Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Enlightenment ideas causing french revolution
Enlightenment ideas french revolution
The influence of the Enlightenment on the French Revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
bourgeoisie, who were wealthier commoners who resented the higher classes due to the burdens of taxation they faced. At the very bottom of the social class ladder were peasants. Peasants were laborers who could barely afford basic necessities and like the bourgeoisie were heavily taxed. As one can see from this description of the social structures that were in place during the ancien regime, just why so many people were unhappy with it. The majority of the people were being heavily taxed and were granted few rights, while the rich minority continued to stay rich. The social structure of France during this period of time was clearly an issue to the vast majority of subjects. However the social structure of the nation wasn’t the only …show more content…
thing subjects of France took issue with. A quote from Reinhart Koselleck’s book Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society serves to describe what was wrong in the political sphere as it pertained to the Absolutist State of the time in saying: The princely State, supported by the military and the bureaucracy, developed a supra-religious, rationalistic field of action which, unlike its other aspects, was defined by the policies of the State. Socially, the monarchies remained entirely bound by traditional feudal stratification, so much so that in most instances they sought to preserve that stratification. Politically, however, the monarchs strove to eliminate or neutralize all institutions with an independent base. Mercantilism, too, was an economic system subject to political planning and State guidance; similarly, religious and ecclesiastical questions were treated with an eye to their usefulness to the State, wether within the framework of an established Church or under toleration with a purpose. The realm of a political system covering all of Europe constituted the constellation from which the Enlightenment started out (Koselleck, p. 16)9. It is clear to see that the system of absolute monarchy that was brought in to save France during a time or political and religious turmoil, was no longer working for the nation, and out of displeasure for it came a new way of thinking called The Enlightenment. The Enlightenment, also referred to as the Age of reason, was a philosophical movement that birthed the political thought in favor of a written constitution, individual rights, anti sacred kingship, and fundamentally challenged the European Old Order of absolute and divine right monarchy. Another quote from Reinhart to back up these statements and describe how the Enlightenment grew in France is as follows: The Enlightenment reached it’s zenith in France, the very country in which the Absolutist system had for the first time, and most decisively, overcome the internal religious conflict. The abuse of power by Louis XIV accelerated the process, in the course of which the subject discovered himself as a citizen. In France this same citizen would one day storm the Bastille. The political structure of the Absolutist State, initially an answer to religious strife, was no longer understood as such by the Enlightenment that followed (Koselleck, p. 16)10. However, despite the fact that during the eighteenth century Enlightenment ideas originated in France and became polar throughout all of Europe, it was not sole aspect that sparked The Revolution and ended the ancient regime. Although it did help, tremendously. A quote from C.B.A. Behrens in his book The Ancien Regime describe just what Enlightenment thinking did in France during this period of time saying Here the Enlightenment can be considered only as a solvent of the old order. It provided a potent one, because it provided all the discontented with principles by which to justify their discontents and with visions of a better future to inspire the attempts at change. The teaching of the Philosophes unsocial and political questions was profoundly revolutionary, since they attacked all the assumptions to ridicule, and continually pointed out that society was rotten. On the other hand, their doctrines did no crystallize into a revolutionary creed until after the Ancien Regime had already begun to collapse under the impact of the impending bankruptcy and the measure adopted to avert it. (Behrens, p. 124-126) 11. As on can see from this quote, The Enlightenment was mainly a theoretical aid in terms of what actually caused the Revolution to occur.
