Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on food security
An essay on food security
The usefulness of food security in the current world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on food security
1. What is food security? Why is food security important, and how is it measured? In contrast, what is food sovereignty and how might it differ from food security? What are some contradictions and dilemmas inherent to these two concepts? In what ways might they be seen as contradictory to one another?
Food security represents the supply of food available at all levels- community, regional, national and worldwide. Whether or not a country has enough access to food for sustenance is used to define the term “food security.” The dilemma in deciding whether an area is food secure or insecure is defining what is ‘enough’ in regard to food supply (Maritzova, 2014). National food security means that a country can feed it’s own population solely with its own resources. All countries potentially have the ability to feed their populations if they leave their own domestic markets and enter global markets (Maritzova, 2014). However, this allows price fluctuations to occur based on supply and demand, thus acting as a barrier to countries that may be unable to afford certain imports.
Food sovereignty on the other hand is the ability for a country (national), region, municipality or the entire globe to meet food demands through domestic supply or imports (Maritzova, 2014). If demands cannot be met due to the population’s inability to purchase goods domestically as a result of low incomes and lack of hard currency to import missing goods, a country would cannot be deemed food sovereign.
In comparison to food sovereignty, food security is relies more deeply on supply; more specifically, whether or not there is enough food available to meet normal dietary requirement across the entire population. In turn, even if there is enough food available, ...
... middle of paper ...
... of a food system to global environmental change? Ecology and Society 13 (2), pp. 14-20. Retrieved from: http://www.gecafs.org/publications/Publications/Ericksen_Vulnerability_of_a_Food_System_to_GEC.pdf Maritzova, C. (2007). Food Sovereignty As a Way to Achieve Food Security. Glopolis.
Retrieved from: http://glopolis.org/en/articles/food-sovereignty-way-achieve-food-security/
n.a. What is Food Sovereignty. Food Secure Canada. Retrieved from: http://foodsecurecanada.org/who-we-are/what-food-sovereignty Reisch, L.A. & Scholl, G.(2014). Sustainable Food Systems. Corpus. Retrieved from: http://www.scpknowledge.eu/sites/default/files/CORPUS_poster_sustFoodsystem.p df
Zanoli, R. & Naspetti,S. (2002). Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food-A means end approach. MPRA. Retrieved from:
http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/32712/1/MPRA_paper_32712.pdf
Nutritionism and Today’s Diet Nutritionism is the ideology that the nutritional value of a food is the sum of all its individual nutrients, vitamins, and other components. In the book, “In Defense of Food” by Michael Pollan, he critiques scientists and government recommendations about their nutritional advice. Pollan presents a strong case pointing out the many flaws and problems that have risen over the years of following scientific studies and government related warnings on the proper amount of nutrients needed for a healthy diet. Pollan’s main point is introducing science into our food system has had more of a negative impact than a positive one, we should go back to eating more of a traditional diet. I believe food science has given us
The book that I read for the required assignment is titled Food Justice, written by two authors. The authors of the book are Robert Gottlieb and Anupama Joshi. The book, in my opinion seemed to be a series of historical and somewhat current stories. The stories in the book discussed how different individuals were affected, whether it be farmers or consumers. Food Justice teaches us that growing and eating food are political acts that challenge a system that is neither good, nor clean, nor fair.
In Lester R. Brown's novel Full Planet, Empty Plates, the issue of food scarcity is explained through an environmental perspective. He begins the novel by addressing the issue of the world's high demand for crops, such as grain, and the stress it places on farmers to keep up with the increase in demand. In a time where there is a significant water shortage, higher temperatures, and eroding soils, food scarcity should be at the top of everyone's agenda. Brown poses the question whether or not food scarcity will be our civilization's "weak link" in terms of survival. He demonstrates how food security is a serious issue across the globe. As supply decreases, demand increases, thus raising the price of food. Unlike global resources such as oil,
From the late 1700’s, documented evidence has existed about the concerning subject of food security; an issue still discussed worldwide today. Food security refers to a country’s ability to access the amount of nutritious food necessary to feed their population. An area with high food security means the population has access to nutritious food at all times, whereas a county with low food security faces the opposite effect. In 1798, Thomas Robert Malthus defined the current issue of food security by referencing the variance between the world’s rapid population growth and the agricultural output needed to maintain the growing population. Malthus believed to solve this issue the rate of population growth would need to be maintained by controlling
The new movement, known as food sovereignty, stresses local agriculture. Much like food security, the definition of food sovereignty has been somewhat apt to change. In 1996, La Via Campesina (an agricultural peasant movement, literally “the Peasant’s Way,” defined food sovereignty as “ the right of each nation to maintain and develop its own capacity to produce its basic foods respecting cultural and productive diversity.” Written six years later, the definition of food sovereignty by the Peoples Food Sovereignty Network states, “Food sovereignty is the right of peoples to define their own food and agriculture; to protect and regulate domestic agricultural production and trade in order to achieve sustainable development objectives; to determine the extent to which they want to be self reliant; to restrict the dumping of products in their markets; and to provide local fisheries-based communities the priority in managing the use of and the rights to aquatic resources.” Because food sovereignty is such a broad topic, the authors of this definition took that into consideration when redefining the term. The diversity of opinions, positions, issues, and politics is clearly present in the text; from the need for sustainable development objectives to the needs of fishing villages to manage aquatic resources. Patel states that food sovereignty is a “big tent” capable of encompassing many smaller
Collier, Paul. "Annual Editions: Developing World 11/12." Article 14. The Politics of Hunger: How Illusion and Greed Fan the Food Crisis, Edited by Robert Griffiths, 61-62. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008.
