Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
European imperialism in india
European imperialism in india
Famous indian and european interactions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Scholars estimate that by the time of the first European contact, in 1492, from 1 million to more than 7 million American Indians lived in North America. European settlers interacted with the continents native peoples in different ways. The Spanish ruled the Indians as a conquered people, forcing many to work on large agricultural estates. The French developed a fairly friendly relationship with the Indians. The English approach to the Indians fell somewhere in between. French and English interaction with Indians can be examined in terms of trade, alliances, and warfare. From the beginning, the focus of the French relationship with American Indians was trade. The French wanted the beaver pelts that the Indians were so skilled at procuring. …show more content…
French traders sent shiploads of beaver furs to France, where hat makers turned them into sturdy, waterproof felt hats that were in great demand among fashionable men and women in Europe. In return for the pelts, traders gave the Indians such items as copper pots, glass beads, blankets, and iron tools. True to native custom, many of these traders married Indian women and blended into their tribal culture. They and their children often served as go-betweens, connecting the two cultures and smoothing over differences. As a result, the French developed a fairly friendly relationship with many Indian culture groups, or tribes, throughout northern and western North America. Native peoples also adopted aspects of French culture. For example, French missionaries converted many Indians to Catholicism. English settlers, too, saw the value of beaver pelts and began establishing a trading relationship with Indian tribes in New England and in the Middle Colonies.
In the South, colonists grew rich trading for deerskins, which could be made into clothing, leather gloves, and moccasins. Like the French, some English traders and other colonists also married Indians. In general, however, the English preferred to keep some distance between the two cultures. By the mid-1700s, New York had become the center of the English fur trade. South Carolina and Georgia came to dominate the deerskin trade. Yet it was the Indians who were really in charge. By controlling the Appalachians and the territory to the west, groups such as the Iroquois in the north and the Cherokee and Chickasaw in the south held the key to the main sources of beaver and deer in the English …show more content…
colonies. Without Indian cooperation, Europeans could not have carried on the lucrative trade in furs and skins.
This need for partnership led the French and English to make alliances with the Indians. The French acted first, beginning around 1600. They allied themselves with several tribes, from the Abenaki in the east to the Huron near the Great Lakes. Later, French traders expanded their territory, making alliances with Indian groups even farther west and also south along the Mississippi River. In the 1660s, the English formed an alliance with the powerful Iroquois. This alliance gave them access to furs in the lands around the Great Lakes and into the Ohio Valley. Through their alliances, the American Indians and the Europeans became economically dependent on each other. The Europeans relied on their Indian partners to provide them furs and skins. The Indians relied on their European partners to provide them iron tools, woolen garments, and guns. But the Indian-European alliances went beyond economics. They also served a military purpose. The Huron and Iroquois, for example, had long been enemies. The French regularly found themselves drawn into battle against the Iroquois in support of their Huron
allies. Early in the colonial period, violent conflicts pitted Indians against English colonists. The competition for land was the main source of friction that led to violence. Powerful Indian tribes controlled access to beaver and deer in the interior of the continent. Those same tribes also blocked access to English settlers who wanted to expand westward. These Indians feared being swamped by the westward migration of English settlers. In King Philip's War (1675-1676), New England Indians fought to preserve their land and way of life. They destroyed a dozen frontier settlements and killed hundreds of colonists. But the colonial militias fought back, wiping out entire villages and some 3,000 Indians. They forced some captured Indians to work on their farms as slaves and shipped others off to plantations in the West Indies. In the Yamasee War (1715-1716) several southern tribes, led by the Yamasee tribe, joined together to attack settlements in Carolina. This war was triggered not just by land disagreements, but also by issues over credit. The Yamasee, largely ignorant of English economic ways, had built up a huge credit debt for goods they received. When traders demanded Indian deerskins to cover the amount due, the Yamasee reacted violently. Backed by other tribes, they launched a series of bloody raids on trading posts and plantations, threatening to wreck Carolina's economy. Troops from neighboring colonies had to be called in to help defeat the Indian warriors and drive them out of Carolina. Indian deaths in wars such as these took a grave toll on tribes. But it was nothing compared with the greatest killer of all: disease. Europeans unknowingly carried contagious diseases with them to the Americas. There they devastated the Indians, who lacked immunity to these foreign diseases. Epidemics of smallpox, measles, plague, and influenza swept through Indian villages, often killing every resident. These deadly diseases wiped out native populations in nearly every section of North America, leaving the Indians less able to resist the Europeans.
