More handpicked essays just for you.
Europeans relationship with indians
Interactions between american indians and european
Indigenous impact colonialization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Benjamin Franklin; “Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America” Benjamin Franklin wrote “In Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America”, because he made observations and describes it in this essay the difference between the society of White English America and Native Americans. Furthermore, he needed people to understand that those supposed savages are different from us and that is acceptable. In every culture, whether White English America, or Native Americans, we all have some practices of disrespect and courtesy. Not all cultures are the same, as well as everyone’s life is different. Benjamin explains the differences between our society and their nation; moreover, he explains that their manners differ from ours as well. …show more content…
Benjamin Franklin describes the culture of Native American in such a way so that it looks like ideal for everyone. Despite with the use of word “savages”, Franklin had an undeniable respect for the people of Native Americans. Franklin tried to explain that Indian men are the backbone of the culture of Native Americans. Franklin has huge admiration towards the Indian men because they were hard worker and disciplined. “The Indian men, when young, are hunters and warriors; when old, counselors; for all their government is by counsel of the sages, there is no force, there are no prisons, no officers to compel obedience, or inflict punishment.” (Franklin 468) Franklin had huge admiration towards the culture due to fact that there are no prisoners, no force and no police officers to impose obedience. Just imagine this country without law enforcement, prisoners and prisons? What would this country be similar, to those of the Native Americans? Would our behaviors be comparable, to those of the Native …show more content…
The Native Americans were more than willing to help out a stranger, whereas the English were more concerned about how much money the stranger had before helping them out. The Native Americans wouldn 't talk when other people were, and they wouldn 't answer the white 's proposal on the same day to show respect that they were actually considering it. In addition, Native Americans allowed everyone to talk in court, whereas the English yelled over each other and wouldn 't accept that they might be wrong. Many of these habits are still evident in today 's world, and it is probably the reason why the Americans were able to take over the Native
Inventing the Savage was an interesting look in how Native Americans are expected to assimilate into culture, and because they have no desire to assimilate in “Euro-American” culture, they are treated harshly. Though this book was published in 1998 (15 years ago), there is most likely unfair treatment for Native Americans in both regular society and prisons. By writing this book, Ross gives a great perspective on how Native Americans are treated like “cultural prisoners” and how the “Euro-Americans” do not take kindly to the behaviors of the Native Americans. Overall, this book is highly recommendable to anyone who has an interest in learning about Native American criminality, as well as the treatment of women in prison, but more importantly the treatment of Native Americans in prison even today.
Although the English and Native Americans were both every different in how they viewed the land, there were some similarities between the two cultures. First of all, both agreed to the terms of a monarchy- the idea that a monarch that ruled over the land was more a symbolic figure of a whole people rather than a rich and wealthy land owner. Even though the English called their monarch a King, and the Indians’ a Sachem, the ideas behind the two were virtually the same. Secondly, if hunters were in pursuit of game, both cultures agreed to the fact that they could cross otherwise strict borders in attainment of the game. This shows that even though both were fairly precise in drawing village borders, food superseded otherwise legal boundaries. Lastly, the English and the Native Americans both were little different in their sense of how land could be bought or sold. Now, this does not mean that they thought viewed property the same or that they us...
The first point of conflicting ideas of freedom was the Native tribes remaining slightly nomadic when hunting. This conflict was highlighted in the selection “On taking the new road” by Carl Sweeny on page 127. In the selection, Carl speaks of how his tribe’s traditions changed when forced to hunt within the reservation and also maintained lifestyles different to those of whites. The Whites often used these differences to reinforce the idea that the Native Americans were inferior. Carl mentions in the selection that Whites disapproved of the Natives withdrawing their students from school during the winter. It would have been common for the Whites to attribute this to the natives being “lazy” (Sweeny, p.127), instead of recognizing it as a cultural difference. White Americans did not want to accept that the Nativ...
“ [They] spent most of the conquest and colonial periods reacting and responding to the European strangers and invaders” (99). Both sides were different in many ways; Their communication, transportation, culture, and the way they survived differentiate the Europeans from the Native Americans. They both acted as wisely as they could when this encounters began after the discovery. “[Tribes] worked mightily and often cleverly to maximize their political sovereignty, cultural autonomy, territorial integrity, power of self identification, and physical nobility” (100). The Europeans were stronger, had better technology, better weapons, and had plenty of experience fighting people like the Native Americans. They could have easily conquer them , but they had a problem of resources, reinforcements and survival. Native American were many but they lacked the knowledge and experience of war and evolution. Europeans were technologically evolved and were experienced at fighting wars, but they ...
American Indians shaped their critique of modern America through their exposure to and experience with “civilized,” non-Indian American people. Because these Euro-Americans considered traditional Indian lifestyle savage, they sought to assimilate the Indians into their civilized culture. With the increase in industrialization, transportation systems, and the desire for valuable resources (such as coal, gold, etc.) on Indian-occupied land, modern Americans had an excuse for “the advancement of the human race” (9). Euro-Americans moved Indians onto reservations, controlled their education and practice of religion, depleted their land, and erased many of their freedoms. The national result of this “conquest of Indian communities” was a steady decrease of Indian populations and drastic increase in non-Indian populations during the nineteenth century (9). It is natural that many American Indians felt fearful that their culture and people were slowly vanishing. Modern America to American Indians meant the destruction of their cultural pride and demise of their way of life.
