During the early beginnings of the Colonial period in the United States, the original inhabitants, the Native Americans had to deal with many invaders from Europe. Of all the Native American tribes, the Iroquois and Huron had the most interaction with the Europeans. The Spanish, English, and French were some of the few countries that worked with the Native Americans the most. Each country had their own methods of dealing with the Native Americans when it came to interaction or methods for trading and obtaining of goods. Of those three nations the French was the one nation that appeared to not take full advantage of the Huron and Iroquois. When the French arrived there were no intentions of enslaving the Huron or Iroquois for farming or mining. Jacques Cartier was the first French colonists to interact with the Huron in 1534. The French exploited the relationship the Huron had with other tribes to establish trade from the St. Lawrence River to further inland towards the Great Lakes. The French colonists relationship revolved around the Huron when it came to hunting, skinning and trading for furs. The Huron would do most of the work when came to the fur trading, however, for their work they would receive weapons and metal goods for trade. Like many other Native American tribes, the Huron became …show more content…
dependent on the European goods because of their dispute with the Iroquois League. The Huron’s biggest rival, the Iroquois League, also had a relationship with the French as well.
As the relationship grew between the French and Iroquois, Jesuit missionaries would be allowed within their camps thus picking up European lifestyle. The Iroquois would exploit the French’s need for more fur to gain more in trade rather than just trade with English colonists. However, because of the relationship the French had with the Huron, the Iroquois would eventually side with the English, thus resulting in the French and Indian War. With the help of the Iroquois the British would later help defeat and drive out the French from their colonies by
1763. The French was one of the big four nations along with the Dutch, English and Spanish that came to the North America to hunt and trade for goods to take back to Europe. Of those four nations, the French appeared to be the less hostile and not abuse the relationship they had with the Native Americans. The French befriended both the Huron and Iroquois League for their fur trade and provided muskets and metal artifacts in return for the hard work that was provided. Like other tribes within North America, as the Huron and Iroquois worked with the French or other European countries, they would become dependent on European goods. Between the Huron and Iroquois League, the French had the better relationship with the Huron. The French would later regret that decision and the Iroquois League would help the British during the French and Indian War, driving the French out of North America. The French would eventually make it back to North America and help the Colonists in defeating the British during the Revolutionary War.
The Europeans invaded America with every intention of occupying the land, the bountiful natural resources as well as the complete domination of the native people. The Europeans desire for the land created an explosive situation for the native peoples as they witnessed their land and right to freedom being stripped from them. They often found themselves having to choose sides of which to pledge their allegiance to. The Europeans depended upon Indian allies to secure the land and their dominance as well as trade relations with the Indians. The Indians were in competition with one another for European trade causing conflict among the different tribes altering the relationships where friends became enemies and vice versa (Calloway, 2012, p. 163). These relationships often became embittered and broke into bloody brawls where it involved, "Indian warriors fighting on both sides, alongside the European forces as well as against European forces invad...
Many years before the Louisiana purchase was thought of, this land was owned by several Native American tribes which included men and woman. “Evidence shows they had extensive cultural and economic exchange networks with tribes around them, reaching as far south as Mexico, Central American and the Caribbean. Material goods were traded, as being language, technology, and recreational practices” (The Louisiana Purchase). The Native Americans were good people who were very humble, but unfortunately “they were overwhelmed by the Europeans and disappeared as a distinct group before the 19th century” (The Louisiana Purchase).
This philosophy was at the core of the powerful Iroquois League of Five Nations. The League of Five Nations, or Iroquois Confederacy as it is more commonly called, was a thriving and well-functioning form of government very similar to that of the United States Government. Hundreds of years before "civilized" man arrived in the New World -- historians think as early as 1400 A.D.-- the Iroquois had created a radically new and well-organized form of government unlike any other before it. This new form of government was the idea of two peaceful men named Hiawatha and Deganawida (McClard 47). Hiawatha and Deganawida realized that the five Iroquois tribes were constantly fighting with one another resulting in many innocent deaths and ongoing tribal wars. As a solution to the constant stream of violence between the Iroquois people, they proposed a union between the five tribes that would make the Iroquois nation as a whole stronger and more powerful, while uniting their "brothers" together in friendship. The Iroquois Confederacy was a lasting union between the five Iroquois tribes: the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca. This union of five Iroquois tribes would prove to have a great deal of impact on the founding fathers of the United States. The grounding principles of unity, freedom of the people, and democracy that defined the Iroquois Confederacy very much impressed certain men who were charged with designing the new government of the United States.
“ [They] spent most of the conquest and colonial periods reacting and responding to the European strangers and invaders” (99). Both sides were different in many ways; Their communication, transportation, culture, and the way they survived differentiate the Europeans from the Native Americans. They both acted as wisely as they could when this encounters began after the discovery. “[Tribes] worked mightily and often cleverly to maximize their political sovereignty, cultural autonomy, territorial integrity, power of self identification, and physical nobility” (100). The Europeans were stronger, had better technology, better weapons, and had plenty of experience fighting people like the Native Americans. They could have easily conquer them , but they had a problem of resources, reinforcements and survival. Native American were many but they lacked the knowledge and experience of war and evolution. Europeans were technologically evolved and were experienced at fighting wars, but they ...
The New England colonists were in constant contact with Indians since their arrival. Conflict was unavoidable between the two polar opposite cultures. The colonists sought to convert the Indians into Christians and attempt to civilize the "barbarians." Also, the expansion of colonies into Indian Territory was a major concern among the Indian tribes. King Phillip's War was the result of the ongoing tensions between the two cultures. Both the colonists and the Indians grew increasingly suspicious of each other eventually leading to war.
