Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on patriarchy
Patriarchy and feminism essay
Patriarchy and feminism essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the memoir From the Graveyard of the Arousal Industry, Justin Pearson sheds light on how society functions according to gender inequalities. In simple words, men are superior to women in a patriarchal society. This means that men possess more authority and power in comparison to women. The memoir explores a punk subculture, and pays particular attention to the ways in which it reinforces ideas of societal norms of male superiority. Moreover, it addresses these societal norms by highlighting the actions of woman in a punk society as references. Although many are eager to achieve equality in society through the ideology of feminism, they prevent themselves from speaking up, further emphasizing inequality between the genders. Feminism “examines …show more content…
representations of the roles of men and women in cultural narratives in order to consider how culture shapes, critiques, and re-imagines who a woman can be” (Grinnell). In attempting to challenge such inequalities and gain the respect they deserve, women undergo physical and psychological transformations. Women in a punk subculture tend to play an insignificant role; they play the role of outcasts, consequently making them feel inadequate. While some say punk culture contests mainstream norms, I argue that it is more than this; it does not only contest the norm but also, surprisingly, reinforces them. According to Mullaney, “even though a subculture deliberately carved out to oppose mainstream norms and values ends up reinforcing masculinist ideals and male-defined gender expectations” (387). In making this comment, Mullaney urges us to look at the bigger picture; how punk culture affects gender especially women, which is frequently overlooked. I agree that subculture enhances masculine ideals and male-defined gender expectations; however, a point that needs emphasizing is how women are treated differently, and what they do in order to overcome the patriarchal norms that they matter less than men. While it is true that women change their physical appearances and what they think about themselves in order to feel accepted, it does not necessarily follow that women are able to overcome the differences they encounter by doing this. Nevertheless, some readers may challenge my view by insisting that women do not put in the effort to overcome these differences, which is the reason, why they exist. I will show this by examining how Pearson’s memoir represents women, by looking closely at how women are treated in this punk culture scene and how this leads to a patriarchal society. According to Pearson’s description, gender plays a significant role in punk culture and leads women to be seen as a minority compared to men. Participants are predominantly males, thus causing an imbalance in gender that contributes to its discursive gender bias. Mullaney acknowledges this clear gender bias: “ American punk ultimately fell short in its quest to bring gender equity to the scenes” (385). In Pearson’s memoir, Nick’s girlfriend is a perfect representation of gender bias. She is a perfect example because she is used as a trap, she “ tried to befriend [Pearson] so she could steal [his] shoes, [his] jacket, some of [his] records…and hand them over to Nick and his loser crew” (Pearson 27). This is gender bias because Nick and his friends knew that she would intrigue Pearson because she was an older woman, which at a young is thought to be ‘cool’ when an older woman takes a liking to you. A male could not have done this since Pearson is heterosexual; he desired the opposite sex. Nick’s girlfriend was sexually objectified, without regard to her dignity, although she didn’t mind, she was not aware that she was only used to gain whatever Nick and his friends wanted from Pearson, that was her sole purpose. She was not respected for her sexuality, thus her gender was used to their advantage. Due to gender imbalance, “ there is a risk that women’s voices are hidden and their contributions overlooked, even where attempts are made to challenge gender norms” (Griffin 71). This is what happened to Nick’s girlfriend, if it was not for her they would have never gotten what they wanted, they used her as an object to trap Pearson. Women have always been treated differently when compared to men that was common during the time, still is till this day.
