Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Freezing point depression experiment
Freezing point depression experiment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Freezing point depression experiment
The freezing point of p-xylene was calculated by taking the average calculated Kf of the three trials of the p-xylene and toluene solution. The average of the three trials was computed as 4.56(C/m) as shown in Table 1, however, the theoretical value was slightly lower than calculated, 4.3(C/m). This resulted in a 6.04% error as shown in Equation 5; possible causes of error could have resulted from adding too much solute or too little solvent, then the calculations would have been off given that the solution was not dilute enough. Having too much solvent could be attributed to having a higher Kf than the theoretical value, given that the solute would not have as much impact on the pure substance, p-xylene. This would raise the Kf value, bringing it closer to the solvent’s Kf. Another source of error resulting in the higher Kf could have resulted from contamination of the solvent or solute, given that it could introduce a polar substance or different molecules which would alter the hydrogen bonding. Using the previously calculated Kf, the molar masses of unknown substances A, C, and D were able to be calculated. However, given that the original Kf was slightly larger than the theoretical value, the molar …show more content…
Given the 6.04% error resulting from Kf, the calculations results were not consistent with what was expected, however, with the theoretical value the results were as predicted. Possible sources of this error could have resulted from combining too much or two little solvent or solute, which would alter the calculated Kf. If this lab were repeated, assuring the measurements of the solute and solvent were accurate would provide more reputable results. Another potential way to receive a more accurate Kf would include more trials to have an average closer to the theoretical
The experiment was not a success, there was percent yield of 1,423%. With a percent yield that is relatively high at 1,423% did not conclude a successful experiment, because impurities added to the mass of the actual product. There were many errors in this lab due to the product being transferred on numerous occasions as well, as spillage and splattering of the solution. Overall, learning how to take one product and chemically create something else as well as how working with others effectively turned out to be a
The mixture was poured through a weight filter paper and Sucrose washed with a 5ml of dichloromethane. The resulting solid was left in a breaker to dry for one week, to be measured. Left it in the drawer to dry out for a week and weighted it to find the sucrose amount recovered amount.
The data we gathered was tested to be as accurate as possible. Our prediction on the solvents did not support our data that we collected. The cause of this could be due to human error when washing the beets or the cutting of the beets. The beets were not perfectly cut the same size, so some beet pieces were bigger than others which can affect the final the final result. We followed each step and followed the time limits cautiously. I can say if we were to redo the experiment our results would be similar because we would attempt to do the experiment as close as we did the first
The temperature probe was placed into the test tube and recorded the temperature of the freezing solution using Logger Pro software. The test tube was held against the inner glass of the ice bath beaker so the test tube was visible to see when the solution froze over. Once the freezing point was measured, the temperature stopped being monitored and the data was recorded. The steps mentioned above for finding the freezing point, also known as ΔTf, was replicated for the 0.0, 0.4, and 0.6 concentrations. To find the freezing point depression, the equation ΔTf = imKf was used. The molality (m) of each solution was then calculated dividing moles of solute by kilograms of solvent, and the Kf value for magnesium chloride is known to be -1.86. Since magnesium chloride breaks down into three ions in deionized water, it was concluded that the Van’t Hoff factor couldn’t exceed three. For better accuracy, the experiment explained above for finding the freezing point depression and Van’t Hoff factor was re-conducted exactly the same to determine more accurate results. Again, the molality of each solution was calculated, and a graph expressing the change in freezing temperature verses molality
The purpose of this lab was to calculate the percent composition by mass of oxygen in potassium chlorate.
In this experiment, there were several objectives. First, this lab was designed to determine the difference, if any, between the densities of Coke and Diet Coke. It was designed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of several lab equipment measurements. This lab was also designed to be an introduction to the LabQuest Data and the Logger Pro data analysis database. Random, systematic, and gross errors are errors made during experiments that can have significant effects to the results. Random errors do not really have a specific cause, but still causes a few of the measurements to either be a little high or a little low. Systematic errors occur when there are limitations or mistakes on lab equipment or lab procedures. These kinds of errors cause measurements to be either be always high or always low. The last kind of error is gross errors. Gross errors occur when machines or equipment fail completely. However, gross errors usually occur due to a personal mistake. For this experiment, the number of significant figures is very important and depends on the equipment being used. When using the volumetric pipette and burette, the measurements are rounded to the hundredth place while in a graduated cylinder, it is rounded to the tenth place.
