Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The indian gaming act
Essay On "Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
Essay On "Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The indian gaming act
Gambling in the form of traditional games has always been a part of many American Indian tribes’ cultures. Though many tribes began using other forms of gambling, this continues today. However, the use of gaming to obtain profit was not as successful until the late 1970's and early 1980's. It quickly grew from an industry that made $100 million annually to over $22 billion annually. Gambling started with simple games such as bingo and continued to grow until the states the tribes were in eventually took notice. Additionally, because of the rapid growth of the gambling industry some tribes used this to better their ailing economies. As more states started to take notice of the increased amount of income the tribes were bringing in, the states’ governments began questioning whether it was a legitimate operation or not. In response states began lobbying for the Federal Government to regulate Indian gaming. The states wanting to both counter infiltration by organized crime and tax income gained by Indian gaming. Tribes fought the states to maintain tribal sovereignty and to protect gaming revenues for further economic development and support. Congress responded with the set of compromises which then evolved into what is now known as the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. The Act separated Indian gaming into three separate classes with a different regulatory scheme for each.
The first, Class 1 gaming, is defined as (1), traditional Indian gaming, which may be a part of tribal ceremonies and celebrations and (2), social gaming with minimal prizes. Regulatory authority over Class 1 gaming is vested exclusively in tribal governments and is not subjected to IGRA's requirements. The second, class II gaming includes bingo, (whe...
... middle of paper ...
...d party attempts to sue on right of action in regards of IGRA violations have had little success. Conflicts between Indian casino and patron over gaming issues fall under jurisdiction of the tribe in exercise of tribal sovereignty.
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act requires compacts between the tribes and states to govern the conduct of Indian casino gaming, and those compacts allocate jurisdiction between tribe and state. The Act authorized tribes to bring an action in federal court against states. Tribe could enforce the states to bargain for a compact. If the court finds the states failed to bargain in good faith, it can order the state and tribe to conclude a compact within sixty days. If the parties do not reach agreement within sixty days, they submit their last best offers to a court appointed mediator who chooses one of the two proposed compacts.
According to Congress, the goal of IGRA is to use gaming as a mean of “[promoting] tribal economic development, self-sufficiency, and strong tribal government,” while ensuring that gaming is conducted fairly and honestly (“Gaming Tax Law and Bank Secrecy Act Issues”). Congress created this act for several reasons. First, they thought that Indian gaming was established as a way to strengthen tribal government, but tribes had been opening casinos solely as a way of making money for tribal government. Second, they believed that tribes had cross the boundary of the contract many times, but the federal government cannot do anything to them because the previous contract was not very clear on how tribes should operate Indian gaming. Lastly, they felt that tribes had been given too much power for being able to regulate gaming exclusively on their own without any prohibition from the federal or stat...
What has changed the way America’s pastime is looked at forever and prompt worldwide discussion? Joe Jackson and his seven teammates changed the face of baseball forever during the intimate scandal of 1919. No other time in baseball history did Americans question the state of the game. Pete Rose had also brought a debate like no other before in baseball. Since his banishment in 1989 the country has been split on the issue. Gambling by these men and others has caused great problems in baseball. The game of baseball has been destroyed by gambling.
Ulrich, G. (1999). Widening the circle: Adapting traditional Indian dispute resolution methods to implement alternative dispute resolution and restorative justice in modern communities. Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy. 20, (2), 419-452.
In regard to law, Deloria defines the relationship between the US Government and the Indians as paternalistic. The US Government treated and governed the Indians as a father would by providing basic needs but without given them rights. There has been some improvement with the Indian Reorganization Act in 1934. This act allowed the return to local self-government on a tribal level and restored the self management of their assets. By allowing the Indians to self govern it encouraged an economic foundation for the inhabitants of Indian reservations. Unfortunately only a few tribes have fully taken advantage of this act, while others continue to struggle for survival.
For years, casino gambling was portrayed in the media and Hollywood as being associated with criminal activities and the mafia. Now with proper scrutiny and government regulations, casino gambling has become a lucrative business, with casinos stock even trading on Wall Street. Casino gambling is an increasingly popular and legal activity in many states throughout the United States. “The term gambling or ‘gaming’ as the industry calls it, means any legalized form of wagering or betting conducted in a casino, on a riverboat, on an Indian reservation, or at any other location under the jurisdiction of the United States” (National Gambling Impact Study Commission Act). States that allow casino gambling benefit vastly by re-incorporating the taxation of commerce gained from casinos and tourism associated with the casinos back into the state and local communities.
The Indian Act is made up from the Gradual Civilization Act of 1857 and the Gradual Enfranchisement Act of 1869. The Gradual Civilization Act encouraged the Indian people to give up their status and become a Canadian citizen. The Gradual Enfranchisement Act gave the government full control over the Indian people. They were able to decide everything from who kept their status, received benefits, and even who were able to keep their children. In 1876, these acts together alongside with other rules and regulations formed the Indian Act. The government thought it was best to be able to control every aspect of the First Nations people’s lives. It was stated in annual report of the Department of the Interior Indian Affairs in 1876:
In 1830s the U.S. congress began developing Indian policy with the main objective of removing all Native Indian Tribes out of any organized “state.” The plan was to allow the Indians to settle to the west in “Indian country” and never be disturbed again. However, the country’s population continued to grow, the Civil war had ended, freed slaves and those exhausted from war began to cry for new opportunities. The government found that if America was to flourish economically that they needed to encourage the settlement of the west. The west promised vast resources, in lumber, gold and farmland. As people began migrating west they began to encroach on Indian country. As the Indians were pushed from their land and the emigrants depleted their resources, many tribes began to rebel and resort to violence.