However, in this particular punk subculture women treated differently was very visible. Women were prize possessions; they were used to show off by men to others that they had a girl. Lahickey mentioned “girls were always the supporting cast, never the stars” (112). If a female were in a band with males, she would not get the same respect a male band partner would. This is due to the male dominance in the punk culture that overpowers females. Studies on women in a music subculture have highlighted the ways “ women exist in these worlds while never collectively reaching the degree and depth of participation by men” (Mullaney 387). Women are treated poorly, they are always assumed to be someone’s girlfriend, never as an equal band participant. Men were not respectful towards women and thought of them as irrelevant. In From the Graveyard of the Arousal Industry Joey, a band member of Pearson’s at that time spat at a girl in the crowd (Pearson 120). Spitting in general is considered disrespectful due to the mere cultivation of ethics made by society over the progression of civilization (regardless of genders). It was particularly rude in this case, although the girl was wrong for yelling at them when in reality her boyfriend was the cause of the fight. However, instead of spitting on her, Joey could have politely asked her to stop, while taking into …show more content…
consideration that she is a woman, and they should be respected. But the boys in the band “were subconsciously pushing buttons and testing boundaries,” (Pearson 118) which lead to Joey disrespecting the girl, who was never at fault. Therefore, the book highlights how in a punk society the men unintentionally disrespect women, which is a representation of a patriarchal society where men are above women, and are able to do as they please. These vast gender inequalities lead women to change who they are and how they look in order to fit a into the ‘punk’ appearance.
They have to uphold theses ‘punk’ appearances in order to fit into the crowd. Body tattoos and piercings were common in the punk scene, which could be a representation of rejection towards social norms and expectations. Furthermore, “as many women struggle to overcome notions of passivity, compliance and naivety, for some, tattoos, piercings and wearing non-traditional clothing may signify resistance to these stereotypical or ‘natural’ notions of femininity” (Griffin 69). However, in Pearson’s memoir, Jesse, his ex-girlfriend, is a perfect representation of a woman changing in order to fit in a punk society. She broke up with Pearson because she believed that he “didn’t like her as a person and thought that [Pearson] didn’t care about her” (Pearson 50). The reason behind this is that during that time, Pearson was very focused on his music, which as a result took up all of his attention leaving none left for her, this caused Jesse to change. After the break-up she began to hang out with a different local rock band, “who had no respect for girls, or themselves” (Pearson 51). This band intrigued Jesse because they gave her the attention she deliberately wanted from Pearson but never got. Her interest in the ‘punk’ society, lead her to suppress her true feelings just to feel accepted. Although she was never fully accepted in this new band, she was
merely used for pleasure and to screw around with, these guys led her to make bad decisions like drinking and doing cocaine. The feeling of being powerless causes women to change who they are, allowing them to have power over something, which they usually hope is a man, but in reality the man has power over the woman. Furthermore, women in a subculture punk society feel pressured to present themselves in a particular way in order to meet the expectations within the punk scene, Jesse being the perfect representation in Pearson’s memoir. In From the Graveyard of the Arousal Industry, Pearson displays the influence of societal norms on a punk subculture and how these norms affect women in particular. The effect of these norms, leads women to change their appearance and how they act in order to fit into this ‘punk’ subculture. Therefore, the message that Pearson is trying to convey through his memoir is that although society today believes women are given their equality, that is no true because in most situations; may it be in a work place or just in general, we continue to live in a patriarchal society. Nonetheless punk is often viewed as progressive, however, it retains damaging mainstream norms regarding the inequality of women. A subculture that objectifies women consequently causes a decline in the progress of feminism.
The world is becoming more aware of the gender hierarchy occurring in our society. Men are consistently leaders and placed in positions of power while women are seen as inferior. Jean Kilbourne, author of “Two ways a Woman Can Get Hurt”, investigates this ideology as she looks throughout media and advertisements and highlights their sexually explicit commercials that degrade woman. In comparison, Allan G. Johnson, writer of Why Do We Make So Much of Gender?, discusses how the world’s view of gender has changed over time and how it has affected the world. Kilbourne and Johnson outline the presence of a gender hierarchy but do not accurately interpret why it happens. The underlying presence driving patriarchy is hidden deep in men’s resistance
In the article “Two Ways a Woman Can Get Hurt,” by Jean Killbourne, she discusses the culture of male superiority over females. With the rise of feminism and exposure to media being at an all-time high, the two topics seem to be overlapping more and more. Daily, society is flooded with sexist, violent, and inappropriate ads and messages that usually degrade women and praise men. This is an issue which only recently gained traction while the “feminist” movement increased in popularity. Women are wrongly objectified for the sake of tradition and a male-driven agenda.
