Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis Shelley's Frankenstein
The effect of science on frankenstein
The effect of science on frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis Shelley's Frankenstein
Peering through the door, I saw a dark room lit by but one candle illuminating my master bent, slaving over what seemed to be a body draped in a pure white veil, while crimson liquid and dead corpses were scattered on the ground. As he moved to grab another butcher knife, I caught a glimpse of this body and the memories of my creation, the most wretched thing, came at me. The “strange multiplicity of sensations seized me” as the darkness of the night contrasted with the light from the candle next to my corpse (Shelley 68). These memories festered within me as well as the disgust of the action to yet be performed, yet I continued gazing towards my master. Step after careful step, I creeped closer to the veil and suddenly the realization dawned on me as a rush of emotions came upon me, he was trying to make a creature just like me. Will he complete this creature or will he just throw it away like he did with my beloved? He promised me one thing that a master ought to give to his creature, “to bestow on me the only benefit that [could] soften my heart” and “deliver into [my] hands a female who would accompany [me] into [my] exile” (Shelley 101).
Frankenstein was born in the family of the most eminent citizens of Geneva. His father married the daughter of his friend Carolina Beaufort, and became the father "in his old age." Victor was their favorite and long-awaited first-born, but Carolina would like to have a daughter. One day relaxing on the shores of Lake Como, the woman went to the poor hut and saw a lovely blonde girl, is very different from the other kids, black-eyed and dark-haired. She was a child of the Italian patriot and Germans. Her mother died in childbirth, his father was sent to prison, and she remained in the family nurse. Frankenstein persuaded farmers to give them the girl and adopted her. In the future, Elizabeth was to become the wife of Victor.
Frankenstein, speaking of himself as a young man in his father’s home, points out that he is unlike Elizabeth, who would rather follow “the aerial creations of the poets”. Instead he pursues knowledge of the “world” though investigation. As the novel progresses, it becomes clear that the meaning of the word “world” is for Frankenstein, very much biased or limited. He thirsts for knowledge of the tangible world and if he perceives an idea to be as yet unrealised in the material world, he then attempts to work on the idea in order to give it, as it were, a worldly existence. Hence, he creates the creature that he rejects because its worldly form did not reflect the glory and magnificence of his original idea. Thrown, unaided and ignorant, into the world, the creature begins his own journey into the discovery of the strange and hidden meanings encoded in human language and society. In this essay, I will discuss how the creature can be regarded as a foil to Frankenstein through an examination of the schooling, formal and informal, that both of them go through. In some ways, the creature’s gain in knowledge can be seen to parallel Frankenstein’s, such as, when the creature begins to learn from books. Yet, in other ways, their experiences differ greatly, and one of the factors that contribute to these differences is a structured and systematic method of learning, based on philosophical tenets, that is available to Frankenstein but not to the creature.
“Allure, Authority, and Psychoanalysis” discusses the unconscious wishes, effects, conflicts, anxieties, and fantasies within “Frankenstein.” The absence of strong female characters in “Frankenstein” suggests the idea of Victor’s desire to create life without the female. This desire possibly stems from Victor’s attempt to compensate for the lack of a penis or, similarly, from the fear of female sexuality. Victor’s strong desire for maternal love is transferred to Elizabeth, the orphan taken into the Frankenstein family. This idea is then reincarnated in the form of a monster which leads to the conclusion that Mary Shelley felt like an abandoned child who is reflected in the rage of the monster.
terror but I couldn’t understand why my creator was horrified at my sight I was devastated all I remember was charging at him My farther was running for his life when my farther thought I was dead he left town without me keeping his secret in his attic.
The fantastical response William Frankenstein creates after seeing the creation shows how humans, when faced with the sublime, form preconceptions from their limited knowledge to "name the unnamable." The creation approaches William, assuming he would be i...
The mind is a very powerful tool when it is exploited to think about situations out of the ordinary. Describing in vivid detail the conditions of one after his, her, or its death associates the mind to a world that is filled with horrific elements of a dark nature.
My life, although not without surprises and unusual events, is dictated by predictable and ordinary elements. However, through fiction I am transported into a world of boundless imagination and extraordinary themes. One such example is evident in my response to Mary Shelley’s gothic novel Frankenstein. Through fiction, Shelley invites the reader to accept the extraordinary. Firstly, we are led to believe that Victor Frankenstein is able to create life by shocking it with electricity, and to this I responded with an imaginative curiosity. But it was the consequences of the creation provoked a stronger response from me. The element of horror Victor experiences and his reaction to the ‘god like’ qualities bestowed upon him as creator is truly extraordinary. Victor, like no other man, experiences the feeling of immense power and responsibility as creator of man, and this provoked a sympathetic response from me. Finally I also accepted and responded to the extraordinary concept of the monster, who, unlike to the majority of humanity, is created without a sense of cultural identity. Additionally, what is extraordinary to me as a reader is the humanity and intelligence the monster displays, despite the disadvantageous of his creation. This made me have sympathy for monster and served to blotch the credibility of Victor. Throughout the novel I was inclined to accept Shelley’s invitation and to explore a deeper view of humanity.