Both countries wanted to assert more control over their colonists and maintain it. In 1749 France began building forts from “Lake Erie to the Forks of the Ohio.” In 1744 under the Treaty of Lancaster, Iroquois chiefs had sold right to “trade at the Forks of the Ohio to Virginia land speculators.” Virgina took this to mean that they would have rights to the land for eventual settlement. Both the Ohio Valley Indian and the French objected to this. In May of 1754, Virginia sent out Washington and some of his soldiers to protect Virginia’s interest and the French stuck back and basically started the French and Indian War. Washington and his men won the battle. In July of that same year, France attacked Washington while at Fort Necessity and her had to surrender. The Delaware and Shawnee Indians joined with France in the French and Indian War. In Europe in 1756 it took off as the Seven Years’ War. In the first phase of the war in North America the French had decisive victories through guerilla war fare by the Indians. Both the English and the French started using European style warfare and this proved a poor decision for both, but especially France. Britain backed off the this strategy
However, the French began to face strong competition in the fur trading industry, which caused many problems between different European nations and different native tribes. Therefore, the trading of fur allowed early seven- teenth century French explorers to establish peaceful relations with the Natives, however, com- petitive trading also incited much quarreling between competing colonies and Indian tribes. Since the early seventeenth century, French explorers had been able to keep peaceful relations with the Native Americans as a result of fur trading. Samuel de Champl...
During the early beginnings of the Colonial period in the United States, the original inhabitants, the Native Americans had to deal with many invaders from Europe. Of all the Native American tribes, the Iroquois and Huron had the most interaction with the Europeans. The Spanish, English, and French were some of the few countries that worked with the Native Americans the most. Each country had their own methods of dealing with the Native Americans when it came to interaction or methods for trading and obtaining of goods. Of those three nations the French was the one nation that appeared to not take full advantage of the Huron and Iroquois.
Fur trading started between the Europeans along with the Aboriginals when the most valuable beaver pelts were substituted for metal and clothing goods such as iron knives and axis, copper kettles, blankets and trinkets. The beaver pelts were well desired by the Europeans for the reason that using this fur for headgear provided an elegant way to keep dry. However these pelts were for fashion, as men and women could be instantly noted within the social hierarchy by according to their beaver hats. It was so valuable that the sand on the floor was filtered to save every hair that had fallen off. For the Europeans, captivating advantages of the rich furs from the Indians in the New World was a major factor in generating handsome profits, and there is no other pelt exchanging business enterprise like the Hudson's Bay Company.
Some more specific examples of how their lives were transformed include the Native’s new dependence to the Europeans for items such as rifles, kettles, tobacco, and many other goods, the European’s desire to convert the Natives, and the way that Native American warfare was transformed forever. Due to the European’s strong desire to obtain animal pelts and other goods, they were more than willing to trade rifles and commonplace kettles to the Natives in return for their help in acquiring these pelts. These goods that the Natives received transformed their life, but not entirely for the better. Prior to this engagement, they were an autonomous society that lived from the land. With the introduction of European goods, there was more and more dependency on these goods which, in the end, led to events such as King Philip’s War and the deterioration of the Native American way of life. An example of this dependency can be seen from Chomina during their time as Iroquois prisoners. He tells Laforgue, “It is you Normans, not the Iroquois, who have destroyed me, you with your greed, you who do not share what you have, who offer presents of muskets and cloth and knives to make us greedy as you are. And I have become as you, greedy for things. And that is why I am here and why we will die together” (BR, 165). These gifts of guns as well as the English and French seeking
The Seven Years War originally dealt with real estate and advantages in the Ohio Valley, however, it became a national war that relied on the Native Americans. The interactions that were held between powers resided based upon the interactions each had with the Natives in their region. During the beginning of the war, different powers were able to lure Native support by using goods and protection. This eventually faded off as the Native Americans sided with the French, and brutalities began occurring amongst the tribes as well. The relations held during the war with the Native American groups shaped the course of the war as well as the course after the war. The Native Americans were undoubtedly the most influential group in the Seven Years War, and the interactions held with them directly affected each world power during and after.
