Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Change management theories, techniques and leadership
The theory and practice of change management
The theory and practice of change management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Force-filed analysis is a concept that asses various forces that can positively and negatively affect a process such as the change management. The analysis begins with the process of identifying the forces that are categorized into enabling and constraining (Grundy & Brown, p. 101). The enabling forces encourage change, while the constraining force prevents introduction of change in the organization. A manager or a leader who fails to understand the constraining forces is not able to introduce the change, as one is not able to comprehend the problems faced by the forces. Conversely, an understanding of various forces enables the manager to achieve the desired result. It is possible to identify the forces by deciding the aims and the objectives …show more content…
A hospital management has decided to upgrade the technology used in the organization. It is likely to assist the organization to provide improved service to the customers. For example, the use of the wireless equipments that are available in the market facilitate communication between the customers and the medical professionals. The enabling forces in this case are the facilities that can be provided to the customers including the service and maintenance of their records, patient satisfaction, and reduced cost of maintenance of the services. The customers may complain regarding the quality of the service that is currently offered to them. They also tend to complain regarding the nature of service that they obtain when they visit other organizations. Competition is an important force that can compel an organization to introduce various changes. The senior management, in this case, is convinced regarding the change. One can use these factors to convince the management to introduce the changes (Sherwin, …show more content…
For example, managers at the intermediate level may oppose this change. They may instigate the staff concerning the need to avoid or postpone change. The staff, in some organizations, resists any sort of change. According to them, the present system is working well and there is no need to introduce change. In many cases, the staff is critical of the change management process. In some cases, the staff may envisage an ulterior motive. The management may be accused of exploiting the workers by introducing undesirable changes. The staff may have certain concerns with the idea of testing the product. The trial process needs time and patience. The management cannot assure the workers that the new technology would be used for a particular period. The employees are also worried concerning the use of the new technology. They need considerable time to learn the new technology. They are generally reluctant to learn new aspects relating to their profession. The workers need to attend the training workshops to obtain expertise in the new technology. The organization needs considerable financial resources to introduce the change. In some cases, they may suffer major losses due to the introduction of new technology. The organization needs to study the impact of the change on its relationship with the employees and the customers (Sherwin,
Technology will continue to improve therefore each organization has the opportunity to advance and take advantage of the new techniques and methods that are being used by successful organization that has proven themselves by continuing to provide excellent services for the community and each employee. Now when you see an organization that didn 't make it you ask yourself the question were they ready did they do all that could have been done to save the business, did they hire the correct people, was training offered to all employees, The factors that were stated will make and break an organization if these steps aren 't followed it could lead to failure in the organization.
Since information technology is growing at a rapid pace, communication and data processing costs are at an all time low. For employees, this rapid impact can threaten or enhance opportunities within one’s career. If one is hesitant and uncertain when it comes to constructing a model for a potential system then they are likely to lose their job. Employees must be able to quickly adapt to changing technology. For example, a chair manufacturing company is loosing revenue due to its
This kind of uncertainty always puts employees at risk. Their knowledge and skills might be out of date; their valued work space, or social relationships might be removed and disrupted. Therefore, people resist change out of worry that they cannot adjust to the new work requirements or they will produce unknown costs. Issues such as “fear of the unknown” and “the inability to see the need for change” are common in resistance to change research (Hickins, 1998; Wienbach, 1994). For instance, if change had been poorly implemented during the past and employees have been subject to broken agreements, unfair treatment and poor management decision making, it is unlikely that trust damaged by such actions will be easily restored (Dent and Goldberg, 1999; Ford et al., 2008; Piderit, 2000). Ultimately, employees also would feel bad towards
This article deals with the topic of how organizations should go about implementing new technology systems. The article is built around Murphy's Law that, "Whatever can go wrong, will." When organizations implement new system a lot of know problems cannot be avoided and unforeseen problems arise with even grater frequency. Chew outlines seven points to help launch a new system with greater success since they are essential for long-term survival.
Prevention of resistance is most effective when implementing change. Preventing the weight of inertia in a workplace allows the change to happen in a timely manner with minimal problems. As Lee (2004) emphasizes, leaders have the ability to effect change and performance. If someone is accountable for outcomes and poor habits, outcomes will improve. The manager must show a caring attitude over the process of change and welcome any positive innovation. This caring attitude will become contagious to the employees working under him and become a priority to them as well. Approaching the change in an accepting, open-minded manner can decrease the vulnerability and frustration associated with change. How the change is presented can make the biggest difference in the outcome of the change. The manager must show that blaming will be avoided at all costs. One will only ask why, not who, to avoid the feeling of belittlement. This can allow employees to become comfortable with voicing their opinions and mistakes, which can allow an even greater range of improvement. The manager must also encourage...