In Benjamin Franklin’s Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America, he writes about how the Native Americans were being called savages because their culture and traditions were different. The work that took place here, was him taking a stand and writing these remarks to bring awareness to others on how everyone is different in some way. Franklin explains, “ But they are still ignorant. You know our Practice. If a white Man in travelling thro’ our Country, enters one of our Cabins, we all treat him as I treat you; we dry him if he is wet, we warm him if he is cold, we give...
The American version of history blames the Native people for their ‘savage ' nature, for their failure to adhere to the ‘civilized norms ' of property ownership and individual rights that Christian people hold, and for their ‘brutality ' in defending themselves against the onslaught of non-Indian settlers. The message to Native people is simple: "If only you had been more like us, things might have been different for you.”
English settlers in the colony of Jamestown, founded in May 24, 1607, were welcomed by the natives when they came over. They were given feasts and gifts. “We were entertayned with much Courtesye in every place.” (Source 2) This quote is from the diary of a settler who lived in Jamestown. They explain how the natives treated them. Also from their diary:“They would shew vs any thing we Demaunded, and laboured very much by signes to make vs understand their Languadg.” (Source 4) These two quotes demonstrate the natives’ respect for the settlers and their wish to get along. In turn, the settlers also treated the natives with respect. When two bullet bags and their contents went missing, the settlers calmly came to the natives and they peacefully worked everything out. The stolen items were returned without and struggle. “Captaine Newport gaue thanckes to the Kinges and rewarded the theeves with the same toyes they had stollen.” (Source 3) This incident shows the depth of the respect natives had for settlers and vice versa. All of these events add up together to make a general sense of peace and respect between the natives and the settlers.
Franklin, Benjamin “Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America.” The Norton Anthology of American Literature, Vol. A. Ed. Nina Baym. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2012. 476-80. Print
In his work Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America, Franklin addresses the superiority the whites feel they have over the Native Americans, while also proving it to be a senseless notion. For instance, he states, “Savages we call them, because their manners differ from ours, which we think the perfection of civility; they think the same of theirs.” (358). He goes on to describe specific examples of Native kindness and civility, which are then compared to the rude ways of the whites. One example is that of how the Natives hold public
One of these people was Thomas Jefferson, who was the 3rd president of the United States. Before he became president he supported military actions against the Indians. When he became president, he was an advocate for the removal of the Indians from the western united states as a solution to the conflicts with the settlers. He also had regarded the Indians as "Noble Savages" which is a term that was coined by the French Enlightenment Philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. He believed that the people of earth had corrupted the intrinsic good of man. There was a stark shift in the perception of the Indians before, during and after President Jefferson's time in office. The book also contained some rather descriptive language when it came to talking about the resilient nature of Indians and the unusual punishments that the Indians gave to Europen settlers who were captured by them endured. One example of this is when Dennis Rusoe D'Eres was talking about Indians would whip the captured and drink their warm blood from their bodies while they were still alive, also day by day they would keep the prisoners captive with no nourishment and "burn them to the bone" so to
Savagery and the American Indian is a two part documentary that tells the of Native American Indians, and how they disappeared from history, both through physical presence, and cultural aspects. Native Americans, despite being one of the stepping stones that allowed America to thrive, have all but become a cultural stereotype. Alvin Josephy, a historian states that Indians have been going through a constant holocaust that has lasted over the last five-hundred years. And it is because of this, mistreatment that many other colonies have thrived. But how did this come to be? How did an entire history get swept under the rug and rewritten in order to show the natives as 'savages'?
Contrary to common belief, Native American culture is not savage nor is it cruel to its people or others. The culture is considerably unique to the usual American culture known to many today. When the white Americans came to the land, they believed that the Natives were of beastly behavior and senseless actions, which was the reason why the Natives repulsed the Puritans; in fact the whites were offended when told they had something in common with the Natives. Native Americans, however, are peaceful, accepting, hospitable, tremendously environmentally friendly and their way of life is inveterate with nature and their religious beliefs. Through reading The Iroquois creation story and Red Jacket: Reply to the Missionary
Native Americans possess a greatly different spirituality than our culture has today. We have varying beliefs, values, and traditions that we deem as normal. If the current generation had to change its way of life to mimic the natives, there would be several potential benefits for ourselves and Mother Earth. There would be considerable changes in role of nature within our lives, the foundation of relationships, and the meaning of connotation of power that would be the cause of a complete paradigm shift throughout the population.
Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America was a comedic work that flipped the outlook on how colonists should view Native Americans. He wanted his readers to reevaluate their relationship with Native Americans. He would refer to the colonists as the savages and the Native Americans as being sophisticated. Historically, Franklin had helped negotiate with the Indians during the French and Indian War. His protests against the Paxton massacre, where the victims were innocent Indian women and children, went unheard. He began the piece stating, “Savage we call them, because their manners differ from ours, which we think the perfection of civility; they think the same of theirs” (“Baym”). He wanted to get through to the colonists that perception is all in the eye of the beholder and that virtue is not bestowed onto any certain race. The Paxton massacre had many Indian victims who had even converted to Christianity. Franklin, thus, argues that the white Christians were the savages in this context. He would also go on to praise the Indian way of life compared to their own, “The Indian men, when young, are hunters and warriors; when old, counselors; for all their government is by counsel for the sages; there is no force, there are no prisons, no officers to compel obedience, or inflict punishment” (“Baym”). Even going on to point out that white civilians had gone on to live amongst the Indians, yet