Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Principles of fractional distillation
Conclusion on gas chromatography
Principles of fractional distillation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Principles of fractional distillation
Objective:
The purpose of this experiment is to learn how to use fractional distillation to separate a mix of isopropyl acetate and toluene, redistill them, and use gas chromatography to examine the separation.
Techniques:
Chemical Name Molecular Weight Appearance Density Amount Boiling Point
Isopropyl Acetate 102.1 g/mol Colorless liquid .88 g/mL 1.5 mL 89°C
Toluene 92.15 g/mol Colorless liquid .87 g/mL 1.5mL 111°C
• Distillation
• Gas Chromatography
Physical Data Table:
Procedures:
The following procedures were performed using pages 27-29 in Dr. Morvant and Dr. Halterman’s Organic Chemistry Laboratory Manual. 1.5mL of Isopropyl acetate and 1.5mL of Toluene were added to a 5mL conical vial by a calibrated Pasteur pipette, and then the spin
…show more content…
vane was added. The Hickman still and heating block was put together and aluminum foil was wrapped around the connecter and Hickman still. When the temperature increased, the thermometer was added to the Hickman still. As the temperature of the hotplate slowly increased to 80°-90°C, the solution was stirred slowly. The connector was tightened during the heating. Distillate was removed using a bent pipette, and it was placed into a .5-dram vial. Distillate was collected and put in the vial until there was 1.2mL in the vial, and then the heat was raised to 105-115°C. .6mL of the distillate was collected into another vial labeled “Fraction 2.” The remaining 1.2mL of liquid in the distillation conical vial was cooled and transferred to a vial labeled “Fraction 3.” Gas chromatography was used to analyze the three samples. A USB cable was used to turn on the mini GC and the LabQuest device. A new file was made, and the collect button brought up the “Temperature-Pressure Profile”. The parameters were modified for the isopropyl acetate and toluene samples. A syringe was 1/3 filled with Fraction one and expelled into a paper towel twice. After clearing out the syringe, it was filled with .2 µl of Fraction 1. Fraction 1 was inserted in the injection port when the GC read “Inject and select Collect simultaneously.” Before removing the needle, the collect button was pushed while depressing the syringe plunger. The data was saved, and the peak areas were calculated using analyzes, advanced, peak integration, and then signal. The starting point of the first peak was tapped on and then “add” was chosen. Then the second peak was added, and peak integration was completed. The steps involving the GC and LabQuest were repeated for Fractions 2 and 3. After that, Fraction 2 was disposed of in liquid waste. Fraction 1 and 3 were combined with another groups 1 and 3 for redistillation. The previous set up for the Hickman still was used with either Fraction 1 or 3. The heating block temperature was raised to 80-90°C for Fractions 1 and 105-115°C for Fractions 3. 1 mL of distillate was collected from either Fraction, and then GC analysis were run again and shared. Observations: 1.5mL of toluene and isopropyl acetate each were added to a 5mL conical vial with a spin vane.
Aluminum foil was not used during the experiment to wrap around the Hickman still. The temperature of the hot plate continuously increased because the thermometer temperature increased very slowly. The stillhead started to collect condensate around 50°C which is much lower than the 80-90°C that the thermometer was supposed to read. A bent pipette was used to collect around 1.5mL of distillate that was put into a .5-dram vial. This vial was named “Fraction 1.” The hot plate temperature was increased a little more to increase the thermometer temperature in the Hickman still. .6mL of distillate was collected, using the same bent pipette, and put into another .5-dram vial named “Fraction 2.” The hot plate was turned off, and everything was left to cool for a little bit. After it cooled, around 1.2 mL of clear liquid was left in the original vial and transferred to another vial named “Fraction 3.” The syringe for gas chromatography was flushed with acetone and then with Fraction 1 before any reading was done. Because the syringe only collects .2µL of Fraction 1, the liquid wasn’t visible to the naked eye. The needle had to be twisted and rotated gently to insert into the injection port. When the LabQuest collected to data, there was one tall peak and a few little ones. The Percent Area for peak 1 was -197.78 and peak 2 was 297.78, and the Retention time for peak 1 was .700 …show more content…
minutes, while peak 2 was .945 minutes. The same steps were repeated with Fraction 3. The analysis had one prominent peak. The Retention time was 1.180 minutes, and the Percent Area was 100.00. Due to time restraints, redistillation was not performed. Results: The Gas Chromatography analysis for Fraction 1 was -197.78 and 297.78 Percent Area and .700 minutes and .945 minutes Retention Time. The Gas Chromatography analysis for Fraction 3 was 1.180 minutes for Retention time and 100.00% Area. Discussion: The purpose of this experiment was to learn how to perform fractional distillation, and understand gas chromatography and LabQuest used with it.