The transformation of a company requires hundreds, sometimes thousands of employees to adopt a new view of its future, a future they must regard as essential. Change management involves managing the process of achieving this future state. Change can be viewed from two vantage points, that of the people making the changes and that of the people experiencing the changes. In the top-down, or strategic viewpoint associated with management, the focus is on technical issues such as the investment required, the processes for implementing the change, how soon the change can be realized, and the outcome. In the bottom-up viewpoint of the employee, the focus is on what the change means to the ...
Therefore, it is advisable for all employees to take advantage of the upcoming training sessions with respect to the impending technological changes coming soon to our organization. Now, let us examine the advantages that will yield great results for our company by embracing this technological change. Common Ground
Change in an organization occurs when an organization identifies an area of where necessary change must be undertaken, examines it thoroughly and adapts to it. This may lead to gaps where employees may not adapt to a certain change and therefore it is important that an organization takes into considerati...
... Worley, C.G. 2006, p.11) is two significant factors that make the organization’s change difficult. Management systems are designed affects every level in the organization structures and processes when make change. On the other hand, people rewarded for stability impact organizational change seriously because people like working in a stability environment and they resist change. It is very difficult for organization to make changes in those two areas.
Change is a constant and ingoing process in an organization. Change can be defined as one of the many characteristics of organization development. The change efforts are based on the analysis of particular problems and their purpose is to attain specific goals. Change is not an easy thing to implement and anticipate. It is a difficult and a challenging process; therefore the management has to take certain steps in order to prepare them for antedating the change in business environment. The senior management can prepare themselves for a change through studying and researching about change, by having a sound awareness about the change process and by understanding the necessity of change and by being mentally tough about the change process. All in all, a constant change is ...
While technological innovations can provide increased opportunities for organizations and give them a competitive advantage, not all employees respond well to changes in their everyday workflow. When an organization updates its systems, it can face some resistance from employees, especially when the employees do not feel properly trained and lack the confidence in using the new system. Employees may grow frustrated and become less productive and efficient. In some extreme cases, technology can also replace some of their duties and make their positions obsolete, leaving them out of a job. This ties back to the need for job security. Technology has come a long way in the past 50 years and the types of challenges just mentioned are a lot more common in this day and age than they were before. Therefore, managers need to adapt to this changes in the work environment and find a way to satisfy their employees’ needs while increasing work performance and
Force of change is a positive factor that an organization must put in place in order to drive and develop the entire organization’s environment. In this process of change more of resistance factors will try to hinder the change. The organization in this case experiences a repulsive force which absolutely adheres to reserve the existing ways of handling of issues. In the process the firm faces the competitive challenges from other organization and in meanwhile diseconomies of scale. Organizational change process is the progression of a given institution, far from its present state and towards some desired prospects to propagate its performance effectiveness. The organization’s work strategy persistently changes for better. Afterwards, the members’ organization must acclimatize to organization’s forces of change in a bid to conserve its relevancy and effectiveness. Lewin’s force field theory of change serves as a convenient model in understanding the change process. The role of the organization leader is both intense and diverse. For the organization to propel in its management processes, the organization leader must adhere to his increasing responsibilities of change. The leader must be the primary catalyst to speed up the mechanism used to assure the members of positivity effect of change and the expected period of its existence.
From state and federal levels, the healthcare industry has come a very long way, experiencing changes along the way. The development of advanced technology that has enhanced the quality of healthcare delivery systems will help all patients to be able to benefit. Doctors are able to access patient records at a faster rate and respond to their patients in a much more timely fashion. E-mail, electronic transfer of records and telemedicine will give all patients and physicians the tools needed to be more efficient, deliver quality care and deliver quality telecommunication at a faster pace than before.
The force field analysis model is a general purpose technique model that was originally developed by Kurt Lewin. The force field analysis model views organizational behavior as a dynamic balance of forces working in opposite directions. These dynamic forces are seen as driving forces and restraining forces. The driving forces are the forces that support and invoke change within the organizations. The restraining forces are the forces that go against the change or hinder the ability of the organization to successfully implement change. A focre field analysis of Starbucks using one organizational change initiative that the organization is attempting to put into place will be reviewed.
The employee reflects change in an organization as a shift of role, responsibilities and skill. However, in an organizational level its refers change as a framework structure around the changing needs and capability of an organization to perform. Both employee and organization’s perception of change are needed to ensure the change is successful. Brown (2011) reported that “the role of change as a corrective action often affect patterns of work or values, and in consequence meet with resistance” (p. 144). Once an organization and its member decide to conduct a change program, they intensify the forces that driving the change. The life cycle of employee’s resistance is necessary in accomplishing change in an organization. There are five important phases in a life cycle of employee resistance to change in an organization, namely introduce the change, forces of change emerge, direct conflict happens in an organization, residual resistance appear in an organization and lastly, establish the change. (refer to Figure 1 in Appendix 1).