... of sex crimes. Furthermore, granting tribes full authority to prosecute any crime may create injustice for accused non-native individuals as well as creating more complication between tribes (Gede, 2012).
According to Congress, Indian Gaming Regulation Act (IGRA) was created in 1988 as a way of helping tribes from falling below the poverty level. The goal of IGRA is to use gaming as a mean of “[promoting] tribal economic development, self-sufficiency, and strong tribal government,” while ensuring that gaming is conducted fairly and honestly. Since its establishment, hundreds of tribes are able to negotiate an agreement with the governments to operate casinos on reservation lands (“Gaming Tax Law and Bank Secrecy Act Issues for Indian Tribal Government”). Although Congress says that the real purpose of IGRA is to allow Indians to open casinos, it is merely a set of laws that limits the tribe’s right on gaming.
The Indian Act was an attempt by the Canadian government to assimilate the aboriginals into the Canadian society through means such as Enfranchisement, the creation of elective band councils, the banning of aboriginals seeking legal help, and through the process of providing the Superintendent General of the Indian Affairs extreme control over the aboriginals, such as allowing the Superintendent to decide who receives certain benefits, during the earlier stages of the Canadian-Indigenous' political interaction. The failure of the Indian Act though only led to more confusion regarding the interaction of Canada and the aboriginals, giving birth to the failed White Paper and the unconstitutional Bill C-31, and the conflict still is left unresolved until this day.
Because the AIRFA lacks direct implementation, it often requires federal agencies to review their rules and regulations to accommodate the practice of Native religions. In the 1988 Lyng vs. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, the people of the Yurok, Karok, and Tolowa tribes challenged the U.S. Forest Service regarding the construction of a logging road through sacred land. The Supreme Court allowed the project to go on, viewing the land as dispensable to Native religious life (Deloria, 1992). The verdict was determined regardless of the Native testimony stating that the area “is not even a part of this world that we live in here. That place up there, the high country, belongs to the spirit and it exists in another world apart from us” (Deloria, 1992). This court case is just one of the numerous cases regarding Native sacred land claims.
In the 1800’s Indians were basically kicked out of their: home, land, territory, that resigned in the west. By basically being in tricked into signing a form saying they would get their land back in the future. The current president at the time Andrew Jackson got the Indians to sign the treaties, which basically made them leave the west. Soon after the Supreme Court decided that Indians could not hold titles to land. Tribes try to resist as much as they could, without violence. In 1830 Andrew Jackson created the Indian removal act. Which meant that Indians could move east and give their land up in the west. It was supposed to be peaceful, however the Indians resisted. So, Americans forced them to leave. Some Indians however decided to stay, but that did not sit well with many Americans.
From the very beginning of its existence, the U.S. dealt with Indian tribes on an official governmental and treaty making basis. Political involvement in Indian affairs was a very important part of governmental life in early America. Indian tribes were very powerful in the 1700s and early 1800s in America and were a serious threat to the new United States. Hence, the United States government was heavily involved in negotiating and dealing with tribes as part of its governmental policies. The United States ultimately negotiated, signed and ratified almost 390 treaties with American Indian tribes. Most of these treaties are still valid today. The United States did not give Indian tribes anything for free in these treaties. Instead, the treaties were formal government to government negotiations regarding sales of land and property rights that the tribes owned and that the United States wanted to buy. The United States Supreme Court stated in 1905 that United States and Indian treaties are “not a grant of rights to the Indians, but a grant of rights from them — a reservation of those not granted.” Thus, while tribal governments sold some of their rights in land, animals, and resources to the United States for payments of money, goods, and promises of peace and security, the tribes held onto or reserved to themselves other lands and property rights that they
Gambling addiction is an issue found in numerous areas where gambling is legal. People who are addicted to gambling, also know as problem gamblers, face many health risks including depression, suicidal thoughts, loss of sleep, loss of appetite, migraine and anxiety in addition to marriage breakdown, problems at work and bankruptcy (9). About 2 percent of adults are thought to be problem gamblers (1). In today’s society this costly addiction is not often considered to be a common problem among those who gamble. Only a small amount of states in the U.S. give enough attention toward this rising problem of people that are sometimes even willing to commit crimes just to aid their addiction. In the past our government has sought out a few solutions that help those who have developed an addiction and prevent a further increase in the number of people becoming addicted. Personally, my outlook on the problem is that it needs a better solution. I think that a higher funding to gambling addiction clinics, more ordinance and restriction laws, and more prevention and awareness programs should bee brought into consideration in order to lower the amount of people who become addict to gambling.
In this era of modern civilization, the consumption of Internet had become a huge part of one’s daily life. According to The new media’s profound influence in GE13 (2013), up to June 2012, the overall number of Internet consumers in Malaysia is determined to be 17723000 which representing 60.7 percent of the nation’s population, recorded by Internet usage monitoring website, Internet World Stats. Without any doubt, one of the reasons consumers use the Internet is online gambling. This cause makes people jump to conclusion and make negative comments that online gambling brings more harm than good. Although some opponents argue that online gambling may lead to addiction, it should not be banned because it helps in the development of the economy of a nation, it saves cost and time as well as it is a convenient and hazard-free way to gamble.