Distillation is used to separate liquids with different boiling points. Because toluene and isopropyl acetate have different vapor and composition phases, fractional distillation was used. Isopropyl acetate’s boiling point is lower than toluene’s boiling point (89°C and 111°C), meaning that Fraction 1 was isopropyl acetate while Fraction 2 was a mixture of the two, and 3 was pure toluene. Gas chromatography was only performed on Fraction 1 and 3, and a packed column was used. Isopropyl acetate and toluene’s polarity were important because the more polar the molecule, the longer it takes to come off of the column in the GC. The number of peaks showing on the gas chromatography analysis shows how many compounds are in the sample. For example Fraction 1 had two peaks, meaning there were two compounds in the sample, while Fraction 3 only had one peak. The longer the retention time, the more polar the compound was. Fraction 3 had the longest retention time, meaning it was more polar than Fraction 1. Fraction 3 was toluene, which is a more polar compound than isopropyl acetate in Fraction 1. Gas chromatography also identifies the concentration of the compound or the size of the peaks. A tall and wide peak means that there was a lot of a compound passing over the detector in the gas
chromatography. Two peaks were seen in Fraction 1 meaning that there were two compounds in the sample. Fraction 1 should have been isopropyl acetate but some toluene could have evaporated with it. Because the thermometer wasn’t heating up very fast, the hot plate could have been heated too fast resulting in some toluene to evaporate with the isopropyl acetate and be collected for Fraction 1. Another possible source of error was from the estimation of 1.2mL in Fraction 1 and .6mL in Fraction 2. It was difficult to estimate how much was actually collected for each, Fractions 1 and 3 had around the same amount. Conclusion: In this experiment distillate was collected into 3 fractions depending on boiling points. 1.2mL of distillate was collected for Fraction 1, .6mL for Fraction 2, and 1.2mL for Fraction 3. Gas chromatography resulted in .700 and .945 minutes for retention time and -197.78 and 297.78 % area for Fraction 1, and 1.180 minutes for retention time and 100.00 % area for Fraction 3. Because Fraction 3 had a longer retention time, meaning it was a more polar compound, and it was collected at a higher temperature, it confirms that toluene was in Fraction 3 and isopropyl was in Fraction 1. Morvant, M and Ronald Halterman. Organic Chemistry Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed.; The University of Oklahoma’s Center for Teaching Excellence: Norman, 2013.
In order to separate the mixture of fluorene, o-toluic acid, and 1, 4-dibromobenzene, the previously learned techniques of extraction and crystallization are needed to perform the experiment. First, 10.0 mL of diethyl ether would be added to the mixture in a centrifuge tube (1) and shaken until the mixture completely dissolved (2). Diethyl ether is the best solvent for dissolving the mixture, because though it is a polar molecule, its ethyl groups make it a nonpolar solvent. The compounds, fluorene and 1, 4-dibromobenzene, are also nonpolar; therefore, it would be easier for it to be dissolved in this organic solvent.
As shown in figure 2, the percentage of each isomeric alcohol in the mixture had been determined. The hydrogen atom on the carbon atom with the hydroxyl group appear at around 4.0 ppm for borneol and 3.6 ppm for isoborneol. The product ratio has been determined by integrating the peaks. A ratio of 6:1 for the Isoborneol/borneol ratio was expected and is validated by the calculations shown above, with isoborneol percentage at 83.82% and 16.17% of borneol. A CHCl3 group noted at around 7ppm and a CH2Cl2 at around 3.5ppm.
The objective of this experiment was to perform extraction. This is a separation and purification technique, based on different solubility of compounds in immiscible solvent mixtures. Extraction is conducted by shaking the solution with the solvent, until two layers are formed. One layer can then be separated from the other. If the separation does not happen in one try, multiple attempts may be needed.
The purpose of this lab is to determine the density of a solid and an unknown liquid in order to determine the unknowns from a list of substances provided in the lab instruction. A method to identify the substance is to figure out the density (d=m/v) where d is the density equals to the mass divided by the volume of the substance. When measuring the mass, reset the balance to zero to obtain only the mass of the object in grams (g) and not anything else. When measuring the volume, read at the meniscus for an accurate measurement.
The experiment was conducted to show which type of distillation is the most accurate in separating the two liquids. Simple distillation results were compared to the different techniques of fractional distillation in order to show which was the most accurate in separating the liquids.