The interpretation of the young girl’s ghastly nightmare, fashioned by her own imagination derived the novel “Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus.” Mary Shelley began, putting pen to paper reveling her cautionary tale, a moral lesson hidden within a horrifying story that would awaken thrill and terror in her audience. Mary felt that if this was not accomplished, the novel would not live up to its title “The Modern Prometheus.” She relates to geographic elements that are subsequent the French Revolutionary era, with a strong connection to Greek mythology. In metaphor she illustrates how creature and creator are one in the same and with the symbolic use of sickness and nature creating the foreshadowing for events to come. Mary Shelley divulges though this novel her personal approach on humanity and life’s lessons; formulating the idea that ignorance is bliss and human injustice is wrong by taking in to account the sexiest views of the later eighteenth-century.
Peter Brooks' essay "What Is a Monster" tackles many complex ideas within Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, and the main concept that is the title of the essay itself. What is the definition of a monster, or to be monstrous? Is a monster the classic representation we know, green skin, neck bolts, grunting and groaning? A cartoon wishing to deliver sugary cereal? or someone we dislike so greatly their qualities invade our language and affect our interpretation of their image and physical being? Brooks' essay approaches this question by using Shelley's narrative structure to examine how language, not nature, is mainly accountable for creating the idea of the monstrous body.
Fundamentally, Victor abandons the newborn creature, leaving the helpless orphan to suffer the society’s rejection. Passionate in his benign desire of discovery, Victor outlines his invention of a life from corpses: “As the minuteness of the parts formed a great hindrance to my speed, I resolved … to make the being of a gigantic stature” (Shelley 32). To quickly achieve his goal, he simplifies his work to avoid small parts by building immense features, yet he ignores how the deformities fit in their society. To him, this life is just a lab product and not a sensitive soul. However, Victor recalls his astonishment at the figure’s ugly birth: “Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room” (Shelley 35). Clearly, this gruesome aftermath catches Victor off guard. Unlike natural parents who take care of their infants, Victor deserts his scary-looking creature wi...
Pretext (prebibliography): In my research paper I am going to explore the roots of the creation of evil.
The human race’s complexity is so muddled with various desires, styles, and actions that even a substantial response could only explain a fragment of human nature, but, even with the intricacy of humanity, there is a barrier an ethical conscience held by the human race as a whole that separates actions human and inhuman. In Mary Shelly’s novel Frankenstein, the characters Dr. Frankenstein and the creature he reanimates walk along the separation line between human and inhuman. Shelly uses the idealisms like Promethean desire and existential questions to exemplify the natural yearnings that humans strive for as they search for their purpose and aspire for something greater. Frankenstein’s creature and Frankenstein illustrate both human and inhuman qualities as they exemplify natural human desires, but also simultaneously act in eerie and coldhearted ways that separate them from natural human society.
My opinion of Frankenstein is similar to the Knight’s Quarterly Review as it is negative and I share some similarities in my opinions of the core of the novel. Opposingly I also have opposing opinions of how the book is bad in different ways. I similarly had high expectations of the novel because of the name, it had been copied and repeated over and over again in movies and literature, but also to my disappointment I thought this book was subpar at best. This is possibly because I was so hyped up for it that when I actually read it, it didn’t hold up to the huge expectations I had set. Nevertheless, it didn’t float my boat. I didn’t think the flaws of the book were “overwriting” or “extravagance” but more melodramatic storytelling and poor characters.
Mary Shelley in her book Frankenstein addresses numerous themes relevant to the current trends in society during that period. However, the novel has received criticism from numerous authors. This paper discusses Walter Scott’s critical analysis of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein in his Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine Review of Frankenstein (1818).
Although he may have lustfully pursued an act taboo to society, the end result was equivalent; utter disgust. Victor had worked long, “. . . for the sole purpose of infusing life into an inanimate body (Shelley 35).” Victor abandoned family and friends to work on this project. At the moment of finishing his creation, “. . . horror and disgust filled my heart. Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room. . .(Shelley 35).” Victor quickly developed a societal attitude upon sight of his creation, soon abandoning it. This abandonment is the first instance of Victor’s failure to nurture his creation, and initialized his cycle of neglect upon the