Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Venezuela from chavez to maduro essay quizlet
Censorship in venezuela
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Venezuela from chavez to maduro essay quizlet
An awful reality, the freedom of speech and press in Venezuela is in danger of disappearing. In Venezuela, if someone has a different opinion of the President of the country, Hugo Chavez, could be penalized. Can the opposition movements, including student force, change this current reality? What can the common citizens do against the government when every day it is capable of setting down more severe restrictions to silence the press? Should the opposition parties keep fighting as they have been for the last 10 years?
In the last 5 to 6 years, the government has been able to control the independence of the media with radical and unconstitutional restrictions. It has been one event followed by others, such as the closure of Radio Caracas Televisión (RCTV), and the intention to do the same to Globovision, both are main private TV channels in the country, the closure of more than 50 radio stations, the constant violence against journalists and the impunity of which Chavez followers enjoy, the developed penal trials against journalists, defenders of human rights, or even public officials that criticize the government.
Through the years, Chavez government opposition movements and student force have became stronger and gained support from many national and international non-government organizations interested in the Venezuela crisis, therefore, even if it seems impossible, opposition movements, including student force and common-civil people should keep fighting for having freedom of speech and press.
In May 2007, RCTV was closed for the first time when the government decided not to renew the broadcast license and this popular and main TV channel was off the air after 53 years of continuous programming. Two months later, this pri...
... middle of paper ...
... state within it a non-ending government period.
Works Cited
El Universal, Dayly News.
Mar. 2010. HRW: Venezuela must end prosecutions of dissenters
Mar 2010. Venezuela's Parliament does not rule out Internet regulation
Jan. 2010. Closure of RCTV Internacional as reported on major news media worldwide
Jul. 2009. National Telecommunications Commission orders closure of 32 radio and two television stations
El Nacional
Nov. 2009. Hugo Chávez raising pressure on Globovision
Globovision
Mar. 2010. Fiscal General instó a la AN a elaborar normativa para regular el uso de internet
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0146551720090801. August 2009. Venezuela begins shutdown of 34 radio stations-Chavez says stations no longer belong to 'bourgeoisie
http://www.guardian.co.uk. Mar 2010. Sean Penn: Journalists who call Hugo Chávez a dictator should be jailed
People in both Venezuela and in Fahrenheit 451 are not allowed to speak out or go against the government without the government's harsh retaliation. Both of these instances show suppression of freedom of speech, but this theme is more strongly expressed by Maduro’s actions.
Chávez’s leadership was based on an unshakable commitment to nonviolence, personal sacrifice and a strict work ethic. He emphasized the necessity of adhering to nonviolence, even when faced with violence from employers and growers, because he knew if the strikers used violence to further their goals, the growers and police would not hesitate to respond with even greater vehemence. Despite his commitment to nonviolence, many of the movement’s ‘enemies’, so to speak, made efforts to paint the mo...
Chavez is one of the greatest Civil Rights activists of times. As a child he watched workers be mistreated and misused. He follows King and Gandhi’s principles of nonviolence and lives by their standards. He also believes that the highest form of freedom carries with it the greatest measure of
The Republic of Cuba is an island in the Caribbean, located between the Caribbean Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean (CIA, 2009). Among many facts about Cuba, such as the militaristic regime, communism, Fidel Castro, cigars, etc, with which Cuba can be associated, there are a prominent historical issue that puts the country in a negative leading position in the world. Such issue is censorship. In that regard, this paper analyzes the issue of censorship in Cuba, specifically addressing the era of electronic expression and the recent trends for change.
Article 53 of the Cuban Constitution provides: “Freedom of speech and press are recognized for citizens consistent with the purposes of socialist society. The material conditions for their exercise are present by the fact that the press, radio, television, movies, and others mass media are state-owned or socially owned, and can in no event be privately owned, which ensures their use exclusively in the service of the working people and in the interest of society. The law regulates the exercise of these freedoms.” (Human Rights Watch 29)
Firstly I would like to tell you about Pluralism and Media independence. The explanation of Pluralism in the article is: “Pluralism Measures the degree to which opinions are represented in the media”. The explanation of Media independence in the article is: “Media independence measures the degree to which the media are able to function independently of the authorities". There is no media independence in Cuba at all. Everything what is digital is controlled by government. The laws for media are very strict and the population is not happy about it. The government should definitely give more freedom for people in both media and political pluralism.
Hugo Chavez was a powerful and positive force in addressing social issues, however, his singular focus on social issues at the expense of other matters of the country left the Venezuelan economy in tatters. In 1998, 50.4% of the Venezuelan population was living below the poverty line, where as in 2006 the numbers dropped to 36.3% (Chavez leaves). Although he aggressively confronted the issue of poverty in Venezuela, many other problems were worsened. Some Chavez critics say he used the state oil company like a piggy bank for projects: funding homes, and healthcare while neglecting oil infrastructure and production. Without growth in the oil ind...