The objective of this experiment was to use a common method of separation distillation. Distillation can be used in purifying or separating liquids, when the liquid if heated the more volatile component, the molecule with the lower boiling point, vaporizes and can be condensed. This type of separation will work efficiently when the feed mixture has a decent range between the boiling points of the components. The relationship between component’s vapor pressure to the composition of the solution is Ptotal==P1+P2, Raoult’s Law. This can be used with Dalton’s Law of partial pressure,
Purpose Meteorologists have been observing clouds to determine weather conditions dating back to the nineteenth century. Various tools and instruments are used to monitor complex measurements of clouds and their effects on the weather. One of these cloud-related instruments is the nephoscope; this instrument can measure the amount of cloud cover, the directional movement of clouds, and even the cloud’s altitude. In the Cloud Watcher investigation, data was collected over three weeks by use of a homemade mirror nephoscope in order to determine trends and variations of the weather in relation to cloud cover, wind direction, temperature, dew point, etc. Supplementary Information
Analyze each fraction by spotting 10 times with capillary tubes on a TLC plate, which is exposed to iodine vapor for 15 minutes.
In this lab, solutions were separated by polarity and affinity to solids by chromatography. Chromatography is the separation of a mixture, where the components move at different rates up a medium. The medium used was chromatography paper, matched with a series of developers to aid in movement of compounds upwards. The distance moved up the paper is measured and the rf is calculated. The distance the pigments traveled is divided by the distance developer traveled. The more polar a substance the further it travels up the paper. The paper works by capillary action and absorption to separate the compounds.
An organic solvent or a mixture of solvents (the eluent) flows down through the column. Components of the sample separate from each other by partitioning between the stationary packing material (silica or alumina) and the mobile eluent. Molecules with different polarity partition to different extents, and therefore move through the column at different rates. The eluent is collected in fractions. Fractions are typically analyzed by thin-layer chromatography to see if separation of the components was successful. Column Chromatography is the preparative application of chromatography, which is mainly used to obtain pure chemical compounds from a mixture of compounds on a scale from micrograms to kilograms using large industrial columns.
The sample was subjected to steam distillation as illustrated in Figure 1. A total of 50ml of distillate was collected while recording the temperature for every 5.0 ml of distillate. The distillate was transferred into a 250ml Erlenmeyer flask and 3.0 g of NaCl was added. The flask was cooled and the content was transferred into a 250-ml separatory funnel. Then 25.0ml of hexane was added and the mixture was shaken for 5 minutes with occasional venting. The aqueous layer was discarded and the organic layer was left inside. About 25.0ml of 10% NaOH was then added and the mixture was shaken as before. The aqueous layer was collected and then cooled in an ice bath. It was then acidified with enough 6.00 M HCl while the pH is being monitored with red litmus paper. Another 25.0 ml of hexane was added and the mixture was shaken as before. The hexane extract was saved and a small amount of anhydrous sodium sulfate was added. The mixture was then swirled for a couple of minutes then filtered. A small amount of the final extracted was tested separately with 1% FeCl3 and Bayer’s reagent.
HPLC is abbreviated as High Performance Liquid Chromatography or High Pressure Liquid Chromatography. In pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis HPLC has utmost feature that is for the development of the characteristic of the methodology since 25 years. During the process of discovery, development and manufacturing for the identification, qualification and quantification of drug analysis in active pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) or in the formulation, HPLC is the most important analytical tool. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is a one of the form of column chromatography that pumps solvent (called as mobile phase) and carried sample mixture or analyte into the column has chromatographic
The purpose of this experiment is to compare the processes of distillation and fractional distillation to discover which procedure enables a more pure sample of ethanol to be collected from an ethanol/water mixture.
Thin layer chromatography is a classical case of adsorption or solid/liquid chromatography or planar chromatography. In planar chromatography, the stationary phase is applied on a flat surface and movement of mobile phase is due to the capillary action. The stationary phase is normally a polar absorbent and the mobile phase can be a single solvent or combination of solvents. Adsorption is a concentration dependent process and adsorption coefficient is not constant, in contrast to partition coefficient (liquid/liquid chromatography). Hence, if the concentration of sample is more than the absorptive capacity of stationary phase, the separation of components of the mixture will be poor. TLC is a useful tool for separating and identifying
There is also the potential of human error within this experiment for example finding the meniscus is important to get an accurate amount using the graduated pipettes and burettes. There is a possibility that at one point in the experiment a chemical was measured inaccurately affecting the results. To resolve this, the experiment should have been repeated three times.