Frederick Herzberg's Theory Of Motivation

1546 Words4 Pages

A dynamic, motivational manager within the workplace must be an individual that takes the time to understand himself and those that fall under his charge. Motivation is not inherent and research has proven a direct correlation to behavior and the functions of the brain. Merriam Webster’s definition of motivation states that it is “a force or influence that causes someone to do something” which leads to the definition of behavior which is “the manner of conducting oneself”. This paper will research why beings act a certain way, those that paved the path and what underlying factors promote successful behavioral outcomes to motivate within life and the workplace.
Thomas Edison believed that “ones greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most …show more content…

The two theories “distinguish between motivators and hygiene factors (the name hygiene is used because, like hygiene, the presence will not make you healthier, but absence can cause health deterioration) motivators encompass challenging work, recognition, and responsibility. These motivators give positive satisfaction arising from intrinsic (intangibles) conditions of the job itself. The hygiene factors such as status, job security and benefits are extrinsic (tangible) and do not give positive satisfaction, though dissatisfaction results from their absence”. Furthermore, according to Herzberg “the job should have sufficient challenge to utilize the full ability of the employee. Employees who demonstrate increasing levels of ability should be given increasing levels of responsibility. If a job cannot be designed to use an employee’s full abilities, then the firm should consider automating the task or replacing the employee with one who has a lower level of skill. Lastly, if a person cannot be fully utilized then there will be a motivation concern”

More about Frederick Herzberg's Theory Of Motivation

Open Document