The Spanish and English cultures were scarcely similar and notably different because of the interaction with indigenous people and the timing in which the interactions occurred. The Spanish and English were very different in how they interacted with the indigenous people. The Spanish main reason for coming to North America was to spread Catholicism. In the Catholic church if two people were both Catholic then the two people would receive the sacrament of marriage. After marriage the two would create a Catholic of their own. This had created 5 new races of people. The races of humanity was then looked at as social classes. The highest social class was a full white European, then a mestizos, which was a someone who was European and an Indian, followed by Indians, African slaves, and lastly a Zambos,
The French and Indian war took place between 1754 and 1763. Here between these nine years would serve as the blue print to America’s history and future. “What began as a struggle over territorial rights between British colonist and French settlers became part of an international war between the great powers” (Schwartz, 1). To truly understand the French and Indian war, many must take a look into the past events that caused the dispute between the British and the French. During the year 1498, the British claims to the continent were based on the London Company and the sailing of the waters under the rule of King James I. This is where the British company in the latter half of the seventeenth century, under the crown established a reign or province, extending from seas to sea.
In 1754-1763 The French and Indian war was fought between France and Great Britain. The war began when the British wanted to settle in the Ohio River Valley in order to trade with the Native Americans but the french had already developed forts to protect their trade with the natives, The British was defeated and so they declared war on France. The conflicts of the French and Indian war altered the relationship of Great Britain and its American colonies from at first growing together as one to then separating because of conflicts of Independence.
During the 16th and 17th centuries, when the Europeans started to come over to the new world, they discovered a society of Indians that was strikingly different to their own. To understand how different, one must first compare and contrast some of the very important differences between them, such as how the Europeans considered the Indians to be extremely primitive and basic, while, considering themselves civilized. The Europeans considered that they were model societies, and they thought that the Indians society and culture should be changed to be very similar to their own.
What were the significant treaties, policies, and events that defined US Government and Native American Relations? How did the Native American respond to these treaties, polices, and events historically? How did these treaties, policies, and events affect the subsistence, religion, political, and social structures of the Native American people? I will answer these questions through the examination of two centuries of US history in six time periods that define clear changes in the relationship between the Native American and the US Government.
They wanted primarily to bring in more furs, namely beaver pelt (Goldfield, 31). This had become a popular commodity and the French jumped on the opportunity to take advantage of this demand. They were also more peaceful in many ways, befriending the Natives and working alongside them instead of overtaking them like the Spanish did (Goldfield, 32). That may have also been due to the fact that the Indians outnumbered the French colonists (Goldfield, 61), however, it still stands to show a peaceful co-existence is much more efficient than a bloody and violent one.
In Carolina, the relationship between the settlers and the Native Americans started strongly as the Savannah Indians aided the settlers in their search of slaves for their plantations. They used the Manacled Indians as a major slave export, although it was greatly opposed by The Lords Proprietors in London. But in 1707, the Savannah Indians ended the alliance. They planned to migrate to Maryland and Pennsylvania, which had better relationships with the Native Americans, but the Carolinas didn't like this idea so they attacked the Savannah Indians in a series of bloody raids and left the Native Americans practically completely gone.
US massacre, give disease, take land without restitution. French do not take as much land because they are operating mainly as fur Traders; shower Indians with gifts of French goods; marry Indian women rather than just rape and abuse them, although there is some of that going on. Not uncommon, however, for a Frenchman to have 2 families, one in France and one in America; provide for their children and wives; educate children in French schools when possible. The French and the Indians become Allies.” (Griffin, PP11, 9/14/15). In King William’s war during 1689 to 1697, “Colonists fighting with the French and Indians over the Hudson Bay area and Mass Bay Area” (Griffin, PP13, 9/14/15). In Queen Anne’s war during 1702 to 1713, “French and Spanish decide to be friends and team up against England. The Indians fight with French in New England, South Carolina, and Florida” (Griffin, PP14, 9/14/15). In the Tuscarora war during 1711 to 1713, “North Carolina and South Carolina colonists against a group of Indians called the Tuscarora Indians. North Carolina colonists are starting to move into Tuscarora land and the Indians fight back. South Carolina calls in their Indian allies to fight and the Tuscaroras are defeated. Those that aren’t killed are enslaved. England gets Hudson Bay area, some of Canada (Newfoundland and Nova Scotia), the island of St. Christopher in the Caribbean, and the French
The First "Europeans" reached the Western Hemisphere in the late 15th century. Upon arrival they encountered a rich and diverse culture that had already been inhabited for thousands of years. The Europeans were completely unprepared for the people they stumbled upon. They couldn't understand cultures that were so different and exotic from their own. The discovery of the existence of anything beyond their previous experience could threaten the stability of their entire religious and social structure. Seeing the Indians as savages they made them over in their own image as quickly as possible. In doing so they overlooked the roots that attached the Indians to their fascinating past. The importance of this past is often overlooked. Most text or history books begin the story of the Americas from the first European settlement and disregard the 30,000 years of separate, preceding cultural development (Deetz 7).