Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the colonial time period
King philip's war quizlet
Basics of the colonial time period
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
During the years of 1675 and 1676 the North American colonies experienced conflicts that shaped the dynamics of their colonial life. King Phillip's War would effectively end relations between the New England colonists and the Indians. Also, the rebellion in Virginia led by Nathaniel Bacon stressed the growing discontent of poor frontier farmers for British rule. The consequences of these two events clearly had an impact on different levels that would extend well beyond their time. Therefore, the years 1675 and 1676 played a very significant role in the Northern American colonies. The New England colonists were in constant contact with Indians since their arrival. Conflict was unavoidable between the two polar opposite cultures. The colonists sought to convert the Indians into Christians and attempt to civilize the "barbarians." Also, the expansion of colonies into Indian Territory was a major concern among the Indian tribes. King Phillip's War was the result of the ongoing tensions between the two cultures. Both the colonists and the Indians grew increasingly suspicious of each other eventually leading to war. King Phillip was the name given to the leader of the Indian Confederacy, Metacomet. Metacomet was able to unite several different Indian tribes and led the attacks on the American colonies. The Indians attacked first and were successful in destroying several towns throughout New England. However, the colonists eventually turn the tide of the war with support from the British. Over 3,000 Indians were killed during the War significantly dec... ... middle of paper ... ...ficant because it further showed the growing discontent of local Virginian farmers of the Royal rule. Some may consider this the first American Revolution but I consider this a small rebellion that would foreshadow a greater problem between American and British relations if nothing was fixed. At this point in time the amount of slaves would significantly increase in Virginia. The planter elite saw it necessary to set up a social order that specifically saw African Americans as inferior. They were afraid of another uprising among the common interests of poor whites and blacks. Therefore, the years of 1675 and 1676 proved to be very significant in forming the dynamics the colonial culture after this point as well as raising a stronger awareness of discontent for increasing British rule.
Bacon’s Rebellion, King Phillip’s War and the Pequot War were similar in that there were conflicts with Natives over land, however they differed in the ways the wars were carried out and the results of the wars. Bacon’s rebellion was a result of the poorer classes moving west to cultivate land, however they encountered natives and the governor refused to protect them. Likewise the Pequot war was a direct effect of puritans moving westward, additionally all three wars resulted in the colonists as victors. During King Phillip’s war the natives destroyed a fifth of the towns in Masseuses and Rhode Island in contrast to the other wars where the natives did not cause as much damage to the colonists. Bacon’s Rebellion was significant because afterwards
In 1675, tensions between Native Americans and colonists residing in New England erupted into the brutal conflict that has come to be known as King Philip's War, the bloodiest battle in America history, in proportion to population it was also the deadliest war in American history. The English colonists wished to rid the country of the Indians in order to seize their land. They believed the Indians were savages and therefore were not worthy of equal rights.
Before the start of the revolution, the colonists were faced with a threat. The French owned a large portion of American soil and had formed close ties with the Native Americans in their area whom were known for their hostility towards the English settlers. During the French and Indian War, the colonists had minimal help other than the strong naval power the English withheld and they were often belittled by the experienced soldiers that quartered in their homes. The colonists gathered a sense of unity in order to win the war. Although England beat the French, the peace would last only a decade before the colonists would revolt.
There was no definite property line in the early New England colony, causing animals roaming freely to become an issue between the two societies. The Indians were ultimately unprepared for the European’s livestock to wonder into their property without any boundaries. The animals would not only walk into their land but eat their resources and grass along the way. Destruction that the livestock caused to the Native American’s land led to a distinct boundary line between them and the Europeans, creating further tension rather than assimilation. Cattle were trapped into Indian hunting traps, causing both a problem to the Indians hunting rituals as well as the Europeans livestock supply. These issues among land division ultimately led to the acceleration of land expansion by the colonists during the 1660’s and early 1670’s. Before King Phillip’s War, Plymouth officials approached the Indians at least twenty-three times to purchase land. The author argues that previous mutual consideration for both the society’s needs was diminished at this point and the selling of the land would eliminate the Indian’s independence. Whenever livestock was involved, the colonists ignored Indian’s property rights
Their disputes were ones of land use. The Puritans drew up treaties to buy the land off the American Indians, but since the belief was that the land was there for everyone to use, the Natives believed the treaties were only an agreement to share the land for a limited period of time. However, this was no the case for the Puritans, who saw the treaties as the American Indians permanently selling off their land. In Connecticut, the Pequot nation attempted to rebel against the Europeans. This war nearly destroyed the Pequot population. The end of the war happened in May of 1637, when English colonists and Native allies of the Narragansett tribe surrounded a fort and set it on fire. They also shot at the Pequot people who tried to escape the burning fort. Only a few out of the 600 people that were in the fort survived. Another rebellion against European expansion into American Indian territory came about with the chiefdom of Metacomet, or King Philip as the English called him. Chief Metacomet was the son of Massasoit of the Wampanoag tribe, who originally aided and interacted with the Puritans. However, as the English settlers gained their footing in New England, they began to seize land from the Wampanoag. The Puritans made the Natives work for them to earn a living, and the Wampanoag were also prohibited to hunt or fish on the Sabbath. Metacomet organized an alliance of
