and lower class men lost much of their identity with regard to their masculinity and purpose. The start of World War II and America’s political and military backing of the Allied powers created numerous jobs at home. Men reentering the workforce began to build machinery and supply arsenal equipment, which in turn gave the American man of the 1940’s a renewed sense of self-worth. Once America officially entered the war, men sought to further reestablish their roles. Joining the war effort, becoming a solider, and protecting the nation, all meant one very valuable thing to American Depression era males: they were needed. “Moreover, in military units men could feel the sort of association with others that had become increasingly hard to find in the modern, individualistic world of the Marketplace. Here a man had a place; he could belong.” The need for soldiers to fight on behalf of the United States gave men a sense of importance that they felt robbed of during the Depression. As the role of men altered, naturally so did the role of their counterparts. Previously only thought to be useful in a domestic environment, women now played an essential role in the Second World War. As American men left for battle, the need for artillery and other warfare supplies became even more in demand. Women began to take on the jobs that their husbands and fathers left behind, fueling the economy and the war effort. One of the most prominent liberation movements in feminist history was when women left their homes to enter the workforce. Positive female propaganda began circulating with the intention of influencing women, such as the iconic Rosie the Riveter image. Rosie depicted women as strong, tough, and capable, all of which contrasted with the initial image of women of being weak and feebleminded. Where there was a will, there was a way, and American women had the determination and drive to show their worth. Suddenly, women were the ones bringing home a paycheck and who were the breadwinners of the family. Women no longer needed to lean on men for financial stability, which furthered the growing sense of self-worth and independence that so many women craved. American women had felt the economic burden of the Depression just as acutely as men and the fact that they were a part of the revitalization of the economy was a huge point of pride. “The war that took millions of young men away from home and resulted in so many women working out of the home changed the traditional family lifestyle and child-raising in fundamental ways. Women of all ages, including teenage girls, had a degree of personal freedom unprecedented in history-and once they had it there was no way they were going to let it go.” (Male and Female Roles, 171). Unfortunately, this financial independence and usefulness did not last past the war. As World War II ended and troops returned home, there was again a change in the dynamics of gender roles in American culture. In 1945, as troops began to return home, American women were forced to ask themselves if they would stand firm in their claim of independence, or return to their domestic roles. Once men arrived home from the war, they were adamant about not returning to the emasculated state they had fallen to during the Great Depression. During the war the numbers of women working had peaked at nearly eight million, but within a year of VE Day that figure had fallen by a quarter. The men wanted their jobs back, and the usurpers were expected to beat a nifty but decorous retreat. Of course, there were some women who longed for nothing more than to be a housewife again: the safety, the security and no officer or factory boss barking orders in your face. (Cooke xviii). As Cooke states, some women were too happy to be done with this sense of independence; they had had their fun.
Others did not have a choice because they were laid off. With the men back home and jobs no longer available to them, women returned to their prior position of homemaker. The baby boom of the 1950’s proved to be a pivotal moment for gender roles in American society as it pushed the last of the women back into the household. The idea that a woman could not work and be a good mother at the same time soon became the unquestioned truth. The nation no longer needed women but now their growing families did. As families began to grow and men brought home bigger paychecks, there was a shift from living in the cities to the suburbs. “Domestic and quiescent, they moved to the suburbs, created the baby boom, and forged family togetherness…the quintessential white middle-class housewives who stayed at home to rear children, clean house, and bake …show more content…
cookies.” Images from the 1950’s images show an almost propagandist depiction of the all-American family--complete with a white picket fence and large home. This was the new American Dream. Men were once again the primary breadwinners of the family unit. The economy during the 1950’s was stronger than ever, due largely to the many manufacturing companies that opened during the war. As America’s economy thrived, people regained trust in the government and in banks and the American middle class continued to grow. During this time, the technological advancements of the country shifted from warfare to that of consumerism. There was an influx in consumerist products geared toward how the average American family should live. With the invention of the television, video recorder, radio, computerized machinery and the credit card, America entered a new phase of socio-economics. As the 1957 U.S. News & World Report tells us, People [in the 1950’s] quickly accepted new products and new inventions.
