Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
John Locke on equality and liberty
Similarities between the american revolution and french revolution
Similarities between the american revolution and french revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: John Locke on equality and liberty
During the Enlightenment period, many thinkers and philosophers advocated for equality among people as well as abolishing the Catholic Church and the monarchs that ruled countries with an iron fist. One philosopher in particular, John Locke, believed in the concept of natural rights; an idea that stated all men are born with the rights of life, liberty and property and whenever government policies appropriate these rights, it is in the people’s hands to rise up against the government. This controversial idea of rights and equality traveled around Europe until it reached France. The French Revolution was influenced by the way the American colonists were able to stand up for their rights and fight for their freedom. The only people who wanted …show more content…
to overthrow the French government were the people of the Third Estate because they were the only ones who found themselves chained tightly to the life of slavery by the laws inflicted upon them by the king and the first two estates. The French Revolution (1789-1799) was caused by the inequality among the social classes, financial debt that consumed the government, the droughts that caused deep hunger and tension amongst the social classes, and the people’s desire to abolish the French monarchy. France’s social hierarchy during the eighteenth century was based on a system called the Ancien Regime; each person in society belonged to a class known as an “estate.” These estates were the First Estate, Second Estate, and Third Estate. Members of the First Estate were the king and queen and those who worked in the church; nuns, monks, priests, bishops, pope, and church workers. These people made up one percent of the French population, they owned twenty percent of the land, and they were exempt from paying taxes. The Second Estate consisted of the nobility of the land and people of the royal court; they made up about four percent of the entire French population and they too were exempted from paying taxes towards the national government. The third and final estate was everybody else that resided in France; this group made up about ninety five percent of the French population. This class, unlike the other two, was divided into two parts; the bourgeoisie─wealthy doctors, lawyers, and business people who weren’t noble─and the non bourgeoisie─teachers, farmers, merchants, and peasants. The Third Estate paid all the taxes to the government and as a result their resentment towards the First and Second Estates grew by ten fold. This system of social classes and inequality is what caused tension among the people and as a result the Third Estate rose up against the monarch. At the time of the revolution, France was under major financial debt due to the deficit spending of the king and queen, taking part in the Seven Year’s War as well as the American Revolution, and borrowing money from other countries. Louis XIV, grandfather of Louis XVI, used a lot of money building the Palace of Versailles and Louis XVI spent the country’s money on things to please himself and his wife. Because the French helped out America during their fight of independence from Great Britain and they were one of the participating countries in the Seven Year’s War, they found themselves under a plethora of debt. To fix this problem they decided to borrow money from other countries and increase the taxes paid by the Third Estate. This tactic only proved to be a failure because not only did France accumulate even more debt than they had before, they also succeeded in making Third Estate Frenchmen infuriated with the monarch and how it had tyrannized their society. Droughts and famine that had overtaken the land caused another rift between the people of France and the monarch. The prices of bread soared incredibly and members of the Third Estate were dying of starvation and malnutrition as evidenced by the quote “June 10, 1789: The lack of bread is terrible. Stories arrive every moment from the provinces of riots and disturbances, and calling in the military, to preserve the peace of the markets...The price of bread has risen above people’s ability to pay. This causes great misery.” from the book Travels in France by Arthur Young. However, even though this was going on with the Third Estate, the First and Second Estate civilians lived without a care in the world because they could just take the food whenever they wanted. The simple fact that the First and Second Estate would take the food that the Third Estate worked hard to grow through the harsh weather conditions and only added to the straining relationship between the classes. Throughout his time on the throne, King Louis XVI continually proved that he was unworthy of the throne and leading his people due to the many crimes he committed and the way he oppressed the Third Estate citizens of France.