As hinted at towards the end of the last quote, one of the main driving factors for the Revolution and end of the ancien regime in France according to Behrens, were relations between French and Britain. Between 1689 and the Revolution, almost half of that time was spent in wars with Britain. He says that “they overburdened the economy and reduced the system of taxation to chaos…The recurrent partial bankruptcies and the continual attempts to increase taxation were among the most potent causes for discontent…The success in the last war, which was fought to win the Americans their freedom, undermined the old ideals of absolutism and privilege and promoted the new ideas of liberty and equality for which the Americans stood” (Behrens, p. 162) 12. So, as a result of discontent with the social and political structure of the nation, a new ideology in The Enlightenment, combined with continual taxation increases, served as the reasoning for change. That change came in the form of the Revolution in …show more content…
1789. The start of the French Revolution came on May, 5th 1789 with the convocation of the Estates General.
The convocation, called for by King Louis XIV, was composed of the three estates, the clergy, nobility, and commoners. This was the first time the Estates General had assembled since 1614. It is here that the Revolution started because the point of Louis XIV calling the assembly was to discuss the levying of new taxes and reform with the three estates. Louis XIV started off the assembly by making a speech in which he declared himself “the peoples greatest friend”. After the kings speech, other speeches followed including ones by "Barentin, the Keeper of the Seals, and Necker, the Minister of Finances, concerning the economic situation in the kingdom. The budget deficit was 56 million. Necker claimed that new taxes would be enough to make up for the deficit” (Chateau de Versailles, p. 1)13. With that being said, the commoners of the third estate, who were the majority of deputies present, realized that nothing was going to change, they were going to continue to be heavily taxed, and they were done with it. One thing became evidently clear from the first assembly of the Estates General in over one hundred years and that was that the commoners needed to take things into their own hands, and that is exactly what they did. On May, 5th 1789 the Revolution had
begun. After the assembly was called the third estate took matters into their own hands first by reconstituting themselves as the National Assembly, whose main goal was to rid the country of the absolute monarchy in King Louis XIV and create a constitution. Out of this formation of the National Assembly the commoners started dawning tricolor cockades of blue white and red to denote themselves. These cockades of tricolor were tremendously significant because the color scheme became the symbol of the Revolution and later became the symbol and national flag of France itself. However, just days after forming the National Assembly, the members found that the door of their usual meeting hall in Versailles was locked and guarded by soldiers. Thinking that the king was sending them a message to disband, the deputies of the National Assembly moved to a nearby tennis court and took an oath where they vowed “not to separate, and to reassemble wherever circumstances require, until the constitution of the kingdom is established”. This would come to be known as the Tennis Court Oath and was a significant point in the Revolution in the sense that it served as the first time that subjects formally moved to oppose the king, and showed political authority from someone other than the monarch. Merely one month after the third estate reconstituted themselves and took the Tennis Court Oath, they took one of their first courses of action in revolting against the crown. That came on July, 14th of 1789 in Paris, where they stormed the Bastille. At this point in time the Bastille was was used as an armory and a political prison, that only housed seven prisoners. The high costs of maintaining such building there served such a minimal purpose, and in the Bastille was seen as a symbol of royal tyranny. However, fearing that the Bastille would become a target of the revolutionaries of the National Assembly, Bernard-Rene Jordan de Launay the military governor of the Bastille, transferred weapons and gunpowder from the armory, brought in his men and raised the two drawbridges. Then, on July 14th a crowd of attackers congregated outside of the Bastille and called for a surrender of the building and a release of the arms and gunpowder in it. Negotiations began, but after hours of getting seemingly nowhere the crowd became impatient and stormed the courtyard and broke the chains of the drawbridge and fighting began. After hours of violent and intense fighting Launay ordered a cease fire and offered terms of his surrender. However, his terms were denied and Launay opened the gates of the Bastille and the revolutionaries liberated the Bastille. Launay was taken into to custody to be arrested and tried by a revolutionary council, however he was taken away by a mob and murdered as well as some of his other officers. The king first learned of the events that occurred in Paris on July 14th, the next morning and realized he had a revolution on his hands. In realizing this, the king and his troops backed down, accepted a tricolor cockade from the leader of Third Estate, and reconciled with the people. However, despite the ostensible reconciliation, many nobles started to flee the country and news of the coup spread throughout all of France. It is at this point that Ancien Regime in France ended. The storming of the Bastille provided revolutionaries with insurmountable momentum that spread throughout the entire country
The French Revolution was a period of political upheaval that occurred in France during the latter half of the 18th century. This revolution marked an end to the system of feudalism and the monarchy in France and a rise to democracy and new Enlightenment ideas. By 1789, when the revolution began, France was in a deep financial crisis due to the debt they had obtained over many years of reckless spending and France was nearly bankrupt. These financial issues fell almost completely on the bottom social class or the Third Estate which made up a majority of the country. Because of this financial trouble the common people were heavily taxed leaving many of them in poverty. In addition to the economic issues, France also held an Estate System that led to heavy
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country.