TV sets, only a curiosity 10 years ago, were acquired by most American families during the decade. High-fidelity phonographs were developed and sold in huge numbers. So were filtered cigarettes of many kinds. Housewives took to detergents. FM radios caught on. Lawn work was made easier with a wide variety of power mowers. People began to buy tape recorders, boats of glass fiber, instant foods, long-playing records… People, more prosperous than ever before, spend record amounts on travel and recreation. More than 8 million civilians traveled abroad. In addition, Americans flocked in record numbers to resorts in the U.S., bought bombs, built summer cottages, went to dude ranches, built their own swimming pools, took up fishing and other forms of recreation – spending about 113 billion dollars on these activities in the
process. With the age of consumerism born, there were no limits on what an American family could have. Advertisements in magazines and newspapers circulated and instructed men what they needed to buy their wife in order to make her happy at home. Other magazines spoke of how men and women should act in relation to one another to achieve the perfect marriage. The change in gender roles in the 1950s was largely shaped by commercial consumerism. The majority of advertisements showed men in smart suits leaning in towards his family to allow a sense of self-confidence and fulfillment to ooze through the image . Men were steadfast in keeping up with the middle class hype that in turn allowed them the recurring notion of masculinity for which they hungered. The 1950s crafted the notion that a man was providing for his family by earning a large paycheck and procuring them the newest consumer goods. Not only did these products improve the day-to-day efficiency of life, but it also kept their families happy and made them look better in comparison to their neighbors. For women in the 1950s, the sense of self-importance and self-reliance wore off as they were once again sent back to what many considered, the mundane daily activities of the home. Women were no longer called upon to serve their country, but to fit the constructed notion of being the perfect wife. Women in 1950’s advertisements were portrayed as motherly, nurturing, the faultless homemaker and caretaker. By 1950 standards, women were expected to keep the family picture perfect, which translated to being obedient wives and loving mothers. Women were expected to keep up with the newest fashion trends such as having a thin waist and perky bosom. They were also expected to stay relevant in the social scene and be a graceful, caring, and gentle to all around them. Women were encouraged by the media to find fulfillment in such roles and goals. As most advertisements were geared towards women, the consumerist culture blurred the lines between want and need for women. Acquiring a washing machine did not mean simply gaining an efficient way of washing clothes, it meant having more time to spend with your family in the evenings. The consumerist culture further personified what the average woman needed in order to have the perfect life. It was a gimmick, but one that worked wonders across the nation in defining a decade of gender roles. The events that spanned from 1940-50 allowed Americans to take a step closer to gender equality. These events propelled women to step outside of their comfort zone, pushed them to realize their worth could be weighed in more than just the home that they kept. This also allowed them to become financially secure and begin to put an end to the warped perception that women are necessarily helpless without a man. At the end of World War II, gender roles morphed back into the familiar. The next decade cemented men into the role of protector and provider in the eyes of American society. A woman’s place especially was at home taking care of children, the house, and other minor tasks that might keep her “simple” feminine mind busy. Always seen as lacking physical strength as well as intellectual capacity, the role of woman has always been subservient to man. For the better part of history, women were seen as little more than wives and mothers. One could say those words translate directly into the dilemma we have today. There are still predisposed notions of what a woman should be, as dictated by societal expectations, as opposed to what she is. The same could be said for men, as they had a strict behavioral pattern to conform to in order to keep their identity as males, which was a recurring thread throughout the 1940’s and 1950’s. The gender shift that occurred throughout these two decades ultimately gave way to the feminist movement of the 1960’s. The feminist movement was successful because of the events of the two prior decades. Feminist goals were simple: they wanted rights and privileges equal to men. In the article “The 1960s-70s American Feminist Movement: Breaking Down Barriers for Women” the author paints a picture of what it was like to be a working woman of the 60’s, The 38 percent of American women who worked in 1960 were largely limited to jobs as teacher, nurse, or secretary. Women were generally unwelcome in professional programs; as one medical school dean declared, "Hell yes, we have a quota...We do keep women out, when we can. We don't want them here — and they don't want them elsewhere, either, whether or not they'll admit it." As a result, in 1960, women accounted for six percent of American doctors, three percent of lawyers, and less than one percent of engineers. Working women were routinely paid lower salaries than men and denied opportunities to advance, as employers assumed they would soon become pregnant and quit their jobs, and that, unlike men, they did not have families to support. Women had been taking steps since the 1940’s to eradicate the stereotypes that came with being a workingwoman. Once women began to create enough awareness, laws were passed and gender discrimination was recognized as a social epidemic. Although women and men have both been influenced by American historical events, the fight for gender equality is still on going. The 1940’s and 1950’s only helped to ignite a whole new conception of what a woman is capable of when given the opportunity. The need for innovative technologies used in World War II gave men the push they needed to feel a sense of purpose. Those same men leaving work to join the war effort had a parallel effect on women of the 1940’s as they took over the jobs the men left behind. These opportunities were liberating for both parties, both in the sense of achieving a lost (or never achieved) sense of self-worth and of serving a greater good. Men reasserted themselves as protectors and women freed themselves of a life lived within the confines of the home. As the war ended and troops made their way home, the economically booming 1950’s awaited them. During this decade the roles of each gender were shaped concurrently with American consumer culture. Women returned to a life of domesticity and molded themselves to fit the description of the perfect wife while men took on the task of working to achieve the American dream as defined by consumerist marketing.