Hugo Chavez's political discourse based on the Marxist thoughts soon was creating "The Bolivarian Revolution", and since its beginning offered the XXI century socialism, which one was never described specifically to people. As a result, with the passing of the years Chavez created an atmosphere of division, violence and unrest within the population. Thus, Created a marked difference between the supporters and opponents of his policies, a situation that President Hugo Chavez took in advantages for his own purposes, deploy a communist regime disguised as a socialist. In other words, Chavez tricked Venezuela’s people, offering the establishment of a socialism that was nothing more than a dictatorship adapted to their own purposes, become the most recognized leader of the left in worldwide.
One of the fundamental roles of the media in a liberal democracy is to critically scrutinise governmental affairs: that is to act as a watchdog of government to ensure that the government can be held accountable by the public. However, the systematic deregulation of media systems worldwide is diminishing the ability of citizens to meaningfully participate in policymaking process governing the media (McChesney, 2003, p. 126). The relaxation of ownership rules and control, has resulted in a move away from diversity of production to a situation where media ownership is becoming increasing concentrated by just a few predominantly western global conglomerates (M...
The investigative journalism developed in post-dictatorship contexts doesn’t fit with the liberal model of investigative journalism conceptualized in more stable democracies, with a strong tradition in practicing and conceptualizing what does mean investigative journalism, as US context. The Chilean case is an example of that: according anecdotal, its investigative role has been an exception more than the rule.
The implementation of freedom of expression entails the abilities to raise the individual’s belief, ideas or opinions by all legal means, the opinions or ideas stated or presented must therefore not cause or lead to harm, hatred, violence or injustice to others (Anon., 2016). The use of and accurate information will not be restricted by censorship (Anon., 1990). The inhabitants may contest acts that violate their rights which are documented under the constitution and other laws in Mozambique.
In Freedom House’s report for 2012, the freedom rating and political rights have increasing indicating a worse score. This increase is due to the fact that the government has been engaging in political repression. The government has proposed two bills, Media Appeals Tribunal and Protection of Information Bill, which would significantly reduce press freedom. There has been also a handful of documented case in which the government has unlawful banned protests that are protected in the Constitution. Police repression has been a major problem, often times targeting journalists and activists. The Right2Know Campaign has reported some instances in which protestors have been harassed by political intimation from political parties. These activities show that even though there a free and fair elections, the human rights of the people are being violated. This shows a conflicting political scenario. On one hand the government is having peaceful presidential turnover, and free and fair elections. However, on the other hand the government has engaged in actions that promote political repression. Actions such as these decrease the democracy because democracy is not only about free and fair elections but about freedom of the individuals as
Jean-Jacques Rousseau who is a famous Francopphone Genvan philosopher explained that opinions form the society is a law which is beyond the law. That is to say, he thought that public opinion is the most important one among the laws (Rousseau, 1762). As a matter of fact, media can gather opinion of citizens, which means if media is not allowed, then public opinion will not be gathered. Therefore, government cannot listen to the people and know their demands. The situation become worse that government will pay less attention to citizens and even ignore them. Additionally, if media is restricted by the government, officials will choose to filter out those information from public opinion which are harmful to the regime of party. A government which lose the public reaction will never be a representative of all citizens and finally it will be a dictatorship society rather than a democracy
There are several ways in which media had been assertive to their roles in strengthening and excavating democracy. Media’s investigative reporting somehow led to ouster a president and befalls a corruptive government. It causes a democratically elected official become more acquainted with an intrusive press and build a culture of disclosure and openness as they assume their responsibilities more accountably.
During each of their time in power, they prohibited freedom of the press. They censored and manipulated all media transmissions including the daily news, newspapers, our magazine and advertising. The aim of media control is to gain more power and brainwash the population. Will we, fellow citizens, stand here and let our power-hungry government brainwash us? Jim Morrison, the activist for freedom and equality expresses, “He who controls the media, controls the mind.” Is this what we want for our nation? 23 million sheep being raised to eventually to be slaughtered in the abattoir? Will we live, only to let them manipulate and exploit us to increase their pay cheques meanwhile, shrinking ours? Do we want to be treated like prisoners, controlled and monitored 24/7? I know what I want, our rights restored and the right to a happy life, don’t you? Freedom of the Press promotes honesty and action! Let us restore our democratic nation, and prevent a brutal autocracy. Let us force the media to shine a light on the myriad of lies our politicians say! Let us restore our