Realistically, when someone is more powerful, they have the ability to set the rules. Men have historically held power in society, which means that women did not have as much stance or freedoms as men have had in the past. For example, Canadian women did not have the right to vote until the year 1916. This factor has continued to trail into the present day, creating the ‘weak’ image towards women, overall forcing and pushing men to become the opposite of this factor. Thus, cultural ideals of masculinity rely on the ideas of femininity through patriarchy and gender binaries. The emphasis on characteristics of men are being exaggerated, as society is pressuring men with unattainable standards of masculinity such as being tough, muscular and buff. Men continue to conform to these characteristics, in the fear of being oppressed through exclusion, which only strengthens society’s standards even more. This leads to more societal pressures on men, thus leading men to experience more societal pressures in the fear of feeling excluded. These “systems of inclusion and exclusion are divisions or barriers that prevent people from joining and belonging.” (50). For example, if a man wears nail polish, they may be oppressed and excluded through facing ridicule and bullying, because wearing nail polish is considered “girly”, therefore this boy is rebelling against society’s socially
This hypersexual behaviour is the most straightforward way for a man to assert his masculinity, most often at the expense of women, while undermining the definition of masculinity given by hegemonic masculinity. The self reference artists make, framing themselves as pimps, hustlers, and players, asserts an oppositional masculinity defined by consciously chosen hypersexuality, and the affluent “pimp” is preoccupied with the commodification of women (Miller-Young, 2008, p.
Throughout history, music has been the artistic stage of philosphoical output of both ideas, emotions and stories, enducing emotional and cogitational responses from the audience, through it’s representation of ideas and through ‘words in music’. Victor Hugo says- “Music expresses…. that which cannot remain silent” (26 February 1802 – 22 May 1885), and is a predominant feature in the early 1990s ‘Riot Grrrl’ movement, in which female-empowerment bands would address modern issues of sexual abuse, racism, and the patriarchy through their underground, punk rock music.
wardrobe, band members wear is a little different from what is trending in the modern society. Ripped skinny jeans or shoes, hoodies in the dark shaded colors are common type of clothing members wear. Additionally, many seem to understand that band individuals have poor hygiene due to how many men have long hair and not a clean cut shave. As said before, many of the stereotypes are not fully wrong. According to Makewav.es, in the article Misconceptions About Rock Music, by Maddie Smith and Talia Alvarez, who both stated, “Will not try to defend the fact that some artists in the industry, like Danny Worsnop and Ronnie Radke, are recovering addicts.” The authors explain that some truth behind what is said about alcohol or drug consumers on band members is true. It has been indicated that not just the act of a small groups has produced a negative image on people who play
Identity is a subject commonly discussed within literature. In William Farrell’s essay entitled “Men as Success Objects” this subject is the object of much scrutiny. Farrell analyzes the role of gender in today’s society and states that male identity is in a condition where male insecurities about success, their appearance, and females have left most men in today’s society in dire straights. Compounded by prevailing ultra-feminist ideals, society has become saturated by the “men are jerks” mentality. This condition can be seen in various aspects of society such as commercials, television programs, even greeting cards (Farrell, 186). While some may not agree with his opinions on the state of male identity, Farrell uses a number of rhetorical strategies and literary devices such as an objective point of view, an intellectual tone, and appeals to both logos and ethos in order to effectively convey belief that men are treated as “success objects” in today’s society.
Social forces tell the American male hat he live in a way that rejects everything seen as feminine. As outlined in In Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences, Hurst asserts that media often portrays American women as emotional and affectionate (Hurst, p. 126-127). Thus, men who show emotion and affection often receive both physical and verbal attacks from other men due to not rejecting these feminine actions. These conceptions of masculinity damage American males because they repress emotion and simultaneously bolster aggression. The Representation Project is combating this damaging narrative by calling on society to change the overarching stereotypes. In their documentary The Mask You Live In, the Representation Project shows American males engaging in conversations about emotions and harmful masculinity in order to peel away the dangerous mask that harms all persons. Overall, The Representation Project strives to “re-humanize” men by drawing society away from the current
Prior to the 1970s when the theme of gender issues was still quite foreign, the societal norm forced female conformity to male determined standards because “this is a man’s world” (Kerr 406). The patriarchal society painted the image of both men and women accordingly to man’s approach of societal standards that include the defining features of manhood that consist of “gentil...