During WWII, women took over the work force, and had such inspirations as Rosie the Riveter. This created a generation of women who wanted more out of life than birthing children, and keeping a nice home for their husband. The end of the war, however, brought with it a decrease of working women. In the 1950’s the rate of working women had slightly rebounded to 29% following the post-war decrease in 1945. These women were well rounded, working outside the home, and still having dinner on the table by 5PM.
The world was a very different place sixty years ago. The men came home from the war to take back the work force from the women and sent the women back into the home to follow traditional domestic roles. All aspects of life had to be cookie cutter perfect, to include the gender roles. The roles of both genders have been portrayed by the BBC Television show, Call the Midwife, as they use to be in the 1950’s. The men were the breadwinners of their family by working arduous hours, protect their family and home, and have zero contact with feminine things and activities; the women were expected to get married early, always look their best, and never indulge in their aspirations for a career outside of the home unless they were single.
In the early 1900’s, women who were married main jobs were to care for her family, manage their houses, and do housework. That is where the word housewife was come from. During the 1940's, women's roles and expectations in society were changing quickly and a lot. Before, women had very limited say in society. Since unemployment was so high during the Great Depression, most people were against women working because they saw it as women taking jobs from men that needed to work. Women were often stereotyped to stay home, have babies, and to be a good wife and mother. Advertisements often targeted women, showing them in the kitchen, talking with children, serving dinner, cleaning, and them with the joy of a clean house or the latest kitchen appliance.
“Gender” refers to the cultural construction of whether one is female, male, or something else (Kottak 2013: 209). Typically, based on your gender, you are culturally required to follow a particular gender norm, or gender role. Gender roles are the tasks and activities a culture assigns to the sexes (Kottak 213: 209). The tasks and activities assigned are based upon strongly, seized concepts about male and female characteristics, or gender stereotypes. Gender stereotypes…are oversimplified but strongly upheld ideas about bout the characteristics of males and females (Kottak 2013: 209).
The social perception of women has drastically changed since the 1950’s. The social role of women during the 1950’s was restrictive and repressed in many ways. Society during that time placed high importance on expectations of behavior in the way women conducted themselves in home life as well as in public. At home the wife was tasked with the role of being an obedient wife, caring mother, and homemaker. Women publicly were expected to form groups and bond over tea with a slice of cake. All the while government was pushing this idealize roll for women in a society “dominated” by men. However, during this time a percentage of women were finding their way into the work force of men. “Women were searching their places in a society led by men;
Due to the idealization of domesticity in media, there was a significantly stagnant period of time for women’s rights between 1945 and 1959. Women took over the roles for men in the workplace who were fighting abroad during the early 1940s, and a strong, feminist movement rose in the 1960s. However, in between these time periods, there was a time in which women returned to the home, focusing their attention to taking care of the children and waiting on their husband’s every need. This was perpetuated due to the increasing popularity of media’s involvement in the lives of housewives, such as the increasing sales of televisions and the increase in the number of sexist toys.