Discussion: The percent of errors is 59.62%. Several errors could have happened during the experiment. Weak techniques may occur.
One possible source of experimental error could be not having a solid measurement of magnesium hydroxide nor citric acid. This is because we were told to measure out between 5.6g-5.8g for magnesium hydroxide and 14g-21g for citric acid. If accuracy measures how closely a measured value is to the accepted value and or true value, then accuracy may not have been an aspect that was achieved in this lab. Therefore, not having a solid precise measurement and accurate measurement was another source of experimental error.
Introduction: A phase change is a result from the kinetic energy (heat) either decreasing or increasing to change the state of matter (i.e. water, liquid, or gas.) Thus saying, freezing is the phase change from a liquid to a solid which results from less kinetic energy/heat. Also, melting is the phase change from a solid to a liquid which results from adding kinetic energy/heat. So, the freezing and melting point of something is the temperature at which these phase changes occur. Therefore, a phase change will occur when a vial of 10 mL of water is placed into a cup of crushed ice mixed with four spoonfuls with 5 mL of sodium chloride for 30 minutes. If 10 mL of water is placed in an ice bath, it will then freeze at 5 degrees Celsius because the kinetic energy will leave quicker with the ice involved. The purpose of this lab is to observe what temperature the water must be to undergo a phase change.
When soluble ionic compounds dissolve in water is due because ionic compounds are strong electrolytes and they completely dissolve and once it reaches saturation point it means it has reached the equal to the maximum amount of water. Solubility product constant (Ksp) states to the product of the concentration of the ions that are present in a saturate solution of ionic compound. Thermodynamic parameters indicates variables such as delta G, H, or S and it is to measure the concentration of reactants and products at equilibrium and calculation the value of equilibrium energy chance is related to value of equilibrium constant of a particular temperature. The objectives of the experiment is to measure the solubility of potassium nitrate in water at several temperatures and to calculate Ksp, delta H, delta G, and delta S for potassium nitrate dissolving in water. The procedural modification in this experiment was the total of KNO3 for each determination. The safety precautions was handling the KNO3 solution with care it is an oxidizing agent and may intensify fire. Being extra careful when stirring the test tube with metal temperature probe to avoid breakage and most importantly is washing your hands before leaving the lab.
From the Results there is an anomaly which is with the test tubes at 58oC, the results spike from 0.100 to 0.536 and then back down to 0.302, this anomaly may have happened due to the three samples in the test tubes potentially having a higher level pigment in the vacuole than the other
...terephthalic acid solubility in water increased linearly proportional with temperature. This situation happens due to the low dielectric constant nature in supercritical water, making it as a good solvent for non-polar substance like para-xylene. Therefore, it can be concluded that the reaction and yield of the reaction could be adjusted by the modification of reaction temperature. As shown in Table 1, the application of sub and supercritical water, could give a greater yield in terephthalic acid, >50%. However, the industrial implementation always demanding the practical application in terms of energy, nature of chemical and operation cost. Even sub and supercrical water could produce high amount of terephthalic acid, but the temperature and pressure applied in this application was far from safe and commercially practical.
Substances at the exact temperature that they melt. Although, every known element of mankind has a freezing point. Each freezing point varies according to the properties of the given elements. “Heavy” water will have a higher freezing point than ordinary water. So,the freezing point temperature will be higher if the pressure is increased. Also, as you add more salt to water, its freezing point drops when it’s frozen. After the liquid is frozen, the temperature of the ice may drop below 32 degrees F. Even though water regulates earths temperature. The temperature still varies according to the given
The ice on the roads during the winter months is very dangerous. Vehicles could slip on the ice and end up in an accident. Because of this, salt is placed on the roads so that accidents don't occur as often. Freezing point depression lowers the freezing point of water when the salt comes into contact. Salt is used to melt ice, and gets in between the ice’s molecules which then changes the freezing point. The more salt, that ice has, the quicker the ice will melt.
There is also the potential of human error within this experiment for example finding the meniscus is important to get an accurate amount using the graduated pipettes and burettes. There is a possibility that at one point in the experiment a chemical was measured inaccurately affecting the results. To resolve this, the experiment should have been repeated three times.