Frida Taymor Frida Kahlo

547 Words2 Pages

Frida Kahlo was a remarkable artist and a powerful woman. Her paintings not only transcended taboos, cultural norms, and beauty standards, but the woman herself was ahead of her time. It is no surprise that a biographical film was made based on her life. However, how is one able to make an equally strong film about a phenomenal person? Julie Taymor takes a chance with her 2002 film, Frida. With the direction of the artistic and dramatic aspect of the film; and the guidance towards the actors, Taymor’s Frida does an excellent job of demonstrating Kahlo’s legacy. Frida’s paintings were a surreal and vivid representation of her life. The way Taymor chose to portray this in the film was by using Frida’s paintings, or using a surreal visual form to introduce a new chapter in Frida’s life. For example, there is a scene where the painter; played by Salma Hayek, gets into a trolley accident that would eventually cripple her. Right after the accident, we are shown images of skeletons dressed as nurses and doctors trying to repair, what looks like a spine. We eventually see Frida open her eyes and skeletons are visible in her pupils; little do we know as the scene progresses that the skeleton is a real doctor and we are seeing Frida’s experience after her accident through her imaginative mind. …show more content…

Taymor captures the real life drama in Frida’s life with the portrayal of her accident and the repercussions of that; however, the biggest dramatic aspects come from the depiction of Frida’s passionate relationship with muralist, Diego Rivera. There’s a scene where Frida sits alone, crying in a dark room after she finds her husband having an affair with her sister. While she sits in silence, Diego bangs on the window begging her for forgiveness. Frida walks up to him and makes one thing clear to

More about Frida Taymor Frida Kahlo

Open Document