However, social conditions made it less feasible for families to live this way. As the 1960s approached and consumption was in high demand, women were yet again, forced to join the work force; but only a quarter of the women joined the workforce, whereas in the 1990s about “two-thirds of women who had children were in the work force (Coontz 55). Coontz (1997) explains how by 1973, “real wages were falling for young families, and by the late 1970s, government effectiveness had decreased (Coontz 54). It was because of economic factors that the nuclear bread-winning family could only be a lifestyle a few can afford. Nonetheless, women joining the workforce created a new understanding of women-hood, changed women’s status in society, and created conflict within the household. Women did not have the time to complete all the household tasks which contributed to the increased divorce rates, but left women happier due to the fact that they had that ultimate
also managed to prove that they could do the jobs just as well as men
In contrast, men have been seen as more dominate than women because of their masculine abilities and other traits and most importantly their profound responsibility of being the provider and head of the household. Americans constantly uses theses two distinct stereotypes that in many cases present many biases regarding gender codes in America. Things have changed over time the women are no longer just house wives taking care of the house and children waiting for their husband to come home from his nine to five occupations. Andrea L. Miller explains in her article “The Separate Spheres Model of Gendered Inequality” that, “A common theme in the study of gender is the idea that men and women belong in distinct spheres of society, with men being particularly fit for the workplace and women being particularly fit for the domestic domain” (Miller 2). Miller gives two very specific examples on how gender is viewed in American
In today’s contemporary American culture, gender roles are despised by the younger generation because of the distinctions placed on them. This is the era of open-mindedness and self-expression and because of this individuals feel they should not be told what they can and cannot do based on their sex. There are now material things such as, clothes, shoes and perfumes that are considered unisex, males and females can now fight in wars and men are no longer fully needed to be the providers of their families. Though the American culture has attempted to make a leap forward when it comes to breaking down the barriers of gender roles, it is still being held back. Being a culture that was first influenced by the Christian religion, there are still traces of these gender roles present. From areas of
The 1940’s were a turning point for women in the workforce. Women were perceived to be the weaker sex by society and faced social prejudices in efforts to become part of the workforce. The common belief was that women were intellectually inferior to men, incapable of making decisions regarding their household, and should not work outside of the home. Their job was to maintain the home, raise the children, and be supportive wives of the working husband.
During the Great War and the huge amount of men that were deployed created the need to employ women in hospitals, factories, and offices. When the war ended the women would return home or do more traditional jobs such as teaching or shop work. “Also in the 1920s the number of women working raised by fifty percent.” They usually didn’t work if they were married because they were still sticking to the role of being stay at home moms while the husband worked and took care of the family financially. But among the single women there was a huge increase in employment. “Women were still not getting payed near as equally as men and were expected to quit their jobs if they married or pregnant.” Although women were still not getting payed as equally it was still a huge change for the women's
Gender roles are based on the norms and standards in different societies (Flores 2012). Each societies has their own set of social norms, and the identities that fit those norms. In the United States masculine roles are associated with strength, dominance, and aggression. Women in the US are expected to be more passive, nurturing and subordinate (Flores 2012).
Since the beginning of time, the perception of gender roles had always been a part of everyday life. In society today, gender role is viewed as a “set of societal norms [that dictate] what types of behavior are generally considered acceptable, appropriate, or desirable” [Wikipedia] based on somebody’s perceived or born gender. In the nineteenth century, a movement has abrupt that is the “advocacy of women 's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men” [Google] known as feminism.Within America and Vietnam in the nineteenth and twenty-first century, gender role is not viewed as universal, but each country has a different set of behavior, belief, norm, and value when it comes to the role of male or female. How does
The differences between women and men are not solely biological. Our society’s culture has established a set of unwritten cultural laws of how each gender should act, or in other words society has ascribed a stereotype. Men’s gender identity has been one of masculinity, and masculinity is defined as referring to a man or things described as manly. What does manly mean though? Is a male manly if he is “Mr. Fix-it”, or the jock, or if he sits on the couch on Sunday watching football? This latter statement is a stereotype of men, that has been around for decades, and is current as well, but starting with the 1960’s a man’s role started to change, despite the stereotype not changing to accommodate it. For the past 40 years one can see how men have taken on roles stereotypically ascribed to women, such roles including being the “stay-at-home mom”, which we can find an excellent example of in the 1980’s film “Mr.