The French government did not seem to be able to manage their finances so that the economy would improve and the people would feel fairly treated. In conclusion, the ancien regime was clearly an outdated, old fashioned system which was biased towards the wealthy and did nothing to improve the French economy. Instead of making France more powerful the ancien regime heightened tensions within the country and created unrest among the peasants who began to resent the government for taxing them, the landlords for treating them badly and the King for failing to do anything to rectify the situation, resulting in discontentment which increased over the years until it came to a head in the revolution of 1789.
There were various amounts of perspectives on the French Revolution. Some were similar, such as those of the people of the 3rd Estate like Joseph Sieyes and the creators of the National Assembly's constitution. There were also some conflicting perspectives between the Third Estate and the other two, such as King Louis XIV and Joseph De Maistre. With all of these perspectives displayed throughout these documents of historical evidence, I see the horrible treatment the people of the 3rd estate received simply because they weren't born into nobility or clergy. This was very unfair, and I believe the country of France needs a revolution.
During the french revolution many events shaped the country into the place it would become. Uprisings and battle for control would keep the country on its toes for many years before eventually it would stop. People were questioning everything and revelling against authority left and right. Blood would paint the streets before eventually it was quelled. Some of the most crucial events were the execution of Louis XVI, The Reign of Terror and the rise of Napoleon.
In all of the documents listed, liberty and equality are described with regards to the French Revolution. These concepts are shown to have evolved over the course of the revolution, and this is proven by the documents chosen. Liberty and equality were emphasized as either major or minor ideas in the documents, and although some were only alluded to, it is evident that the ideas of liberty and equality changed during the years of the French Revolution. Also, some of the terms used connoted different things at the end of the Revolution than the original Revolutionaries of 1789, which demonstrates the transformation of the use of words which were symbolic at that time.
They say knowledge is power. This was the case for 1789 France, where the “Enlightened” peasants, after years of autocratic dominance from the First, Second Estate and the King, decisively fought and won a revolution for civil liberties and rights, an event which would not have happened had the peasants and lower classes not been literate. But, their literacy did not come immediately. It took at least a century for the peasants to be numerously literate, and even then they were still not as educated as the privileged, wealthy nobility. In addition, different regions in France had access to different rates of schooling, which had a profound effect on how the local peasantry responded to their rulers and events. The levels of literacy in Old
The Revolution brought to its end an era where the French Catholic church was allowed to do as it wanted with little to no oversight. Ever since its establishment in France the church had amassed wealth and power by becoming the singular religion of the nation, however discontent grew and masses rose against the institution of the church. The revolution split the country in two, on one side those who supported the church as it always had been and on the other side those who supported the church as it had been redesigned by the new constitution.
...search for a way to relieve the national debt, however policies by financial ministers like Jacques Neckler and Charles Alexandre de Calonne increased the debt even more. Louis would attempt to evoke the Assembly of Notables, which consisted of nobles, and later the Estates-General, which consisted of peasants, to ease the economic burden. However, both assemblies were shocked and disgruntled with the poor economy, and revoked the power of the King, leading to the French Revolution and forever abolishing absolutism from France.