Jessica Valenti’s book “He’s a Stud, She’s a Slut” highlights the many double standards men and women have and continue to face today. As a free spirited and down to earth feminist, she challenges these stereotypes and educates others on the negative aspects they have on people’s daily life. Issues ranging from wage pay gap, to sexism, racism, etc., there is nothing that makes her comfortable to talk about. In this book, I resonated closely with three chapters she wrote: “He’s a Hipster, She’s a Ho”and “He’s Getting an Education , She’s Getting in the Way”; respectively, these chapters discuss how women and men physically present themselves in society, and their education.
...der stratification—unequalness of power, property, and prestige between men and women (Henslin 280)—still encounters within our society, and men are usually superior to women; women are uprising feminism. Henslin defines feminism as “the philosophy that men and women should be politically, economically, and socially equal; organized activities on behalf of this principle” (292). An example of a toy I saw showing feminism is a pink bow and arrow in the archery section of the toy store. Although the black bows and arrows dominated this aisle, there was one bow and arrow for girls showing that females have their right to be equaled with men. One last game I saw in Toys R Us that was interesting to me was a video game called Grand Theft Auto, which is a video game intended for boys. The point of this game is to join gangs and do their “dirty work”. In some parts of this
Masculinity is a subject that has been debated in our society for quite some time. Many wonder what it means to be masculine, as it is difficult to define this one –sided term. Pairing this already controversial term with “feminist studies” can bring about some thought - provoking conversation. Feminist studies of men have been around for many years with regards to the feminist movement. It seeks to create gradual improvements to society through its main principle of modifying the ways in which everyone views what it means to be a man. Feminist studies of men bring forth the discussion of hegemonic masculinity; how this contributes to the gender hierarchy, the radicalized glass escalator and ultimately the faults of this theory.
The sexualization of women in the 21st century has led many to wonder whether or not the feminist movement actually resulted in more harm than good. Although the progress and reform that came out of the feminist movement is indisputable, things such as equal rights under the law, equal status and equal pay, the reality is that the subjugation of female roles in society still exist, and the most surprising part about this is that now women are just as much as at fault for this as men are. Ariel Levy defines female chauvinist pigs as “women who make sex objects of other women and of ourselves” (Levy 11). This raunch culture is mistakenly assumed to be empowering and even liberating to women when it is in fact degrading and corrupting to the modern feminist movement and makes it more difficult for women to be taken seriously in society. The shift in the nature of the feminist movement is in Levy’s opinion attributed to by the massive industry now profiting off of the sexualization of women, the reverse mindset now adopted by post-feminists and women in power roles in our society, and ultimately the women who further their own objectification as sex objects and thus, so by association, deem themselves lesser than man.
Additionally, I will look at fan feedback of the band and see if even the people who are buying the albums and going to the concerts are even acknowledging the successes of the band as something of merit, or are viewing their music in terms of how the patriarchy tells them to (i.e as a guilty pleasure). This is where I will apply the idea of discourses (whole systems of thought, speech, and knowledge production that structure institutional and social practices, (O’Brien & Szeman, 2014), ISAs, and feminist ideas of patriarchy spurring off Gill’s challenges of postfeminist assumptions of power that “women have not overthrown but rather internalized the disciplinary regime that dictates particular and compulsory ways of looking and acting” (O’Brien & Szeman, 2014), the idea that not only is the band not given respect musically, but perhaps these young women themselves become convinced that their music is more of a “guilty pleasure” than it is “quality
There is an emphasis on self-actualization, expression through art and media, as well as an embrace of difference within the punk community, which opposes with the prevailing public opinion of punk from popular culture as being violently oppositional, anarchists, and