He would keep prisoners at the Bastille for however long he wanted without getting questioned for his behavior, he didn’t possess the qualities of a wise and just leader, and he lacked proper knowledge of how to run the military and the finances of the country. He and his wife, Marie Antoinette, were common criminals who were convicted of many crimes, one of them being high treason against the state. Louis XVI was very hypocritical in his way of ruling the people of France; he claimed to be someone of high values and ethical standards, when in reality he never lived up to those standards and expected everyone to just bow down to …show more content…
him. When King Louis realized the extent of the amount of problems that had faced his country, he called together a meeting of the Estates General. At this meeting representatives of each estate were asked to bring in cahiers; special notebooks that stated the grievances France was facing. A few excerpt from the cahiers stated, “In order to assure the third estate the influence it deserves because of its numbers...its votes in the assembly should be taken by head…” and “That the taille (a tax on land) be borne equally by all classes….” Most of the grievances that proposed an actual change that should’ve been added to France came from the Third Estate because they were fed up with the way rulers of France were treating them. When the three estates voted, the First and Second Estates always had the same votes and the odd one out was the Third Estate. This just emphasized the point that the three estates were not in perfect union with each other. The Third Estate then created the National Assembly and Tennis Court Oath; on this oath they pledged, “all members of this Assembly shall immediately take a solemn oath not to separate, and to reassemble wherever circumstances require, until the constitution of the kingdom is established and consolidated upon firm foundations; and that, the said oath taken, all members and each one individually shall ratify this steadfast resolution by signature.” In conclusion, there were many causes that led the people of France to revolt against the brutality of their monarch. Among those causes were the unjust social classes, financial debt of the government, drought and famine, and the people’s desire to destroy the monarch. These causes can be seen evidently when the people created the National Assembly and devised up the Tennis Court Oath, Stormed the Bastille, and even during the Great Fear. The quote, “Absolute silence leads to sadness. It is the image of death,” by Jean-Jacques Rousseau form the Enlightenment period mirrors exactly how the people felt when they realized that they wouldn’t be given any opportunities for equality unless they took matters into their own hands and make the change that they wanted to see happen in France, even if it was at the cost of a few people’s lives. After the revolution, a new figure rose to power; this person’s name was Napoleon Bonaparte.
Napoleon is credited with the way he reformed France for the better because he was a lot more lenient and intelligent with how he led the people of France unlike Louis XVI. He rose through military ranks quickly and was loved dearly by the people of France. His tactics were perfectly timed when he waged wars with countries for dominion over their lands. Some of his strategies for how he became ruler of France and almost all of Europe included: letting the peasants of France receive their properties that were taken from them by the First and Second Estates, driving British Forces out of France, and making friends and relatives in charge of ruling the lands he conquered. However, every emperor has a downfall and Napoleon’s came in the form of his soldiers dying due to the harsh and terribly Russian winter of 1812 when he led them against Tsar Alexander I for his decision to leave the Continental
System.
The enlightenment ideas affected politics for both the French and the American peoples through the form of government and individual rights. Thinkers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, believed in the individual right of man as a citizen of a sovereign nation. In 1789, Marquis de Lafayette used Rousseau and other free thinker’s ideas to draft his Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen to the National Constituent Assembly in France (http://www.pbs.org/marieantoinette/revolution/america_france.html). This established universal rights for individuals that always existed at all times. The document shows many similarities to American documents such as the declaration of Human Rights in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. For instance, they all show a relationship through the declaration of individual rights such as free speech and freedom of religion. However, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen focuses more on individualism while American documents focus more on a community “We the People” (http://www.pbs.org/marieantoin...
The French Revolution was a period of political upheaval that occurred in France during the latter half of the 18th century. This revolution marked an end to the system of feudalism and the monarchy in France and a rise to democracy and new Enlightenment ideas. By 1789, when the revolution began, France was in a deep financial crisis due to the debt they had obtained over many years of reckless spending and France was nearly bankrupt. These financial issues fell almost completely on the bottom social class or the Third Estate which made up a majority of the country. Because of this financial trouble the common people were heavily taxed leaving many of them in poverty. In addition to the economic issues, France also held an Estate System that led to heavy
The citizens of France, inspired by the enlightenment, desired a government run by the people. Marquis de Lafayette wrote, “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness” (de Lafayette 783). The French wanted to bring equality to all classes. The French revolution brought much more social change than the American revolution. Inspired by Lafayette’s declaration that, “no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom” (de Lafayette 783), the class system was destroyed. The revolutionaries were open to ending slavery, however women remained marginalized within the social structure of France. Similarly to the American revolution, the enlightenment ideas that drove the French revolution were not applied to society as a
The French Revolution was a tumultuous period, with France exhibiting a more fractured social structure than the United States. In response, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen proposed that “ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the sole cause of public calamities, and of the corruption of governments” (National Assembly). This language indicates that the document, like its counterpart in the United States, sought to state the rights of men explicitly, so no doubt existed as to the nature of these rights. As France was the center of the Enlightenment, so the Enlightenment ideals of individuality and deism are clearly expressed in the language of the document. The National Assembly stated its case “in
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country. Over time, historians’ views on these questions have changed continually, leading many to question the different interpretations and theories behind the Revolutions effectiveness at shaping France and the rest of the world.