The French revolution started because of an ongoing “fiscal mismanagement contributed to a French society that was ripe for revolt” (Sparknotes). King Louis XVI was falling into a finical crisis, due to extravagant living. So, in panic, he called financial advisers. After a while, each of them was dismissed from their job. Louis XVI was growing desperate, so he called the Estates-General. This assembly was made to represent three Estates, “the First comprised of the clergy, the Second comprised of the nobility and the Third comprised of the middle and lower classes” (EyeWitness). The Third Estate broke off, and became the National Assembly. People who were part of the National Assembly demanded a new constitution, because the first one became a dead letter right after it was established. The Assembly members took an oath called the Tennis
Way back in the late 1789, a country went through a great change. France had always a monarchical country, as well as the rest of Europe and Great Britain. Despite the long history of being that, the people wanted a change. France had some great kings, but they also had some not so great ones, which I believe may had led them to their decision to revolt. There were many factors that caused them to be upsetted by bad kings, such as higher taxes, loss of land, mistreatment, or just corruptness (not all of the bad kings had these qualities)but, the thing that upsetted them the most, was the feudal system. People of higher classes were growing and the peasants just wanted to be free, they wanted their own land, and not have to work off someone else’s. Anyways, back to the revolt, this was no little revolt, this revolt turned into a revolution. The revolutionaries had good intentions, at first, to make a constitution, (they were inspired by the American revolution) but that didn’t go as planned, and it all went south. Later on, they planned to get rid of the King, and they did, beheading King Louis XVI, but after that, a thirst for blood continued, seeking out the people they despised, the Aristocrats.
The French Revolution began in 1789,1 when France was divided by regions and religions. The one thing that the French people had in common was that they shared the belief that they should serve the king. The revolution changed this, and at the end of the revolution in 1799, the people saw each other as citizens rather than subjects of the king.2 France had been experiencing economic hardship, and the people became discontented because of food shortages. Ideas of reform spread after the Enlightenment, and the people wanted a constitution.3 The French Revolution greatly increased nationalism in France. Before the revolution, there was little nationalism in France. It is evident that nationalism was created when one looks at the formation of the
However beforehand it was, “a standoff between Louis XVI and the parliaments” (Source ). To call for the assembly to intervene meant King Louis was losing his absolute power over France because the people were creating a solution to lessen the financial burden. Ultimately any decision would result in loss of more political power because “King Louis XVI needed more money but had failed to raise more taxes” especially since most of the population already struggling to cope with high pre-existing taxes (Source ). France was in a state of bankruptcy due to their participation in the American Revolution and the monarchy’s unwillingness to give up some aspects of their luxurious lives while most civilians were working and starving to death. After many years under a tyrannical government, the National Assembly formed through the Tennis Court Oath. The reformers declared it was the time for action making an oath to not disband until their constitution was
Prior to the French Revolution, the Ancien Régime was in power; following the Revolution, King Louis XVIII ruled. Towards the end of the Ancien Régime, King Louis XVI and wife, Marie Antoinette, were the monarchs of France. Under their reign, many people began to get angry about their irresponsible spending and lack of good leadership of France. These monarchs spent 160 percent of their annual income every year, and as a result, had to call upon other kings as well as the Estates General for money. Shamefully, this was the first time a king had needed to ask the Estates General for financial help since 1614. The people’s anger about this outrageous spending continued to build up until it finally burst, and was one of the first, and biggest, factors leading up to the French Revolution.
The social differences in France were very unreasonable. People openly argued that “social differences should not be defined by law, as they were in the old regimes order” (2). In France, much of the inequality came from the social class system. It led to angry peasants and tons of revolting. This could have been avoided if France maintained equality for all estates, as it would have been rational. In addition, the clergy and nobles were given many rights which “included top jobs in government, the army, the courts, and the Church” (109). This was very biased as they were able to get the highest jobs, not because they earned it, but because of their social stature. Meanwhile, commoners or bourgeoisie, were not granted those jobs even if they had the ability to do them. This caused much of the third estate to become mad which led to uncivilized manner in France. If the government had just given equal rights and granted jobs by merit opposed to social class rankings, there would have been less drama between the estates and everything would have been