The Lenape tribe lived in what is currently called Delaware, Pennsylvania and New Jersey and were one of the first tribes to interact with the Europeans. They were known for their peacefulness and were therefore called upon in times of wars or arguments to settle the matter. Many times they chose not to take the path of war and were forced to submit. When the Europeans first arrived Indians did not fully understand the European settler’s goals. They traded with them and offered to the Europeans what little they had. The Europeans had bigger plans tha...
The French and Indian war took place between 1754 and 1763. Here between these nine years would serve as the blue print to America’s history and future. “What began as a struggle over territorial rights between British colonist and French settlers became part of an international war between the great powers” (Schwartz, 1). To truly understand the French and Indian war, many must take a look into the past events that caused the dispute between the British and the French. During the year 1498, the British claims to the continent were based on the London Company and the sailing of the waters under the rule of King James I. This is where the British company in the latter half of the seventeenth century, under the crown established a reign or province, extending from seas to sea.
Considering historical evidence, the notion: Native –Americans was not the first inhabitant of America is a complete false. For centuries, history kept accurate and vivid accounts of the first set of people who domiciled the western hemisphere. Judging by those records, below are the first set of Native-American people who inhabited America before the arrival of another human race; the Iroquois: The Iroquois of Native Americans was one of the tribes that lived in America before other people came. Based on historical evidence, it is believed that the Native Americans came from Asia way back during the Ice Age through a land bridge of the Bering Strait. When the Europeans first set foot in America, there were about 10 million Native Americans
The Native Americans were more than willing to help out a stranger, whereas the English were more concerned about how much money the stranger had before helping them out. The Native Americans wouldn 't talk when other people were, and they wouldn 't answer the white 's proposal on the same day to show respect that they were actually considering it. In addition, Native Americans allowed everyone to talk in court, whereas the English yelled over each other and wouldn 't accept that they might be wrong. Many of these habits are still evident in today 's world, and it is probably the reason why the Americans were able to take over the Native
They were warlike and went out on expeditions to places in New Brunswick, Massachusetts, parts of Maine, and the north shore of Lake Huron. Excursions have been documented all the way to Ohio-Mississippi valley. “’The character of all these [Iroquois] Nations is warlike and cruel,’ wrote Jesuit missionary Paul Le Jeune in 1657.” (Richter, 528) They had different purposes for war than Europeans did. Thus, since the Europeans did not understand the similarities and differences, they were called savage. The Iroquois did not wage war all the time though. The Hudson Bay Company and the Northwestern Fur Company employed Iroquois as canoe men; they were also employed by private enterprises connected with the fur trade or exploration. The Iroquois employed by the Hudson Bay Company “are reputed to have been the most expert in the country, and many stories are told of their skill and spirit of adventure.” (Chamberlain, 460) They also hunted beaver for corporations, sometimes with their families with them. Iroquois were employed as “canoe men, guides, carriers, and voyagers in the service of the Hudson Bay Company.” (Chamberlain, 460) Some of the Iroquois went as far as the Rocky Mountains, where they stayed and brought their culture with them. As time passed though, they mixed cultures until one could hardly tell they were part Iroquois. They did bring dug-outs, the crossbow, and teaching of the Jesuit fathers to
During the numerous years of colonization, the relationship between the English settlers and the Native Americans of the area was usually the same. Native Americans would initially consider the settlers to be allies, then as time passed, they would be engaged in wars with them in a struggle for control of the land. This process of friendship to enemies seemed to be the basic pattern in the majority of the colonies.
While all four of these articles had their own unique knowledge and points of view, the one that I found to be most stimulating was that of the Selections on the Iroquois. After reading this particular article, I found myself drawing many similarities to many of the same things I took away after reading Deloria’s Sacred Places and Moral Responsibilities article. I think that both these selections are rooted from the same underlying message, respect for the environments and surrounding lands. While the Sacred Places and Moral Responsibilities reading revolved more around this idea of certain territories’ being considered holy for the Hopi people, the Selections on the Iroquois embodies many of these same environmental similarities. For instance, on page 4 we are presented with the value to which the tree bark means to the overall function and construction of the
The European arrived in the America in the sixteenth century. The American Indians, who had a culture of welcoming and honoring any visitor welcomed them and provided them with food and almost all the assistance they needed. But immediately after the arrival of the European to America, there was a conflict of the two cultures; the American Indians culture and the Europeans culture. American Indians who consisted of many tribes had their own culture and way of life. Every American Indian tribe spoke a different language and had a different way of life; some were hunters, some grew crops and they traded between themselves.
During the beginning both nations knew how important the Natives were to them. For instance the french needed the Natives to look for pelts and be allies. While the English needed them to learn how to survive in the new world. The French and English were very different when it came to their relationship with the Native Americans. For instance The French viewed them as allies while the English would see the Natives as a lower life form.Their relationship was also based on the people that colonized the areas. The french would bring Single Men who would marry Natives. Through these marriages their relationship would become stronger. While the English brought families so the chance of intermarrying would be low. The French would also respect the Natives customs and rules like boundaries. While the english chose to ignore them and would break boundaries and kick out natives who were living
Each European country that settled in America around the 1600’s treated Native Americans differently. Many of settlers, such as the Englishmen, treated them harshly because they either wanted their land or they wanted to convert the natives to their religion. Other countries, such as France, treated the natives in a more respectable way. Unlike other European countries the French built a remarkably good relationship with the Native Americans (ancestralfindings.com). Because the French settlers respected and were fascinated by the Native Americans, they treated the natives in a sophisticated way while Englishmen treated them harshly.