Even though the critical aid of Indians had saved the settlers in Virginia from extinction, conflict—rooted in both ideological and practical reasons—was a prevalent tone in the relations between Virginian settlers and Indians during the 17th century. The undesirable relations began in the first months of the Jamestown colony. The early colonists in Jamestown viewed the Indians as savages and expressed hostility towards them. Captain John Smith established an unstable relationship with the Indians, occasionally stealing food from them. Tensions increased even further when tobacco cultivation became prominent in Virginia, which increased the demand for land as farmers required large tracts of farmland for tobacco cultivation. This increased demand for land caused settlers to expand into areas claimed by Indians. In fact, one of the major causes of Bacon’s Rebellion, the most powerful uprising against authority in North America prior to the Revolution, was the desire to expand into Native American lands. The series of conflicts that triggered Bacon’s rebellion began when Doeg Indians assaulted a plantation in retaliation for intrusions upon native land. White settlers struck back at the Indians in
The American Revolution was sparked by a myriad of causes. These causes in themselves could not have sparked such a massive rebellion in the nation, but as the problems of the colonies cumulated, their collective impact spilt over and the American Revolution ensued. Many say that this war could have been easily avoided and was poorly handled by both sides, British and American; but as one will see, the frame of thought of the colonists was poorly suited to accept British measures which sought to “overstep” it’s power in the Americas. Because of this mindset, colonists developed a deep resentment of British rule and policies; and as events culminated, there was no means to avoid revolution and no way to turn back.
“Where we do well know that all our causes will be impartially heard and equally justice administer to all men,” as said by, Nathaniel bacon. During the early years, when the America was still developing, conflicts formed the United Stated and its relationship with different part of regions. One of earliest rebellion showed different groups of people uniting, to rebel against the government. Bacon’s rebellion was important because it threaten governor Berkley’s government, in Virginia. In 1676, leader of the rebellion was Nathaniel bacon rebelled and held a revolt in colonial Virginia. High, taxes, low prices for tobacco and antipathy against special privileges given to close to the governor, Sir William Berkeley, provided the reasons for the uprising.
Changes in British policies toward the colonies between 1750 and 1776 played paramount in the evolution of relations between British North America and Mother England. Tension between England and the colonies mounted from the conclusion of the Seven Years’ War to the signing of the Declaration of Independence as a result of the several implemented changes imposed by Parliament for the purpose of increasing income and tightening the grip on America.
Although much of the land was tended to by the Indians, the unoccupied land was taken by the English and its profits were traded within each group. When intercultural trading started to occur, disagreements on price sparked conflict. The problem was exemplified once it went across to the English and the greater battle took place at this point. Although King Philip's War was tragic and costly in human lives, it also proved that two very different societies can coexist in a single region for an extended period of time before conflict can arise.
The war is named for King Philip, the son of Massasoit and chief of the Wampanoag nation. In his language, his name was Metacom, Metacomet, or Pometacom. In 1662, the court at Plymouth Colony arrogantly summoned the Wampanoag leader Wamsutta to Plymouth. Major Josiah Winslow (later Colonel) and a small force took Wamsutta, Philip’s brother, at gunpoint. Soon after questioning, Wamsutta sickened and died and his death infuriated the Wampanoag nation.
During the numerous years of colonization, the relationship between the English settlers and the Native Americans of the area was usually the same. Native Americans would initially consider the settlers to be allies, then as time passed, they would be engaged in wars with them in a struggle for control of the land. This process of friendship to enemies seemed to be the basic pattern in the majority of the colonies.
In spring 1676, Phillip attacked Massachusetts and lower Rhode Island. All of the Indians from Phillip’s tribe were helping him, except for the praying Indians who were on the English side. Phillip relocated all of the praying Indians to Dear Island, while he continued his conquest.
The Colonial Period, beginning in the early 1600 's with the founding and settling of Jamestown, signaled a new era in the New World. The Spanish had already conquered and colonized a great deal of Central America, and the French had established a strong fur trade and relatively good relations with the Native American 's of North America. Native American 's were succumbing to diseases in alarming numbers, and growing more wary of the arrival of even more Europeans. It is true that during the 1600 's to almost the end the Revolutionary War in 1781 was a time of “many mixtures of powers, conflict, and rivaling interests,” but the “dominant narrative” of that time varies from culture to culture and generation
Tension and disputes are sometimes resolved by force but more often by negotiation or treaties. On the other hand, the Natives were described as strong and very innocent creatures awaiting the first opportunity to be christianized. The Indians were called the “Noble Savages” by the settlers because they were cooperative people, but sometimes, after having a few conflicts with them, they seem to behave like animals. We should apprehend that the encounter with the settlers really amazed the natives, they were only used to interacting with people from their own race and surroundings and all of this was like a new discovery for them as well as for the white immigrants. The relations between the English and the Virginian Indians were somewhat strong in a few ways.