Napoleon was able to grant French citizens natural rights, which was the main purpose of the Revolution, and use this to better society as a whole. For example, he used a plebiscite, vote of the people, to approve a new constitution that gave him power to rule. By getting the consent of the people to rule and to create and pursue certain actions in government, Napoleon used the governed as a ruling mechanism; he didn't ignore them. He created a system of meritocracy (what the people wanted): granting positions to those that deserved them based on qualifications, not just handing out jobs to people of higher social status giving “careers open to talent (Coffin and Stacey, 494).” Finally through his supremacy as French ruler,...
But, most importantly, Napoleon did what he thought would make his country stronger. One of Napoleon’s first areas of concern was in the strengthening of the French government. He created a strong centralized government and pretty much got rid of the hundreds of localized law codes that had existed while under the control of the monarchy. He also created an army of government officials. He had the entire country linked under a rational administration.
The French Revolution evokes many different emotions and controversial issues in that some believe it was worth the cost and some don't. There is no doubt that the French Revolution did have major significance in history. Not only did the French gain their independence, but an industrial revolution also took place. One of the main issues of the Revolution was it's human costs. Two writers, the first, Peter Kropotkin who was a Russian prince, and the other Simon Schama, a history professor, both had very opposing views on whether the wars fought by France during the Revolution were worth it's human costs. Krapotkin believed that the French Revolution was the main turning point for not only France but for most other countries as well. On the other hand, Schama viewed the French Revolution as unproductive and excessively violent.
First of all, the French Revolution is one of the reasons the Eiffel Tower was built. In 1789 the French Revolution started for many reasons. Those reasons are rising taxes, wanted a new ruler, food shortages, impoverished peasants, ravenous royals and violence. The revolution started as a dispute over tax reforms soon evolved to a movement for political reforms. Also what got the revolution started was the peasants were tired of the high taxes that was only put on them and also the high food prices. During the war they had guillotines that they first used it on one if the leaders of the Reign of Terror, Robespierre. He was sent to the guillotine by his rivals when he was in charge he had condemned many to the same fate. There were also lies, corruption, and angry town
When asked if an event was successful or not, one must take into account every aspect of the event. “Success” is a very subjective and imprecise word. In history, when one power or group feels that they have succeeded in their goal, the opposing group will most likely feel that they have failed. During the French Revolution (1789-1799), there were many successes and failures that took place in the stages of the revolution that led to an eventual failure for the middle-class bourgeoisie and a moderate success in its attempt to achieve its goals for the poor lower class.
bourgeoisie, who were wealthier commoners who resented the higher classes due to the burdens of taxation they faced. At the very bottom of the social class ladder were peasants. Peasants were laborers who could barely afford basic necessities and like the bourgeoisie were heavily taxed.
In that same year, his mother was another victim of the guillotine. The royalists (the aristocrats and people for the monarchy) now saw Louis as the King of France, that is, after his father was killed. Yet, he wasn’t able to do anything, because well, he was in captivity, and in fact, treated awfully, and a victim of proposed sexual abuse. The people who were entrusted to others to care for Louis attempted to brainwash, and after they saw that it was successful, he was put into confinement, where he was neglected and his health declined very much, and died from Tuberculosis in
The French Revolution of 1789 is an extraordinarily complicated and complex time period. The country was having financial, social and political problems all of which contributed to the outbreak of the war. France, had two Kings each of whom ruled the country in different ways but both were effected tremendously by the people. When an absolute monarch is in control the king is supposed to have complete control over the country and therefore in order to be a successful or well-liked King he must be able to connect to the people.
Revolutions are a part of our history, its seems as if no lower class is ever happy and no upper class powerful people are ever fair to anyone other than themselves. It becomes a vicious cycle that continues to repeat itself throughout history. A rebellion is an uprising against the powers in control, but a rebellion is not synonymous with a revolution it can only become a revolution. The French Revolution was harsh and bloody, it can be compared to and different from the Revolutions of America and Haiti in ways including; the reign of terror, Maximilien Robespierre, and the cult/temple of reason.
Napoleon Bonaparte was an interesting ruler in that he was compromised of attributes of both a tyrant and a hero. Napoleon had a strong following throughout his reign and even during his two exiles. He was the emperor of France between 1799 and 1815, following the fall of the Directory. Despite the efforts of the French Revolution to rid the country of an autocratic ruler, Bonaparte came to power as Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte I in 1804. He claimed that he preserved the goals of the Revolution, which can be easily argued as his rule became more dictatorial as it progressed. Despite his departure from some of the gains of the Revolution, he overall was a hero for the French people. Through his military ventures, political changes and social reform, Napoleon proved himself as a hero. This is not to say that there were aspects of his reign that were tyrannical, but he was overall beneficial for France.