The movement of food is also one of the things that have negative implications on public health. Food is an inevitable commodity in the life of human beings. With globalization, the eating culture of individuals have changed to something more foreign creating the room for importation of food. Food products exported by developing countries lack some standards. In Africa the food market is porous and expired food and unhealthy products are smuggled into the market through its boarders. International food movement is a national security issue because of the fatalities involved when food products are compromised.
There are many problems confronting our global food system. One of them is that the food is not distributed fairly or evenly in the world. According “The Last Bite Is The World’s Food System Collapsing?” by Bee Wilson, “we are producing more food—more grain, more meat, more fruits and vegetables—than ever before, more cheaply than ever before” (Wilson, 2008). Here we are, producing more and more affordable food. However, the World Bank recently announced that thirty-three countries are still famine and hungers as the food price are climbing. Wilson stated, “despite the current food crisis, last year’s worldwide grain harvest was colossal, five per cent above the previous year’s” (Wilson, 2008). This statement support that the food is not distributed evenly. The food production actually increased but people are still in hunger and malnutrition. If the food were evenly distributed, this famine problem would’ve been not a problem. Wilson added, “the food economy has created a system in w...
Food security is when everyone in a certain group of people have access to healthy and nutritious food. The North American countries Canada, United States and Mexico have relatively different food security and agriculture which it isn’t necessarily a dreadful factor as long as all countries meet the basic needs for the population so they can live a joyful and pleasant life. It is important to note that when analyzing the food system in a country is not only the food that counts; it is how they are produced; how accessible they are and how to make the most out of it. What determines if a nation meets the criteria of healthy living is: stability, sustainability, access, availability and utilization. These factors combined make all the difference in a country especially if they are in balance.
According to Wayne Roberts (2013), food sovereignty gives great importance to the farmer’s rights to counter food security that highlights the consumer’s rights. I recognize that the term food sovereignty is similar to feminism as it empowers the oppressed for equity and justice. However, I believe that the heavy emphasis on one over the other is inaccurate representation of the ideal food system, where the public depends on to the farmers for food and the producers rely on the buyers to purchase their goods. I think that post structural theorists should come up with a term that has an equal representation of producers and consumer, as the relationship is mutualistic, one cannot survive without the other. Like community arts and body/mind, people try to separate the two concepts; however they fail to realize that these terms are interconnected and
Have you ever looked inside your refrigerator and thought, ”I wonder how all of this food ended up here?”, If you have, you and the rest of America would be surprised at the answer. Many people in the U.S do not know where and how their food is produced, which raises many
Patrick Reyes’s uses factual and ethical info to conveys his outlook on the controversial issues on poverty and food insecurity. He addressed food insecurity in relation to four key factors: the physical availability of food, the utilization and nutritional value, the economic and physical access of food and the stability of these three factors. The main focus of this essay was the economic access to food and the government plays a vital role in controlling the access of food. He uses previous and present instances of poverty and food insecurity to show how these two issues connect. The common threads in the relationship between poverty and food insecurity lie in the two different entities of the government and economy.
America is a capitalist society. It should come to a surprise when we live like this daily. We work for profit. We’ll buy either for pleasure or to sell later for profit. It should come to no surprise that our food is made the same way because we are what we eat. We are capitalist that eat a capitalist meal. So we must question our politics. Is our government system to blame for accepting and encouraging monopolies?
Because of the wealth allocation around the world, developed countries are capable of purchasing the high quality food without pollution in their own countries. America has a higher purchasing power than most of developing countries that depends on their economy. Since agriculture is the only way to eat healthy and America does not have enough people to work on farms all day, the country will purchase its food from other developing countries. Meanwhile, American purchases food from developing countries is very convenient and affordable for themselves; the country strives to import as much food as it is available to make sure that its citizens stay healthy. In the end, the producing country only leaves with very little to high quality food for their own citizen. Some developing countries heavily rely on exports for the economy to run their countries. Although those producing countries can relieve their financial problems, many of people still confront
Food insecurity defined, is ‘the state of being without reliable access to a sufficient quantity of affordable, nutritious food’ (Oxforddictionaries.com, 2014). This in turn leads to hunger, which can have three possible meanings; 1) ‘the uneasy or painful sensation caused by want of food; craving appetite, also the exhausted condition caused by want of food’, 2) ‘the want or scarcity of food in a country’, and 3) ‘a strong desire or craving’ (Worldhunger.org, 2014). Food insecurity also leads to malnutrition, with 870 million people in the world or one in eight, suffering from chronic undernourishment (Fao.org, 2014). From this alarmingly high figure, 852 million of these people live in developing countries, making it evident that majority of strategies used to solve this problem should be directed at them (Fao.org, 2014). The world produces enough food to feed everyone, with an estimated amount of 2,720 Kcal per person a day (Worldhunger.org, 2014). The only problem is distri...